What the fuck is this propaganda
someone who I believe to have conservative views based on his past, may work to slow down or even permanently halt the ranking of these maps.How come this society thinks that conservatives are always the enemy, that everything they do is bad and that anything bad is caused by conservatives? That's simply not true, and it's intolerant. This applies to irl and even to osu, apparently.
Uhh you misinterpreted what I meant by that lol
Ashton wrote:someone who I believe to have conservative views based on his past, may work to slow down or even permanently halt the ranking of these maps.How come this society thinks that conservatives are always the enemy, that everything they do is bad and that anything bad is caused by conservatives? That's simply not true, and it's intolerant. This applies to irl and even to osu, apparently.
It is my understanding that most people don't like modern maps. They think that they are too PP-oriented in their design, and they think the ol' Sotarks 1-2 is cancer (please correct me if I'm wrong about this viewpoint). In that case, conservative QATs would be exactly what we need. These QATs would attempt to correct the style of maps that are apt for farming PP and push maps that are old-fashioned in the sense that they don't have these shitty patterns today's maps have.
You're also saying non-conservative QATs help speed up the ranking process. Please tell me, what good comes from speed ranking? Wouldn't it be better if maps took longer to rank? That way, maps can be closely examined for imperfections and shitty patterns that no one likes.
If anything, we need more conservative QATs, not less.
John, I am currently trying to rank a map using classic style mapping. Sadly, after I got mods to it, most of them disagrees to what am I mapping, so I ended up (currently) remapping it in modern style while trying to be not to overkill jumps and stuff. As of the current developments in the mapping sector and thr state of ranked maps of today, I sometimes somehow feel hopeless of even passing a map to suit thier preferences, It's just to confusing on how to determine what is rankable and what's not (depends on who will do the checking and stuff). There are some maps that clearly defies logic and explaination on how it is okay (like a certain spike or overmap) to be it that way, and yet it passes though just to avoid the long texts of argument..This is the exact reason why a more conservative mapping community would be a good thing.
I might be writing something longer in the future just to express my view at this topic.
UC is a mapper called UndeadCapulet. You can search him up and see some of his mapsI see. I'm not familiar with his maps, so I can't continue this discussion. Please excuse me.
But i need pp to survive the great outside. Without pp i cant buy anything.And by not buying anything i will die from something and not from nothing .
abraker wrote:so many mania maps are worth to be rankdRanking in mania is a worthless stat. There is no reason to rank mania maps because nine times out of ten it ruins the map. Just play unranked wwww
Also if you say "but muh pp" then u shouldn't play mania