Okay lets see if I can find anything.
Sleeping
I really don't recommend exceeding 1.0 with any margin really. 0.99/1.01 is nice to look at, but 1.02 creates a bit too much space between the notes and it kind of ruins how the notes look to me. Other things to note is that this map is an example of how people should not map Easy difficulties if they want to not bore their audience. One thing I definitely think you should keep in check is the use of repetitive and bland patterns. I modded this pointing out errors in the map, you will have to figure out what to do about keeping it interesting.
00:01:958 (2,1) - The slider blanket doesn't look good. I'm assuming the slider isn't symmetrical on purpose? Not having it symmetrical also means you can't just copy paste it and reverse selection. There are several ways to fix this, so I'll let you decide how to change.
00:42:603 (1,2,3) - Line isn't perfect. 3 is slightly misaligned. Move it to x 31 y 265 to fix.
00:46:474 (1,2,3,4,1) - You should make the alignments here perfect. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/410512
00:54:216 (1,2) - 0.98 snap looks better to me.
01:25:184 (2) - I don't like this slider curve. You should end the slider level, because it will open the curve up a bit, and that makes it more pleasant to look at IMO. http://puu.sh/XO5T
01:32:926 (1,2,3) - Sort of nazi This could be straighter. It may or may not require grid snap off to make it perfect. (I was under the assumption you wanted to transition somewhat straight into the next pattern)
01:44:055 (2,3,4) - Make spacing equal.
01:48:410 (1,2,3,4,1) - Same alignment issue? You keep using various patterns for these, so I'm just going to back off from this type of pattern.)
01:54:216 (3,4,1) - Spacing difference is definitely notable while playing.
01:56:152 (1,2) - 0.98-1.0. Space it around there for the best look IMO.
01:57:119 (2,1,2) - Also exactly 0.99/1.0 would be best.
02:01:958 (3,4,1) - Make spacing equal.
02:36:313 - Slightly weird skipping these sounds IMO. It works I guess.
02:38:732 (1,2,3,4,5) - Dull pattern IMO. You should add more defined curves for a better effect.
02:42:603 (1,2,3,4,5) - You should make spacing exactly equal. It would look better if you did.
03:00:023 (1,2) - Blanket is off. Make it perfect?
03:13:571 (1) - This note seems slightly too low to be naturally coming off 3,s position. I think you need to either lower the previous note somehow or place this higher on the screen.
03:25:184 (1,2) - These aren't exactly parallel.
03:29:055 (1,2) - I really don't know why you choose to map these sections in the same predictable bland way. Why don't you at least make it interesting and have the slider actually appear in differently on the screen. 03:29:055 (1,2,3,1) - reminds me too much of 03:13:571 (1,2,3,1) -. At least make them different enough to be interesting.
Walking
Probably the biggest issue with this map is off looking sliders, and misalignment.
00:03:893 (1,1,1) - Gaps between sliders are different. They should be the same.
00:06:797 (1) - You should have this try to follow the pattern of the sliders.
00:18:410 (2) - something about this slider looks bad to me. I swear it's the curve usage that makes this pattern look bad. :/
00:27:119 (1,2) - Same curve issue here. :/
00:34:861 (1,2,3,4) - Make parallel? I see no reason not to make parallel, it looks better that way.
00:48:410 (3) - Expected this to be a mirror of 1. It would be more consistent if it were. You seem to have consistent slider shapes here 02:50:345 (1,2,3,4) -
00:54:216 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I find it peculiar that you mapped this combo so noticeably different from start to end. This part is screaming map me similarly. I recommend you do so. It just doesn't make sense to go from straight to curve on this type of vocal pair.
01:01:958 (1,2,3,4,5) - Seems uninspired to me. Just because the vocalist is singing dull and boring, doesn't mean you need to try to map that part the same way.
01:09:700 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ (Other parts like this too)
01:28:571 (1) - This could start on the vertical line.
01:33:893 (2,1,2,3) - Unsure that this is the best thing you should do here. The curve change of 1,2,3 seems like it should change as much as it does compared to the curve of 2,1,2. Take that as you want, if you find a better curve great!. If not it doesn't matter that much.
01:48:410 (1) - Please make symmetrical.
01:54:216 (1) - Why is this slider different than the other sliders?
01:55:668 (4,1) - Nazi - Stack perfectly 0.0.
02:09:458 (3,4) - 0.00
02:11:635 (1,2,3,4,5) - This pattern actually works IMO.
02:37:764 (2,1) - Should be parallel IMO.
02:42:603 (1,2) - Transition doesn't look good being straight at an unusual angle. It shouldn't look like it's only purpose is to start a pattern in a particular area of the screen. I suggest a more flatter transition. http://puu.sh/XPIC
02:45:022 (4,5,6) - I don't like how this pattern flattens here. I think it would be better to create a zigzag pattern through here.
03:07:764 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - If these are supposed to be straight and parallel, they are neither.
03:16:474 (4,5,6) - Seems to play better (and looks better) if this was a mirror of 1,2,3. You should do so.
03:17:442 (1) - I think this would be better more forwardly placed compared to 6. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/410598
03:22:281 (3,4,1) - This would be better if 1 started at the same level as 3.
Dancing
I was having framerate issues when I tried to mod this. I have to say some parts just felt randomor just changing just to change. This difficulty misses some prime symmetry opportunities. I'm not a fan of a lot of the jumps either. Overall I probably disliked more than I liked, but the framerate was a real kill joy, and I have to consider that into account. It may play fine with someone with perfect framerate.
00:03:893 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not a fan of this part really. I feel the rhythm wants more of a jump, but instead these parts feels mechanical instead of flowing like jumps would do. If this was a flowing pattern, I wouldn't recommend stacking at all. all the stopping ruins the enjoyment of rebounding to hit the next part. Although feel free to take my opinion as someone who doesn't like this style of mapping.
00:19:377 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - This is a really nice pattern.
00:34:377 (4,1,2) - Exactly 1.2?
00:50:345 (3,4,5) - Is the spacing supposed to look like this?
00:52:039 (6,7,8,9) - You should try to create a little more consistency of the proximity of notes to other notes. There are slight variations currently.
01:00:748 (3) - Center this better?
01:21:313 (1) - Make a more perfect triangle with 01:20:829 (1,2) - ?
01:27:119 (5) - Make symmetrical?
01:44:539 (2,3,4) - spacings differ. Turn gridsnap off and make perfect.
01:56:152 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I really don't like the flow here. You shouldn't have a jump immediately follow by a stack like that. I don't think 2,3 should be a jump. and the stack would be better spaced out IMO. and I think the spacing changes after are unnecessary and play better without.
02:35:829 (6,1) - exactly 1.2.
02:38:732 (2) - Sounds bad. Plays slow. Don't repeat on a blue tick. Repeating on the white tick works.
02:41:635 (1,2) - This stack is so awkward with that vocal in the middle. You should do something else here IMO.
02:54:216 (3,4,5) - The transition to the straight repeater looks weird. I'm not the biggest fan of the spacing you use, but for starters you can just have another curved repeater instead. It fits better than straight.
02:59:055 (1,2) - Not sure I like going back to a straight slider here. Another curved pair would be better IMO.
03:02:926 (2) - Looks way too high for the transition to look right. I suggest moving it here x 472 y 224
03:03:652 (3,4,5) - Does this really have to be a jump? It's an obnoxious jump IMO.
03:06:313 (3) - Use a more symmetrical slider?
03:17:442 (1,2,3) - Spacing feels way too close. I like the snap when it's at 1.5 snap. This pattern plays a lot better. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/410661 It would require a bit of remapping though.
03:23:248 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This pattern seem uninspired. You should try to make a nicer looking pattern. This one wont do IMO. (Perhaps have a jump every 2 notes instead of just the first sequence).
03:31:716 (4,5) - Not a fan of this being a non jump much like the previous section.
03:32:926 (1,2) - 1.5?
Sleeping
I really don't recommend exceeding 1.0 with any margin really. 0.99/1.01 is nice to look at, but 1.02 creates a bit too much space between the notes and it kind of ruins how the notes look to me. Other things to note is that this map is an example of how people should not map Easy difficulties if they want to not bore their audience. One thing I definitely think you should keep in check is the use of repetitive and bland patterns. I modded this pointing out errors in the map, you will have to figure out what to do about keeping it interesting.
00:01:958 (2,1) - The slider blanket doesn't look good. I'm assuming the slider isn't symmetrical on purpose? Not having it symmetrical also means you can't just copy paste it and reverse selection. There are several ways to fix this, so I'll let you decide how to change.
00:42:603 (1,2,3) - Line isn't perfect. 3 is slightly misaligned. Move it to x 31 y 265 to fix.
00:46:474 (1,2,3,4,1) - You should make the alignments here perfect. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/410512
00:54:216 (1,2) - 0.98 snap looks better to me.
01:25:184 (2) - I don't like this slider curve. You should end the slider level, because it will open the curve up a bit, and that makes it more pleasant to look at IMO. http://puu.sh/XO5T
01:32:926 (1,2,3) - Sort of nazi This could be straighter. It may or may not require grid snap off to make it perfect. (I was under the assumption you wanted to transition somewhat straight into the next pattern)
01:44:055 (2,3,4) - Make spacing equal.
01:48:410 (1,2,3,4,1) - Same alignment issue? You keep using various patterns for these, so I'm just going to back off from this type of pattern.)
01:54:216 (3,4,1) - Spacing difference is definitely notable while playing.
01:56:152 (1,2) - 0.98-1.0. Space it around there for the best look IMO.
01:57:119 (2,1,2) - Also exactly 0.99/1.0 would be best.
02:01:958 (3,4,1) - Make spacing equal.
02:36:313 - Slightly weird skipping these sounds IMO. It works I guess.
02:38:732 (1,2,3,4,5) - Dull pattern IMO. You should add more defined curves for a better effect.
02:42:603 (1,2,3,4,5) - You should make spacing exactly equal. It would look better if you did.
03:00:023 (1,2) - Blanket is off. Make it perfect?
03:13:571 (1) - This note seems slightly too low to be naturally coming off 3,s position. I think you need to either lower the previous note somehow or place this higher on the screen.
03:25:184 (1,2) - These aren't exactly parallel.
03:29:055 (1,2) - I really don't know why you choose to map these sections in the same predictable bland way. Why don't you at least make it interesting and have the slider actually appear in differently on the screen. 03:29:055 (1,2,3,1) - reminds me too much of 03:13:571 (1,2,3,1) -. At least make them different enough to be interesting.
Walking
Probably the biggest issue with this map is off looking sliders, and misalignment.
00:03:893 (1,1,1) - Gaps between sliders are different. They should be the same.
00:06:797 (1) - You should have this try to follow the pattern of the sliders.
00:18:410 (2) - something about this slider looks bad to me. I swear it's the curve usage that makes this pattern look bad. :/
00:27:119 (1,2) - Same curve issue here. :/
00:34:861 (1,2,3,4) - Make parallel? I see no reason not to make parallel, it looks better that way.
00:48:410 (3) - Expected this to be a mirror of 1. It would be more consistent if it were. You seem to have consistent slider shapes here 02:50:345 (1,2,3,4) -
00:54:216 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I find it peculiar that you mapped this combo so noticeably different from start to end. This part is screaming map me similarly. I recommend you do so. It just doesn't make sense to go from straight to curve on this type of vocal pair.
01:01:958 (1,2,3,4,5) - Seems uninspired to me. Just because the vocalist is singing dull and boring, doesn't mean you need to try to map that part the same way.
01:09:700 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ (Other parts like this too)
01:28:571 (1) - This could start on the vertical line.
01:33:893 (2,1,2,3) - Unsure that this is the best thing you should do here. The curve change of 1,2,3 seems like it should change as much as it does compared to the curve of 2,1,2. Take that as you want, if you find a better curve great!. If not it doesn't matter that much.
01:48:410 (1) - Please make symmetrical.
01:54:216 (1) - Why is this slider different than the other sliders?
01:55:668 (4,1) - Nazi - Stack perfectly 0.0.
02:09:458 (3,4) - 0.00
02:11:635 (1,2,3,4,5) - This pattern actually works IMO.
02:37:764 (2,1) - Should be parallel IMO.
02:42:603 (1,2) - Transition doesn't look good being straight at an unusual angle. It shouldn't look like it's only purpose is to start a pattern in a particular area of the screen. I suggest a more flatter transition. http://puu.sh/XPIC
02:45:022 (4,5,6) - I don't like how this pattern flattens here. I think it would be better to create a zigzag pattern through here.
03:07:764 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - If these are supposed to be straight and parallel, they are neither.
03:16:474 (4,5,6) - Seems to play better (and looks better) if this was a mirror of 1,2,3. You should do so.
03:17:442 (1) - I think this would be better more forwardly placed compared to 6. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/410598
03:22:281 (3,4,1) - This would be better if 1 started at the same level as 3.
Dancing
I was having framerate issues when I tried to mod this. I have to say some parts just felt randomor just changing just to change. This difficulty misses some prime symmetry opportunities. I'm not a fan of a lot of the jumps either. Overall I probably disliked more than I liked, but the framerate was a real kill joy, and I have to consider that into account. It may play fine with someone with perfect framerate.
00:03:893 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not a fan of this part really. I feel the rhythm wants more of a jump, but instead these parts feels mechanical instead of flowing like jumps would do. If this was a flowing pattern, I wouldn't recommend stacking at all. all the stopping ruins the enjoyment of rebounding to hit the next part. Although feel free to take my opinion as someone who doesn't like this style of mapping.
00:19:377 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - This is a really nice pattern.
00:34:377 (4,1,2) - Exactly 1.2?
00:50:345 (3,4,5) - Is the spacing supposed to look like this?
00:52:039 (6,7,8,9) - You should try to create a little more consistency of the proximity of notes to other notes. There are slight variations currently.
01:00:748 (3) - Center this better?
01:21:313 (1) - Make a more perfect triangle with 01:20:829 (1,2) - ?
01:27:119 (5) - Make symmetrical?
01:44:539 (2,3,4) - spacings differ. Turn gridsnap off and make perfect.
01:56:152 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I really don't like the flow here. You shouldn't have a jump immediately follow by a stack like that. I don't think 2,3 should be a jump. and the stack would be better spaced out IMO. and I think the spacing changes after are unnecessary and play better without.
02:35:829 (6,1) - exactly 1.2.
02:38:732 (2) - Sounds bad. Plays slow. Don't repeat on a blue tick. Repeating on the white tick works.
02:41:635 (1,2) - This stack is so awkward with that vocal in the middle. You should do something else here IMO.
02:54:216 (3,4,5) - The transition to the straight repeater looks weird. I'm not the biggest fan of the spacing you use, but for starters you can just have another curved repeater instead. It fits better than straight.
02:59:055 (1,2) - Not sure I like going back to a straight slider here. Another curved pair would be better IMO.
03:02:926 (2) - Looks way too high for the transition to look right. I suggest moving it here x 472 y 224
03:03:652 (3,4,5) - Does this really have to be a jump? It's an obnoxious jump IMO.
03:06:313 (3) - Use a more symmetrical slider?
03:17:442 (1,2,3) - Spacing feels way too close. I like the snap when it's at 1.5 snap. This pattern plays a lot better. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/410661 It would require a bit of remapping though.
03:23:248 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This pattern seem uninspired. You should try to make a nicer looking pattern. This one wont do IMO. (Perhaps have a jump every 2 notes instead of just the first sequence).
03:31:716 (4,5) - Not a fan of this being a non jump much like the previous section.
03:32:926 (1,2) - 1.5?