Looks like Google couldn't resist the military work and we need start preparing for terminators after all.
https://www.wired.com/story/google-sets ... ense-work/
https://www.wired.com/story/google-sets ... ense-work/
forum
Google = Skynet
posted
Total Posts
6
Topic Starter
>implying it doesn'thayate13 wrote:
Google Shall rule the entire world one day.
Topic Starter
So google posted their "AI Principles": https://www.blog.google/topics/ai/ai-principles/
Here are the points in a nutshell
What AI applications they will pursue:
1. Be socially beneficial.
2. Avoid creating or reinforcing unfair bias.
3. Be built and tested for safety.
4. Be accountable to people.
5. Incorporate privacy design principles.
6. Uphold high standards of scientific excellence.
7. Be made available for uses that accord with these principles.
What AI applications they will NOT pursue:
1. Technologies that cause or are likely to cause overall harm. Where there is a material risk of harm, we will proceed only where we believe that the benefits substantially outweigh the risks, and will incorporate appropriate safety constraints.
2. Weapons or other technologies whose principal purpose or implementation is to cause or directly facilitate injury to people.
3. Technologies that gather or use information for surveillance violating internationally accepted norms.
4. Technologies whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.
Ok I will place my bets on a technocratic AI run government now
Here are the points in a nutshell
What AI applications they will pursue:
1. Be socially beneficial.
2. Avoid creating or reinforcing unfair bias.
3. Be built and tested for safety.
4. Be accountable to people.
5. Incorporate privacy design principles.
6. Uphold high standards of scientific excellence.
7. Be made available for uses that accord with these principles.
What AI applications they will NOT pursue:
1. Technologies that cause or are likely to cause overall harm. Where there is a material risk of harm, we will proceed only where we believe that the benefits substantially outweigh the risks, and will incorporate appropriate safety constraints.
2. Weapons or other technologies whose principal purpose or implementation is to cause or directly facilitate injury to people.
3. Technologies that gather or use information for surveillance violating internationally accepted norms.
4. Technologies whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.
Ok I will place my bets on a technocratic AI run government now