Saten wrote:

Hello~

[General]
Add lead-in, even if it is 0,5 sec oop I forget, added!
Why would you silence the ticks at the beginning? wouldn't it be easier to use custom hitsounds here? It also affects taiko mode, but I guess it's not that important for you Umm, because it sounds noisy for me...

[Insane]
Maybe turn up the difficulty a bit by raising the AR by 1? Some stuff becomes much clearer but also a bit harder nah, I think it shouldn't be AR9 :p
00:02:490 (5,6,1) - NC on (5) instead. Much better imo, instead of mixing colors in a small stack
00:03:886 (5,6,1) - ^
00:05:281 (5,6,1) - ^
00:08:072 (9,10,1) - NC on (9) instead
00:09:467 (5,6,1) - NC on (5) instead
00:10:863 (5,6,1) - ^
00:17:839 (6,7,1) - NC on (6)
00:29:002 (3,4,1) - NC on (3) instead all NC changed
00:32:490 (2,3,4,5) - This order feels much better

SPOILER

good! changed!
00:45:223 (1,2,3) - same here, the distance between (3) & (1) makes it feel more natural

SPOILER

changed
00:50:107 (3) - finish on start ok

[Hard]
if you raised the AR on Insane, do it here too. 8 feels pretty good nah
00:28:304 (1) - Reverse this (Ctrl+G) somewhat better flow imo I agree, changed!
00:28:653 (2) - ^ ^
00:50:107 (3) - finish on start ok

[Normal]
00:50:107 (3) - finish on start ok
00:55:514 (1) - can you make it so the start & end doesn't touch each-other? ok
01:23:595 (1) - end this 1/1 earlier? (01:26:909 - ) Umm, I think the vocal ending is not here

[LF]
00:17:665 (5) - custom clap instead ok
00:44:525 (3,1) - make sure they don't overlap each-other

SPOILER

Umm, spacing... I think the spacing should keep in easy diff, so...
00:50:107 (2) - Finish on start ok


That's all I have to say for now
Good luck!

• 00:12:432 (1) - うーんシンバルの音がほとんど曲に埋もれてしまっているように感じるので、このfinishの部分だけもう少し音量を上げても良いように思います。
  00:45:223 (1) - 今までのパターン的にはこのclapは無くても良いと思います。また、エコーが掛かっているということもあり、同じ音量で3つ連続で付けてしまうと少しうるさく感じたので外してみてはどうでしょう。
  00:56:037 (2,3) - 2ではなく3にfinishがあったほうが、曲のアクセントを上手く表現しているように感じました。
  01:14:525 (5,6,5,6) - エコークラップの特性上、音楽が盛り上がっている部分ではその音に紛れやすいので、これらのノートのHSが聞こえづらく、それがノートのタイミングの取りづらさに繋がると思います。finishの音を用いるか、音量を上げてHSを分かりやすいものにした方が良いと思います。

• 00:17:665 (3,1) - ボーカルは00:17:839 に乗っており、またこれらをスタックさせることで、スライダーを早く押しすぎてしまう原因になると思います。単純にこれらのノートの間にサークルを追加するなどしてノートを追加する事で解決すると思います。
  00:23:246 (6) - 細かいですが左下に傾けたほうが前後のスライダーとの流れが良くなると思います。
  00:56:037 (6,7) - Insaneに同じ
  01:14:525 (5,5) - ^

• 00:20:107 (6) - ギターの音を拾っているのは分かりますが、歌い方からして00:19:235 (3,4,5) の3つの音の後ろには均等な間隔が欲しいように思います。
  00:20:281 にもう一つサークルを追加し、00:20:107 (5) を1/1だけ後ろに移動させて折り返しを削除するというリズムはいかがでしょうか。
  SPOILER

  
  00:43:130 (1,2,3,4) - 違うリズムのスタックを立て続けに配置するのは少し不親切に感じました。3,4をスタックさせない配置にした方が良いと思います。
  01:17:490 - add note 少し難易度が上がるかもしれませんが、ここにサークルを追加することで次のノートとの間隔が1/1となり、リズムは分かりやすくなると思います。

• 00:05:456 (1,1) - これらのノートは連続していませんが、このARならば同時に表示されてしまう為、もう少し綺麗に囲むような形にした方が見栄えが良くなると思います。nazi
  00:10:883 - 00:10:863 に移動させておいて下さい。
  00:11:735 (2) - 手前のスライダーとの間隔が狭く、その為にスライダー同士が重なってしまっているので、このスライダーを1か2グリッド程上に移動させた方が良いと思います。
  00:22:549 (5,1) - この2つのノートの部分において、歌詞はひとまとまりとして繋がっており、NCで切るのは少し変な感じがしました。
  手前のコンボが少し長めでもあるので、00:21:502 (4) にNCを置き、00:22:897 (1) はNCを削除、新たに00:24:293 (2) からNCを始めてはどうでしょうか。
  00:30:572 (2,1) - これらのスライダーの繋がりが少し悪いように思います。Easyなので可能ならばもう少し自然な流れの配置にしてみて下さい。
  00:34:583 - SVのmultiplierを変更してしまう事で、スライダーの速度だけでなくDSを使用した時におけるノートの間隔も変わってしまうので、Easyではあまりしないほうが良いと思います。
  00:38:595 - add note?　前半音の数を減らして後半少し増やすみたいな感じの流れは結構好きです。
  00:44:176 - ^
  00:44:525 (3,1) - うーん完全に重なってしまっているのでちょっとサークルが見づらいと思います。画面のかなり右上ということも相まってARがかなり見づらく、もう少し見やすい配置に変更した方が良いように思いました。

h-728 wrote:

ばんびさんお久しぶりです お久です～
Pendで見つけてきました ありです～！！ヾ(ﾟωﾟ)ﾉ゛

[General]
Offsetが少し遅い気がします。-7msを試してみて下さい。 後半のタイミングが良くなったと感じました！私のoffset間隔は少し人より遅めなようなので助かりました！

[Insane]

• 00:12:432 (1) - うーんシンバルの音がほとんど曲に埋もれてしまっているように感じるので、このfinishの部分だけもう少し音量を上げても良いように思います。う～ん、私的にはこの大きさが一番しっくりくるので保留で><
  00:45:223 (1) - 今までのパターン的にはこのclapは無くても良いと思います。また、エコーが掛かっているということもあり、同じ音量で3つ連続で付けてしまうと少しうるさく感じたので外してみてはどうでしょう。う～ん、ある方がジャンプとかも考えると自然のような気もするので保留で
  00:56:037 (2,3) - 2ではなく3にfinishがあったほうが、曲のアクセントを上手く表現しているように感じました。変えました！
  01:14:525 (5,6,5,6) - エコークラップの特性上、音楽が盛り上がっている部分ではその音に紛れやすいので、これらのノートのHSが聞こえづらく、それがノートのタイミングの取りづらさに繋がると思います。finishの音を用いるか、音量を上げてHSを分かりやすいものにした方が良いと思います。
  う～ん、いろいろ変えてみたんですが私的にはこれが一番よくてさわやかな感じ(?)がするので保留で

[Hard]

• 00:17:665 (3,1) - ボーカルは00:17:839 に乗っており、またこれらをスタックさせることで、スライダーを早く押しすぎてしまう原因になると思います。単純にこれらのノートの間にサークルを追加するなどしてノートを追加する事で解決すると思います。これはわざとそうしていますｗ
  00:23:246 (6) - 細かいですが左下に傾けたほうが前後のスライダーとの流れが良くなると思います。了解です！
  00:56:037 (6,7) - Insaneに同じ はい
  01:14:525 (5,5) - ^ インセインと同様で><

[Normal]

• 00:20:107 (6) - ギターの音を拾っているのは分かりますが、歌い方からして00:19:235 (3,4,5) の3つの音の後ろには均等な間隔が欲しいように思います。
  00:20:281 にもう一つサークルを追加し、00:20:107 (5) を1/1だけ後ろに移動させて折り返しを削除するというリズムはいかがでしょうか。
  SPOILER

  
  せっかくの提案ですがここはギター音を取りたいので><
  00:43:130 (1,2,3,4) - 違うリズムのスタックを立て続けに配置するのは少し不親切に感じました。3,4をスタックさせない配置にした方が良いと思います。
  確かにそう思いましたが… 見た目的理由とNormalっぽい要素(?)になると思うので買えませんでしたm(__)m
  01:17:490 - add note 少し難易度が上がるかもしれませんが、ここにサークルを追加することで次のノートとの間隔が1/1となり、リズムは分かりやすくなると思います。ここは最初は入れてたんですが☆4.5で表示されてしまうことと1/1リズムが続くのを避けることからわざとこうしてます><

[LF's Easy]

• 00:05:456 (1,1) - これらのノートは連続していませんが、このARならば同時に表示されてしまう為、もう少し綺麗に囲むような形にした方が見栄えが良くなると思います。nazi しました！
  00:10:883 - 00:10:863 に移動させておいて下さい。はい
  00:11:735 (2) - 手前のスライダーとの間隔が狭く、その為にスライダー同士が重なってしまっているので、このスライダーを1か2グリッド程上に移動させた方が良いと思います。 はい
  00:22:549 (5,1) - この2つのノートの部分において、歌詞はひとまとまりとして繋がっており、NCで切るのは少し変な感じがしました。
  手前のコンボが少し長めでもあるので、00:21:502 (4) にNCを置き、00:22:897 (1) はNCを削除、新たに00:24:293 (2) からNCを始めてはどうでしょうか。
  私もそう感じてますがこれは対称パターンによる見た目重視のNCなので変えるのにも抵抗があります…他のmodderさんに言われたらまた検討してみます
  00:30:572 (2,1) - これらのスライダーの繋がりが少し悪いように思います。Easyなので可能ならばもう少し自然な流れの配置にしてみて下さい。う～ん、これは見た目重視で考えるとこのままでもいい気がします。それほど流れも悪くないと感じるので保留で
  00:34:583 - SVのmultiplierを変更してしまう事で、スライダーの速度だけでなくDSを使用した時におけるノートの間隔も変わってしまうので、Easyではあまりしないほうが良いと思います。う～ん………今のところ保留で…
  00:38:595 - add note?　前半音の数を減らして後半少し増やすみたいな感じの流れは結構好きです。う～ん、ノート数と密度がEasyのわりに多くなるので
  00:44:176 - ^ ^
  00:44:525 (3,1) - うーん完全に重なってしまっているのでちょっとサークルが見づらいと思います。画面のかなり右上ということも相まってARがかなり見づらく、もう少し見やすい配置に変更した方が良いように思いました。
  はい、これはさすがに指摘が多く変えるべきだと思ったのでそれなりに変えてみましたー

Easyですが日本語で大丈夫かなって勝手に思い込んで書いたんですが、必要なら英語で書き直しますので仰ってください。
私が勝手に直していいとのことなので大丈夫です！ (多分)

1. 00:59:867 (1) - You really shouldn't use such short more repeating Sliders in easier diffs. Beginners are most likely to be messed up with that as they don't really know about the amount of repeats being on the Slider. Changing this up to 2 Sliders might work better
2. 01:02:658 (1) - You should get rid of the finish on start. Actually I'm pretty much seeing why you decided to add it. But in fact you firstly used it on 00:56:902 which starts on a red tick. This Slider starts on downbeat so the finish is inconsistent and sounds late.
3. 01:11:030 (1) - This has the same issue as above noted, consider fixing it the same way
4. 01:15:216 (2) - You should add a finish on the start to emphasize the strong voice in music as you did on the Slider before, so this would give more consistency to hitsounding at this place.

1. 00:31:960 (4,5) - Well, while looking at this is not really a problem, this crumbled arc makes a unconfident flow while gameplay as the shape doesn't really fit with your used pattern at all. You might try just using regular shapes which play alot better here.
2. 00:43:123 (1,2,3,4) - Having these both stacks in a row is not a good idea in a Normal diff. While there is actually no problem with stacking, having stacks with a red tick break in and after that one without a tick break could confuse Normal players. When playing the first stack they would be most likely to play the next stack the same way so my suggestion to you is just to unstack the first one, as the second is pretty good with the music at all
   01:13:821 (1,4) - Consider giving these two Sldiers a finish on start. While this helps to emphasize the strong voice, it also gives a nice consistency with having same type Sliders and both same hitsound on start.
3. 01:14:867 (3) - To be honest, my personal preference for this stack would be on 4. It fits the music in a, well, cooler way in my opinion. As this is just my personal preference you might want to check if you like or just deny.

1. You should be having a good reason to have no Spinner. As it is really not a good thing because of score can't vary on this place. Think about adding a Spinner
2. Well, HD + 1 is more fitting for this. As HP bar is not really making much troubles here for a hard diff, you should keep in mind that going for same HD and OD is another good thing to have aswell
3. 00:06:495 (4) - To be honest, I don't see any reason of having this curved. It affects flow in kinda bad way as the short curve plays unclean and irritating in first play. Consider leaving it straight for the sake of gameplay :3
4. 00:18:007 (3) - This stack with 1 plays very strange and confusing for hard difficulty. As 3's start gets kinda hidden by the hitburst, it's not easy to see if the stack has a beat break or if it doesn't. Consider to find another sulution as a stack here
5. 00:34:402 (7,1) - This spacing is a bit big and could get to a problem for hard difficulty. Consider lowering the spacing a bit for a better gameplay and more comfortable spacing with hard difficulty ;3
6. 00:56:204 (7) - Well, I'd prefer this note just to be deleted as real noticeable sounds end with 6. So this note feels just a bit too much and not really good going with the song therefore.
7. 01:13:821 (1) - Same suggestion as for Normal. Also add a finish on 01:15:216 then of course.

1. Same thing about the Spinners as in Hard diff.
2. 00:01:262 (1) - Use a tripeclick for this. You did it on all places similar this place so it would be a good thing to keep consistency in rhythm and another good thing to keep up flow with the triples
3. 00:15:739 (3) - This exactly straight angle breaks kinda flow. Just deciding for a small change in angle would make a better gameplay here as this one does. Even something like
   
   SPOILER

   
   Would flow in a pretty much better way so think about it
4. 00:21:321 - Beat is feeling really empty here. So consider adding a note here which would also keep flow on going and helps to fill the beat a bit more then the current rhythm does
5. 00:30:216 (5) - This stack with 4 is odd. Keeping mouse here feels pretty strange and somewhat of bad flowing. Moving this stack to 6 would flow better. Or unstacking it would make flow even more good
6. 00:33:181 (1) - This should actually be moved to the right a bit to make the star kinda perfect. Move it until it looks somewhat like
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:56:204 (3) - Please remove it ;3 There is actually no sound on this if you listen, the actual sound just ends with 2 and there is just an empty space then. So just delete 3 please for keeping this more exact to where the music ends.
8. 01:13:821 (1) - You just know this suggestion :3

Konei wrote:

From my Queue ~


[Easy]

1. 00:59:867 (1) - You really shouldn't use such short more repeating Sliders in easier diffs. Beginners are most likely to be messed up with that as they don't really know about the amount of repeats being on the Slider. Changing this up to 2 Sliders might work better fixed
2. 01:02:658 (1) - You should get rid of the finish on start. Actually I'm pretty much seeing why you decided to add it. But in fact you firstly used it on 00:56:902 which starts on a red tick. This Slider starts on downbeat so the finish is inconsistent and sounds late. ok
3. 01:11:030 (1) - This has the same issue as above noted, consider fixing it the same way fixed
4. 01:15:216 (2) - You should add a finish on the start to emphasize the strong voice in music as you did on the Slider before, so this would give more consistency to hitsounding at this place. ok

[Normal]

1. 00:31:960 (4,5) - Well, while looking at this is not really a problem, this crumbled arc makes a unconfident flow while gameplay as the shape doesn't really fit with your used pattern at all. You might try just using regular shapes which play alot better here. Hmm, I don't think so... and I have no idea... so...
2. 00:43:123 (1,2,3,4) - Having these both stacks in a row is not a good idea in a Normal diff. While there is actually no problem with stacking, having stacks with a red tick break in and after that one without a tick break could confuse Normal players. When playing the first stack they would be most likely to play the next stack the same way so my suggestion to you is just to unstack the first one, as the second is pretty good with the music at all
   Well, it was pointed out the same thing again... But honestly I don't wanna change this... I like this pattern and I think it's fine for normal a diff
   01:13:821 (1,4) - Consider giving these two Sldiers a finish on start. While this helps to emphasize the strong voice, it also gives a nice consistency with having same type Sliders and both same hitsound on start. ok
3. 01:14:867 (3) - To be honest, my personal preference for this stack would be on 4. It fits the music in a, well, cooler way in my opinion. As this is just my personal preference you might want to check if you like or just deny. Umm, nah

[Hard]

1. You should be having a good reason to have no Spinner. As it is really not a good thing because of score can't vary on this place. Think about adding a Spinner Sorry I don't like spineers. Hmm, if some modders insisted on this, I would change.
2. Well, HD + 1 is more fitting for this. As HP bar is not really making much troubles here for a hard diff, you should keep in mind that going for same HD and OD is another good thing to have aswell ok
3. 00:06:495 (4) - To be honest, I don't see any reason of having this curved. It affects flow in kinda bad way as the short curve plays unclean and irritating in first play. Consider leaving it straight for the sake of gameplay :3 hmm, okay
4. 00:18:007 (3) - This stack with 1 plays very strange and confusing for hard difficulty. As 3's start gets kinda hidden by the hitburst, it's not easy to see if the stack has a beat break or if it doesn't. Consider to find another sulution as a stack here nah... I wanna keep this because I really like this and I believe it's not so hard for hard diff.
5. 00:34:402 (7,1) - This spacing is a bit big and could get to a problem for hard difficulty. Consider lowering the spacing a bit for a better gameplay and more comfortable spacing with hard difficulty ;3 nah, I think this is okay
6. 00:56:204 (7) - Well, I'd prefer this note just to be deleted as real noticeable sounds end with 6. So this note feels just a bit too much and not really good going with the song therefore. really? Umm, but I think this is the most natural pattern for now...
7. 01:13:821 (1) - Same suggestion as for Normal. Also add a finish on 01:15:216 then of course. ok

[Insane]

1. Same thing about the Spinners as in Hard diff. same as hard
2. 00:01:262 (1) - Use a tripeclick for this. You did it on all places similar this place so it would be a good thing to keep consistency in rhythm and another good thing to keep up flow with the triples It's my silder style at this map, so...
3. 00:15:739 (3) - This exactly straight angle breaks kinda flow. Just deciding for a small change in angle would make a better gameplay here as this one does. Even something like yes, but I wanna keep this because I want to focus on the appearance.
   
   SPOILER

   
   Would flow in a pretty much better way so think about it
4. 00:21:321 - Beat is feeling really empty here. So consider adding a note here which would also keep flow on going and helps to fill the beat a bit more then the current rhythm does I don't think so...
5. 00:30:216 (5) - This stack with 4 is odd. Keeping mouse here feels pretty strange and somewhat of bad flowing. Moving this stack to 6 would flow better. Or unstacking it would make flow even more good Hmm, I don't worry about this... and it's hard to change...
6. 00:33:181 (1) - This should actually be moved to the right a bit to make the star kinda perfect. Move it until it looks somewhat like ok
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:56:204 (3) - Please remove it ;3 There is actually no sound on this if you listen, the actual sound just ends with 2 and there is just an empty space then. So just delete 3 please for keeping this more exact to where the music ends. same as hard
8. 01:13:821 (1) - You just know this suggestion :3 :3

That's all I got then :3

Good luck ~

1. 3が2のARと合うように、かつ 01:04:053 (3,1) - を左右対称に
2. 01:02:658 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - の1->2->3を一直線に
3. 01:06:844 (3) - の曲線と 01:05:449 (1) - の始点が重ならないように 00:27:774 (2) - をコピーし変更

424,336,62658,6,0,P|463:280|457:212,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
412,144,63704,1,10,0:0:0
364,72,64053,2,0,P|323:129|340:192,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
171,192,65449,6,0,P|188:129|148:72,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
100,144,66495,1,10,0:0:0
52,212,66844,2,0,P|119:276|119:276|165:287,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
288,316,68065,6,0,P|371:325|414:256,1,175,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
332,244,69286,1,10,0:0:0
388,180,69635,2,0,P|355:122|379:57,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

MerryGate wrote:

初めまして、modding経験が無いので自分のスキルアップも兼ねてのmoddingです。
全て提案です～。

[General]
問題ありませんでした。
音源名が曲名と少し違いますが問題は無いですし。

[Easy]
SliderMultiplierが0.699999999999999になってますが、rankableだったとは思うので特に気にならなければ放置で大丈夫なはずです。
配置に特に問題は無いように見えますが 00:51:321 (1,2) - など、ところどころスライダーのポイントが汚いのが気になりました。
一応自分で左右対称（もしくはそれに近い）スライダーを作って重ねてみた所殆ど形自体は変わらなかったのでついでに配置が良く出来そうな所だけ載せておきます～。

00:52:716 (2) - エンドポイントのグリッドを少し下げた方が次のスライダーの中心により近付きます（ 00:54:111 (1) - をCtrl+Gで確認） fixed!
01:02:658 (1,2,3) - ポイントと角度が若干汚く、3のスライダーが綺麗に2を囲えていません。
それと1->2->3でAIMを一直線、または中心向きに曲がるように変えた方がより綺麗になると思います。
それを利用して画面端に近い 01:08:065 (1) - を画面中心よりにずらす事が出来ればARが見やすくなるはずです。

1. 3が2のARと合うように、かつ 01:04:053 (3,1) - を左右対称に
2. 01:02:658 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - の1->2->3を一直線に
3. 01:06:844 (3) - の曲線と 01:05:449 (1) - の始点が重ならないように 00:27:774 (2) - をコピーし変更

01:02:658 (1) - ~ 01:09:635 (3) - のみですが上記を満たすように自分なりに配置を弄ったコードを置いておくので、osuファイルの最後の行から19行目の420~の行から9行下の224~の行までをコピーdiff上で書き変えて参考にしてみてください。

424,336,62658,6,0,P|463:280|457:212,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
412,144,63704,1,10,0:0:0
364,72,64053,2,0,P|323:129|340:192,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
171,192,65449,6,0,P|188:129|148:72,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
100,144,66495,1,10,0:0:0
52,212,66844,2,0,P|119:276|119:276|165:287,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
288,316,68065,6,0,P|371:325|414:256,1,175,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
332,244,69286,1,10,0:0:0
388,180,69635,2,0,P|355:122|379:57,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

codeをコピペして若干スペーシングが気になるところがあったのでそこを直しました！良い配置だと思いました！

粗探しのようで非常に申し訳ないです(☍﹏⁰) いえいえ！modは粗探ししてみる努力が大切です！(｀・ω・´) (mapの個性を壊さないように

[Normal]
00:56:902 (1) - サビの音量が上がる所からS:C1のclapの音量が若干大きく感じます。
恐らく3diffともですが、カスタムサウンドのsoft-hitclapの音量をほんの少し下げてみてはどうでしょうか？
う～ん、一段階下げると曲の音で埋もれてしまうので今のところこの音量が一番いいかなって思います

[Hard]
00:50:623 (4,5,6,7) - 5,6,7,4の順になるほうが流れが良くなるように見えます。 う～ん、4のところでカクっとさせた方がプレイしやすいと私的に感じるので、あと7-1間でジャンプさせたいので保留で

[Insane]
00:45:739 (1,2,3) - ベースか何かの音を拾っているのは分かるのですが、その前にあるスライダー->単発の若干似たような流れがある事と単発のジャンプが大きくなる事を考えると、初見で分かりやすいように連打はスタックさせずに置いた方が良いかもしれないです。 3連打はスタック共通にしているので
00:56:030 (2,3,1) - 超細かいですが 00:54:635 (2) - の終点にあうように少し左にずらしたほうがEdit的には見た目が良いです。
またそれによって 00:55:507 (1) - のスペーシングが狭まるので 00:55:158 (3,4,5) - を 00:54:635 (2) - の形にあうように左下に移動。
実はプレイの際スタックでずれる分を考えて少しずらしています
01:01:253 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 少し-方向にRotateさせた方が飛びやすい図形ジャンプになると思います。 ふむむむ、個人的にこの角度が一番いいと思っているので保留で


指摘する所が全然見つかりませんでした！
参考にならなかったらばっさり切り捨てちゃってください～。

それでは頑張ってください

Kawayi Rika wrote:

Hi ~ banvi ~

Mod time for my Random Queue ~



Red : Must be fixed
Pink : Should be fixed
Purple : Just suggestions

[General]

1. Mp3 quality is really too bad,you should change other. I looked for many times, and I think I found better one! Changed!!

[Insane]

1. 01:13:821 (1,2,4,5) - I guess you missing make symmetry to here. ooops, fixed!
2. 01:15:216 (1,5) - ^^

[Normal]

1. 00:26:379 (1,2,3) - More better rhythm,like this.
   
   Yes... but I don't want to see this ☆4.5. so not changed...

OK ~ Hope this can help you ~

Good luck with rank ~

• I see what you did there

• Make sure that you reply with what you haven't fixed. Since I could poke Kevin for a mod, it would be better for me and him to know what you haven't fixed on my mod and maybe, why. But it would be good if you simply reply with a Yes/No. After that, I could come here and gives more suggestion on the point you have rejected.

• You have made a nice job here! Call me back for a recheck when you're ready to pass on the next step.

Gabe wrote:

• I see what you did there

Hi banvi! Here's a mod from Gabe's mod> Kevin's bubble> Chewin's Rank modding queue!

• Make sure that you reply with what you haven't fixed. Since I could poke Kevin for a mod, it would be better for me and him to know what you haven't fixed on my mod and maybe, why. But it would be good if you simply reply with a Yes/No. After that, I could come here and gives more suggestion on the point you have rejected.

General

1. The folder is looking fine, nothing wrong for this.
2. You could consider to add more tags, maybe? For an example.. the characters, the director of the anime (Hatsuki Tsuji), etc.. Right now, there's only two tags. If you want more persons to look at your map and maybe play it, it would be good to add more tags on every difficulty. (Make sure they're all consistent) ok, added actors of the anime as like http://osu.ppy.sh/s/24333
3. You could disable Letterboxes during break time on every difficulties since they don't contain any breaks. It will be useless to keep it enabled.　ok
4. You should be adding spinners on every difficulty to make some variation on the scores. That's not cool to see everyone having the same exact score. I don't mind it and I don't like spinners xD nvm ok, added

Easy
When I was looking at this difficulty, I thought banvi made it. The patterns are well constructed, the blankets are awesome but then, I saw: LF's Easy. Because of this, I'm glad to say that difficulty is awesome!

Flows/Emplacements of the objects
To make sure there's no random jumps, has great flows, do not have random objects placed on the timeline that doesn't fit with the song;

1. 00:08:588 (2,2) - Do you see the overlaps here? You could try to make another form or even, move it somewhere else to avoid this overlaps. Even if it's almost fade out, we can see the previous slider and it doesn't look pretty good. fixed
   
   Example of the overlap

   
2. 00:16:612 (3,4) - I do not recommend stacking notes on an Easy difficulty. It doesn't make sense since these objects are consistent on the timeline and should also be consistent on the playfield. Unstack these objects and rearrange your pattern to keep the same spacing anytime. removed (3) and arranged
3. 01:04:402 (3) - That's not something wrong but, can you try to make a better blanket here? Like making the curve more closer to the circle. Because right now, it has a little space which is not a pretty good blanket. If you do a better blanket here, you would need to do a copy/paste to get the same slider with 01:05:798 (1) - .
   
   Example

   
   maybe fixed
4. 01:21:146 (3) - You should try make this more easier for beginners. Having two reverses arrows on a slider can be difficult for some new players. Try to make it easier by deleting a reverse arrow and adding a circle to 01:23:239 with a finish. It's going to be easier that way c: ok~

Hitsounds
In case there's inconsistencies with your hitsounds, useless hitsounds. I may also suggest you some things to make your hitsounds better;
It seems consistent~

New combos
New combos are one of the things I think it's important for a beatmap. Combos shouldn't be overused, have too much objects in a combo and should fit with the song;
Looks pretty good!

Normal

Flows/Emplacements of the objects
To make sure there's no random jumps, has great flows, do not have random objects placed on the timeline that doesn't fit with the song;

1. 00:20:449 (6,1) - Can you try to make a better second wave please? Even if it's a 1/2 sliders, the end of both sliders should have been curved like the first wave. You can look on the box above for a little more information of what I'm telling you. As you can see, there's more difference with the slider (1) from the previous slider. The slider (1) looks more curved and it looks better. why don't you try to do the same?
   
   Example

   
   maybe fixed?? but I feel it's the best form.
2. 00:37:891 (1,2) - Since these object has the same spacing of the previous objects, you should try to avoid this kind of stack by moving the slider (2) somewhere. By doing this, the spacing will be consistent like it was previously and there won't be any stacks~
   Umm, sorry I don't want to make these unstack. and these stacks fit with the voice imo.
3. 00:43:472 (1,2) - You should try to make the same thing here as I said on the point above, you can have an example with the two next objects. Since they're more closer, it's good for them to be stacked, but for these two, they're placed consistently in 1/2 on the timeline. So, the spacing should stay the same for these objects. (Well, I mean, move the object (2) somewhere else so there won't be any stackings) Try to do the same thing for these objects:
   
   00:49:053 (1,2) -
   Hmm, unstacked only 00:44:518 (3,4)

Hitsounds
In case there's inconsistencies with your hitsounds, useless hitsounds. I may also suggest you some things to make your hitsounds better;

1. 00:20:798 - Shouldn't it have a clap here even if there's a finish? Even if there's a finish, you could add a clap here to keep the consistency with your previous claps. ok

New combos
New combos are one of the things I think it's important for a beatmap. Combos shouldn't be overused, have too much objects in a combo and should fit with the song;
Nothing wrong to say here!

Hard

Flows/Emplacements of the objects
To make sure there's no random jumps, has great flows, do not have random objects placed on the timeline that doesn't fit with the song;

1. 00:06:844 (4,1) - I don't really like this 1/4 slider with two reverses arrow and the next slider. The form of the next slider makes these objects really odd. What I meant is, the slider (1) has two red nodes which cuts the slider and makes it straight to another place, well, for this place, it's a bit overlapped by the previous slider which makes it awkward. To be honest, it would look better if you do the same thing like you've done to 00:12:425 (4,1) - by curving the slider (1) like you've done for these. It would look better than these weird shaped straighslider. (I don't know how I can call it xD)
   Hmm...? but... it looks cool for me... and I don't think this affect the playing so much. so I keep this.
2. 00:29:344 (1) - The emplacement and the flow here isn't pretty good because of the two previous sliders, which are straight sliders that does a rotation from up to down. As you can see at this slider, it doesn't make it good after the previous slider since this one goes to the left. So the transition from the slider (2) to the slider (1) is not good. Sooo.. my suggestion here is to stack the 1/4 reversearrow-slider(1) with the previous slider (1)'s end. It will make the flow more better than it is currently.
   Umm, it's not good for me, but I have no idea... so changed to normal pattern.
3. 00:50:449 (3,4) - Erm, I don't really like the flow here when it turns with the square form. The emplacement of these objects: (3,4,5) makes the flow a bit bad. (Well, the form of the slider (3) makes it a bit bad). But seriously, I think you should start the circle (4) at where the circle (5) is. It will make a better transition and the flow is going to be way more better. also, you're making a jump with the objects (7,1), which shouldn't happen. Look on the box for more information Honestly I didn't want to change this ;_; but I respect your opinion. changed
   
   Example

   
   
   As you can see, the circle (4) is where the circle (5) was, the circle (5) is where the circle (6) was, the circle (6) was where the circle (7) was and etc. That's simple to do.
4. 00:52:891 (5) - This doesn't need a lot of explanation, instead of stacking this circle with the circle (3), why don't you make a diamond form with these objects: (3,4,5,1,)? It will be more enjoyable to play instead. nah, I wanna keep this.
5. 01:14:693 (4,5) - Since it as a long and strong word from 01:14:693 to 01:15:042, I think it would be better if you reverse the emplacement of these two objects on the timeline to make it sound better. I've found it randomly because I thought it the slider (5) didn't sounded good if I followed the vocals. If you don't change it because of the hitsounds, you could add an hitsound to the slidertick? It will make the same job. You should consider to do the same thing for these objects 01:16:088 (4,5) - :3 Hmm, no sorry. I want to follow behind voice.

Hitsounds
In case there's inconsistencies with your hitsounds, useless hitsounds. I may also suggest you some things to make your hitsounds better;

1. 00:28:472 (5,1,2) - Are these claps intentional? I don't know.. it just don't keep the consistency and it sounds a bit weird. Would you mind to try something else here? Just following the drum

New combos
New combos are one of the things I think it's important for a beatmap. Combos shouldn't be overused, have too much objects in a combo and should fit with the song;

1. 00:25:158 (4) - You could add a new combo here for the polarity of the downbeat/upbeats for these red lines. Also, It will fit with the vocals, which also fit with these red lines. ok
2. 00:39:286 (3) - To keep the consistency with your hitsounds and your previous combos, don't you think it would be better if you add a new combo to this object? but I think combo will be too short, so not changed
3. 00:55:856 (5) - This new combo seems to be a bit long and also, you should make it consistent like the Insane difficulty: By adding a new combo at this place. To be honest, it wasn't bad the way it was, but it would be preferred if it was consistent with the Insane difficulty. ok

Insane

• This difficulty is really good! I couldn't find anything wrong while play testing and looking more patiently on the editor. Most of your objects are well placed, which follows the vocals and obvious sounds in the song. You've made a nice job. I've play tested the map at least five times, looked on the editor many times and I can't find anything wrong! wow thanks!!

Flows/Emplacements of the objects
To make sure there's no random jumps, has great flows, do not have random objects placed on the timeline that doesn't fit with the song;

1. 00:24:635 (3) - With this slider, you could make a better flow with the previous curved slider (1) and the next slider which is also curved. I guess it would be better if you do that since the first slider is curved to go at the left but then, at this slider, it curves at the right. So it doesn't make a pretty good flow here. What you should do here is: Highlight the slider (3) and do CTRL+H to change the direction of the slider. After it, with the distance snap, make sure that it goes to x:88 y:116. After you've done all that, maybe you could stack the next slider with the circle (2). Since it does a great flow with (1,2,3), you could keep the same thing with (3,1). just changed the direction of the silder.
2. 01:15:216 (6) - Don't you think it would be better if you avoid doing a jump here? I swear I've missed this a lot of time. But seriously, I really think you shouldn't do a jump here. Since there's a clap at this note and on the previous note (Obviously, the note 5), I think it would be good if you stack these circles together. Since that's the same hitsounds and it's placed twice, that's not a bad idea. You could also do the same thing with these circles, to keep the consistency (since it's the same thing): 01:16:263 (5,6) -
   nah, I don't want to change. It's my style
3. 01:22:716 (2,1) - *You can skip this one, if you want* I think you should avoid stacking these objects since there's a break time between these objects. When play testing, it confused me a bit since I didn't know where to click. So maybe, to avoid any confusion for players, you should unstack these two objects. Because of changing to a spinner, I seem this problem was solved.

Hitsounds
In case there's inconsistencies with your hitsounds, useless hitsounds. I may also suggest you some things to make your hitsounds better;

• Pretty good! Everything is consistent, I can't even try to give you more suggestions for that!

New combos
New combos are one of the things I think it's important for a beatmap. Combos shouldn't be overused, have too much objects in a combo and should fit with the song;

• Everything looks fine here again; There's only one thing I didn't liked. 01:21:146 (1,1,1,1,1,2) - These objects makes the new combo option overused but you've used it in a good way since to be honest, it wouldn't make it good if they were in a simple combo. Mostly that they are the same object copy/paste and it fits with the song, so that's alright! Well, I like this pattern and it looks beautiful~

• You have made a nice job here! Call me back for a recheck when you're ready to pass on the next step.

1. 00:13:123 (1,2,3) - That press-hold rhythm introduced by 00:13:123 (1) - does not actually fit/sound that good... As you see,you are skipping over the vocals introduction,making this kinda strange to hear. What about instead replacing the slider with 00:14:518 (2) - ? It would follow the vocals transition much better as you did in the following patterns too!
   
   To mantain the symmetry used there,I tried to make a pattern using this arrangement. See if you like it,and feel free to make changes if you want!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   392,156,13123,1,8,0:0:0
   388,240,13472,6,0,P|360:280|360:280|348:324|296:344,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   213,342,14518,2,0,P|164:324|152:280|152:280|124:240,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   76,172,15565,5,0,0:0:0
   16,16,16263,1,0,0:0:0
   184,36,16960,2,0,P|196:108|224:176,1,140,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

2. 00:21:844 (4,5,1) - This is just a little suggestion of mine,please avoid that if you don't want to change: what about following a bit more the vocals here instead of just the drums here,to vary a bit the rhythm? Even if that kinda breaks the symmetry created with 00:24:635 (2) - ,it would be really nice to play as it varies your usual 1/1 rhythm by using a 3/2 repeated slider and as it plays pretty good! Here's what I have done here:
   
   Here's a pattern that could flow absolutely well using this "tecnique"
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   172,260,21844,2,0,P|148:296|112:308,1,69.9999999999999,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   92,228,22542,2,0,P|128:184|172:172,2,105,4|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   172,260,23937,5,4,0:0:0
   272,128,24635,2,0,P|324:108|392:148,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   364,316,26030,2,0,P|340:340|300:356,1,69.9999999999999,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   232,308,26728,6,0,P|188:292|188:292|92:308,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:50:100 (x)- What about adding a note here,maybe at x:224 y:316 to make a nice arc-shaped pattern which perfectly continues the flow with 00:50:449 (3) - 's oval flow? It fits good with emphatizing the vocals there,as you followed almost all the vocals in this part
4. 00:54:460 (1) - CTRL+G here? After the oval flow given by 00:51:670 (1,2) - ,I expected instead something going downwards ---> upwards,as this setting does follow pretty good 00:54:460 (1) - ,making the flow here smoother. To fix the next spacing you can use CTRL+G on the top of 00:57:251 (1) - too,to make it follow right ahead 00:54:460 (1) -!
5. 01:07:193 (3) - What about transforming this to make it an elbow slider instead of a linear one? Other than encircling better 01:05:798 (1) - 's beginning it would follow up a bit better with 01:08:414 (1) - 's oval flow... See if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   148,197,65798,6,0,P|170:130|138:73,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   86,140,66844,1,10,0:0:0
   54,218,67193,2,0,P|68:264|100:280|100:280|160:292,1,140,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   284,316,68414,6,0,P|368:324|420:256,1,175,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   336,244,69635,1,10,0:0:0
   392,180,69984,2,0,P|359:122|383:57,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

1. 00:02:484 (2) - I kinda understand what are you trying to do with this slider,but anyways wouldn't it be better if you placed it so that it continues the flow properly with 00:03:007 (1) - ? The actual pattern would have been good just if 00:03:007 (1) - was reversed...
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   60,136,1612,6,0,B|55:105|103:55|177:49|203:71,1,180,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   212,188,2484,2,0,P|216:216|236:248,1,60
   340,296,3007,6,0,B|344:326|296:376|222:382|196:360,1,180,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   140,256,3879,2,0,P|152:196,1,60
   116,84,4402,6,0,B|141:63|214:69|262:119|258:149,1,180,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,264,5274,2,0,P|244:320,1,60
   360,348,5798,5,4,0:0:0
   468,300,6146,1,4,0:0:0
   368,232,6495,1,4,0:0:0

2. 00:20:449 (6,1) - I saw Gabe's mod was mentioning this,but still I think these can be done in a better way. See what I have done here,and use them if you like them!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   284,180,20449,2,0,P|320:160|344:180|372:200|400:180,2,120,4|12|4,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   232,288,21495,6,0,P|196:308|172:288|144:268|116:288,2,120,8|0|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:55:332 (2) - Please,consider extending this by 1/2,until 00:55:681 - . The vocals here do not finish at 00:55:507 - like in the other parts,but instead finishes with a held 1/2 later. With that being said,that slider you have used there does not really fit rhythmically talking,so I highly suggest you to make this 1/2 longer instead.
   
4. 01:07:716 (6) - This is a quite little thing,but what about adding a finish on this slider's end? It fits quite good to emphatize the vocals that are "repeating" here,imho!
5. 01:17:832 (x)- What about adding a note here? Finishing the whole part with this note imho fits and sounds better,as the vocals are supposed to end here,other than making the gap with the next slider a 1/1,making it even easier to finish the pattern!

1. 00:28:995 (7) - What about splitting this in a 1/2 slider and a note? This should make more sense,as it follows the drums transition there. Here's the outcome:
   
   I actually have a little idea which could work pretty good with the kind of rhythm I just showed you. See if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   384,280,28472,1,8,0:0:0
   328,352,28646,2,0,P|304:328|292:288,1,75,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   440,208,28995,2,0,P|464:232|476:272,1,75,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   384,280,29344,1,4,0:0:0

2. 00:31:263 (1,2,3) - Heh,not really fond of the dropoff between 00:30:739 (4,1) - ,which doesen't play really THAT good... What about instead making another triangular pattern going this time downwards and upwards to flow pretty good within 00:32:309 (1) - ? Here's what I have made:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   328,196,31263,5,8,0:0:0
   172,284,31611,1,0,0:0:0
   328,372,31960,1,8,0:0:0

3. 00:48:356 (3) - That's a pretty much personal thing,so just fix if you want. What about structuring this slider vertically,encircling 00:48:181 (2) - ? This is a little thing,but it should mabe the dropoff with 00:49:053 (1,2) - smoother to play.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   40,296,47658,6,0,B|40:316|76:348|124:356|136:340,1,120,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   120,256,48181,1,0,0:0:0
   96,176,48356,2,0,P|64:188|44:216,2,60,0|8|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

4. 01:17:658 (2) - Another personal thingthough what about instead making the rhythm here a bit more complicated by replacing this slider with 3 1/2 notes? Imho,it is funnier to play
   

1. 01:04:402 (1) - What about using CTRL+G on the top of this? I liked that "returning back" that happened between 01:04:228 (4,1) - ,and that dropoff with 01:04:925 (2) - does actually play really good!
2. 01:09:809 (4,1) - Well,instead of blanketting 01:09:809 (4) - with 01:09:286 (3) - I would have instead a better formation in mind. What about placing this note right next to 01:09:984 (1) - ,so that with 01:09:984 (1) - (reversed using CTRL+G) it makes a really good to play pattern that plays really natural. Here's what I have done right now!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   312,36,69286,2,0,B|283:27|224:60|208:141|228:164,1,180,0|10,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   292,280,69809,1,0,0:0:0
   392,352,69984,6,0,B|421:361|483:319|496:247|476:224,1,180,0|10,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   382,253,70507,2,0,B|385:222|332:169|259:170|236:192,1,180,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

   For the rest this diff is totally awesome! <3 Sorry for my quite poor mod there D:

-kevincela- wrote:

Hey!

[LF's Easy]

1. 00:13:123 (1,2,3) - That press-hold rhythm introduced by 00:13:123 (1) - does not actually fit/sound that good... As you see,you are skipping over the vocals introduction,making this kinda strange to hear. What about instead replacing the slider with 00:14:518 (2) - ? It would follow the vocals transition much better as you did in the following patterns too!
   Hmm, but I think current pattern is better for take a rhythm than your suggestion... so, I keep this ><
   
   To mantain the symmetry used there,I tried to make a pattern using this arrangement. See if you like it,and feel free to make changes if you want!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   392,156,13123,1,8,0:0:0
   388,240,13472,6,0,P|360:280|360:280|348:324|296:344,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   213,342,14518,2,0,P|164:324|152:280|152:280|124:240,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   76,172,15565,5,0,0:0:0
   16,16,16263,1,0,0:0:0
   184,36,16960,2,0,P|196:108|224:176,1,140,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

2. 00:21:844 (4,5,1) - This is just a little suggestion of mine,please avoid that if you don't want to change: what about following a bit more the vocals here instead of just the drums here,to vary a bit the rhythm? Even if that kinda breaks the symmetry created with 00:24:635 (2) - ,it would be really nice to play as it varies your usual 1/1 rhythm by using a 3/2 repeated slider and as it plays pretty good! Here's what I have done here:
   
   Here's a pattern that could flow absolutely well using this "tecnique"
   okay!! nice suggestion!!
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   172,260,21844,2,0,P|148:296|112:308,1,69.9999999999999,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   92,228,22542,2,0,P|128:184|172:172,2,105,4|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   172,260,23937,5,4,0:0:0
   272,128,24635,2,0,P|324:108|392:148,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   364,316,26030,2,0,P|340:340|300:356,1,69.9999999999999,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   232,308,26728,6,0,P|188:292|188:292|92:308,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:50:100 (x)- What about adding a note here,maybe at x:224 y:316 to make a nice arc-shaped pattern which perfectly continues the flow with 00:50:449 (3) - 's oval flow? It fits good with emphatizing the vocals there,as you followed almost all the vocals in this part
   Umm, you're right, but I wanna keep consistency of the rhythm. And if I added this, the spacing would looks close because of ×0.8. I think it's not good, so not added, sorry ><
4. 00:54:460 (1) - CTRL+G here? After the oval flow given by 00:51:670 (1,2) - ,I expected instead something going downwards ---> upwards,as this setting does follow pretty good 00:54:460 (1) - ,making the flow here smoother. To fix the next spacing you can use CTRL+G on the top of 00:57:251 (1) - too,to make it follow right ahead 00:54:460 (1) -!
   nice! changed!
5. 01:07:193 (3) - What about transforming this to make it an elbow slider instead of a linear one? Other than encircling better 01:05:798 (1) - 's beginning it would follow up a bit better with 01:08:414 (1) - 's oval flow... See if you like it!
   ok! but I used an arcs silder.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   148,197,65798,6,0,P|170:130|138:73,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   86,140,66844,1,10,0:0:0
   54,218,67193,2,0,P|68:264|100:280|100:280|160:292,1,140,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   284,316,68414,6,0,P|368:324|420:256,1,175,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   336,244,69635,1,10,0:0:0
   392,180,69984,2,0,P|359:122|383:57,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

[Normal]

1. 00:02:484 (2) - I kinda understand what are you trying to do with this slider,but anyways wouldn't it be better if you placed it so that it continues the flow properly with 00:03:007 (1) - ? The actual pattern would have been good just if 00:03:007 (1) - was reversed...
   ok, changed!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   60,136,1612,6,0,B|55:105|103:55|177:49|203:71,1,180,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   212,188,2484,2,0,P|216:216|236:248,1,60
   340,296,3007,6,0,B|344:326|296:376|222:382|196:360,1,180,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   140,256,3879,2,0,P|152:196,1,60
   116,84,4402,6,0,B|141:63|214:69|262:119|258:149,1,180,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,264,5274,2,0,P|244:320,1,60
   360,348,5798,5,4,0:0:0
   468,300,6146,1,4,0:0:0
   368,232,6495,1,4,0:0:0

2. 00:20:449 (6,1) - I saw Gabe's mod was mentioning this,but still I think these can be done in a better way. See what I have done here,and use them if you like them!
   ok~
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   284,180,20449,2,0,P|320:160|344:180|372:200|400:180,2,120,4|12|4,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   232,288,21495,6,0,P|196:308|172:288|144:268|116:288,2,120,8|0|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:55:332 (2) - Please,consider extending this by 1/2,until 00:55:681 - . The vocals here do not finish at 00:55:507 - like in the other parts,but instead finishes with a held 1/2 later. With that being said,that slider you have used there does not really fit rhythmically talking,so I highly suggest you to make this 1/2 longer instead.
   Hmm, okay. changed
   
4. 01:07:716 (6) - This is a quite little thing,but what about adding a finish on this slider's end? It fits quite good to emphatize the vocals that are "repeating" here,imho!
   Ummmm... it sounds exaggerated for me...
5. 01:17:832 (x)- What about adding a note here? Finishing the whole part with this note imho fits and sounds better,as the vocals are supposed to end here,other than making the gap with the next slider a 1/1,making it even easier to finish the pattern!
   I have considered before you say it. But if I did it, the star rate would be ☆4.5. I don't wanna to see ☆4.5 for a normal diff. Honestly, I think this rhythm is okay, so not changed, sorry ><

[Hard]

1. 00:28:995 (7) - What about splitting this in a 1/2 slider and a note? This should make more sense,as it follows the drums transition there. Here's the outcome:
   
   I actually have a little idea which could work pretty good with the kind of rhythm I just showed you. See if you like it!
   nice! changed!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   384,280,28472,1,8,0:0:0
   328,352,28646,2,0,P|304:328|292:288,1,75,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   440,208,28995,2,0,P|464:232|476:272,1,75,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   384,280,29344,1,4,0:0:0

2. 00:31:263 (1,2,3) - Heh,not really fond of the dropoff between 00:30:739 (4,1) - ,which doesen't play really THAT good... What about instead making another triangular pattern going this time downwards and upwards to flow pretty good within 00:32:309 (1) - ? Here's what I have made:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   328,196,31263,5,8,0:0:0
   172,284,31611,1,0,0:0:0
   328,372,31960,1,8,0:0:0

   Well... some people think this is bad flow. But I believe it's fun to play! ><
3. 00:48:356 (3) - That's a pretty much personal thing,so just fix if you want. What about structuring this slider vertically,encircling 00:48:181 (2) - ? This is a little thing,but it should mabe the dropoff with 00:49:053 (1,2) - smoother to play.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   40,296,47658,6,0,B|40:316|76:348|124:356|136:340,1,120,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   120,256,48181,1,0,0:0:0
   96,176,48356,2,0,P|64:188|44:216,2,60,0|8|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

   looks nice! changed!
4. 01:17:658 (2) - Another personal thingthough what about instead making the rhythm here a bit more complicated by replacing this slider with 3 1/2 notes? Imho,it is funnier to play
   
   Umm, sorry. I keep this.

[Insane]

1. 01:04:402 (1) - What about using CTRL+G on the top of this? I liked that "returning back" that happened between 01:04:228 (4,1) - ,and that dropoff with 01:04:925 (2) - does actually play really good!
   I like too. but... I think I shouldn't do here. I wanna keep consistency of the spacing for 00:58:821 (1,2) and 01:09:984 (1,2).
2. 01:09:809 (4,1) - Well,instead of blanketting 01:09:809 (4) - with 01:09:286 (3) - I would have instead a better formation in mind. What about placing this note right next to 01:09:984 (1) - ,so that with 01:09:984 (1) - (reversed using CTRL+G) it makes a really good to play pattern that plays really natural. Here's what I have done right now!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   312,36,69286,2,0,B|283:27|224:60|208:141|228:164,1,180,0|10,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   292,280,69809,1,0,0:0:0
   392,352,69984,6,0,B|421:361|483:319|496:247|476:224,1,180,0|10,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   382,253,70507,2,0,B|385:222|332:169|259:170|236:192,1,180,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

   yes, but I wanna keep this because I also use this formation at 00:58:123 (3,4,1). I usually focus on consistency. ><
   For the rest this diff is totally awesome! <3 Thanks~ <3 Sorry for my quite poor mod there D:
   Noooo, there are nice suggestions although I didn't change

Call me back once when you finished fixing!

-kevincela- wrote:

Since I can't meet you online,I'll say it all here: the mp3/s vlume is actually quite low... You should consider making the volume higher. If you want,I can give you a mp3 with higher volume...just ask me if you want.

Once you have done,call me back again!

1. Shouldn't the source be "Cardfight!! Vanguard"? Searching on internet I just found information pages with that title: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardfight!!_Vanguard http://myanimelist.net/anime/9539/Cardfight!!_Vanguard
   I'm not sure about this because I didn't see the anime, but I suggest you to inform yourself about it further.

1. 01:01:611 (3) - whistle on this slider head would fit very nice IMO, obviously, same for 01:12:774 (3)

1. 01:23:937 (1) - You need to reduce this spinner by 1/2 so that it follows vocal rhyrhm. Moreover, the next circle 01:28:123 (1) is placed too soon on the time line after the spinner for a N diff IMO

1. 00:25:158 (1,3) - These 2 circles sounds too empty imo, what about to add 2 whistles on them?

1. 00:27:949 (4) - I don't recommend to overlap totally this slider with the previous (1) because it's hard to read at the first try. I would avoid this kind of "stacked sliders", pls.

Chewin wrote:

Hello, here's my mod from my queue

~General~

1. Shouldn't the source be "Cardfight!! Vanguard"? Searching on internet I just found information pages with that title: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardfight!!_Vanguard http://myanimelist.net/anime/9539/Cardfight!!_Vanguard
   I'm not sure about this because I didn't see the anime, but I suggest you to inform yourself about it further.
   
   Hmm... I don't know which one is correct...
   I found both "CARDFIGHT!!" and "Cardfight!!" are used.
   But, in the title logo, "CARDFIGHT!!" is used. So I decided not to change.
   
   SPOILER

   

~LF's Easy~

1. 01:01:611 (3) - whistle on this slider head would fit very nice IMO, obviously, same for 01:12:774 (3) ok

~Normal~

1. 01:23:937 (1) - You need to reduce this spinner by 1/2 so that it follows vocal rhyrhm. Moreover, the next circle 01:28:123 (1) is placed too soon on the time line after the spinner for a N diff IMO hmm, okay

~Hard~

1. 00:25:158 (1,3) - These 2 circles sounds too empty imo, what about to add 2 whistles on them?
   ok, but I added on (2,4). I think it's better than adding on (1,3) :>

~Insane~

1. 00:27:949 (4) - I don't recommend to overlap totally this slider with the previous (1) because it's hard to read at the first try. I would avoid this kind of "stacked sliders", pls.
   
   Hmm... ok, changed the placement. But I wanna keep the rounded formation. I think it's readable enough. >_<

That's it, orz.

banvi wrote:

Saten wrote:

[Insane]
Maybe turn up the difficulty a bit by raising the AR by 1? Some stuff becomes much clearer but also a bit harder nah, I think it shouldn't be AR9 :p