Also i wouldn't be so proud of this. Nor with the playtime.fatassnegro wrote:
After some heavy pp farming
1. Agree.[Taiga] wrote:
1. GnR is not your private diary, gtfo to reddit with this
2. You should get restricted for your username, it is offensive.
I know it means black and his username split into pieces as "fat-ass-negro" is already very offensive. Add to this his avatar and we have a racist here.ManuelOsuPlayer wrote:
2 Negro means black. Isn't offensive.
Except in this context, it is. Just look at the profile pic.ManuelOsuPlayer wrote:
2 Negro means black. Isn't offensive.
DLoomz wrote:
This forum is not for diaries.
fatassnegro wrote:
After some heavy pp farming
Also i wouldn't be so proud of this. Nor with the playtime.
[Taiga] wrote:
1, Your username is offensive, I still advice you to change it before reports reach support, then your situation will not be funny
2, To actually farm, you need to know how this game works and you should be efficient in all kind of maps. As Azer for example said yesterday - farming will not teach you anything, it will just boost your internet points and ranking but at the end, even if you will be 4-digit with tons of farmed pp, a 5 digit guy who spend more time on improving all kind of skillsets will be always better in term of general skill than you. This ends with you hitting a wall at some point while this second guy, when he decide to farm, he will just pass you without much problems and without much farming.
My own example why farming is bad:
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/11124736
Under 10 plays split within over a year, played it occasionally, today random play turned to bad acc FC which I will probably fix one day. It wasn't a problem to FC it at all, it just came. I didn't need to farm it at all, retry etc. I focus mainly on pushing my limits and training all skills - reading, consistency, aim and tapping speed, etc.
Everyone has their own standards. Usually 98+ is good, he meant the bad acc because it was a monstrata map (sorry Taiga if not)raccoongamer wrote:
>98,52%
>bad acc
wut
Isn’t like 97%+ considered “good acc”?
What is even “good acc” to you? 99%+?!
farming is not badfatassnegro wrote:
Maybe dumb question but why is farming bad?
Yes, 98,52% is bad.raccoongamer wrote:
>98,52%
>bad acc
wut
Isn’t like 97%+ considered “good acc”?
What is even “good acc” to you? 99%+?!
Partially monstrata map. It is very well mapped, easy and enjoyable to play. One of reasons why this acc is bad.DLoomz wrote:
Everyone has their own standards. Usually 98+ is good, he meant the bad acc because it was a monstrata map (sorry Taiga if not)
lol noManuelOsuPlayer wrote:
To me 93%+ is good enought. Anything more means the map is to easy for you.
lol yes. I said to me, not to you xDKupcaH wrote:
lol noManuelOsuPlayer wrote:
To me 93%+ is good enought. Anything more means the map is to easy for you.