TheGrimOfCrazy wrote:

I do believe this map can still be ranked since Skrillex released this track a long time ago as a free track. It's even a free download link in his youtube video description. It was passed around as a promotional track. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOofWzI3flA Check Description.

Hope this can get cleared up.

CDFA wrote:

maybe you should make a phone call to Skrillex INC and be like "i want map rank pls help"

Roxas wrote:

CDFA wrote:

maybe you should make a phone call to Skrillex INC and be like "i want map rank pls help"

+999999999999999

Stefan wrote:

Anyway I still hate Skrillex, so.

WasteK wrote:

RIP

SuperMICrophone wrote:

BULLSHIT

UKCKWKSFJLAMDWMS

TicClick wrote:

hey smic how it's going

Hakard wrote:

SuperMICrophone wrote:

BULLSHIT

UKCKWKSFJLAMDWMS

TicClick wrote:

p[erhaps it's better to get an extra difficulty inbetween hard and insane, I don't feel like "buffing" anything now http://puu.sh/n1Eht/12181a0905.zip

Kibbleru wrote:

okayy lets see here

insane
00:35:502 (1) - a bit inconsistent here with ur rhythm choice, previously u always mapped 00:35:385 - and skipped 00:35:502 - personally i'd recommend something like this, u can also emphasize 00:35:620 - more this way. changed

SPOILER

00:51:557 (2) - imo think this could be spaced even more u could probably stack it on 00:50:151 (8) - if u want, then you can adjust the placement of the previous slider to adjust spacing. changed
01:02:924 (6,7) - minor suggestion, if u ctrl g these, it would flow to the next slider a bit better i think. agree
01:47:690 (5,6) - ^ mmm, disagree here
02:27:182 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - could fit the wubby music better if you made some zig zag streams? agree

SPOILER

same applies with other places like 02:34:682 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - yup
as for stuff like 02:23:432 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i dont think u can change this anymore haha >< tried something
02:00:112 (2) - hmm isnt this kinda overmapped? oh well it kinda fits i guess? the "lo" of "hello" is the beat here
02:36:010 (2) - i think the small spacing should be 02:35:620 (1,2) - and the big spacing should be 02:36:010 (2,1) - agree

normal
00:15:937 (2,3,2,3) - uhm, why don't you stay consistent to ur rhythming? for 00:19:687 (3) - etc rhythms are grouped in twos, fixed some of them later on
00:36:562 (4,5) - kinda weird to map 00:37:031 - when it doesn't have a sound, i would just recommend using 1 big 3/2 slider for this part disagree, mapping to vocals
01:18:750 (1) - for these cases i think u should just ignore the 1/3 and map the dominant white ticks changed
01:24:375 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - the 1/2 chain is a bit long here imo, consider breaking it up somewhere. changed
01:48:046 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - ^ disagree here because of the 1/1 slider
02:30:937 (2,1) - uh. nothing too bad, just kinda weird u decide to stack this all of a sudden, i assume its cuz ur running out of space? eh i like this
tbh it looks more like an advanced to me due to the rhythms.

easy
00:21:562 (3) - 3/4 sliders in easy,, may need some discussion o_O. yeah idk maybe it's different nowadays

okayy. so i would rename easy to normal, and normal to advanced, and buff tic's diff a bit.
spread is kinda in a weird position atm i think. time to map another difficulty

Reditum wrote:

I remember fucking loving this map back in 2012 and I remember the mega salt when Skrillex got DMCA'd lmfao

Insane:
00:48:745 - This SV change feels REALLY sudden. It may be better to save the 1.5x until the chorus so it's more effective
01:05:620 (1) - i forget if these are rankable lmfao will clarify; also is easy to change i just like it lel
02:22:495 - I generally feel that half-time feel sections like this should be mapped more in a DiamondCrash style rather than a slowed SV stlye but like ok interesting idea, but i think i'll keep them slow for now

Hard:
fine

Advanced:
00:15:000 - there's claps on every tick why are you omitting beat 4 changed
Technically I could get mad about slidertrains but like meh. It's not too bad, and the AR is high enough to where it doesn't look clumpy

Normal:
nice thank

i really liked this map in 2012 and i still like it now

Osuology wrote:

[General]
The skin's hitcircles don't fit together completely, they don't fit. i'll have to ask ticclick lel
Timing points conflict?? good catch thanks

[Advanced]
00:19:687 (3,1) - Please do not overlap like this, not for prettyness, but for reading ability of normal players. Try to fix all the others, since I won't list them. I have a schedule you know! there's not much I can do given the fact that constant distance spacing is necessary at this level of play, with reason actually being readability! so I don't think I can really change this
00:26:015 (3,1) - This I think is fine, even though it's the same gap between the two as the previous, it's not a slider this time.

[Hyper]
00:44:409 (4) - Seems like it should start on blue tick no? I'm following the pattern used at 00:40:307 (3,4) - , but blue tick definitely has a stronger rhythm. I will get more opinions
01:05:151 (6,1,2) - Very bouncy, might be too hard. reduced spacing
01:14:760 (7) - If you're gonna have a 1/4 slider, maybe point it towards next slider? changed for now, ds is a little inconsistent but we'll see what happens
01:29:760 (9) - This twice with OD 6.8? I doubt it. I think it's fine as they're sliders
02:08:784 (4) - Again, shouldn't it start on blue tick? as above
02:24:252 (8,1) - Jump intentional? yes
02:31:752 (8,1) - You copied and pasted so ^ ^
02:35:502 (8,1) - I won't list these anymore so look out!
03:03:745 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - May be too hard. I think 1/2 stacks at this difficulty are fine
03:07:495 (1,2,3,4,5) - Whoa, I'm not even sure I could FC that, and I'm ~4k! but it's the exact same spacing as the first kiai ;w;
Difficulty at the last chorus could be too much, but that might be me.

[Insane]
00:25:073 (6) - NC? Please? doesn't follow the NC pattern; I have NC's at the start of "hello again to all my friends" and "together we can play some rock n roll"
00:34:213 (3,4) - DS plz? wow current spacing is atrocious lmao
00:56:948 (6,7) - whoa I didn't read that right, I thought it was a hit circle should be ok
01:05:620 (1) - I thought these were unrankable??? i think so too; i'll ask a qat or bn
01:22:495 (1,2,3,4,5) - Doesn't look good to me, but it fits rhythm so... (1,2,3) versus (3,4,5) movements are supposed to reflect the different sub-melodies in the music
01:40:698 (6) - Slightly offscreen slider. will look fine in play
01:41:010 (7) - Also overlaps reason is because it's 1/6 instead of 1/4 ;w;
01:45:463 (2) - Oh come on you too? Look out for offscreen stuff please... again it's fully visible in play
02:50:620 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - WHOA. That came unexpectedly. Doesn't match up with total difficulty. agree, scaled down 0.75

TicClick wrote:

Osuology

Osuology wrote:

[Hard]
Has a different start than normal?? It should be the same, drain time should be the same. ..what? Who told you that? Besides, it is the same

makemecool123 wrote:

You should try higher AR from insane because its a bit not fun
why do you refer ar9 or ar8?

Lasse wrote:

m4m from modhelp, lol
my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/436799

General

1. shouldnt your comboburst be mirrored? http://i.imgur.com/66Zc2S3.jpg seems a bit odd to me will get more opinions it's an easy fix
2. bg hitsound and skin files seem fine
3. using a silent normal-sliderslide would be nice for the "calmer" parts meh, think it's fine as is

Insane

1. how about some ar ~8.7? I played it with 8.7 first and then with 9 and 8.7 seemed really nice to, but both work happy medium at 8.8 LOL
2. 00:15:703 (3) - only slider to end on a clap+ "vocal" for this whole section and it feels a bit unfitting
   ctrl+g on this rhythm: 00:15:468 (2,3) - would work better imo agree, but did something a little different
3. 00:52:968 (3,4,5) - such an obtuse angle doesnt really fit with how strong 4 is since you dont hcange your movement or anything to hit it. maybe you could at least try sth like http://i.imgur.com/67Arzyb.jpg to make 4 and 5 feel a bit more important? completely agree
4. 00:58:828 (4) - tried a 1/4 kickslider here? seems nice with the sound on blue tick and etc WOW that's nice
   01:13:828 (4) - same here yes
5. 01:14:062 (5,6,7) - how about making this stream a little more "wobbly" or anything? the sounds seem pretty unique so it should stand out a bit sure
6. 01:20:156 (5) - splitting this into two repeat sliders at 01:20:390 - would work well with the music, but might be a little harder to read. but since the sounds are so different, having them on the same slider feels a bit unfitting changed
7. 01:38:203 (4,5) - why stack? 5 is so strong and you never stacked sth like this before i get where you're coming from but i like the stack here
8. 02:03:281 - feels a bit strong to skip, maybe try http://i.imgur.com/xoBVhSj.jpg sacrificing that to stress the vocals
9. 02:04:687 - really feels like it should be clickable with strong clap and all but agreed here
10. really liking the "wub" part thank
11. 02:42:656 - how about splitting this here? goes nicely with the music and such a long held slider in this part is a bit underwhelming hmmm, i think the electronic sound justifies the hold though

enjoyed playing this, even though I normally don't really like this bpm since I'm too slow to singletap the 1/4 my finger control is too bad too porperly stream it, lol

Hyper

1. 02:39:375 (3,4,5,6,7) - less spacing would fit better here imo since it doesnt really seem this strong compared to the ones before and in exchange space 02:41:250 (1,2,3,4) - more since you space those "wub streams" a bit normally disagree with both just because of preference
2. 03:20:625 (1) - idk shape of this feels a bit out of placed compared to all other sliders in this diff, lol agreed

Advanced

1. 01:03:281 (5,1) - could make the movement a bit more intuitive. if people follow this normally they would expect sth like http://i.imgur.com/pIT16AP.jpg edited slider shape
2. 03:26:484 (2,3,4) - rather weird pattern for such a low diff imo i think it should be ok....?

so looking at this made me worry a bit about the spread. hard already uses lots of 1/4 (which is totally fine at this bpm) but this doesnt really use any :/ i'll definitely keep that in mind; but in my view my rationale would be that this diff is 1/2 heavy

Normal

1. not really liking the 5/4 gaps on such a low diff, but they don't really seem avoidable with how the music goes so I guess it's fine anyways
2. 01:03:750 (1,2) - stacks aren't that nice for a lowest diff, especially if they occur kinda randomly
   + then later taacking 1/1 at 01:11:250 (1,2) - doesnt work very well changed some stacks

gl with ranking

konatatasan234_ wrote:

4 years? I mean, how come it hasn't been ranked?

TheLeviathan wrote:

konatatasan234_ wrote:

4 years? I mean, how come it hasn't been ranked?

Probably because it's Skrillex. Skrillex wanted so all his maps were removed, that's why you can't find any skrillex map now. On official osu website at least

1. 00:16:875 (1,2) - some bad DS.
2. 00:15:937 (3) - / 00:21:562 (3) - / 00:20:039 - / 00:23:437 (2) - / 00:25:312 (3) - etc. there's kick on blue tick and clap on white tick. You emphasizing different sounds and it looks random and senseless. Make patterns that will make sense — full 3/4, full 1/1, half 1/1 and half 3/4 and so on.
3. 00:18:750 - strong beat. I'd like you to start an object from strong downbeat. Sounds better.
4. 00:36:562 (2) - mapped for the vocals. 00:37:265 - must be clickable. A 3/4 slider and a circle will work better here.
5. I really do not like these strong beats skipping 00:37:968 - / 00:39:843 - / 00:43:593 - and others.
6. 00:45:000 (1) - 1/1 gap isn't enough for the easiest diff. 2/1 for 128 bpm will be OK.
7. 01:08:437 (2,3,4) - if you emphasized this 01:08:671 - then you should do the same thing to this 01:09:140 - . So I suggest to remove this 01:08:671 - .
8. 01:15:000 - the same stuff with a downbeat. And there's a lot of them.
9. 01:30:000 (1,2) -
10. 01:40:312 (3) - 1/6 snapping in Normal. It's better to not make it complex. 1/1 work well.
11. 01:52:500 (5) - NC makes sense.
12. 02:15:000 (1) - recover time, ye.
13. 02:39:375 (1,2) - confusing pattern. Space it by 0.7x as you did before.
14. 02:50:625 (1) - listen to it. From here 02:51:562 - music changes, so you need to emphasize it. And make this blanket 02:51:796 - . From my side this makes much more sense.
15. 03:24:609 (2,3) - ^^^.

1. 00:36:562 (4,5) - one 1/2 reverse sounds better.
2. 01:18:750 (1) - two 1/2 sliders instead? Imo sounds kinda good.
3. 01:20:625 - NC makes sense.
4. 01:26:015 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - due to this pattern is complex I suggest to make 1/1 slider instead of those two sliders 01:26:250 (3,4) - and this 1/2 gap 01:26:953 - sounds fine.
5. 01:32:812 - place a circle!
6. 01:38:437 (1) - doesn't really make sense this NC.
7. 01:40:312 (3) - ye, 1/6 is complex for Adv. Make it easier.
8. 01:47:812 - ^^^.
9. 02:40:312 (4) - isn't it seem to be parallel? I think it seems to be!
10. 02:42:187 (2,3,4) - 3/4 slider reveres instead work better. This beats isn't really audible 02:42:656 - / 02:42:890 - , so it does not make big sense to place circles.
11. 03:05:625 - strong, emphasizing it would sound better and make more sense to patterns.
12. 03:11:718 (2,3) - not really a good idea to break the spacing here if you were mapping the entire map for 1x.
13. 03:18:750 (2,3) - the same as above for 1/1 and 1/2 gap.
14. Spacing changes look out of the context (if you used only one spacing for the whole map) 03:26:718 (3,4) - / 03:27:656 (6,1) - .
15. 03:32:812 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1) - really complex 1/2 pattern. Maybe try to make somewhere 1/2 recover gap?

1. 00:45:000 (1,1) - думаю, 1/1 гап недостаточно для хардика.
2. 01:06:562 (1,2,3,4) - а вот тут делаешь начало линейное флоу, а четверка куда-то в сторону уходит. Давай-ка четверку левее.
3. 01:20:625 (1) - ну да.
4. 01:31:406 (1) - вот тут НК не нужно. Если смотреть на другие такие паттерны (типа такого 01:38:906 (5) - ).
5. 03:31:171 - странно, до этого же пропускал в подобных местах. Бтв, звучит с этим серклом там овермапнуто.
   Сказать нечего, очень чистенько.

1. 00:23:203 (4,5) - okay, minor and my opinion. But as this isn't the highest diff, maybe it's not the best idea to emphasize those really quiet sounds. Make a kick-slider instead? More like which one you prefer.
2. 01:42:187 (4,5,6,7) - honestly, don't like this kind of overmapping according to quiet 1/4 vocal. 1/2 fits better.
3. 03:19:687 (6,7,8,9) - same as above.
4. 03:34:687 (6,7,8,9) - and here.
   The rest is really good!

1. Here I can hear some overmapping.
   00:22:617 - no really audible sound in music.
   00:25:078 (6,7) - and here. Kick-slider will fit better.
   02:00:117 - and others.
2. Some slider-shapes are awful as well.
   00:42:187 (1,3) - this is more better from aesthetic side.
   00:57:656 (9) - why not just a simple curve with one anchor?
   02:12:187 (1,3) - ^^^.
3. 01:05:625 (1) - there was something in RC about sliders with huge amount of red anchor and slider speed without a green line. But I think this is fine.
4. 02:52:500 - NC!
5. 03:27:187 (3,4,5,6) - huge spaced stream for quiet sounds in music is bad idea.
6. 03:34:687 (7,8,9,10) - I can hear 1/2.
7. 03:37:500 - and the very last thing is NC!