The only thing which came to my mind right after I finished reading the draft is the following question:
So, if the tests will stay, how are they going to look like? Or rather, how frequently are you going update them? Because there were cases where people got accepted with others' help (revealing the whole test and the answers and similar) with the test. The only solutions which come to mind is whether you come up with a dynamic system or you update the tests pretty much daily / or you make seperate tests for each individual applicants (or even more than one, given the chance they might fail). The first option would be far more ideal obviously but I can hardly imagine a possible way to do it, the second option is well....time consuming and redundant so it is probably not the way it should go as far as I can tell.
Now, obviously you mention that the "implementation of this system might take some time to prepare" but it is probably worth the time to play with the thoughts before you actually start making this system becoming real.
Also, please keep in mind that I'm fairly outdated with how BNs get promoted nowadays (thus I don't really know how a "proficiency test" really looks like today if those have been changed) so please ignore me if my question didn't make any sense in the current context.
Draft wrote:
Applications for joining the Beatmap Nominators will mostly stay the same but instead of holding them every three months, they will be open at any point in time.
The applications will still be composed of two parts, a ranking criteria proficiency test and a manual evaluation by members of the “Management Team”.
So, if the tests will stay, how are they going to look like? Or rather, how frequently are you going update them? Because there were cases where people got accepted with others' help (revealing the whole test and the answers and similar) with the test. The only solutions which come to mind is whether you come up with a dynamic system or you update the tests pretty much daily / or you make seperate tests for each individual applicants (or even more than one, given the chance they might fail). The first option would be far more ideal obviously but I can hardly imagine a possible way to do it, the second option is well....time consuming and redundant so it is probably not the way it should go as far as I can tell.
Now, obviously you mention that the "implementation of this system might take some time to prepare" but it is probably worth the time to play with the thoughts before you actually start making this system becoming real.
Also, please keep in mind that I'm fairly outdated with how BNs get promoted nowadays (thus I don't really know how a "proficiency test" really looks like today if those have been changed) so please ignore me if my question didn't make any sense in the current context.