terametis wrote:

AWESOME

Shiirn wrote:

General
S:C2 Finish lasts a very long time, and you use it very often. It overpowers the music and sounds bad, imo. Totally change the mp3 of S2finish.

Peaveable
No problems. yeah!

TuNormal
No problems. yeah!

Alarmable
01:25:479 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - This is readable in editor but is extremely confusing while playing. Try to make it a bit more friendly? Done a new pattern,hope it's more readable.:3

Superable
00:15:716 (1,2,3,4) - Select all of these and snap a bit to the right.
00:30:035 (2,3,4,5) - snap all of these to 1/8 correctly
01:27:762 (2,3,4,5) - same as 0:15:716
I think all of these problems are done but unsure.I orginally couldn't find any unsnap notes or sliders in AIMod...
But I tried to put them and move them in the time line.Hope they're done now.:33

call me back /me calls Shiirn back.

ertyukjh010 wrote:

我在想我是不是串錯了字=口=

和平的應該是Peaceable而不是Peaveable

抱歉，麻煩幫我改掉

ertyukjh010 wrote:

Peaceable才對

http://translate.google.com.tw/#en|zh-CN|Peaceable

Jenny wrote:

I'm SO loving it <3
nold, be my waifu <3



i'd love to collab the full-version with you one day~

Miu Matsuoka wrote:

......

Miu Matsuoka wrote:

......

nold_1702 wrote:

......

nold_1702 wrote:

Will fix when the bubble gets popped by BAT...
I have no choice...

• 
  Tags:

1. What the hell is doing Overmap in tags? Like:
   
   SPOILER

   
   Seriously, remove it.
2. What exactly is 222ha? I don't get why it is in the tags, remove it please.
   
   SB:
3. Basically, you can get rid of that Black.png file to reduce some SB load and some filesize, using the same method that I explained in this post. I'm too lazy to explain it again
   
   Settings:
4. Disable the Coundown in all difficulties. It's unused, since the intro is too short.

1. I'd rather see this called [ert's Peaceable] because: 1) his/her name doesn't use capitals 2) it's more gramatically correct to use the possessive ('s).
2. 00:38:661 (2) - I recommend adding a new combo here, since this slider: 00:37:752 (1) - is somewhat "special" because of how the music is in that part.

1. This difficulty name seems rather silly and unfitting with the rest of the spread. You should choose something like [tutu (or tutuhaha)'s *insert word finished in "able" here*] to fit the other diffs.
2. 00:59:115 (5) - I suggest a new combo - this sounds kind of separated from the combo in which it is now.
3. 01:16:729 (4) - If this was intended to be a blanket, it looks pretty bad. Try this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   It touches (5) this way, you might want to fix that.
4. 01:21:843 (2) - This slider looks pretty ugly in my opinion. Something like this should look better:
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:43:206 (5) - This is kinda unfitting with the SB. I suggest adding one more repeat so it makes more sense with the sudden black background.

1. 00:39:115 (4,5) - I didn't really feel that this jump flowed so well, using simple distance snap seems a better idea imo ;_;
2. 01:06:388 (1) - I don't really recommend using 0,5x here. It was ok at 00:59:115 (2) - because there weren't objects before it (I mean, near in the timeline), so it was readable. But here, it's a different story. x0,75 works much, MUCH better. Change it please.
   I recommend changing the two other 0,5x sections that come after this one to 0,75x, too.

1. 00:02:638 (4) - This circle here makes the jump to the next slider not flow so well if you ask me. I recommend removing this circle, it will improve the flow imo. At least until the player gets the pace of the map
2. 00:12:524 (1,2,3,4,1) - Stacked 1/8s ? Doesn't look so good... How about a slider with repetitions? Would work as a hold slider, of course. Give the players a break xD
3. 00:15:934 (5,6) - I recommend 1,2x for these sliders. They might be too hard to catch with that 1/16 sliders stream before them. Perhaps even make the 1/16 sliders 1,2x too, like here: 00:30:025 (2,3,4,5) -. Makes more sense imo.
4. 00:54:115 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Again, how about a hold?
5. 01:17:524 (1) - This, stacked, with AR9 and an ultra high SV, might be super tricky to read. I recommend unstacking it somehow.
6. 01:22:638 (4) - Ctrl + R on this makes more sense, I believe. It flows better, at least.
7. To be honest, I don't think that 1,6x fits AT ALL in most parts. I think that you are overdoing it a little with the overmapping, and that's why I won't recheck this for the time being. I want some other staff member's opinion on this (BAT). Please try to contact one, you can tell them that you are doing it on my behalf.
   
   EDIT: I just read ztrot's comment and basically... Well yeah, we share some thoughts.

ztrot wrote:

Call me old fashioned But I'm getting tired of seeing maps with little to no consistency with spacing I'm mainly griping about the insane in this case. Personally I think the whole map should be remapped I mean not even a few moments in you are ripping apart one of the main metrics of game-play in half. spacing should never have to be read on a per note basis of course some sections can break spacing to provide a challenge as long as the spacing is done in a intuitive matter but things like this have to stop.

ztrot wrote:

Call me old fashioned But I'm getting tired of seeing maps with little to no consistency with spacing I'm mainly griping about the insane in this case. Personally I think the whole map should be remapped I mean not even a few moments in you are ripping apart one of the main metrics of game-play in half. spacing should never have to be read on a per note basis of course some sections can break spacing to provide a challenge as long as the spacing is done in a intuitive matter but things like this have to stop.

BAT Please Mod Please :<
And please don't pop my bubble if you disagree with this map is going to rank ><"Please~

Natteke wrote:

EDIT: naraku, man, you made me sad with your shitty "too hard to read" ,"doesn't fit" and "overdoing" mod post....

narakucrimson wrote:

We can get some more skilled BATs to test it, if you want!