i've skimmed the thread, but i may have missed it-allow me to voice some concerns in a really, really nerdy way (and let me make clear i speak for taiko and taiko only)
i believe this proposal in giving BNs the DQ button and forcing all nominators to vote on a veto will result in a majoritarian democracy and tyranny of the majority in which if you find yourself in the minority over any subjective issue, you're tough out of luck. perhaps it may be a bit pessimisstic and paranoid, however i think this will create a war of pulling in your friends that agree with you into the BNG so they can agree with you and you can win vetoes.
i firmly believe that subjective more complicated issues that may or may not warrant a DQ should be left in the hands of those who are experienced in their knowledge. i can get behind all BNs allowed to DQ unrankable issues to keep things moving, however subjective things should be left to those who are experienced.
i think a good talking point to prevent the tyranny of the majority is to require a supermajority-or 2/3 vote-in order for a veto to be sustained or overruled. along with that, assuming probation would still exist, probationary BNs should only be allowed to DQ maps with unrankable issues, not subjective ones. those who have shown questionable judgment or are new to the BNG don't have the experience necessary to mediate in complicated issues, in my opinion.
if anyone has expressed these ideas or if there is a need for clarification, pls be nice to me c:
i believe this proposal in giving BNs the DQ button and forcing all nominators to vote on a veto will result in a majoritarian democracy and tyranny of the majority in which if you find yourself in the minority over any subjective issue, you're tough out of luck. perhaps it may be a bit pessimisstic and paranoid, however i think this will create a war of pulling in your friends that agree with you into the BNG so they can agree with you and you can win vetoes.
i firmly believe that subjective more complicated issues that may or may not warrant a DQ should be left in the hands of those who are experienced in their knowledge. i can get behind all BNs allowed to DQ unrankable issues to keep things moving, however subjective things should be left to those who are experienced.
i think a good talking point to prevent the tyranny of the majority is to require a supermajority-or 2/3 vote-in order for a veto to be sustained or overruled. along with that, assuming probation would still exist, probationary BNs should only be allowed to DQ maps with unrankable issues, not subjective ones. those who have shown questionable judgment or are new to the BNG don't have the experience necessary to mediate in complicated issues, in my opinion.
if anyone has expressed these ideas or if there is a need for clarification, pls be nice to me c: