I think I'm liking this new system already.
forum
pp: new ranking system
posted
Total Posts
990
fabriciorby #1 BR
notbad.jpg
notbad.jpg
hope the ranking atm is not the final one. the spread is really bad, nearly everyone has a 1
Waryas
but what's the point of a ranking if nobody knows what exactly gets ranked?
Showing the ranking?
I still think that the previous one shouldn't be removed.
I still think that the previous one shouldn't be removed.
old rank => http://puu.sh/ppRA
nobody said it is.Salvage wrote:
Showing the ranking?
I still think that the previous one shouldn't be removed.
it says normal rank. so it's an alternative ranking system?uljjang wrote:
old rank => http://puu.sh/ppRA
It's probaly just in testing/calculating phase. And most likely will be implented when it's ready.
lol, so many easy/normal-farmer in the top 50, and other really insane players are not even close to them.
...dNextGen wrote:
Swatty wrote:
213 points o.ohey look i have 309,im better than both of you <3winber1 wrote:
oh look i have 212 points.
ok
I have 2 points now... LOL
Its Top Ranks
some users points fit with their top ranks
some users points fit with their top ranks
went from 210 to 2 points myself 
it isn't, I have no toprankLolicore Flandre wrote:
Its Top Ranks
Mine's still there.
It's changing again...
ohlol I wont pay attention anymore
The way it is right now is a huge improvement over how it looked during the last few versions xD
WW, Cookie, Silvia top 3
Rucker, Reisen, MAID all in top 10
Still many mistakes, but it's getting there
WW, Cookie, Silvia top 3
Rucker, Reisen, MAID all in top 10
Still many mistakes, but it's getting there
No matter how you look at it, it will be what you crybabies call "rankwhoring system". It will 99% be based on 3 main things, which is: 1) score, 2) top ranks, 3) Accuracy. Please speak up if you have a plan for a perfect ranking.
I can't hear anyone Tought so.
I can't hear anyone
Tought so.
Xau_old
If its only summing up top ranks, this is gonna be very stupid. even if normal #1 are giving less than insanes. Only one diff (the best pass) should be count.
Whatever. If this stays like it appears to be, this is something more telling about having no life than having skill at all
Whatever. If this stays like it appears to be, this is something more telling about having no life than having skill at all
I went to rank #61
I'm getting closer to my #1. The system is improving.
I'm getting closer to my #1. The system is improving.
Indeed. I already see Niko- on the list.
first i had 256 then 2 now 586
nobody caresLolicore Flandre wrote:
first i had 256 then 2 now 586
Yesterday I was #41 and now not even in #1000 just wtf
neither do Itheowest wrote:
nobody caresLolicore Flandre wrote:
first i had 256 then 2 now 586
http://osu.ppy.sh/u/276462#_leader
~500 Easy Top1 ranks.
???: 2,076
Here we have the biggest bug in our new system.
I'd add a rule that diffs with star rating lower than 4 stars will not be included into calculating at all =\
~500 Easy Top1 ranks.
???: 2,076
Here we have the biggest bug in our new system.
I'd add a rule that diffs with star rating lower than 4 stars will not be included into calculating at all =\
I really think it works like someone said few pags before:
You get points by good ranks in popular maps. The problem is that the calculation seems to be quite complicated and that's why the ratings are very unstable right now as the system just goes through all the beatmaps calculating the score.
Atleast that's what I think.
You get points by good ranks in popular maps. The problem is that the calculation seems to be quite complicated and that's why the ratings are very unstable right now as the system just goes through all the beatmaps calculating the score.
Atleast that's what I think.
sounds good.grumd wrote:
I'd add a rule that diffs with star rating lower than 4 stars will not be included into calculating at all =\
Sounds good if the star rating system wasn't inconsistent.theowest wrote:
sounds good.grumd wrote:
I'd add a rule that diffs with star rating lower than 4 stars will not be included into calculating at all =\
so truegalvenize wrote:
Sounds good if the star rating system wasn't inconsistent.theowest wrote:
sounds good.
I just hope we can keep the old one while having the new one seperate.
I guess in a few days we will see how this gonna be
I guess in a few days we will see how this gonna be
Waryas
It's just a ranking thingy. Nothing special.
lol, this guy is still not deleted?Waryas wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/u/touchscreenpro
Look at this hacker, higher than me with only 5 top10
wtf?