community forum

Brookes Brothers feat. Georgie Allen - New Wave

posted
Total Posts
11
Topic Starter
Mir
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 11:35:25 PM

Artist: Brookes Brothers feat. Georgie Allen
Title: New Wave
Tags: yearmix liquicity 2018 dnb drum and bass yusomi zetera
BPM: 174
Filesize: 4413kb
Play Time: 02:32
Difficulties Available:
  1. Hard (3.72 stars, 485 notes)
  2. Normal (2.4 stars, 300 notes)
  3. Revival (6.09 stars, 696 notes)
  4. Yusomi's Extra (5.39 stars, 675 notes)
  5. Zetera's Insane (4.46 stars, 572 notes)


Download: Brookes Brothers feat. Georgie Allen - New Wave
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
what are patterns why do i only have like 3 patterns in my brain

i am generic mapper x2019123
literally only 3 patterns exist in this map for each group of sounds

yusomi extra
zetera insane
rest by me
Sonnyc
Hey there~ Random modding passing by.

Hard:

00:09:246 (3) - 01:20:970 (1) - 02:32:694 (3) - I think you can try assuring some combo consistency.

Zetera's Insane:

- Tag conflicts with other diffs.

02:28:556 - Why not add break here like other diffs?

Yusomi's Extra:

- Interesting slider styles.

00:07:867 - I'm pretty sure the volume here should be 20%.
01:16:832 - Why not add a break here like other diffs?

Revival:

00:07:867 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 01:19:591 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 02:31:315 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Along a strong concept and a variation added, I think this made a good expression of the song.
00:34:073 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Interesting usage of 1/8 sliders.
00:54:763 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2) - etc, The mapping concept you've decided for this section rather felt very similar with the ones happening at 00:32:694 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2) or 01:44:418 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2). Since the music is doing something different with those sections, personally I'd expect a stronger variation to happen in the concepts than reusing similar ideas of other parts. A new instrument sound appears, the vocal disappears, but the map was sharing the core concept of the other section so it didn't felt effective on reflecting the song.
01:44:073 (5,6,7,8) - Not really sure what was happening in the spacings here, as it is kinda increasing and decreasing simultaneously unlike 00:32:263 (4,5,6,7,8) which resulted in some messy follow point visuality.

I liked the pattern base mapping which felt effective on showing the song in visuals intuitively. Good luck!
Left
~0w0~
Gaia
Smug Nanachi
what
Topic Starter
Mir

Sonnyc wrote:

Hey there~ Random modding passing by.

Hard:

00:09:246 (3) - 01:20:970 (1) - 02:32:694 (3) - I think you can try assuring some combo consistency. (for first two yes, but last one isnnt necessary cuz it's in groups of 3)

Revival:

00:07:867 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 01:19:591 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 02:31:315 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Along a strong concept and a variation added, I think this made a good expression of the song.
00:34:073 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Interesting usage of 1/8 sliders.

00:54:763 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2) - etc, The mapping concept you've decided for this section rather felt very similar with the ones happening at 00:32:694 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2) or 01:44:418 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2). Since the music is doing something different with those sections, personally I'd expect a stronger variation to happen in the concepts than reusing similar ideas of other parts. A new instrument sound appears, the vocal disappears, but the map was sharing the core concept of the other section so it didn't felt effective on reflecting the song. (i'd normally agree here but the difference is in the flavor in the background and not in the actual main melody/rhythm of the bass which stays the same despite that. i couldn't figure out a way to incorporate that difference aside from lowering sv on 00:56:487 (1) - for the sax, and having triples that start on the red 00:58:039 (3,4,5) - for the sax as well as opposed to 00:35:798 (2,3,4). essentially, i tried but it didnt work as well as i'd hoped so i tried to make it a more subtle change with rhythm and stuffs instead)

01:44:073 (5,6,7,8) - Not really sure what was happening in the spacings here, as it is kinda increasing and decreasing simultaneously unlike 00:32:263 (4,5,6,7,8) which resulted in some messy follow point visuality. (tried to make spacing a bit more consistent)

I liked the pattern base mapping which felt effective on showing the song in visuals intuitively. Good luck! (thanks!)
odd that there's still the option for v1 but its a lot harder cuz i can't click timestamps nor add colors for replying

nonetheless thanks for the feedback!
Sonnyc
Oh looks you didn’t come from the old forum owo
Zetera
Asked Mir to add a break and to change the tags. Thanks!
Topic Starter
Mir
yea staff are locked to new forum so i cant reply on old forum so its inconvenient for me lol
Yusomi

Sonnyc wrote:

Yusomi's Extra:

- Interesting slider styles.

00:07:867 - I'm pretty sure the volume here should be 20%. yep, fixed
01:16:832 - Why not add a break here like other diffs? yep, fixed
😊
Pennek
this is actually pog
Please sign in to reply.

New reply