osht. wait, then in that case aren't you able to tell who the baddies are?
forum
Great Idea Mafia Game Over
posted
Total Posts
410
it only works if they are taking about mafia stuff
*taking -> thinking
damn so you're basically saying that the mafia members are so well hidden among us to the point that even their minds don't shed a hint of malice? perhaps they don't even realize they're apart of the mafia..
yes
vote: Westonini
vote: Westonini
Clearly it's Penguin's intention to eliminate everyone as fast as possible.
Vote: Penguin
Vote: Penguin
Topic Starter
Vote Count 1.2
Husa (1) - Penguin
Westonini (1) - abraker
Penguin (1) - Death
Not Voting (5) - Husa, cravenfinder, Westonini, keremal, GuyInFreezer
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline: Feb 8th 2019 - 5:22 PM ESTWestonini (1) - abraker
Penguin (1) - Death
Not Voting (5) - Husa, cravenfinder, Westonini, keremal, GuyInFreezer
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch
Penguin has been marked by Death
see what I did there e◡e
see what I did there e◡e
Please allow me to have a few more minutes to think about that one abraker.
vote: Westonini
for good measure
for good measure
oh shit.
it's way too early in the game to start lynching people but ok lmao
clearly, unless you're guessing at him being a detective :harddthonq:
Vote: Death
unless you can't vote against someone who already voted, then in that case i'll go with No vote.
- don't wanna go killing first day, qwq
it's way too early in the game to start lynching people but ok lmao
Death wrote:
Clearly it's Penguin's intention to eliminate everyone as fast as possible.
clearly, unless you're guessing at him being a detective :harddthonq:
Vote: Death
unless you can't vote against someone who already voted, then in that case i'll go with No vote.
- don't wanna go killing first day, qwq
The only way someone won't be lynched is if there are absolutely no votes for anyonekeremal wrote:
- don't wanna go killing first day, qwq
keremal wrote:
oh shit.
it's way too early in the game to start lynching people but ok lmao
contradicting yourself, huh?keremal wrote:
Vote: Death
abraker wrote:
The only way someone won't be lynched is if there are absolutely no votes for anyonekeremal wrote:
- don't wanna go killing first day, qwq
meant me personally, not sure about the rest of you zzz
Penguin wrote:
keremal wrote:
oh shit.
it's way too early in the game to start lynching people but ok lmaokeremal wrote:
Vote: Death
contradicting yourself, huh?
all about that self-contradictory today xf
now that is a big thonktea for me.... ewePenguin wrote:
makes sense.
Vote: Husa
abraker wrote:
Do you hear that? "I'm gonna vote a townie, but it's a friendly vote because I am town and town does not lynch other fellow town."
That sounds like a scum trying to make himself appear as town. I'm on to you ( =.=)<
But how do ya know that Husa is town?
I don't.
Sus list: kere
Possibly sus list: Westo, craven
Kere is playing the "I'm town so I don't want to kill anyone yet!" card which makes me think he's trying to come off as town.
Westo is just kinda spouting off randomly and craven is in the same category as kere.
Possibly sus list: Westo, craven
Kere is playing the "I'm town so I don't want to kill anyone yet!" card which makes me think he's trying to come off as town.
Westo is just kinda spouting off randomly and craven is in the same category as kere.
Topic Starter
Vote Count 1.3
Husa (1) - Penguin
Westonini (1) - abraker
Penguin (1) - Death
Death (1) - keremal
GuyInFreezer (1) - Husa
Not Voting (3) - cravenfinder, Westonini, GuyInFreezer
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline: Feb 8th 2019 - 5:22 PM ESTWestonini (1) - abraker
Penguin (1) - Death
Death (1) - keremal
GuyInFreezer (1) - Husa
Not Voting (3) - cravenfinder, Westonini, GuyInFreezer
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch
All Kere said wasPenguin wrote:
Kere is playing the "I'm town so I don't want to kill anyone yet!" card which makes me think he's trying to come off as town.
AND YOU SAIDkeremal wrote:
oh shit.
it's way too early in the game to start lynching people but ok lmao...
unless you can't vote against someone who already voted, then in that case i'll go with No vote.
- don't wanna go killing first day, qwq
"I'm gonna vote a townie, but it's a friendly vote because I am town and town does not lynch other fellow town."Penguin wrote:
No reason, I just wanted to throw a vote out there. I don't plan on actually lynching Husa lol
goddamn hypocrite scum
First off, my vote was RVS, so you're accusation of me is completely baseless.
Secondly, there's a huge interpretable difference between what I said and what kere said. I was merely explaining to you that I was RVSing. Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.
Based on your reaction to what I've been saying, it seems like you are trying to find small and random accusations, which make no sense, so that you can put others in the spotlight while keeping the attention off of yourself.
This theory makes no sense. What does "friendly vote" even mean?
Seems like youre trying to defend Kere though, makes me wonder..
Secondly, there's a huge interpretable difference between what I said and what kere said. I was merely explaining to you that I was RVSing. Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.
Based on your reaction to what I've been saying, it seems like you are trying to find small and random accusations, which make no sense, so that you can put others in the spotlight while keeping the attention off of yourself.
abraker wrote:
"I'm gonna vote a townie, but it's a friendly vote because I am town and town does not lynch other fellow town."
This theory makes no sense. What does "friendly vote" even mean?
Seems like youre trying to defend Kere though, makes me wonder..
it means that one votes the other of the same party to fend off suspicionPenguin wrote:
This theory makes no sense. What does "friendly vote" even mean?
Your claim that your vote was RVS may as well be a liePenguin wrote:
First off, my vote was RVS, so you're accusation of me is completely baseless.
I dont see it. How should I come to such conclusion?Penguin wrote:
Secondly, there's a huge interpretable difference between what I said and what kere said. I was merely explaining to you that I was RVSing. Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.
Nice try but it's going to take more than that to bounce back suspicion toward me. The way you reply and the way you react is evidence. The small and random accusations you speak of is nothing more than you trying to get me off your back.Penguin wrote:
Based on your reaction to what I've been saying, it seems like you are trying to find small and random accusations, which make no sense, so that you can put others in the spotlight while keeping the attention off of yourself.
Also here is a good example in how you reply and react tells me you are scum. You panicking lowers your logical ability. So much so that you fail to find contradictions in your own writing. Observe:
Penguin wrote:
First off, my vote was RVS
So did you vote because of RVS or did you vote because you think kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us? So much for small and random accusations. That will not fly as your accuse, scum.Penguin wrote:
Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.
*accuse -> excuse
abraker wrote:
it means that one votes the other of the same party to fend off suspicionPenguin wrote:
This theory makes no sense. What does "friendly vote" even mean?
Still makes no sense, voting for a townie wouldn't fend off suspicion at all. Nobody knows who's a townie at this stage anyways.
abraker wrote:
Your claim that your vote was RVS may as well be a lie
Why?
abraker wrote:
I dont see it. How should I come to such conclusion?Penguin wrote:
Secondly, there's a huge interpretable difference between what I said and what kere said. I was merely explaining to you that I was RVSing. Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.
Because I was claiming that I was RVSing and Kere was claiming he didn't want to lynch anyone so soon. I never tried to claim that I don't want to lynch anyone so that I would come off as sweet and innocent. I only explained that my vote was RVS because you asked why I voted. It's not so hard to tell the difference.
abraker wrote:
Nice try but it's going to take more than that to bounce back suspicion toward me. The way you reply and the way you react is evidence. The small and random accusations you speak of is nothing more than you trying to get me off your back.
This literally made no sense.
abraker wrote:
Also here is a good example in how you reply and react tells me you are scum. You panicking lowers your logical ability. So much so that you fail to find contradictions in your own writing. Observe:
Penguin wrote:
First off, my vote was RVSPenguin wrote:
Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.
So did you vote because of RVS or did you vote because you think kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us?
Need I remind you that I only ever voted for Husa as an RVS at the very beginning of the game? I never voted for kere, so your argument is null. I have not contradicted myself at all.
Also, your argument about me "panicking" makes no sense since I have all the time in the world to read and post since this is a forum based game. Once again, it just seems like you're trying to make baseless accusations on trivial and senseless things.
Vote: abraker
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
Penguin is a safe town read
abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
You're possibly saying this because you realize your faults and now your trying to backtrack and do damage control.
But you really weren't making much sense. You're usually very well put together and logical on the forums, so maybe it was a test. You might be town, but I'm still very suspisious of you.
abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
Why do you think so? Is it because he stayed calm and collective while under fire? I'm not asking this to accuse Penguin or anything, but I believe most would react the way he did. Townie or not.
abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
Now you gotta share with us what was the reaction you were looking for and how penguin met the expectation.
Rxn testing 101.
Apparently I missed this post and I posted the literally same thing. rippoWestonini wrote:
Why do you think so? Is it because he stayed calm and collective while under fire? I'm not asking this to accuse Penguin or anything, but I believe most would react the way he did. Townie or not.abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
Main reason is because Penguin did not vote me after all that and remained on Husa. Give mafia a reason to vote someone and they will take it, and that will be their excuse when the lynched does turn town.
Oh wait he did. I'll reply again when I have the beer out of my system :\
Wait, but he did vote for you.
Penguin wrote:
Vote: abraker
abraker wrote:
Main reason is because Penguin did not vote me after all that and remained on Husa. Give mafia a reason to vote someone and they will take it, and that will be their excuse when the lynched does turn town.
I was expecting an actual reason for your "scum bait". A simple vote isn't sufficient enough to determine a scum read. Now just seems like you're trying to make an excuse to cover up for your scum-like behavior before.
I don't buy the whole "beer" thing at all too lmao. Sounds like you're stretching for excuses.
Topic Starter
Vote Count 1.4
Westonini (1) - abraker
Penguin (1) - Death
Death (1) - keremal
GuyInFreezer (1) - Husa
abraker (1) - Penguin
Not Voting (3) - cravenfinder, Westonini, GuyInFreezer
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline: Feb 8th 2019 - 5:22 PM ESTPenguin (1) - Death
Death (1) - keremal
GuyInFreezer (1) - Husa
abraker (1) - Penguin
Not Voting (3) - cravenfinder, Westonini, GuyInFreezer
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch