1. osu! forums
  2. osu!
  3. Development
  4. Ranking Criteria
  5. Finalized/Denied Amendments

Please choose a method that you feel would be better for handling hybrid sets

1. Require 2 full nominators of separate modes, taking partial responsibility for any mode neither are proficient in.
10.20% 5
2. Require as many full nominators as there are modes, where 2 nominate and any remaining modes require approval in the discussion before qualifying.
89.80% 44
Total votes: 49
Please sign in to vote.
show more
posted
can timing be a mode
posted
"You have been kicked from standard mode because you didn't show enough understanding of taiko"
posted

Sinnoh wrote:

"You have been kicked from standard mode because you didn't show enough understanding of taiko"
This what I wanna ask lol

U need to clarify about dq point for each modes so hybrid is still exists in the future.

If somethin like sinnoh said, all nominator from each mod wont nominate becuase that thing.

Thx
posted
The bn who approved/nominated their mode should take full responsibility for DQ's/vetoes caused by that mode, unless it was for general stuff (ie metadata).
posted

Sinnoh wrote:

"You have been kicked from standard mode because you didn't show enough understanding of taiko"

Nao Tomori wrote:

why would you put responsibility for mania issues on a standard bn? lol
posted
I don't want to get blamed for a mode I am not proficient, that just make no sense at all.

Also, how'll the technical aspect work? Do we get a overhaul of the nomination page where the respective BN needs to click on the nomination button to have that mode nominated?
posted
" **Hybrid beatmapsets must be nominated by full nominators from two of its modes in order to be qualified**, as well as gain clear approval from any remaining modes' nominators in the modding discussion. This means only full members may nominate hybrid sets, and ensures that a full nominator takes responsibility for each mode (regardless of nominating or just giving approval in the discussion)."

I don't think this was implemented in the way the public clearly wanted as shown by the poll. The way it was written in the official ruling is that it only requires two Full Mode nominators, not one full mode nominator per gamemode. The way its currently is written opens up 3-4 gamemode hybrid sets being nominated by 2 Full mode BNs and having the other 2 gamemodes being approved by probation BNs. I don't think this is at all what the public wanted.

It seems obvious to me that most people want 1 full mode nominator per gamemode.

Noffy wrote:

2. Require as many full nominators as there are modes, where 2 nominate and any remaining modes require approval in the discussion before qualifying.
This can be easily fixed by changing

Hybrid beatmapsets must be nominated by full nominators from two of its modes in order to be qualified, as well as gain clear approval from any remaining modes' nominators in the modding discussion. This means only full members may nominate hybrid sets, and ensures that a full nominator takes responsibility for each mode (regardless of nominating or just giving approval in the discussion).
to

Hybrid beatmapsets must be nominated by full nominators from two of its modes in order to be qualified, as well as gain clear approval from any remaining modes' full nominators in the modding discussion. This means only full members may nominate hybrid sets, and ensures that a full nominator takes responsibility for each mode (regardless of nominating or just giving approval in the discussion).
posted
Would it be possible to update the modding discussions panel to automatically change number of nominations required depending on how many modes were detected in the map set?

Like making the nomination bar have three ticks instead of 2 when three modes are detected, and four when 4 modes are detected?

This would make the amount of nominations clearer for everyone and would be a welcome visual change.
posted
so am i two bns if i'm modding osu! / osu!taiko hybrids or am i one bn?
posted
posted
It doesn't really make sense that multi mode BNs can approve 2 modes but they can't qualify a hybrid map along with a probationary BN. Like, if they are full BNs in 2 modes, they already take the responsibility for both of them so why is another full BN needed?
Btw "In this scenario, nominators proficient in multiple modes can approve more than one mode." sounds like they can nominate more than one mode (idk if hybrid v1 maps still exist but it's better to clarify it nonetheless) so I would just add "but only nominate one of them" at the end.
posted
merged
Please sign in to reply.