● = don
● = katsu
◎ = big done
◎ = big katsu

* = suggestion
* = strongly recommended
* = mini explanation

[*]00:12:093 (21) - delete ?
[*]00:12:607 - is this not ● ?

[*]00:32:321 ~ 00:33:521
How about ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ●

[*]01:27:778　,　01:30:521　,　01:32:921
Properbly delete them

Easy

00:21:344 (3) - Blanket :F
Actually just check your blankets in general, I don't want to just list them here and waste space

00:43:629 (2) - Make this the same direction as 00:43:115 (1) - for better visuals

00:47:401 (1) - This could end at 00:49:801 and you could have another repeat slider like 00:51:515 (2) - starting at 00:50:144 () for consistency

01:06:944 (1,2) - Missing note between these, feels off and it's inconsistent with the following repeat slider


01:39:515 (1,1) - Same as the previous similar part, consistency could be better, I like the symmetrical pattern though

01:53:915 (1,2,3) - What rhythm do these emphasize? All the hits are at minor beats, feels off.

Normal

The slidertick hitsounds can be distracting for new player, especially in places like this 00:21:344 (5,6) - etc short sliders although they do sound good :S

00:47:572 (1,1) - Same thing as in [Easy], somewhat inconsistent with following rhythms because the major beats aren't on sliderstart/end

01:01:801 (1,2,3) - Again similar case

01:46:201 () Timingpoints wut

01:53:572 (1) - Again, no note on major beat

01:57:001 (2,3) - I suggest you change this so that 01:57:001 (2) - is just a circle and the next slider starts where 01:57:001 (2) - ends now, for better emphasis on the major beats.

02:17:572 (2) - Maybe change this to two circles for better emphasis on the final hit

Hard

00:11:915 (1,2,3) - Sliderends are on major hits, would emphasize better if they started on 1/1s or 1/2s (white lines)

00:14:144 (3) - Easier to blanket if you just have 1 white point in the slider, like this https://my.mixtape.moe/fsgzwm.png

00:16:715 (6) - Again, emphasizing with sliderends doesn't work well

00:24:430 (1) - And again, if you're just making 1 curve, use only 1 white point, makes it way prettier. I'll stop saying this now, but go through all your diffs and fix please.

00:41:401 () Add a circle here?

01:09:344 (1,1) - Inconsistent again, would be better if there was two repeat sliders

01:26:829 (4) - A circle at the 1/1 tick would emphasize better than repeat slider, make it similar to 01:32:315 (4,1) -

02:08:658 (1) - Not sure about emphasizing big hit with a repeat is good, once again :F

Insane

00:09:858 (7,1,2) - Same thing with emphasis on sliderends

00:34:372 (1,2,3,4) - This would flow better if you started the square rotation at 00:34:887 (4) -

00:36:944 (2,3,4) - 00:36:944 (2,3,4) - Again, emphasis, sliderend, and so on

01:01:458 (1,2,3,4,5) - This looks pretty wonky, remake it with ctrl+shift+R and 72 degree angles

01:04:715 (1) - This feels somewhat awkward to play, make the repeat slider start at a white tick please :F

01:05:058 (2,3,1,2,3) - Poor flow from low angles to anti-jumps

01:07:972 (1,2) - Make these the same direction (copypaste and ctrl+G) and align 01:08:658 (3) - in that direction too for better visuals

01:26:487 (1,2,3,4) - I think this would also flow better if it started from 01:26:829 (3) - or 01:27:001 (4) -

01:31:972 (1,2,3,4,1) - Make this neater with slider-to-stream tool (ctrl+shift+F) and remember to also use it to align 01:32:658 (1) - more neatly with the rest

01:53:915 (3,4) - Try ctrl+G on these?

01:56:829 (1,2) - Again, kick sliders on white ticks for less awkwardness pls

02:09:687 (1,1,1,1) - Align using copypaste and ctrl+g

I think that's about it. Good luck!

00:11:058 (1,2) – Really nitpicky but you could align these slider ends.

00:22:372 (4,5) – Imperfect blanket.

00:22:372 (4,5) – Align these, maybe?

00:27:172 (4) – Breaks flow a little much, I would remove this slider and just continue with another slider like 00:26:487 (3). Also, it ends on a downbeat, which isn’t too good in my opinion.

01:07:287 – Could add a note here.

01:14:829 (3) – NC?

01:42:772 – Could add a note here.

00:08:658 – Downbeat but no note. Would suggest putting something there.

00:13:115 (1) - Remove NC, add it here 00:12:772 (4).

00:15:172 (1) – Remove NC, add it here 00:15:515 (2).

00:19:972 (4) – NC?

00:22:715 (1,2) – Maybe switch these two around so the player has to move in a circular motion?

00:28:372 (1) – NC?

00:30:944 (7) – NC?

00:38:144 (5,6) – Imperfect blanket. Move 00:38:144 (5) down a bit?

00:47:572 (1) – Wouldn’t end this on a downbeat.

00:58:544 (1) - ^

01:06:601 (1,2) – Imperfect blanket. Move 01:07:287 (2) to the right a bit.

01:07:972 (3,4) - ^ Move 01:09:001 (4) to the right a bit.

01:09:344 (1) – I’d end this one white tick earlier. Then have another slider from the downbeat to the next red tick.

01:13:801 (3) – Maybe a slider here for better flow?

01:14:144 (4) – I’d keep the reverse sliders like 01:13:287 (2) just to keep this section consistent.

01:53:229 – Could probably add a note here since it’s a downbeat.

01:57:001 (2,3) – Maybe move 01:57:001 (2)’s slider end to the middle of 01:57:515 (3)? If you do that, do it for these two as well 01:58:715 (1,3).

02:01:629 (1) – Ends on a downbeat.

Mostly aesthetic things to be honest.

00:09:858 (1,2) – Could blanket these so that 00:09:858 (1) also kinda blankets 00:09:001 (2).

01:08:658 (2) – Why not curve this so that it kinda mirrors 01:07:972 (1)?

01:09:344 (1) – Ends on a downbeat, could shorten the spinner by one white tick and add a note on the downbeat instead.

01:29:229 (3,4) – Imperfect blanket.

Honestly, this difficulty is pretty damn good, so I have very little to say here.

00:19:287 (1,2) – Personally I feel this jump is too big.

00:33:258 (5) – There is no sound here. You could space 00:33:344 (6) out and leave 00:33:001 (2,3,4) as a triplet.

00:34:029 (2,2) – Stack is slightly off.

00:57:687 (1,2,3) – These feel anticlimactic to me, I would space 00:57:687 (1,2) out a little bit more.

01:00:944 – Could add a note here.

01:00:429 (5,3) – Stack is off, but I think I understand why. You can ignore this if it was intentional.

01:04:715 (1,2,3) – There are still notes here you can continue mapping 1/4. It feels weird not having 1/4 notes in a 1/4 section.

Not much to say here either. A lack of 2012 mapping experience. ._.