Vuelo Eluko wrote:
..SunriseAbsence wrote:
Mostly...
Sayo, a former rank 1...
You're making typical logical error called survivorship bias. If Sayo(top player(sic!), as you have stated) is a)rank 1 b)plays with bad tools it doesn't mean it is 'ok' way to do for casual player.
Leaders don't make statistics, only statistically average elements do.
>probably
You're wrong again.
2 of 3digits(one of them is irl friend actually, who tried to play on my setup as I tried to play on his), 2 of 4digits, 10+ of 5digits of under 50k range(5 of them are also from irl, tried my setup and vice versa).
You're making the same mistake again. You ignore factor of incomplete knowledge. There are many more factors than just simply resolution which make difference of experience using different tools: size(sic!), type of display(matrix etc), production quality, laptop has place taken by the hardware between the screen and something after this hardware->you can use tools like extra keyboard and graphical tablet->they take decent amount of space too(between laptop and you)->you're so far from the small screen\res->harder to look, much harder(impossible?) to have comfortable\healthy and effective posture->decreasing quality of performance from you. Not even speaking about subjective factors like biology\health. Your Sayo could be little man who feels more comfortable(posture etc) with little devices than bigger guys do, etc.
And finally, I'm repeating myself `more pleasurable way`, if person consider that something is not right, not perfect, it makes him feel stressed\distracted, which affects his mindset, motivation\immersion into the process. So if person says something is not perfect and right-it is not, unless person has all objective(which means, again, statistically average) requirements met-only in this case, mostly probably, the only responsible aspect for his state is him.