1. osu! forums
  2. Other
  3. Off-Topic
  4. Forum Games
  5. Mafia

show more
posted
...wait. I just realized, that means nothing at this moment.

I honestly don't care who wins.
posted

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

...wait. I just realized, that means nothing at this moment.

I honestly don't care who wins.
..as long as it's not mafia.
posted

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

I've said it before. I'm as town as town can be.
get the townie
vote: vash
posted

Wojjan wrote:

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

I've said it before. I'm as town as town can be.
get the townie
vote: vash
Yes, because I'm never townie. >_> (In your eyes, that is)
posted
Vote: No-lynch


Im mean and won't simply let a survivor win by stating their wincon, scum should NK a jester if they want to win, if that wasn't obvious.
posted
^ clearly mafia.
posted
If jesters are going to overthrow town and mafia, I'd rather cooperate with mafia for the first days instead of letting the jesters lynch us.
posted
I'm gonna laugh really hard when this strategy goes to waste, 'cause in the long run, it's not that helpful at all.

I mean, sure, there are 11 jesters out there, but does that really mean you should give a damn that they're there? Nah. Going for a 100% no-lynch strategy doesn't necessarily mean that you'll get jesters every single time. Hell, even the mafia could do something like "Let's NK this guy" or "Let's NK that guy". It's all pointless for town to try to side with the mafia. I wouldn't even be surprised if Salvage IS mafia, to be honest.
posted
Vote Salvage and you may just be spared for now, guy.

Besides we'll need some townies to lynch the jesters. It's all down to if you want to co-operate or die by the hands of the mob.

And it's more hilarious this way.
posted
I propose two options for town and mafia if Jesters do really want to do what Rantai is doing.



We quickly do a No-Lynch and keep on going against the jesters denying that from happening, or we hammer the indie (possible jester too) and go on with the same idea ignoring that awfull plan.



So basically we can do a no lynch and i'll scan Rantai to make sure he's not a jester and lynch him tommorrow, and we can arrange here who Mafia should kill here, town and mafia should work together atleast till Jesters are a minimun of people .. or we can lynch Rantai asap and risk him being a Jester (i personally do not like this choice but it's one to take in mind).



Either the need of making a target for mafia to kill it's needed cause otherwise we'll be facing the same jester problem again tommorrow.




So here is my suggest: No lynch today, mafia kills Sync i scan Rantai.


any objections?
posted
Even though he claimed survivor, and you want to lynch him.


Smart thinking, Salvage.


/sarcasm
posted
Again you don't have the majority, Salvage.

Even if you convinced every mafia and town to work with you, you'll be 3 votes short.
posted
?



explain that swift please cause i don't get what you mean .. we'd be lynching someone who isn't town and jester .. so it would help town also taking in mind he has anti town iniciatives he's suggesting.
posted

Rantai wrote:

Again you don't have the majority, Salvage.

Even if you convinced every mafia and town to work with you, you'll be 3 votes short.
activeness > mayoritiy.




bring them all up and we'll talk then
posted
--> implying town is active

Besides we have a week.

Also requesting a vote count somewhere please.
posted
You do a no-lynch, and you get a 0% chance of hitting town, mafia, and jesters. Cool, but wouldn't you rather try to hit a mafia instead? Sure, odds are, you'll hit a jester, but think about it for a moment, would you rather go for a lynch and at least TRY to get a mafia instead of doing this no-lynch strategy?

Now, about the survivor. Why do you want to lynch a survivor in the first place? Unless he really IS a jester (which I doubt, by the way), I don't think doing this is a good idea.
posted
I'd rather like it if jesters actually earned their win by being lynch-able, I guess I may change my mind later in the day :s
posted
Earning their win is by banding together and forcing it instead of milling around hoping to be lynched.

No?
posted
Jesters WANT to get voted for.

I don't. ...nor do I know why Wojjan is voting for me.
posted

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

You do a no-lynch, and you get a 0% chance of hitting town, mafia, and jesters. Cool, but wouldn't you rather try to hit a mafia instead? Sure, odds are, you'll hit a jester, but think about it for a moment, would you rather go for a lynch and at least TRY to get a mafia instead of doing this no-lynch strategy?

Now, about the survivor. Why do you want to lynch a survivor in the first place? Unless he really IS a jester (which I doubt, by the way), I don't think doing this is a good idea.
i wouldn't try to hit mafia instead cause that would give jesters more advantage against town, we need to cooperate with mafia to take the jesters away from the picture and take some mafias in the proccess, then play a traditional game after that, if we take mafia at the beginning it's a free win for atleast 70% of the jesters and a possible high chances of loosing for town.



the no-lynch strategy can break all this cons regarding the town dissadvantage against the jesters if mafia works with town atleast the first two days


about lynching the indie it's just because he's having several anti-town suggestions and that doesn't help us at all.
show more
Please sign in to reply.