1. 00:08:214 (4) - (140,156)
2. 00:45:311 (1) - 没必要而且不美观而且三个圈在一个地方还不同颜色实在不舒服
3. 其实连续slider对新人不简单。。又不都是强双打的 不过算了
4. 01:45:311 (1,2) - 没clap?
5. 01:46:601 (1) - 1/2 early, end at the same time?

1. 00:09:504 (5,6) - 好像不对称...
2. 00:10:956 (6) - ^ this one move to (260,260)
3. 00:17:085 (8,9) - ctrl+r ? 这里叠着不好打 还不如来回跳符合音乐节奏
4. 00:34:827 (6,7) - 压抑感太重 不如5放下面这个左移
5. 00:45:311 (1,2,3,4,5) - 居然不是1/8不幸福
6. 00:54:988 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这里用那种slider梗? 听节奏的话1/4也有
7. 00:59:827 (9,10) - ctrl+r?
8. 01:45:311 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - http://up.ppy.sh/files/screenshot500.jpg 这里的节奏 别看我排列没认真摆
9. 01:47:327 (1,2,3,4) - 好梗233

1. 96kbps的MP3是unrankable的……能不能找个音质高一点的？
2. Audio lead-in没必要，拿掉吧……

1. 00:24:020 - 这个break我觉得删掉感觉更好～
2. 呃。。似乎没啥可说的…………唔，可以的话尽量把没必要的遮挡去掉吧比如00:55:633 (2) - 01:16:924 (1) -
3. 01:11:762 (1) - 另外Nazi一下……这个形状好像没blank好……
4. 01:45:311 (1) - 还有这个形状也是不好看……

1. 建议AR+1呢～～后面有些地方AR低了反而不是很舒服……
2. 00:07:246 (1,2,3,4,1) - 要是我的话这里就摆五角星了（几何图形控！）
3. 00:24:020 - 依然是建议去掉break...

1. 00:07:891 (1,2,3,4) - 这组梗的顺序感觉(1,3)互换位置，然后(2,4)互换位置，最后再(3,4)互换会流畅一些？
2. 01:09:665 - 考虑加个note？
3. 01:37:891 (2,3,4) - 这里的前面蓝线上似乎有节奏？而且后面白线三连打的也不是很舒服……试试这个节奏？
   

1. Everything's fine around the block, I suppose?

1. 00:49:827 (2) - Missing Claps?
2. 00:55:633 (2) - Clap at the beginning of the slider?
3. 01:32:407 (4) - NC and then remove NC for 01:34:988 (1)?

1. 00:07:569 (2,4) - This slight overlap looks weird.
2. 00:11:762 (2,2) - ^

1. 00:07:246 (6) - NC?
2. 01:25:311 (3) - I think using a 1/4 slider should do better than a 1/8 one.
3. 01:34:988 (9) - NC?
4. 01:40:794 (5) - ^
5. 01:41:440 (9) - ^

1. 00:07:246 (4) - maybe whistle to the repeat? :O
2. 00:12:407 (3) - and here to the end
3. 00:13:698 (1) - finish please as there is one in music *^*
4. 00:17:569 (3) - whistle on the end will be good
5. 00:20:149 (1) - remove new combo, it's unecessary
6. 00:22:730 (1) - ^
7. 00:22:730 (1) - whistle to the beginning and end
8. 01:16:924 (1) - finish
9. 01:34:988 (3,4,5) - this is quite hard to play (as it has red tick), try this, please:
   
   SPOILER

   
   As you made here 01:29:827 (2,3) -
10. 01:45:311 (1,2) - this is hard too (red tick again), so:
    
    SPOILER

    
    I mean, slider with red ticks plays better than circle (in easy diffs)

• Your Medium is quite hard D: Is it Normal diff or what? I would better AR+1 here...

1. 00:08:214 (4) - move it up to make a square with 00:07:569 (2,3,4) -
2. 00:22:730 (1,2,3,4) - I don't like that about a half of this square is under 00:21:924 (2) - slider. So, move it, for example like that:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:45:956 - oh, hard part (but I like it)
4. 01:06:601 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I would better to make the ends of this slider in soft. So that the notes (in music) 01:07:891 - 01:09:182 - and so on will be in normal C:
5. 01:46:440 (1) - I do not recommend you to use 1/4 slider streams in Normal and Easy diffs.

1. 00:03:859 (4,5) - spacing? Oh, but it's readable, I guess
2. 00:09:182 (3,4,5,6) - make good square?
3. 00:11:762 (1,2,3,4) - random jump D: maybe rearrange it? It doesn't make sense
4. 00:25:311 (1) - finish!
5. 00:45:956 (5) - new combo here
6. 00:47:730 (6) - and here
7. 00:49:020 (6) - ^
8. 00:52:246 (14) - ^ long combo D:
9. 01:06:117 (6) - move it down and right to make 01:05:956 (5,6,7,8) - a better triangle.
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 01:18:214 (1,2,3,4) - make an equable square
11. 01:20:794 (1,2,3,4) - ^
12. 01:27:246 (1,2,3,4) - don't stack them, please. Hard to read
13. 01:28:536 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - what with that jumps. They are random and make no sense. At least make something like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
    Triangle with 01:28:536 (1,2,3) - this three notes and then square with 01:29:020 (4,5,6,7) - and new combo on 4. (4) is in the centre of triangle and 01:29:343 (6,7,8,1) - have equal spacing and 01:29:665 (8) - is stacked with 01:28:536 (1) -
14. 01:31:117 (7) - new combo

Kawayi Rika wrote:

Hi ~ Megurine Luka ~

Mod time for my Queue ~



Red : Must be fixed
Pink : Should be fixed
Purple : Just suggestions

[Hard]

1. Too hard for this diff,likes Insane...try reduce difficulty.
2. 01:05:311 (1) - Unsnapped slider(end point). /oops i use the wrong silder speed X fixed
3. 01:05:633 (2) - ^ /^
4. 00:08:375 - Remove finish,sound weird. /nope

That's all ~ Amazing mapset ~

Good luck with rank ~

Fear wrote:

那群人對Hard概念就是送分數拍子,老實說這個Hard會被挑,可以考慮Basic Standard Medium Extreme 這樣看起來也好點
受DeeN之托來看看

Megurine Luka wrote:

主要考虑到Medium也不简单啦，而且RB里的Hard就是Insane

lol

看情况吧如果这么反应的人多我就再多加一个diff承接medium和hard

Twice wrote:

我觉得Medium做normal非常好，可是硬要强调Medium -> Normal & Hard就感觉有点太简单了._.

Megurine Luka wrote:

Twice wrote:

我觉得Medium做normal非常好，可是硬要强调Medium -> Normal & Hard就感觉有点太简单了._.

lol RB就是这么命名的所以比较麻烦~脑叔的http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/80732 这图婆婆的难度也是叫Hard但是难度上来说是Extra等级的了一样的道理~

这难度的命名暂时不考虑了，最多考虑在med和hard里加个adv~

kd for difficulty spread.

看我人多好o3o

Lissette wrote:

hi~

[Extreme]
00:04:182 (5) - this anti jump is nice, but you should add a new combo, addind to 00:05:472 (5) - 00:06:762 (5) - too for consistenceadded
00:09:182 (3) - new combo here too, to mark the jump added
00:10:472 (3) - same ^
00:12:246 (4) - this jump is unpredictible, should space this combo more evenly, spacing in 1,2,3 is so short, you could make a increasing spacing here too, just an idea I fixed the spacing lol
00:25:633 (3,4,5,6) - this is confusing - 4 should be at the same distance as 1,2,3 This is my mistake lol
00:44:182 (3,4,5,6) - place them farther than 4 fixed
01:38:214 (5,6,7,8) - the placement of this combo is random to me fixed spacing

[Basic]
00:18:859 (1,2,3) - fix spacing fixed

Leorda wrote:

Hi Luka o3o


[Basic]
* AR +1? fixed

01:33:698 (2) - End at previous red tick? Like 01:32:407 (1)? fixed


Good luck

P.S. where did you get that sound bites? e.g. "I miss you", "Battle start"
Battle Start is from http://osu.ppy.sh/s/46268
Elisha sound bites are from DeeN.~ I think he will answer you when he see this.

1. Please turns the volume to normal 70%.

1. 00:06:601 (2,1,2,1) - diplets sound weird here imo, I would rather using 1/2 instead of it.
2. 00:07:891 (1,2,1,2,1,1,2,3,1) - How about removing the stream? I don't see the reason that it needs to put here, at least they can't fit the music well.
3. 00:13:698 ~ 00:23:859 - Too many unnecessay big notes, too many big notes will lower the impression of the important big notes.
4. 00:51:117 ~ 00:56:278 - This stream is too difficult compare to the whole difficulty. Please simplify it if possible!
5. 01:01:440 ~ 01:06:601 - ^ Same
6. 01:22:891 (4) - kat here?
7. 01:35:956 (1,2,3) - Remove the big notes here? I can't hear any accents there.
8. 01:37:972 (1) - kat?
9. 01:39:262 (1) - Change this to don if you fix the previous one.

Steph De Chine wrote:

General
首先确认下artist真的是dj TAKA么？不应该写成DJ Taka的么？ dj TAKA无误
图真心不错，果然神麻婆就是和我们这种新麻婆不一样……所以后面的全都是建议，爱改不改随你便~

Basic
00:07:246 (4) - 这种折返的动作不是很好看……或许移到1那里，然后加点小弧度以衔接前面的移动轨迹？ 呜稍微改了下
00:09:827 (1,2,3,4) - 这四个的轨迹有些诡异啊……试着保持鼠标移动线路的转弯角度一致？
00:15:633 - 这里习惯性认为应该有一个circle，但是却没有…… fixed
00:20:794 - 这里也是 fixed
00:22:730 (3) - 这个中间concave up一下？让人家的鼠标轨迹好看些 fixed

Medium
到了Medium突然发现鼠标轨迹好看了很多……什么情况？暂时没发现问题……

Hard
00:45:311 (1) - 这个长度长了点吧？看起来你是想做Kick slider 或者Hold slider的，但Following circle在距某一端最远时只能覆盖那一端的一半不到，很容易100&断的。
把那里的Slider velocity调慢点或者缩短一半而加更多折返可以解决。
后面的00:47:246 (3) - 00:48:536 (1) 等等都有同样的问题。

我个人认为不是什么大问题w

Extreme
Uh……这个还有我说话的地么？

算了，就这样了。毕竟集popner, spboxer, Luka几大神|V| /-\ |º |º Σ Я的图我还是只能拜拜的……