Hi M4M back
[General]
The BG is really small. Yeah I know the source isn't that big either (I looked at the creator's gallery on pixiv)
though this looks like a screencap
[Insane]
00:18:302 (1) - finish
00:32:255 (10) - ^
00:34:174 (7) - clap on start feels kinda weird
00:39:930 (2) - normal clap fits better here imo, but changing it to normal also changes the whistle to normal though
01:08:534 (1) - Finish, new stanza and the cymbal sound is in the background
01:29:464 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This is clearly 1/3
01:42:371 (1) - clap on start
01:50:395 (2) - finish on start
01:52:837 (2) - clap instead of finish fits better imo
01:53:185 (4,2) - can you stack these properly, not really needed, but yeah
01:58:069 (2) - doesn't feel like this clap should be here
01:58:069 (2,4,4,6) - nothing important either but these are not stacked properly
02:15:511 (1) - finish on start
02:36:441 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 1/3
02:40:017 (3) - this shouldn't be here, I hear nothing in the background. Also it's hard to go 1/4 after 1/2 slider and then if follows up with a stream.
02:43:418 (1) - finish
02:51:092 (3) - this should be a 1/4 either but easier than the previous thing
02:57:371 (9) - finish on start
02:58:767 (5) - clap on end
02:59:813 (2) - clap
03:10:976 (5) - finish on end
03:17:953 (3,4) - clap on (4) instead
[Harder]
00:15:162 (8) - clap on start
00:32:255 (1) - finish on start
00:36:790 (6) - normal clap fits better
00:37:488 (9) - ^
00:38:185 (1,2) - clap on (1) instead
00:39:581 (4) - normal clap
00:40:976 (1,2) - clap on (1) instead
00:42:895 (6) - normal clap instead
00:43:767 (1) - clap on start
00:44:464 (3) - ^
01:36:790 (2) - ^
01:42:023 (1) - finish on start
01:42:023 (1,2) - a clap does fit better on (1)'s end instead of (2)'s start imo
01:44:116 (7,8) - move the clap to the other slider instead
01:44:813 (1,2) - same as 01:42:023 (1,2) -
01:50:395 (1) - finish on start
02:10:627 (3) - clap fits better on the end instead imo
02:15:511 (1) - finish on start
02:31:790 (6) - this slider feels odd. Do something similar what you did on the previous part 01:24:581 -
02:48:476 (4) - clap on end
02:51:092 (7) - add clap on 2nd repeat
[Hard]
00:18:302 (1) - finish on start
00:29:116 (7) - finish on end
00:35:744 (3,1,2,3) - is this spacing difference on purpose?
00:38:883 (4,1,2,3) - ^
00:41:674 (4,1,2,3) - ^ uh yeah, it seems like that lol
01:06:790 - it actually feels weird that you're skipping this beat. Actually, this plays better imo
http://puu.sh/1uMoZ02:05:395 - same here, it plays weird. Double, Double, Single is better than Double, Single, Double.
02:20:046 (4,5,6) - for some reason, I thought this was 1/3 as well. The beat actually goes like this
http://puu.sh/1uMil02:54:930 (1) - clap
02:58:767 (1,2,3,4) - this is really confusing imo. Stacking like this after a spinner is not very friendly
[Normal]
You should use AR 5. Plays smoother imo and less confusing stuff such as
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/506067 or
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/50606801:05:046 (5) - why hiding it under the previous slider?
02:13:069 (1,1) - this is pretty close actually
02:46:558 (1,1) - ^
[Easy]
00:30:860 (3) - a slider like this looks better imo
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/50607600:32:255 (1,2) - odd, but I guess it's fine
01:31:209 (2) - something like this?
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/50607702:11:325 (3,4,5) - I think such patterns are messy because of the Approach Rate
02:47:604 (2) - do it like this?
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/50607802:48:999 (1,2) - I personally wouldn't stack these if the there are more notes ahead
That's most likely everything I have to say
Good luck