LaVolpe024 wrote:
Oh come off it man, your lot didn't play at their best but you can't deny that we were great.
Read the edit. First emotional post, I'm sure you can understand. I could've just erased it all but I decided to keep it.
LaVolpe024 wrote:
We made the most of their shortcomings and played some honourable football.
Honourable? You can't use that word simply because you played a decent to good match. Cahill was disgusting with his two fouls on Martins Indi. The poor lad is in the hospital now with a concussion. Before that he blatantly stepped on his achilles heel as well. That's not honourable. His goal was of world class, nobody can deny that. I myself cheered to that goal. But the fouls were disgusting.
LaVolpe024 wrote:
The penalty was a blatant handball, it's not your usual deflection off the elbow or arm; it was right on his hand and that effectively means a penalty regardless of his intention.
Yes it was a handball. But he completely searched for it. He almost crossed the backline, that's how long he took with his weird shot from an impossible angle. He got completely lucky and hit a wrist. It's what he looked for. That's, again, not honourable play. I don't want to sound like a cunt towards Australia, they played well, but not honourable. Same deal with the Pepe 'headbutt' on müller. Müller needs to stop being a little bitch. Seconds before the incident, he got a pinky finger in his face and cried like his skull just got bashed in. No wonder Pepe went towards him. Sure, what Pepe did was wrong, but so was that what Müller did. It's disgusting to cry murder and blood if a pinky hits you. And yes that counts for every side, so going in and saying ''YES BUT THE OTHER TEAM'' is irrelevant and next to that a fallacy.
LaVolpe024 wrote:
Open your eyes, just because the bigger side who are clear favourites don't get the favouritism of the ref apparently he's completely biased towards the other team. Utter horse bollocks.
I never said he's completely biased. Open your eyes as well mate. I said the 50/50 decisions mostely went in favor of Australia. That's not something to argue about, it's a cold truth. A lot of the 'well you could blow the whistle for this' moments went in favor of Australia. If NL got 'm, ref would either play on or even give the free kick to Australia. It became enervating to watch. A lot of the comments on main news sites/twitter etc. are not about the ref being bad, but about the ref simply not being fair in the small decisions. Inconcistency brings annoyance.