forum

Fetish thread

posted
Total Posts
129
show more
levesterz
Should i do a leg thread ver 3 :too many leg?
Achromalia

levesterz wrote:

Should i do a leg thread ver 3 :too many leg?
the mystery of the third leg?
Penguin

Achromalia wrote:

levesterz wrote:

Should i do a leg thread ver 3 :too many leg?
the mystery of the third leg?
wow, i can't believe that mr president didn't even respond to me. gosh im hurt.
Achromalia

Penguin wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

levesterz wrote:

Should i do a leg thread ver 3 :too many leg?


the mystery of the third leg?

wow, i can't believe that mr president didn't even respond to me. gosh im hurt.


well, I don't have anything against hand threads. I'm not sure if I needed to respond, but yes, I allow hand threads.
Westonini
perhaps I could lend you a hand with that
abraker
all five fingers too or?
Westonini
sorry, that's a bit too generous for me.
Achromalia
Add 3 of Westonini's fingers to the hand thread.
keremaru
add 50 of westonini's fingers
abraker
Is that like some kind of black market commodity?

Did they steal my tech to manufacture the shit?

WHO ARE THE PEOPLE TELL ME!!!
Westonini
but I need me fingies
pentaqola
l i c k
t h e
f i n g e r s

e a t
t h e
f i n g e r s

p l e a s e
t h e
f i n g e r s

b e
t h e
f i n g e r s
Westonini
o my
abraker





There is something about C̷͘O̷͘͜͡͡D̷̡̡͟͞É ̷̵R҉́͢͢È͝҉͠the finge Ć̶O̢̧̕͢͝N͝͞Ţ͡À̡̕I͡͏̴̧N̡̧͢͞M̀͢͏E̵͏̸͢Ņ̧͢T̶̨̧ ̶͟҉̨҉A͝͠L̷̨̕ BREać̡̛͜͟H̕͜͞ that ihyponot RU̧̡̧N̴̡̨̡

Westonini


everyone's favorite game.
payney
i can only offer 2 of my hands to the hand thread, sorry.
abraker
What you need then is a small loan for hands with an interest rate as low as 2 fingers.
levesterz
With that loan we can build a palm?
Aiseca

charamaru wrote:

i can only offer 2 of my hands to the hand thread, sorry.

Westonini also accepts bananas, remind you.
Westonini
I do enjoy a good banana
abraker
payney
Westonini

abraker wrote:

oh well here you go then

the hell is this thing
levesterz

abraker wrote:

oh well here you go then
Now thats my kink
Achromalia
hi hello i have a fetish for points in thread necromancy

oh and uh

there's points in thread necromancy.
Radiohead
ok


cries
Plini


prefer it without the banana tho
abraker
wew
that's enough OT for one day
Dawns
being told i matter uwu....
Penguin

Plini wrote:

[CENSORED]

prefer it without the banana tho
that is awful
ColdTooth

Penguin wrote:

Plini wrote:

[CENSORED]

prefer it without the banana tho
that is awful
hey! no kinkshaming!

unless kinkshaming is your kink
abraker
a kink of kinkshaming your kink also is kink with kink within kink
TheLegendaryHD
furry fetish disgust me, they literally trying to kill human civilization
they value animals more than humans
Achromalia
A kink in which you kinkshame your own kink of the kinks, folds and creases of the household hose.
Penguin
I think it’s funny how people try and “normalize” kinks and say that they are 100% normal. The definition of kink is a sharp twist in something that is otherwise straight, like a kink in a water hose. They’re not supposed to be normal.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that kinks are inherently bad. Just that they aren’t normal. It’s fine to not be normal.

There are some kinks that are bad though. Sometimes there’s good abnormalities and bad abnormalities.

Eh, I feel like this is just a strawman argument, I don’t know. I personally haven’t really run into many people trying to normalize such things.
Westonini
The kink itself may not be something that's normal, but I think it's normal to have one.
Achromalia

Westonini wrote:

The kink itself may not be something that's normal, but I think it's normal to have one.
I definitely agree with this.

I don't think it's particularly wrong to have kinks.

It depends to some extent on what kink it is, as sometimes this'll involve something quite explicitly illegal.

But if it's merely borders on something and cannot be directly equated with anything illegal, I think the kink would be okay by humanity's standards.

Otherwise, it'd be illegal, y'know?
Penguin

Achromalia wrote:

Westonini wrote:

The kink itself may not be something that's normal, but I think it's normal to have one.
I definitely agree with this.

I don't think it's particularly wrong to have kinks.

It depends to some extent on what kink it is, as sometimes this'll involve something quite explicitly illegal.

But if it's merely borders on something and cannot be directly equated with anything illegal, I think the kink would be okay by humanity's standards.

Otherwise, it'd be illegal, y'know?
I agree!
Achromalia
i've got a fetish for insightful discussions!
Dawns
ma'am this is a wendy's
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply