1. Insane (4.97 stars, 600 notes)
2. Mickey's Hard (4.64 stars, 453 notes)
3. Normal (2.41 stars, 261 notes)

1. OD and AR look hard for me this I like more AR +1 and OD -1 that most better imo

1. 00:20:378 (1) - forget add whistle in start slider
2. 00:34:923 (2) - add whisle in start slider that really fit more imo
3. 00:40:378 (1) - ^ same
4. 01:05:378 (4) - Forget add clap
5. 01:07:423 (3) - forget add clap in end slider
6. 01:28:105 (2) - add whistle in end slider
7. 01:47:650 (2) - add whistle is fit more melody imo
8. 01:54:014 (1) - add whistle in end slider
9. 02:03:105 (4) - forget add whsitle end slider
10. 02:17:650 (4) - forget add clap in end slider
11. 02:54:923 (1) - add whistle in start slider is fit more and if you keep it consistency
12. 02:55:605 (2) - add whistle in end slider ^ same explain
13. 03:39:468 (2) - i guess you forget add whistle in end slider
14. 03:40:378 (1) - add clap in end slider you know i mean orz
15. 04:05:832 (3) - add whsitle in start slider
16. 04:06:514 (4) - add whistle
    
    good hitsound but really looot missing if you keep it consistency
    
    Gameplay:
    
17. 00:49:468 (X) - IMO this really need add note i feel i lost ryhthm
18. 01:11:287 (X) - this make sense if add note follow vocals or drums
19. 02:15:832 (X) - same happened 00:49:468
20. 02:37:650 (X) - that really make me lost ryhthm
21. 03:48:559 (X) - ^ same
22. 03:50:378 (X) - ^ same
23. 03:57:650 (X) - ^ same
24. 04:04:014 (X) - ^ same

1. 01:19:241 (4) - Forget add whistle in start slider
2. 01:21:741 (3) - I guess you forget add whistle in end slider if you keep it consistency
3. 01:26:741 (2) - add whistle
4. 01:46:741 (1) - the end slider really need add whistle because the melody is really strong
5. 01:52:196 (3) - Forget add whistle in start slider
6. 01:54:923 (1) - no add whistle in start slider? that really fit more
7. 04:11:287 (2) - add whistle in start slider is fit more and you if keep it consistency
8. 04:20:378 (T) - need change to timing soft is fit more

1. 00:13:218 (4) - i guess you missing add whistle here if you keep consistency
2. 00:22:650 (T) - you should add timing here to soft because you will listen the body slider like "ZZZZZZZZZZZ" that ugly and don't fit song so add timing to soft then the "ZZZZZZZZZZZZ" gone like you did before
3. 00:38:673 (T) - add here timing to soft is same i explain before if you fix this remove the timing 00:38:787
4. 00:15:378 at 00:44:014 too many body slider like " ZZZZZZZZZZ" you don't need like this http://puu.sh/1gLfv, just try this http://puu.sh/1gLg8 this is most better and slider body song will disappear like you did 00:15:832 (2) IMO if you like you really remap this part, be carefully
5. 00:41:741 (2) - ?? lol the end slider don't fit normal i guess you missing work this timing
6. 01:04:696 (3) - need add whistle here in end slider i dunno you follow melody here or vocals but that sense for me
7. 01:08:787 (4) - add whistle that really sense more because here is piano
8. 01:19:241 (4) - add whistle in end slider
9. 01:56:741 at 02:11:287 same explain at 00:15:378 at 00:44:014
10. 02:13:787 (1) - I guess you forget add whistle here
11. 02:18:559 (3) - forget add whistle in end slider
12. 02:22:196 (3) - ^ same
13. 02:24:015 (3) - ^ same
14. 02:27:423 (2) - add whistle here
15. 02:32:423 (3) - When you test play you will listen Drum whistle is because this http://puu.sh/1gM1E (when you click slider (3) will appear Drum) you need move to "Auto" in additions and SAVE
16. 02:57:196 at 03:11:287 I can still hear body slider song that ugly, remap this part
17. 03:41:514 (4) - same happened 02:32:423 (3)

Pereira006 wrote:

[0OoMickeyoO0]

Hitsound:

1. 01:19:241 (4) - Forget add whistle in start slider my bad xD Fixed
2. 01:21:741 (3) - I guess you forget add whistle in end slider if you keep it consistency no, I didn't forget
3. 01:26:741 (2) - add whistle no~
4. 01:46:741 (1) - the end slider really need add whistle because the melody is really strong no~
5. 01:52:196 (3) - Forget add whistle in start slider no, I didn't forget
6. 01:54:923 (1) - no add whistle in start slider? that really fit more yes, no add whistle because I keep consistency in the song already
7. 04:11:287 (2) - add whistle in start slider is fit more and you if keep it consistency no~
8. 04:20:378 (T) - need change to timing soft is fit more ok, but I added normal sampleset in the end of slider *evillaugh*

perfect for me just some missing whistle if you keep it consistency oh no, you're wrong. I didn't miss anything. except first mod of you lol

Gameplay:

armazing, 1 first try SS lol, look good for me because you pro rofl

1. ไม่มี SB หรือ วีดีโอ ก็ติ๊กตรง Letterbox during breaks ด้วยนะฮะ ใน Song Setup
2. 03:25:378 (4) - *nazi* ย้ายท้อนเบรคให้เป็นอย่างนี้ไหมฮะ http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/469747

1. เรื่อง Hit Sounds ผมว่าพี่จิ๊บน่าจะก๊อปเส้นเขียวของมิกไปเลยน่าจะดีกว่านะครับ เสียงมันฟังดูแปลกๆกับ clap -.-
2. ใส่เสียง clap ตรง slidertick ของดิฟนี้ด้วยไหมครับ ?

1. เราว่านะมิกกี้ ตรงที่เส้นเขียวเยอะๆเป็นพุ่มหญ้าอะ ใส่ whistle ทุกเส้นสีแดง 1/2 มันน่าจะฟังดูสบายหูกว่านะ เหมือนพวกนี้อะ 02:25:832 (1,2,3,4) - =w=" http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/469751

Netsukawa wrote:

เนี๊ยว M4M

[General]

1. ไม่มี SB หรือ วีดีโอ ก็ติ๊กตรง Letterbox during breaks ด้วยนะฮะ ใน Song Setup ขอไม่ละกัน พี่ไม่ชอบ letterbox during breaks -.-(เหมือนทุกๆแมพที่พี่ทำ)
2. 03:25:378 (4) - *nazi* ย้ายท้อนเบรคให้เป็นอย่างนี้ไหมฮะ http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/469747 รู้สึกไม่ค่อยเข้าไงไม่รู้ ขอไม่ละกัน ~

[Normal]

1. เรื่อง Hit Sounds ผมว่าพี่จิ๊บน่าจะก๊อปเส้นเขียวของมิกไปเลยน่าจะดีกว่านะครับ เสียงมันฟังดูแปลกๆกับ clap -.- ตอนแรกทำงั้นไปแล้วอ่ะแต่มันไปลงทับเส้นสไลเดอร์ ทำให้เสียงสไลเดอร์แปลก (จาก ม็อดของ pereira เลย)
2. ใส่เสียง clap ตรง slidertick ของดิฟนี้ด้วยไหมครับ ? เอ่อไม่ดีกว่า มันแหม่งๆ =_=a"

00:22:196 (1) - ใส่ finish ที่หัวสไลด์แทน ? เสียงท่อนนี้มันเบามากๆอ่ะ พี่ใช้ whistle หมดเลยทั้งท่อน ไม่อยากให้มันดังเกินไป
00:29:014 (3) - finish ท้ายสไลด์ ? ^
01:05:378 (5) - NC ไหม ผมว่ามันน่าจะเริ่ม NC ใหม่ตรงที่แพทเทินมันห่างจากอันเก่า สำหรับคนเล่นใหม่ๆมันน่าจะอ่านง่ายกว่านะฮะ กำ , วางตามการเปลี่ยนไปของเสียงร้องอ่ะ แล้วพี่ว่ามี follow point เวลาโน้ตห่างกัน มันน่าจะง่ายขึ้นกว่านะที่จริง =.= ไม่รู้เหมือนกัน ไม่ได้เล่น normal diff บ่อย ~~
01:12:650 (5) - ^ ^
01:21:287 (5) - ^ ? ^ ของตรงนี้อยากทำให้สไลยาวมันเด่น เลยนิวที่สไลยาวแทนดีกว่า
01:27:650 (1) - ใส่ finish ? whistle , วางเหมือน insane ดิฟเลย :3 ~ เพราะใส่ finish แล้วมันเสียงแหม่งๆเหมือนกัน
01:44:923 (3) - NC ตรงนี้เเล้วลบ NC ตรง 01:45:832 (1) - ok !
02:03:105 (4) - finish ที่ท้าย ? เหตุผลเหมือนเดิมเลยเน่อ ~~
02:10:832 (4) - NC ตัวนี้เเล้วลบ NC ตัวข้างหลัง ? นิวตัวนี้ให้เป็น 1 ตัวเดี่ยวๆ ไม่ลบข้างหลัง , ให้มันแสดงถึงเสียงตรงนี้ชัดเจนละกัน
02:11:741 (1) - ลองทำให้มันเป็น 1/1 reverse สไลด์เดอร์ แล้วใส่โน๊ต 1/1 ทับไปมันน่าจะเหมาะกว่านะครับ http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/469744 เอ่อ กะตั้งใจให้หางสไลมันไป โดนเสียงที่นักร้องร้องดังสูงสุดอ่ะ -_- (ทั้งท่อนของกลางเพลง ตั้งใจวางอย่างนั้นหมด ให้มันหลากหลาย ไม่น่าเบื่อ)
02:34:696 (1) - ลบ NC อีกครั้งเหมือนเดิม , nc ตามเสียงร้อง =.=
02:36:287 (4) - NC ตัวนี้แทนแล้วลบ NC ตัวนี้ 02:37:196 (1) - ^
02:55:605 (2) - เสียงดีเลย์หรอเนี่ย 555+ 555
03:42:423 (3) - ลากหางสไลด์ให้มันตั้งตรงขนานกับพื้นไหมฮะ ? ไม่อ่ะ ไม่เท่
03:47:650 (6) - NC ตัวนี้แล้วลบ NC ข้างหลัง ถ้าแก้ตรงนี้ , ก็คือต้องไปแก้ตรงนี้ทั้งหมด {03:54:923 (3) - ,02:36:741 (3) - ,02:44:014 (4) - ,02:51:287 (4) -,01:16:741 (4) - } เป็นวิธีวางคอมโบของพี่ในดิฟง่ายอ่ะนะ โทดทีๆ

[Insane]

00:02:309 (2) - ลบ whistle ? ผมว่ามีแค่อันเดียวมันฟังรื่นหูกว่านะ =.=" ok
00:05:946 (5) - ^ ^
00:09:468 (1) - ^ ^
00:13:218 (4) - ^ ^
00:29:014 (1) - finish ท้ายสไลด์ ? whistle แทน เหมือนดิฟ normal
01:06:287 (5) - ลากลงมาข้างล่างทำเป็นโน๊ตโดด ดีกว่าไหม มันยังไงๆไม่รู้ตอนเล่น http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/469761 ok , แก้แบบวิธีของพี่ (ของเดิมแหม่งจริง)
02:56:116 (3) - finish ท้ายสไลด์ ? เป็น whistle เหมือน normal

นั่นก็ทั้งหมดเเหละครับ =w="

Netsukawa wrote:

[มิกกี้'s Hard] พร่อง

1. เราว่านะมิกกี้ ตรงที่เส้นเขียวเยอะๆเป็นพุ่มหญ้าอะ ใส่ whistle ทุกเส้นสีแดง 1/2 มันน่าจะฟังดูสบายหูกว่านะ เหมือนพวกนี้อะ 02:25:832 (1,2,3,4) - =w=" ฃhttp://osu.ppy.sh/ss/469751 ก็ใส่ท่อนฮุกแล้วไง ใส่ที่อื่นไม่เข้าหรอก ฮา

00:29:014 (3) - ใส่ finish ท้ายสไลด์ ? no
00:31:287 (1) - ลบ NC ตัวนี้แล้ว NC ตัวถัดไป no
01:16:741 (1) - finish ที่ต้นสไลด์ ? อืมลืม
01:27:650 (4) - finish ? no
02:18:105 (7) - NC ตัวนี้เเล้วลบ NC ตัวถัดไป no
02:56:116 (3) - เลื่อนตรงนี้มาอยู่ตรงนี้ดีกว่าไหม 02:56:173 - กดสไลด์เดอร์ต่อกันแบบ 1/8 มันท่าจะยากไปไหน่อยสำหรับดิฟ Hard นะ no
02:56:116 (3) - finish ท้ายสไลด์ ? no

1. 00:05:378 (2,3) - I have to say,this double slider 1/1 combination here doesen't work that well as you are combining the synth part there with the "drum" one... You should use a different set here,like a note with a 1/1 repeated slider or a note with a 1/1 slider and another note. Your choice,though!
2. 00:16:287 (2) - Rhythmically-wise,this 3/2 slider does really not make sense,especially because of its repeat that sounds really strange and out of place. What about using this setting instead? It follows the rhythm really good,especially if talking about the vocals!
   
3. 00:20:378 (1) - What about adding a whistle along with the clap at the beginning of this slider? It helps emphatizing that "drum" being played exactly there,and it sounds really good!
4. 00:24:923 (1) - (optional,just fix if you want) What about curving this a bit towards 00:25:832 (2) - to smooth a bit out the flow there?
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   100,304,24923,6,0,B|92:256|124:216,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 00:32:196 (5) - Well,same as above. Again,this is pretty much optional and nazi,so fix just if you want :3
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   428,192,32196,2,0,B|392:224|400:280,1,90,10|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   416,360,33105,6,0,B|324:388|244:332,1,180,10|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   164,172,34923,2,0,B|256:144|336:200,1,180,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   364,284,36287,2,0,B|316:300|272:268,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   188,264,37196,6,0,B|172:284|152:296,2,45,8|0|10,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

   I adjusted the patterns after this to make the flow better too :>
6. 00:42:196 (3) - I really don't get why you are semplifying the rhythm here. As this is a Normal,you should keep this rhythm too by making this 1/2 shorter and adding a note 00:42:878 -!
7. 00:45:832 (3) - I guess you forgot a whistle at the beggining of this slider? This sould be consistent with the rest of the pattern.
8. 01:14:696 (1,2,3,4) - Nothing really wrong here, but imho a arc based pattern continued from a wave slider here flows absolutely good within the previous pattern. Here's an example of what I have done there:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   188,236,74696,6,0,B|224:233|246:206|246:206|267:179|309:180,1,135,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   392,200,75832,1,2,0:0:0
   424,284,76287,1,8,0:0:0
   360,344,76741,1,4,0:0:0

9. 01:48:105 (5) - That could be just me,however what about making this 1/1 shorter so you can add a note at 01:49:468 - ? Delimitating the synth from the piano here would actually be a better choice.
10. 02:00:832 (1,2,3) - These 2/1 gaps actually don't fit well at all with the rhythm itself,imho. What about instead using this kind of rhythm? It follows the synth WAY better than with the actual pattern.
    
11. 02:34:696 (1) - Well,this slider here sounds really strange,because of finishing in a red tick there,and while the other sliders finishing there sounded good,this one does not fit well with any of the instruments. You could add a note at 02:35:832 - to follow the kicks or you could use 2 1/1 sliders separated by a 1/2 transition to avoid that instead.
12. 03:00:832 (1,2,3,4,5) - Oh well,the entire structure of this arc-shaped pattern could be made better. What do you think of this?
    
    SPOILER

    
    

    128,304,180832,5,10,0:0:0
    60,248,181287,1,10,0:0:0
    60,160,181741,1,10,0:0:0
    132,104,182196,1,10,0:0:0
    220,96,182650,2,0,B|269:85|309:119,2,90,10|10|10,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    244,184,184014,6,0,B|256:232|228:280,1,90,10|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    172,336,184923,2,0,B|204:368|260:356,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    328,304,185832,2,0,B|379:292|411:324,2,90,8|8|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    248,260,187196,2,0,B|276:215|321:215,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

13. 04:04:468 (x)- Add a note here? I know you wanted to follow that synth there,but by using that 3/2 slider I felt like something was missing there... But maybe it's just me.

1. 00:07:196 (6,7) - Uhm... it could be just me,however here I expected another type of pattern here. What about doing something like this? Imho,this actually flows better as it completely follows the dropoff with 00:06:514 (5) - .
2. 01:15:378 (8) - What about switching the whistle being played right at the end of this slider to 01:15:832 (9) - ,as frost has done in his diffs? It sounds pretty good to emphatize the vocals which are going high with the pitch there. If you want,you can mantain the whistle at the end of this slider,too!
3. 02:42:650 (8,9) - The same applies here
4. 03:46:287 (7,8) - ^
5. 03:53:560 (8,9) - Guess what?
6. 04:00:378 (4) - That's really a minor thing... Anyways new combo here? It delimitates well the pattern and it works to delimitate the synthesizer taking the part here too!
7. 04:04:468 (6) - Whistle at the end? That's mostly subjective,but imho this works well to emphatize the singer here.
   Stop mapping so good! >_<

1. 00:10:378 (3,4) - Well,not saying this stack is confusing or anything else but this 3/4 stack actually surprised me. Imho,this would have worked better if these 2 were using a 3/4 rhythm,just like in this example:
   
   This setting follows the rhythm better too,as with the actual pattern you are just following the synth's echos!
2. 00:27:650 (3) - Why is this stacked with 00:27:196 (2) - ? ;_; From my point of view,this is the worst way possible to follow the rhythm there... Instead a triangular jump with 00:27:878 (1,2,3,4) - would fit absolutely good within the synthesizer,as its pitch gets higher and higher there...
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   120,312,27196,2,0,B|168:332|208:300,1,90,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   284,256,27650,5,10,0:0:0
   260,124,27878,1,0,0:0:0
   260,124,27991,1,2,0:0:0
   152,204,28218,1,0,0:0:0
   152,204,28331,1,2,0:0:0
   124,124,28559,2,0,B|100:80|132:36,1,90,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:54:696 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Just a comment: awesome usage of this repetitions here,they fit incredibly well within the vocals repeating themselves!
4. 00:59:241 (2,1,2) - Oh well,this transition is not really bad,but I kinda liked more the transitions before. As there isn't any vocal changement there, I'd suggest you to finish the pattern like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   260,280,58332,5,2,0:0:0
   260,280,58446,1,0,0:0:0
   260,280,58559,2,0,B|304:300|348:264,1,90,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   288,196,59014,5,2,0:0:0
   404,332,59241,2,0,B|440:300|428:248,1,90,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   288,196,59696,5,0,0:0:0
   512,252,59923,2,0,B|513:203|466:177,1,90,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 01:14:468 (2,3,4) - Am I wrong or this triplet doesen't follow anything? Please, remove 01:14:582 (3) - out of them,it's really unneded here :\
6. 01:23:559 (4) - CTRL+G here? I kinda like that anti-clockwise turn to complete the pattern
7. 02:26:968 (1) - Again,CTRL+G? I felt much more comfortable playing with a left-right-left flow there :<
8. 02:27:423 (1) - Move the new combo at 02:27:650 (2) - ,it makes much more sense rhythmically and pattern-wise
9. 02:29:014 (3) - That's a really little and subjective thing,so just fix if you want: well, I like better a curved slider to continue the flow here,instead of the actual straight one,which transition is not so intuitive. Here's an example of what I mean if you want to fix.
10. 02:48:787 (2) - Once again,CTRL+G? I really like the transition with 02:49:241 (1,2,3) - with this reverse!

-kevincela- wrote:

[Mickey's Hard]

1. 00:07:196 (6,7) - Uhm... it could be just me,however here I expected another type of pattern here. What about doing something like this? Imho,this actually flows better as it completely follows the dropoff with 00:06:514 (5) - okay
2. 01:15:378 (8) - What about switching the whistle being played right at the end of this slider to 01:15:832 (9) - ,as frost has done in his diffs? It sounds pretty good to emphatize the vocals which are going high with the pitch there. If you want,you can mantain the whistle at the end of this slider,too! no~
3. 02:42:650 (8,9) - The same applies here same answer here =v=
4. 03:46:287 (7,8) - ^ ^
5. 03:53:560 (8,9) - Guess what? guess no lol
6. 04:00:378 (4) - That's really a minor thing... Anyways new combo here? It delimitates well the pattern and it works to delimitate the synthesizer taking the part here too! no sorry, I keep the nc pattern \:D/
7. 04:04:468 (6) - Whistle at the end? That's mostly subjective,but imho this works well to emphatize the singer here. no~
   Stop mapping so good! >_< sorry but I don't like liar

0OoMickeyoO0 wrote:

-kevincela- wrote:

sorry but I don't like liar

-kevincela- wrote:

I am not a liar,really!\o/ Your map is already ready for rank xD Sorry for my kinds useless mod >_<

-kevincela- wrote:

[Normal]

1. 00:05:378 (2,3) - I have to say,this double slider 1/1 combination here doesen't work that well as you are combining the synth part there with the "drum" one... You should use a different set here,like a note with a 1/1 repeated slider or a note with a 1/1 slider and another note. Your choice,though! 1 repeated slider and note !
2. 00:16:287 (2) - Rhythmically-wise,this 3/2 slider does really not make sense,especially because of its repeat that sounds really strange and out of place. What about using this setting instead? It follows the rhythm really good,especially if talking about the vocals! eh, for this one I think it sounds quite good =D it's strange yes.. but it sounds well in some way too xD , so I think I will leave it here :3
   
3. 00:20:378 (1) - What about adding a whistle along with the clap at the beginning of this slider? It helps emphatizing that "drum" being played exactly there,and it sounds really good! oh oh it makes this not less emptyyyyy so added
4. 00:24:923 (1) - (optional,just fix if you want) What about curving this a bit towards 00:25:832 (2) - to smooth a bit out the flow there?
   
   SPOILER

   oh , fixed this one too but didn't copy your code because editing in the game is easier than copying to the notepad myself lol
   

   100,304,24923,6,0,B|92:256|124:216,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 00:32:196 (5) - Well,same as above. Again,this is pretty much optional and nazi,so fix just if you want :3
   
   SPOILER

   haha , thank you for a code but I want to make linear slider in the case that it goes down from the upper note :3
   

   428,192,32196,2,0,B|392:224|400:280,1,90,10|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   416,360,33105,6,0,B|324:388|244:332,1,180,10|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   164,172,34923,2,0,B|256:144|336:200,1,180,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   364,284,36287,2,0,B|316:300|272:268,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   188,264,37196,6,0,B|172:284|152:296,2,45,8|0|10,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

   I adjusted the patterns after this to make the flow better too :>
6. 00:42:196 (3) - I really don't get why you are semplifying the rhythm here. As this is a Normal,you should keep this rhythm too by making this 1/2 shorter and adding a note 00:42:878 - =.= , but it sounds well with the music , so I added note more at 00:43:559 (4) - to make it not too much empty then :3
7. 00:45:832 (3) - I guess you forgot a whistle at the beggining of this slider? This sould be consistent with the rest of the pattern. think so , did have a subjective opinion but I guess I should follow this one
8. 01:14:696 (1,2,3,4) - Nothing really wrong here, but imho a arc based pattern continued from a wave slider here flows absolutely good within the previous pattern. Here's an example of what I have done there: Oh this one I have to use your code ><"
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   188,236,74696,6,0,B|224:233|246:206|246:206|267:179|309:180,1,135,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   392,200,75832,1,2,0:0:0
   424,284,76287,1,8,0:0:0
   360,344,76741,1,4,0:0:0

9. 01:48:105 (5) - That could be just me,however what about making this 1/1 shorter so you can add a note at 01:49:468 - ? Delimitating the synth from the piano here would actually be a better choice. for this one , I want to let it follow the sound in the music by this slider like louder up gradually
10. 02:00:832 (1,2,3) - These 2/1 gaps actually don't fit well at all with the rhythm itself,imho. What about instead using this kind of rhythm? It follows the synth WAY better than with the actual pattern.
    I want to make a gap like this 01:51:287 (4) - ,02:08:105 (1,2) - because it sounds like mapper shouldn't touch it while vocal of Saitou is sounding lower and eventually silenced :3
11. 02:34:696 (1) - Well,this slider here sounds really strange,because of finishing in a red tick there,and while the other sliders finishing there sounded good,this one does not fit well with any of the instruments. You could add a note at 02:35:832 - to follow the kicks or you could use 2 1/1 sliders separated by a 1/2 transition to avoid that instead. a.. sorry but for this one I make it perfectly follow the vocal xD so I would like to leave it here : )
12. 03:00:832 (1,2,3,4,5) - Oh well,the entire structure of this arc-shaped pattern could be made better. What do you think of this? fixed xD
    
    SPOILER

    
    

    128,304,180832,5,10,0:0:0
    60,248,181287,1,10,0:0:0
    60,160,181741,1,10,0:0:0
    132,104,182196,1,10,0:0:0
    220,96,182650,2,0,B|269:85|309:119,2,90,10|10|10,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    244,184,184014,6,0,B|256:232|228:280,1,90,10|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    172,336,184923,2,0,B|204:368|260:356,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    328,304,185832,2,0,B|379:292|411:324,2,90,8|8|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    248,260,187196,2,0,B|276:215|321:215,1,90,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

13. 04:04:468 (x)- Add a note here? I know you wanted to follow that synth there,but by using that 3/2 slider I felt like something was missing there... But maybe it's just me. not only you , me too -_-a[/*:m:5b102]

[Insane]

1. 00:10:378 (3,4) - Well,not saying this stack is confusing or anything else but this 3/4 stack actually surprised me. Imho,this would have worked better if these 2 were using a 3/4 rhythm,just like in this example: I.. I think they are fine because I want to make little gap before next part and I have the sound that I really want to follow in the first place, placing like that would be a bit rush imo =_=a" , but that works well , I tried it already but as I said, it's quite crowded rhythm
   
   This setting follows the rhythm better too,as with the actual pattern you are just following the synth's echos!
2. 00:27:650 (3) - Why is this stacked with 00:27:196 (2) - ? ;_; From my point of view,this is the worst way possible to follow the rhythm there... Instead a triangular jump with 00:27:878 (1,2,3,4) - would fit absolutely good within the synthesizer,as its pitch gets higher and higher there... for this one , I fix by my own way , increasing it gradually 1.3 1.6 1.9 , Thanks for the code anyway kevin
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   120,312,27196,2,0,B|168:332|208:300,1,90,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   284,256,27650,5,10,0:0:0
   260,124,27878,1,0,0:0:0
   260,124,27991,1,2,0:0:0
   152,204,28218,1,0,0:0:0
   152,204,28331,1,2,0:0:0
   124,124,28559,2,0,B|100:80|132:36,1,90,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:54:696 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Just a comment: awesome usage of this repetitions here,they fit incredibly well within the vocals repeating themselves! \:D/
4. 00:59:241 (2,1,2) - Oh well,this transition is not really bad,but I kinda liked more the transitions before. As there isn't any vocal changement there, I'd suggest you to finish the pattern like this: well , okay !
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   260,280,58332,5,2,0:0:0
   260,280,58446,1,0,0:0:0
   260,280,58559,2,0,B|304:300|348:264,1,90,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   288,196,59014,5,2,0:0:0
   404,332,59241,2,0,B|440:300|428:248,1,90,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   288,196,59696,5,0,0:0:0
   512,252,59923,2,0,B|513:203|466:177,1,90,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 01:14:468 (2,3,4) - Am I wrong or this triplet doesen't follow anything? Please, remove 01:14:582 (3) - out of them,it's really unneded here :\ oh yes, it had been really overmapped so I changed it to another rhythm , you will see how it turns out good xD
6. 01:23:559 (4) - CTRL+G here? I kinda like that anti-clockwise turn to complete the pattern made a windmill pattern : )
7. 02:26:968 (1) - Again,CTRL+G? I felt much more comfortable playing with a left-right-left flow there :< oh , fixed this one too
8. 02:27:423 (1) - Move the new combo at 02:27:650 (2) - ,it makes much more sense rhythmically and pattern-wise remapped this part lol
9. 02:29:014 (3) - That's a really little and subjective thing,so just fix if you want: well, I like better a curved slider to continue the flow here,instead of the actual straight one,which transition is not so intuitive. Here's an example of what I mean if you want to fix. a... I want to make it trendy xDD so I think this pattern works /o/ !
10. 02:48:787 (2) - Once again,CTRL+G? I really like the transition with 02:49:241 (1,2,3) - with this reverse! hehe , fixed

Orz,I have to stop here now >_<
Tommorrow I'll finish it,I hope I helped you in the meanwhile! Mod finished!
That's all. Nice map,I hope this well get ranked someday.
Hope I have been helpful! >_<

Kawayi Rika wrote:

[Mickey's Hard]

1. 02:56:741 - #2 Kiai time should end to here. yes!
2. 04:16:741 (1,2) - More better rhythm,like this. sorry, I keep conistsantcy
   

alacat wrote:

ya ^^/ frost ~

Saitou Chiwa : 斎藤千和

Futakotome : 二言目

go go ~