1. Easy (1.41 stars, 141 notes)
2. Hard (2.43 stars, 284 notes)
3. Insane (4.31 stars, 460 notes)
4. Normal (1.82 stars, 213 notes)

HelloSCV wrote:

as M4M

General

1. i think you need to change MP3 file to low kbs file

Thought I used kethsar's, but I forgot to add it . Fixed now, offset -11

Easy

00:53:037 (4) - NC
01:48:704 (2) - touching HP bar k
02:53:704 (1) - delete NC k

Normal

00:21:371 (1) - hmm i think clap isn't good choice Changed to snare
00:58:037 - not used green line (and 02:07:038 (1) - same) k
01:00:371 (1) - delete NC k
01:18:204 (1) - add finish? k
01:44:037 - need clap here k
02:04:787 - not used green line too k
02:46:704 - clap k
03:06:371 (3) - NC for SV changing k
03:33:704 (3) - NC k

Hard

00:21:704 (2) - hmm there is only one default whsitle on this slider imo delete this? k
00:47:371 (7) - i'd rather add clap on start instead end It makes the next slider sound really weird if I do that, tho
02:00:704 - add clap on this slider tick
02:51:037 (1) - add finish on start

Insane

01:41:537 (7) - you added this clap by purposed? how about delete this for consistence or add clap on other same parts too k
01:50:371 (1) - delete NC and 01:51:037 (3) - add NC k
02:43:037 (4) - how about NC? k
03:28:704 (2) - touching HP bar k

i can see some parellel parts on kiai times well good luck~

1. Apparently the offset of Hard is inconsistent with the rest of the mapset which you can see in the .osu file, it's off by a few decimals. Make sure it's exactly 360 and be sure to resnap all notes after the fix.
2. Inconsistent kiai times. I'll highlight where to fix below.
3. Correct me if i'm wrong because i'm not entirely sure myself. Shouldn't the source just be K-ON!! Movie?
4. In general there are a lot of unsnapped green lines. From what I saw they didn't appear to break anything but I would have a quick check yourself just to be sure.

1. 00:21:359 (1) - For Normal and Hard the first object of the difficulties both use normal samplesets on the head. If using one is something you would prefer consider adding them here for Easy and Insane.
2. 00:33:693 (3,1) - This is quite the spacing error. Though the symmetry looks nice, I recommended finding a way to keep the spacing at a consistent 1.0x interval.
3. 00:43:026 (1,2) - Another spacing inconsistency. This one should be easier to correct.
4. 00:47:026 (4,1) - I feel that these two could fit much more nicely with each other. See if you can try a shape like this:
   Example

   172,212,47026,2,0,B|216:224|256:192|256:192|296:224|340:212,1,180
   452,56,48359,6,0,B|356:28|304:100|304:100|232:72|192:116,1,270,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   144,172,49693,2,0,P|144:240|244:300,2,180

   
5. 00:53:693 (1) - This can definitely curve more smoothly around the head of (1), try using additional slider points or something like 01:05:693 (2).
6. 00:55:026 (2) - A looser blanket feels more fitting with how you're spacing objects. Consider moving this a bit further away.
7. 01:37:026 (4) - Same as above.
8. 02:59:026 (1) - The symmetry of this one could be improved.
9. 03:01:693 (2) - Nudge this over to x:8 y:76 for a more evened out wrap around.
10. 03:08:359 (2) - How about using a slider shape like 03:01:693 (2) here for a nice blanket around the sliderbody.

1. 00:42:026 (1) - See if you can avoid this one object combo (just my personal taste, I find them to be strange). As simplying removing the NC here would make the previous combo too large you could trying NCing 00:39:693 (4) as you break into symmetry here and then remove on 00:42:026 (1). This would be consistent with what you did for 01:46:359 (1,2,3,4).
2. 00:44:359 (3) - I feel this would follow the music better if you broke it up into a repeating 1/1 slider and a circle.
3. 00:51:026 (6) - Consider using a NC here, this combo gets rather long, also for consistency with 01:57:693 (1).
4. 01:05:693 (5) - Perhaps NC to split up this large combo?
5. 01:13:026 (2,3) - Try to avoid the slight touching between these two, it doesn't look very pretty.
6. 01:52:359 (5) - NC for consistency with 00:45:693 (1).
7. 02:07:026 (1) - Probably going to want to remove NC here for obvious consistency reasons.
8. 02:12:359 (5) - If you applied the NC for 01:05:693 (5) make sure to use one here as well for consistency.
9. 02:37:693 (1) - While playing I found myself rather confused as to what I was being followed here with how this slider is ending on a red. Consider shortening this by 1/2 and adding a circle on 02:38:359 or making it to be a 2/1 slider to cover the heavy beat on 02:38:359.
10. 03:07:026 (1) - Here I feel like a repeating 1/1 slider and a circle fits better. Currently the reverse doesn't seem to follow any stresses in the music.
11. 03:19:693 (3) - NC here for consistency with the previous kiais.
12. 03:25:026 (4) - Using a NC here would fit with how you use one for the vocal previously on 03:22:359 (1).
13. 03:32:359 (2) - Spacing error here, move this further away to avoid having players accidentally hit this too early.

1. 00:47:026 (6) - Maybe NC here for consistency with its use on 01:53:693 (1)?
2. 00:47:360 (7) - Missed a clap on the head?
3. 02:24:360 - Snap this green line to 02:24:359 for consistent kiai times.
4. 02:38:193 (2,3,4) - Try making some adjustments to get even spacing between these sliders, would look nice.
5. 02:54:193 (2) - I think it would be neat if you made this a 1/2 slider starting on 02:54:693 (3). It fits really nicely with how 02:55:360 (1,2) plays.
6. 03:18:526 (3) - In my opinion, shifting this note 1/2 earlier fits better with how the music plays here.
7. 03:18:693 (3,4) - Perhaps make these two their own combo to be consistent with the previous two kiais?
8. 03:19:693 (1) - This can certainly wrap around 03:18:860 (4) more smoothly.
9. 03:25:693 (2) - The 3/2 felt a little plain to hold for so long and it skips over a lot of nice sounds. Why not try something like this:
   Example

   

1. 00:42:693 (1) - Remove NC for consistency with 01:49:360 (5).
2. 00:45:693 (4) - NC here for consistency with 01:52:360 (1).
3. 01:00:360 (5) - Maybe NC here? The combo is pretty long and it would nice as we're moving into a back-and-forth pattern.
4. 02:09:693 (7,1) - This kind of jump doesn't bother me too much but it's far more challenging and strenuous than anything seen in the difficulty and may frustrate the more low/average-skilled Insane players so I thought I would point it out. If you can think of a way to nerf this jump, I would go ahead and do it. Also it would be nice to have these two objects apart of the same combo to compliment the symmetry.
5. 02:11:026 (2) - Shift this down a bit so the tail isn't slightly overlapping with 02:10:360 (1).
6. 02:19:693 (1) - NC for consistency with 01:13:026 (1)
7. 02:20:193 (1) - Remove NC as well for consistency.
8. 02:39:026 (5,6) - Overlapping like this doesn't look very nice in my opinion. Maybe try something like this, you might need to make some adjustments to accomodate for the proceeding objects if you do.
   Example

   
9. 03:18:360 (4) - NC for consistency with how you follow previous kiais.
10. 03:20:026 (1) - Remove NC
11. 03:20:360 (3) - NC
12. 03:21:026 (1) - Remove NC.
13. 03:31:526 (5) - Using a NC for this would make me so happy.

1. Artist from HTT -> HO-KAGO TEA TIME (including unicode), following the official album.
2. Source from "K-On!! The Movie" -> "K-ON! The Movie", following official listings off VGMDB.
3. Various changes in Hard and Insane, where an impartial log (can be a little bit empty, we talked over Mumble) can be found here.