KOTOKO - Agony · forum

IceBeam

osu! Alumni

Joined December 2009

Topic Starter

IceBeam 2012-05-26T15:43:40+00:00

This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 19 сентября 2012 г. at 23:14:23

Artist: KOTOKO
Title: Agony
Source: Kannazuki no Miko
Tags: reiji-rj ending
BPM: 132
Filesize: 6513kb
Play Time: 03:36
Difficulties Available:

Easy (1,34 stars, 171 notes)
Hard (4,93 stars, 601 notes)
Normal (2,76 stars, 222 notes)

Download: KOTOKO - Agony
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
12-th map

one of the first songs/maps I liked in osu,so I suddenly made my own version
I tried to make it look a little old-school,not sure if it's succeed.

Easy by me
Normal by Reiji-RJ
Hard by me

Last edited by IceBeam 2012-09-19T20:16:36+00:00, edited 13 times in total.

Reiji-RJ

1,402 posts

Joined April 2010

Reiji-RJ 2012-05-26T15:49:08+00:00

*bows down*

cRyo[iceeicee]

1,885 posts

Joined May 2011

cRyo[iceeicee] 2012-05-27T05:18:43+00:00

:3

Tony

1,510 posts

Joined July 2010

Tony 2012-05-27T14:40:48+00:00

wat?? :3

Natsume

Natsume 2012-06-22T01:19:08+00:00

Наконец-то отличный ремап на отличную песню. Нравится.

YTYuyu

osu! Alumni

4,146 posts

Joined January 2011

YTYuyu 2012-08-15T22:14:09+00:00

oh my you're mapping this song...i'll see what i can find. found this on #modreqs.

Bold: Unrankable/must fix.
Red: You should fix it, but it's up to you.
Italic: Suggestion. Feel free to ignore this if you don't like it.
Blue: Comment. I'll give you my opinion, advice, or if i'm curious about something.

[General]
consider adding "ending" in the tags since this is the ending of the anime.
you have the change the bitrate...it's at 320 and that's unrankable due to the filesize. change it to 128-192 to show that it's rankable.
the preview times are inconsistent. Easy's preview time is off by 60ms compared to the other diffs.

[Easy]
weird...decrease every setting by 1. the normal diff has the same thing. keep the circle size. it fits with a song like this. about the others...i feel that it'd be a bit too hard for beginners to clear or keep up IMO.
00:06:527 (3) - since you have a whistle at the end of the previous note, i think adding a whistle at both ends sounds better as it plays nicely with the piano IMO.
00:10:164 (3) - ^
00:13:800 (3) - ^
00:17:436 (3) - ^
00:18:800 (2) - move this slider up by 1/1. it'll be consistent with the last few combos that follow the piano in this part.
00:36:527 (1) - i think it'd be easier if you can do Ctrl+J for this. i feel that beginners might let go when the overlap is reached. it'd be easier for beginners to do as the path is straightforward and easier IMO.
01:16:527 (1) - same as above, but try the other way...in other words, move it to the right so that the note gets technically blanketed.
01:24:027 (1) - extend this spinner by 4/1. the vocals are fading from here.
01:41:073 (3) - i suggest making this a curved slider pointing up to represent the change in the vocals...right when you're about to hit the beginning, the volume in the vocals suddenly shoots up to the default volume.
01:51:073 (2) - i can hear cymbals at the left side of my headphones, so add a finish at the end to match it.
02:31:982 (3) - idk...i can see the feeling in this slider, but it isn't curved nicely...curve it more to give off that feeling to the song.
02:36:982 (2) - hmm...curve this slider like (2). i feel that by doing this, the flow would keep going during gameplay.
02:44:254 (2) - ^
03:36:754 (1) - same as 01:24:027.

[Normal]
i think increasing the settings by 1 (except CS) would fit with a song like this for a somewhat smoother flow and i also feel that the diff settings would be balanced.
00:03:800 (1) - maybe you can add a whistle here so that it'd be consistent with the easy diff?
00:13:800 (4) - same as above, but not for consistency, but i think that it plays nicely with the vocals.
00:17:436 (4) - ^
00:29:027 - maybe you can add a circle or a repeat here to follow the vocals, and to make the diff somewhat interesting for players? since this is the 2nd diff, there should be a bit of a challenge for players for this IMO.
00:32:664 - ^
00:52:777 (1) - consider moving this spinner 1/4 up to give players a bit of time to get ready to spin. i feel that moving it here might surprise players during gameplay.
01:00:164 (3) - remove that whistle. it just sounds weird and i feel that it sounds unfitting with the finish for this part of the song.
01:04:709 (5) - similar as above, this time add a whistle at the beginning to emphasize the instrumental in the song.
01:09:254 (1) - i feel that this note should be stacked on the other 3 notes because the vocal tone is the same and it doesn't change until the end of the slider.
01:20:277 (1) - same as 00:52:777.
01:22:436 (1) - the vocals continue here, so i feel that a spinner doesn't fit in this part of the song. i suggest something like this. this pattern should follow the vocals nicely in this part of the song. you can come up with
01:41:982 (1) - do manual stacking on this so that it'd be consistent with the other stacks in the song.
01:43:800 (3) - consider making this slider look like (1) to keep the flow going since the vocal tone is the same as (1).
01:44:482 - same as 00:29:027.
01:57:436 (3) - i feel that the whistle isn't loud enough to match the vocals...replace it for a finish to match the vocals in the song.
01:59:254 (3) - ^
02:05:391 (4) - do manual stacking here since you did it on (1,2).
02:05:504 (1) - same as 00:52:777.
02:15:391 (2,3,4,5) - same as 02:05:391, but on (3,5).
02:17:209 (1,2) - ^ this time on (2).
02:27:436 (4) - same as 01:57:436, but it's the instrumental.
02:29:936 (2,3,4,5) - same as 02:15:391.
03:34:482 (3,4) - ^
03:36:641 (1) - same as 01:24:027 on easy.
oh yea i forgot to mention: i suggest that you add whistles at the beginning of the song like the easy diff. it'll be consistent throughout the mapset if you do.

[Hard]
00:05:845 (5,6) - consider manual stacking here like you did on easy?
00:08:345 (3) - curve this slider a lot more to emphasize the instrumental in this part of the song. you did in on the last 2 sliders so i think doing it here would be consistent.
00:10:845 - same as normal. either add a repeat or a circle to follow the instrumental in the song. i think it'll keep that rhythm of the piano going.
00:14:482 - add a circle here. they should follow both the instrumental and the vocals in this part.
00:18:118 - ^
00:20:504 (6,7,8) - same as 00:05:845, but for consistency with the stacks.
00:23:800 (1) - why don't you do an alternating pattern to follow the drums and vocals...let's start with 2 1/8 kick sliders from downbeat to downbeat and from 00:24:709, add 3 or 4 1/8 kick sliders to follow vocals. i think doing this would make it fun for players during gameplay IMO.
00:46:414 - add a circle here because it follows the vocals. the vocals quickly speed up at this part.
00:46:754 (10,11) - this part doesn't fit with the vocals. i feel that the flow is already broken since it's following something different whereas this part focuses on vocals IMO. i suggest a circle and a 1/2 slider to follow the vocals nicely.
01:23:914 (1) - same as 01:24:027 on easy.
01:59:482 (10,11) - same as 00:46:754.
03:36:641 (1) - same as 01:23:914.
i highly suggest that you do manual stacking because i saw the stacks and they are perfectly stacked...if you do this, then it'll be consistent throughout the whole mapset, and same comment as normal about the whistles.

i guess that's it. GL

IceBeam

osu! Alumni

1,957 posts

Joined December 2009

Topic Starter

IceBeam 2012-08-16T10:35:40+00:00

Byakugan249 wrote:
[General]
consider adding "ending" in the tags since this is the ending of the anime. why not
you have the change the bitrate...it's at 320 and that's unrankable due to the filesize. change it to 128-192 to show that it's rankable. okay
the preview times are inconsistent. Easy's preview time is off by 60ms compared to the other diffs. my bad,fixed

[Easy]
weird...decrease every setting by 1. the normal diff has the same thing. keep the circle size. it fits with a song like this. about the others...i feel that it'd be a bit too hard for beginners to clear or keep up IMO. reduced OD and AR
00:06:527 (3) - since you have a whistle at the end of the previous note, i think adding a whistle at both ends sounds better as it plays nicely with the piano IMO.
00:10:164 (3) - ^
00:13:800 (3) - ^
00:17:436 (3) - ^ well,I re-arranged this part,thanks
00:18:800 (2) - move this slider up by 1/1. it'll be consistent with the last few combos that follow the piano in this part. well yes,but I don't follow piano here at all :s
00:36:527 (1) - i think it'd be easier if you can do Ctrl+J for this. i feel that beginners might let go when the overlap is reached. it'd be easier for beginners to do as the path is straightforward and easier IMO. well,then I should remove all overlaps from the map,there're pretty much of them. I think it's fine
01:16:527 (1) - same as above, but try the other way...in other words, move it to the right so that the note gets technically blanketed.
01:24:027 (1) - extend this spinner by 4/1. the vocals are fading from here. sure
01:41:073 (3) - i suggest making this a curved slider pointing up to represent the change in the vocals...right when you're about to hit the beginning, the volume in the vocals suddenly shoots up to the default volume. I didn't get it
01:51:073 (2) - i can hear cymbals at the left side of my headphones, so add a finish at the end to match it. it's intentional,I removed them by own
02:31:982 (3) - idk...i can see the feeling in this slider, but it isn't curved nicely...curve it more to give off that feeling to the song. then I have my own feeling it's fine to me
02:36:982 (2) - hmm...curve this slider like (2). i feel that by doing this, the flow would keep going during gameplay. nono it should be like that
02:44:254 (2) - ^
03:36:754 (1) - same as 01:24:027. done

[Hard]
00:05:845 (5,6) - consider manual stacking here like you did on easy? nope,it was intentional
00:08:345 (3) - curve this slider a lot more to emphasize the instrumental in this part of the song. you did in on the last 2 sliders so i think doing it here would be consistent. I'll keep mine
00:10:845 - same as normal. either add a repeat or a circle to follow the instrumental in the song. i think it'll keep that rhythm of the piano going. err..no I think
00:14:482 - add a circle here. they should follow both the instrumental and the vocals in this part. this part is simpified :s
00:18:118 - ^
00:20:504 (6,7,8) - same as 00:05:845, but for consistency with the stacks. it's fine..just grid 3 and it's glory
00:23:800 (1) - why don't you do an alternating pattern to follow the drums and vocals...let's start with 2 1/8 kick sliders from downbeat to downbeat and from 00:24:709, add 3 or 4 1/8 kick sliders to follow vocals. i think doing this would make it fun for players during gameplay IMO. sigh,oh well. I can't explain it right. I didn't aim to make a fun map. I aimed to do a map in outdated style,so such things just won't fit
00:46:414 - add a circle here because it follows the vocals. the vocals quickly speed up at this part. sounds good,but I can't break this pattern,it's same all over the map
00:46:754 (10,11) - this part doesn't fit with the vocals. i feel that the flow is already broken since it's following something different whereas this part focuses on vocals IMO. i suggest a circle and a 1/2 slider to follow the vocals nicely. it doesn't follows vocals at all xD why would I do this
01:23:914 (1) - same as 01:24:027 on easy. fixed
01:59:482 (10,11) - same as 00:46:754. well already replied
03:36:641 (1) - same as 01:23:914. okay
i highly suggest that you do manual stacking because i saw the stacks and they are perfectly stacked...if you do this, then it'll be consistent throughout the whole mapset, and same comment as normal about the whistles.

i guess that's it. GL

thanks a lot!

ryuu

802 posts

Joined February 2011

ryuu 2012-08-16T10:52:09+00:00

привет, няши :3
решила вот глянуть, потому что потом будет лень ._.
я, наверно, буду очень нази ;_; сразу извиняюсь

[General]

agony.mp3 192kb/s
на бг можно забить, это не сильно важно.
про превью сказали выше.

[Easy]

00:13:800 (3,1) - на 231, 135
00:22:46 (2) - ладно там, два выше. но третий уже скучно. может как-нибудь по-другому закрутить?
00:23:800 (3) - мне нравится этот слайдер. и я короче попыталась немного поправить его. не помню координаты всех точек. запишу все. 1я - та же. 2я - 88, 217. 3я - 57, 179. 4я - 57, 114. 5я - 98, 71. 6я - 160, 60. 7я - 217, 98. 8я - 223, 144. 9я - 203, 182. у ещё надо будет изменить угол поворота ;_; да. блять. не там немного. так что забей.
00:40:618 (2) - 2я - 176, 308. 3я - 196, 276. 5я - на своё усмотрение.
00:58:800 (2) - не помню, что меняла ;_; так что. 3я - 300, 244. 4я - 264, 284. 5я - 224, 296.
01:00:164 (3,4) - 203, 218. (без грид снапа, угу)
01:09:709 (2) - 4я - 264, 242. 5я - 260,
276. 6я (на всякий случай) - 286, 314.
01:11:527 (4) - 3я - 408, 212. 4я - 432, 240 , 5я - 432, 272,6я - 416, 304.
02:22:436 (2) - вот у него такая странная форма. ну то есть. мне кажется, неуместная. можно вот так сделать http://puu.sh/VQfz

[Normal]

рейджик охуенная! *------*
милые хитсаунды ;____;
милые слайдеры ;_______;

[Hard]

00:36:527 (1,2,1,2,1) - клеееееево :о
01:23:289 - зелёная линия не на тике

блин. ну так нечестно. мне всё нравится ;______________;
бу.
всё. мне только нечего сказать.
соу глупый мод ;_;
мне стыдно.

IceBeam

osu! Alumni

1,957 posts

Joined December 2009

Topic Starter

IceBeam 2012-08-16T11:37:36+00:00

ryuu wrote:
привет, няши :3 привет,няша!
решила вот глянуть, потому что потом будет лень ._.
я, наверно, буду очень нази ;_; сразу извиняюсь /me hides

[General]

agony.mp3 192kb/s спасибо :О
на бг можно забить, это не сильно важно.
про превью сказали выше. превью пофиксил,бг просто сжал,но не обрезал

[Easy]

00:13:800 (3,1) - на 231, 135 сделал
00:22:46 (2) - ладно там, два выше. но третий уже скучно. может как-нибудь по-другому закрутить? я не умею xD да и любое другое симметричное уже не будет смотреться,из-за тех двух
00:23:800 (3) - мне нравится этот слайдер. и я короче попыталась немного поправить его. не помню координаты всех точек. запишу все. 1я - та же. 2я - 88, 217. 3я - 57, 179. 4я - 57, 114. 5я - 98, 71. 6я - 160, 60. 7я - 217, 98. 8я - 223, 144. 9я - 203, 182. у ещё надо будет изменить угол поворота ;_; да. блять. не там немного. так что забей. что-то я пробовал пробовал и поломал все D:
00:40:618 (2) - 2я - 176, 308. 3я - 196, 276. 5я - на своё усмотрение.
00:58:800 (2) - не помню, что меняла ;_; так что. 3я - 300, 244. 4я - 264, 284. 5я - 224, 296. попробовал,становится сильно коротким :<
01:00:164 (3,4) - 203, 218. (без грид снапа, угу) фиксд :3
01:09:709 (2) - 4я - 264, 242. 5я - 260, уф,вроде сделал,правда второй слайдер все равно кривой :с
276. 6я (на всякий случай) - 286, 314.
01:11:527 (4) - 3я - 408, 212. 4я - 432, 240 , 5я - 432, 272,6я - 416, 304.
02:22:436 (2) - вот у него такая странная форма. ну то есть. мне кажется, неуместная. можно вот так сделать http://puu.sh/VQfz ух,да это ж все переделывать D: пусть так уже :Р

[Normal]

рейджик охуенная! *------*
милые хитсаунды ;____;
милые слайдеры ;_______;

[Hard]

00:36:527 (1,2,1,2,1) - клеееееево :о
01:23:289 - зелёная линия не на тике зоркая ;3

блин. ну так нечестно. мне всё нравится ;______________;
бу.
всё. мне только нечего сказать.
соу глупый мод ;_;
мне стыдно.

бака,отличный мод! спасибо!

IceBeam

osu! Alumni

1,957 posts

Joined December 2009

Topic Starter

IceBeam 2012-08-16T12:13:46+00:00

changed mp3 and bg,redownload

Reiji-RJ

1,402 posts

Joined April 2010

Reiji-RJ 2012-08-16T12:47:06+00:00

Fixed some stuff /too lazy to post what I fixed xD/
Also, about whistles in the beginning - I like, when whisltles are beginning with vocal
Thank you!
Спасибо, Рюша :3

MoodyRPG

2,754 posts

Joined August 2010

MoodyRPG 2012-08-16T22:04:12+00:00

Hi my lovely IceBeam :3

General

• Nothing wrong here

Easy

- 00:34:709 (x) - To keep the flow here, add a note please

Normal

- 01:21:982 (T) - I think is much better if you end this kiai time here 01:23:800
- 01:49:027 (6) - Be careful about this note because is hard to see when I play this diff, just a suggestion

Hard

-- Nice stuff

Awesome job IceBeam and good luck

Last edited by MoodyRPG 2012-08-17T15:19:52+00:00, edited 1 time in total.

cRyo[iceeicee]

1,885 posts

Joined May 2011

cRyo[iceeicee] 2012-08-17T11:20:00+00:00

\o.o/

[General]
#why countdown x.x
~~#change diff names to Normal, Normal+, Normal++?~~

[Hard]

SPOILER

00:05:391 (4) - whistle ? (cause piano sounds a bit louder here)
00:09:027 (4) - ^^^
00:10:164 (7) - feels like simple slider sounds softer and better http://puu.sh/W8cw, because there is actually no sound in music at red tick, also this can be *whistled* cause it fits with piano *changing sound*
00:18:686 (2,4,6) - all this sliders using different spacing, i suggest you to use 0.5 spacing for last slider (so it will look like speed up(#1- 0.16 #2- 0.28, #3- 0.5) wich fit with music \o.o/) and 0.7 for this xD 00:22:323 (2) -
00:41:073 (4,5) - just my vison of this patern http://puu.sh/W8ev
00:43:573 (10,11,1) - y not make this same color for whole part ?
00:43:573 (10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - slightly increase volume for each finish ? i think it fits o:
00:46:754 (10,11) - http://puu.sh/W8fw sounds better for me cause triplet fits with vocal and slider folowing music better cause beat sound on white tick
here ( 00:46:300 (8,9) - also good triplet but i guess it will be too much of them ww)
00:51:073 (1) - make it more *jumpy* cause vocal louder here also note emphasized by music and ur finish sound
01:07:436 (5,6,7) - change this to triplet and note http://puu.sh/W8ig ? sounds better for me cause lyric will start from note instead of slider tail
01:09:936 (3) - start using whistles from here ? (like you did at 02:08:118 (3) - and 03:22:664 (3) - )
01:15:164 (10) - the only slider that using 0.8 spacing, all others using 0.5 max, so change it to keep consistency
01:21:186 (6,9) - claps for blue ticks ?
01:22:777 (4) - hmm maybe whistle ?
01:23:914 (1) - i dont understand your using in volume sections here, 70% of spinner almost silenced and then suddenly volume up \o.o/ http://puu.sh/W9lw (recheck it in testplay, sounds a bit strange ww)
01:56:300 (12,13,1) - y no
01:56:300 (12,13,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - slightly increase volume ?
01:59:027 (8,9,10,11) - same suggestion as before ( about changing it to triplet)
02:03:573 (9,10,1) - i hear drum sound in music here so probably add claps ? (also claps both head/tail for this 02:04:141 (2,3) - )
02:18:686 (2) - 0.4 between notes, 02:19:595 (4) - 0.3 , make it same ?
02:33:914 (4,7) - same about blue tick claps
02:35:504 (4) - same whistle suggestion
02:36:527 - 02:43:800 how about to use claps on every white tick, fits with background beat sound o: (same goes here 02:47:436 - 02:49:027)
03:00:164 - 03:01:982 use N sound for this part with low volume, fit with drums that suddenly appears here (also NC on switching hitsounds from S to N
03:06:527 (17) - use some + volume here ? cause it definitely sounds louder in music o:
03:07:891 (2) - NAZI MOD ON http://puu.sh/W8oA
03:11:073 (1,2) - put it in same direction to next note o: http://puu.sh/W8oP
03:33:914 (5,8) - blue tick claps ?
03:35:504 (4) - whistle ?

[Easy]

SPOILER

y so high settings for 1.54 star diff........ for me AR-2 fits much better for this bpm and star rating
consider to use blanket sample for sliderslide cause this long reverts like this 00:29:709 (2) - sounds very noisy x.x
00:03:800 (1) - whistle here ? (same with hard diff)
00:06:527 (3) - whistle on head instead of tail and then whistle on 00:07:436 (1) - sounds better for me
00:10:164 (3,1) - same here
00:13:800 (3,1) - same
00:17:436 (3) - same head whistle instead of tail
00:18:345 (1) - prefer to delete this note and move slider like this http://puu.sh/W96t
00:21:982 (1,2) - if u apply previous suggestion, ctrl+r for this sounds better i think o:
00:34:709 - +note here sounds much better ==+
00:38:345 (2) - doesnt it sounds better o: ? http://puu.sh/W997 also it will brings some variety to this pattern
00:51:073 (1,2,3,4) - looks like simple spam ^^, maybe this ? http://puu.sh/W9b6
01:01:982 (1) - dunno why but i was expecting 1 more repeat here when i played this, just saying ww
01:21:982 (3) - also wasnt expecting changing in SV here, probably better to add NC to show this speed change, also some different pattern can be applied here http://puu.sh/W9iA (and consider about this changing speed, does it really necessary here ?)
01:24:027 (1) - yeah this spinner again, make same sections with your Hard diff for this
01:36:527 - probably reduce break like this http://puu.sh/W9n0, looks more intuitive
01:51:073 (2) - same here http://puu.sh/W9o3 , just some variety
02:03:800 (1,2,3,4) - same pattern same suggestion ^^
03:05:618 (1,2) - i think ctrl+r sounds much better here, because according to music long slider starts together with that (new ?)loud stream sound, and note is perfect way to play this loud cymbal sound.
03:34:936 (1) - nooooooooo, i was like ~~watching movie and~~ playing this diff in relax mod (not osu mod xD) and then, so sudden, wtf!?!?!?! so fast spinner, and missed it www, maybe play this part with slider/notes and start spinner from downbeat i think its much better for 1.5star diff (also those spinners plays very strange, because last spinner sounds much better if it starts at downbeat ==||) (if u change first spinner to sliders dont forget to remove 0.75 section there)
I would probably used a bit different usage of slider/notes in this diff ( like put long sliders here 00:54:709 (1) - , and 00:56:527 (3) - ) but i guess u decided to keep ur own rhytm instead of sticking with vocal
Also i saw some 5% sections there, i heard that 5% is unrankable now, is it ?

[Reiji]

SPOILER

00:04:709 (3) - add whistle on head and repeat to follow piano ? (also silence 2nd tick please it doesnt match with music here )
00:06:527 (4) - whistle
00:07:436 (1) - whistle
00:08:345 (3) - same whistles same tick
00:10:164 (4) - whistle
00:11:982 (2) - whistle match with piano o:
00:15:618 (2) - and here (also sounds good with ur whistle rhytm)
00:31:982 (4) - clap on the head sounds good for me
00:35:618 (4) - same clap head
00:36:527 (1) - perhaps +10% volume, cause this BGmusic stream sounds pretty louder here (much louder then pattern )
00:44:709 (1) - i think finish sounds better, also u can slightly increase volume for each finish, i think it will sounds good here !
00:46:527 (1) - same thing about changing whistle to finish
00:47:436 (1) - hmm, i think simple pattern sounds better here, because you loosing clap with your long slider http://puu.sh/W9G4
00:51:073 (1) - change this note to short slider too prevent loosing ur clap rhytm ? http://puu.sh/W9QF (also some +star rating would be nice here)
00:51:982 (2) - clap match with drums here o:
00:52:891 (1) - the spinner is quite short + and its really hard to predict where it will ends + time distance between spinner and slider is quite short, all this is not good for 2.7 star diff and you might have problems with it during XAT's mod x:
So play this part with slider notes would be much better i guess http://puu.sh/W9Np
00:54:709 (1) - why speed up during kiai x.x
01:00:164 (3) - finish sounds better here ?
01:11:073 (3) - end slider 01:11:527 and add tail clap ? (and then swtich whistle and clap here 01:11:982 (4) - )
01:14:709 (3) - prefer finish then whistle here ^^
01:20:277 (1,1) - hmm maybe redesign this pattern and finish this part with looooong spinner (same with H and N diffs) (you can copy paste this 02:36:073 (1,2,3,1) - )
01:36:527 - probably reduce break like this http://puu.sh/W9n0, looks more intuitive
01:48:345 (5,6) - use regular spacing here like u did 00:35:618 (4,5) -
01:49:254 (1) - same suggestion about +volume
01:56:527 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - same suggestion about *only finish* and +volume for each
02:05:618 (1) - spinner again x.x
02:12:891 (3) - is it intended ? (finish + whistle)
02:17:209 (1) - RNC and add NC at 02:18:345 (3) - (like u did 01:05:618 (1) - )
02:24:709 (4) - clap here cause it match with drum and remove clap from 02:25:164 (5) - and add whistle instead
02:26:527 (2,3) - same here
02:27:436 (4) - finish instead of whistle
02:28:345 (5) - clap on head ?
02:55:618 (1,3) - maybe #1 whistle #2 finish ? boring soft is so boring ==||
02:59:254 (2) - whistle ?
03:00:164 - add N low volume section here cause u can clearly hear drum sound
03:14:709 (1,2,3,1,2) - i think this 2 parts should have identical hitsounds and NC 01:01:073 (1,2,3,4,5) -
03:25:618 - 03:28:800 recheck all parts that similar to this because some of them have whistles, some of them have finishes, another have both finish+whistle x.x
03:31:982 (3) - whistle i guess ?

~~orz...~~

Good luck xD

IceBeam

osu! Alumni

1,957 posts

Joined December 2009

Topic Starter

IceBeam 2012-08-17T16:14:39+00:00

MoodyRPG wrote:
Hi my lovely IceBeam :3

General
• Nothing wrong here
Easy
- 00:34:709 (x) - To keep the flow here, add a note please yeah,it fits,added
Normal
- 01:21:982 (T) - I think is much better if you end this kiai time here 01:23:800 would be inconsistent :s
- 01:49:027 (6) - Be careful about this note because is hard to see when I play this diff, just a suggestion fixed
Hard
-- Nice stuff
Awesome job IceBeam and good luck

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
\o.o/

[General]
#why countdown x.x because his voice is sexy as hell :s
~~#change diff names to Normal, Normal+, Normal++?~~ /me shrugs

[Hard]
SPOILER
00:05:391 (4) - whistle ? (cause piano sounds a bit louder here)
00:09:027 (4) - ^^^ kaaay both
00:10:164 (7) - feels like simple slider sounds softer and better http://puu.sh/W8cw, because there is actually no sound in music at red tick, also this can be *whistled* cause it fits with piano *changing sound* that's the rhythm I heard :<
00:18:686 (2,4,6) - all this sliders using different spacing, i suggest you to use 0.5 spacing for last slider (so it will look like speed up(#1- 0.16 #2- 0.28, #3- 0.5) wich fit with music \o.o/) and 0.7 for this xD 00:22:323 (2) - I love my spacing :s
00:41:073 (4,5) - just my vison of this patern http://puu.sh/W8ev nice! buy my broken rhythm is only mine =\
00:43:573 (10,11,1) - y not make this same color for whole part ? because of the downbeat o3o
00:43:573 (10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - slightly increase volume for each finish ? i think it fits o: tried to add a gradual volume increasing,but at 75% there's no slight difference,but 80% is horribly loud D: dunno why. also then I'd have to do it for all diffs in all such moments! /me lazyass
00:46:754 (10,11) - http://puu.sh/W8fw sounds better for me cause triplet fits with vocal and slider folowing music better cause beat sound on white tick
here ( 00:46:300 (8,9) - also good triplet but i guess it will be too much of them ww) yeah previous modders already suggested that,it'd break my pattern/rhythm as I don't really follow vocals here,I'll leave it as it is! thanks!
00:51:073 (1) - make it more *jumpy* cause vocal louder here also note emphasized by music and ur finish sound made it more jumpy
01:07:436 (5,6,7) - change this to triplet and note http://puu.sh/W8ig ? sounds better for me cause lyric will start from note instead of slider tail oh I want to keep this pattern as it's one of a few that sound right to me xD
01:09:936 (3) - start using whistles from here ? (like you did at 02:08:118 (3) - and 03:22:664 (3) - ) ah,sure,looks like a mistake,fixed.
01:15:164 (10) - the only slider that using 0.8 spacing, all others using 0.5 max, so change it to keep consistency buuuuut it doesn't look like I want then .-.
01:21:186 (6,9) - claps for blue ticks ? no :3
01:22:777 (4) - hmm maybe whistle ? I think I'll leave it empty
01:23:914 (1) - i dont understand your using in volume sections here, 70% of spinner almost silenced and then suddenly volume up \o.o/ http://puu.sh/W9lw (recheck it in testplay, sounds a bit strange ww) ahh..how could it be..fixed = =
01:56:300 (12,13,1) - y no because of a downbeat!
01:56:300 (12,13,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - slightly increase volume ? replied already!
01:59:027 (8,9,10,11) - same suggestion as before ( about changing it to triplet) same reply :p
02:03:573 (9,10,1) - i hear drum sound in music here so probably add claps ? (also claps both head/tail for this 02:04:141 (2,3) - ) sounds too noisy orz
02:18:686 (2) - 0.4 between notes, 02:19:595 (4) - 0.3 , make it same ? how do you even spot such things? xD it's fine!
02:33:914 (4,7) - same about blue tick claps well same reply again
02:35:504 (4) - same whistle suggestion ^
02:36:527 - 02:43:800 how about to use claps on every white tick, fits with background beat sound o: (same goes here 02:47:436 - 02:49:027) yeah,but when the part with red ticks based sliders will start - I won't be able to continue adding claps to all white ticks :s
03:00:164 - 03:01:982 use N sound for this part with low volume, fit with drums that suddenly appears here (also NC on switching hitsounds from S to N) hm...tried..but left mine
03:06:527 (17) - use some + volume here ? cause it definitely sounds louder in music o: loud enough
03:07:891 (2) - NAZI MOD ON http://puu.sh/W8oA I'm blind,I know,but I don't even know what did you fix xD
03:11:073 (1,2) - put it in same direction to next note o: http://puu.sh/W8oP okay
03:33:914 (5,8) - blue tick claps ? both,already told why :>
03:35:504 (4) - whistle ?
[Easy]
SPOILER
y so high settings for 1.54 star diff........ for me AR-2 fits much better for this bpm and star rating omg please no D: I can't read such stuff
consider to use blanket sample for sliderslide cause this long reverts like this 00:29:709 (2) - sounds very noisy x.x okay
00:03:800 (1) - whistle here ? (same with hard diff)
00:06:527 (3) - whistle on head instead of tail and then whistle on 00:07:436 (1) - sounds better for me
00:10:164 (3,1) - same here
00:13:800 (3,1) - same
00:17:436 (3) - same head whistle instead of tail re-arranged all this part before,I think I'll leave mine
00:18:345 (1) - prefer to delete this note and move slider like this http://puu.sh/W96t but I want my fake claps rhythm :<
00:21:982 (1,2) - if u apply previous suggestion, ctrl+r for this sounds better i think o:
00:34:709 - +note here sounds much better ==+ added
00:38:345 (2) - doesnt it sounds better o: ? http://puu.sh/W997 also it will brings some variety to this pattern I never use 1/2 stuff in Easy :3
00:51:073 (1,2,3,4) - looks like simple spam ^^, maybe this ? http://puu.sh/W9b6 nono D:
01:01:982 (1) - dunno why but i was expecting 1 more repeat here when i played this, just saying ww maybe,but isn't it readable much?
01:21:982 (3) - also wasnt expecting changing in SV here, probably better to add NC to show this speed change, also some different pattern can be applied here http://puu.sh/W9iA (and consider about this changing speed, does it really necessary here ?) then it wll be a pure combo spam D: though good idea,yeah,will think of it
01:24:027 (1) - yeah this spinner again, make same sections with your Hard diff for this there's no 65% section o3o
01:36:527 - probably reduce break like this http://puu.sh/W9n0, looks more intuitive sure
01:51:073 (2) - same here http://puu.sh/W9o3 , just some variety nope,though nice one
02:03:800 (1,2,3,4) - same pattern same suggestion ^^ yeahyeah
03:05:618 (1,2) - i think ctrl+r sounds much better here, because according to music long slider starts together with that (new ?)loud stream sound, and note is perfect way to play this loud cymbal sound. it was intentional :s
03:34:936 (1) - nooooooooo, i was like ~~watching movie and~~ playing this diff in relax mod (not osu mod xD) and then, so sudden, wtf!?!?!?! so fast spinner, and missed it www, maybe play this part with slider/notes and start spinner from downbeat i think its much better for 1.5star diff (also those spinners plays very strange, because last spinner sounds much better if it starts at downbeat ==||) (if u change first spinner to sliders dont forget to remove 0.75 section there) omg why D: I love it so much >,<
I would probably used a bit different usage of slider/notes in this diff ( like put long sliders here 00:54:709 (1) - , and 00:56:527 (3) - ) but i guess u decided to keep ur own rhytm instead of sticking with vocal
Also i saw some 5% sections there, i heard that 5% is unrankable now, is it ? yep,except spinners!

~~orz...~~

Good luck xD