forum

We Live In A Society

posted
Total Posts
40
show more
abraker

Mishima Yurara wrote:

we live in it

a society

Can you debunk this?
what is there to debunk?
Penguin

Mishima Yurara wrote:

we live in it

a society

Can you debunk this?
I can only debunk you if you live in a bunker
abraker

Penguin Sanchez wrote:

I can only debunk you if you live in a bunker
dubunk the bunk bed in bunker not the bunk bunking in bunker
Penguin

abraker wrote:

Penguin Sanchez wrote:

I can only debunk you if you live in a bunker
dubunk the bunk bed in bunker not the bunk bunking in bunker
That reminds me, I'm still waiting for john's response in this thread

t/709368/
abraker
omg
Shohei Ohtani
Comfy Slippers
Big mappers are clinically insane interesting people

But I can understand vinxis. He's washed up and stuck in limbo. His shitposts need to be further examined and decoded.
levesterz
B1rd



Australia built a wall, and we made the dingoes pay for it.
ac8129464363
consider the following
Meah
yes
Topic Starter
VINXIS
:idea:

Comfy Slippers wrote:

Big mappers are clinically insane interesting people

But I can understand vinxis. He's washed up and stuck in limbo. His shitposts need to be further examined and decoded.
more proof that we live in a society... can't believe some people think like this...... absolutely This appointment
ColdTooth
h
xMelonadex
We live in a society which is getting stupider and stupider as time passes.
johnmedina999

xMelonadex wrote:

We live in a society which is getting stupider and stupider as time passes.

xMelonadex wrote:

stupider
This is the exact thing you're talking about. It's "more stupid", not "stupider".
Jordan
gamers rise up
Quibbly
1000pp plays will become normal in the near future
Nathan
ok but wheres mca
ColdTooth

Nathan wrote:

ok but wheres mca
in another extra difficulty
johnmedina999
Why is this thread not dead yet
RLC

johnmedina999 wrote:

Why is this thread not dead yet
still waiting for someone to debunk the op
ColdTooth

RLC wrote:

johnmedina999 wrote:

Why is this thread not dead yet
still waiting for someone to debunk the op
goddamnit i don't understand top tier mappers
levesterz
Society is derive from the word sos and also meaty. To achieved a balance flavour, one have to find the correct balance of sos and meat. Too much meat it will feel like you are having a meat party (bad kind of course) where all the meat are meating each other and no moisture .Too much sos however it will overwhelm the meat causing it too moist and soggy meat. Nobody want a wet and soggy meat right? So, this is why ypu have to keep balance the ampunt of meat and sos to create the perfect symphony of meat
Serraionga


levesterz wrote:

Society is derive from the word sos and also meaty. To achieved a balance flavour, one have to find the correct balance of sos and meat. Too much meat it will feel like you are having a meat party (bad kind of course) where all the meat are meating each other and no moisture .Too much sos however it will overwhelm the meat causing it too moist and soggy meat. Nobody want a wet and soggy meat right? So, this is why ypu have to keep balance the ampunt of meat and sos to create the perfect symphony of meat
/thread
ColdTooth
yeah /thread
levesterz
?
Serraionga
Society is derive from the word sos and also meaty. To achieved a balance flavour, one have to find the correct balance of sos and meat.

macOS 10.12 is not installed on this virtual machine. Insert the installer disc and click "Restart VM".
ColdTooth
woke
keremaru
isn't society a word that derives from social, which means that we have to have lives to find the definition of said word?
and so if we have to do something to find the definition of a word to explain the process of another word, doesn't that mean that we have to be willing to do so?
and im pretty sure that nobody wants to go be social when it's hard to do so already in this time and day, because all people currently care about is shit irrelevant to me, which already says a lot for people my age. i think.
nonetheless, to debunk the theorem, we must be willing to go out and experiment that theorem, which already supports the theorem into becoming a fact. so by staying indoors, we are already debunking it.
Comfy Slippers
FALLACIES!
DXPOHIHIHI
We live in a society where weebs live
Nathan
I would like to add my voice to the chorus of people who criticize Mr. Omar Yaseen Kamal for his deplorable writings. As this letter will make clear, once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that Omar's artifices are childish. They're weapons-grade childish. If childish were architecture, Omar's artifices would be the Parthenon. To restate that with less grandiloquence, we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we lend a helping hand, or is it sufficient to answer the recalcitrant tossers who commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility? I'm sure you already know the answer so I won't bother repeating it. I'd like to emphasize, however, that Omar's detachment from, or denial of, the truth is not just a political tactic or say-anything-to-please character flaw. It reveals an elemental attitude that he shares with the worst types of illogical backstabbers I've ever seen: fueling the censorship-and-intolerance crowd.

The question that's on everyone's mind these days is, “Is there anything that Omar can't make his helpers believe?” I mean, Omar keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his “cause” is to cloak favoritism in the garments of truth and beauty. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, whenever Omar announces that those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve, his idolators applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that the nicest thing that can be said about Omar's proxies is that they are fickle, disgraceful misosophists out to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Omar Yaseen Kamal Rainbow of Gangsterism. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that one often finds Omar in the company of uneducated, tasteless spouters or other unsavory characters. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Omar does, and that's why I have in fact told him that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of his craven execrations. Unfortunately, there really wasn't anything to his response. I suppose Omar just doesn't want to admit that his refractory reports will cause our country to lose credibility with many nations, great and small, who have hiterto taken it for granted that I would sooner let him force me to dive into the abyss that he has opened and face the demons lying within it than become one of his apparatchiks. This is not a matter of perception but of concrete, material reality.

Omar wants us to believe that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. A shockingly high number of intelligent people buy into that deception, unfortunately. I say we need to inform such people that Omar insists that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so he's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that the problem with Omar is not that he's stupid. It's that he wants to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women.

Omar's ballyhoos leave me with several unanswered questions: How does he benefit from defending judgmental, sordid cult leaders against the just expostulations of the public? And does he believe, deep in the adytum of his own mind, that the future of the entire world rests in his hands? These are difficult questions to answer because it is high time to get rid of horny shysters, to get rid of shysters who stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. Omar is just trying to pick a fight. That's why he says that he would never dream of forcing onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in.

There are those who are informed and educated about the evils of commercialism, and there are those who are not. Omar is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why he has been reinforcing the impression that crazy moonbats—as opposed to Omar's forces—are striving to abandon me on a desert island. In response, we must take the inevitable action: treating the blows of circumstance. Will that be difficult? Perhaps. But there exists a concerted, well-funded, and aggressive anti-science campaign whose charter is to undermine the current world order. Omar supports this apolaustic campaign's activities by intimidating anyone who attempts to upbraid him for being so pusillanimous. Many the things I've talked about in this letter are obvious. We all know they're true. But still it's necessary for us to say them because Mr. Omar Yaseen Kamal's peeps are capable of little else but hating and lying, even to each other.I would like to add my voice to the chorus of people who criticize Mr. Omar Yaseen Kamal for his deplorable writings. As this letter will make clear, once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that Omar's artifices are childish. They're weapons-grade childish. If childish were architecture, Omar's artifices would be the Parthenon. To restate that with less grandiloquence, we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we lend a helping hand, or is it sufficient to answer the recalcitrant tossers who commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility? I'm sure you already know the answer so I won't bother repeating it. I'd like to emphasize, however, that Omar's detachment from, or denial of, the truth is not just a political tactic or say-anything-to-please character flaw. It reveals an elemental attitude that he shares with the worst types of illogical backstabbers I've ever seen: fueling the censorship-and-intolerance crowd.

The question that's on everyone's mind these days is, “Is there anything that Omar can't make his helpers believe?” I mean, Omar keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his “cause” is to cloak favoritism in the garments of truth and beauty. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, whenever Omar announces that those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve, his idolators applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that the nicest thing that can be said about Omar's proxies is that they are fickle, disgraceful misosophists out to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Omar Yaseen Kamal Rainbow of Gangsterism. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that one often finds Omar in the company of uneducated, tasteless spouters or other unsavory characters. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Omar does, and that's why I have in fact told him that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of his craven execrations. Unfortunately, there really wasn't anything to his response. I suppose Omar just doesn't want to admit that his refractory reports will cause our country to lose credibility with many nations, great and small, who have hiterto taken it for granted that I would sooner let him force me to dive into the abyss that he has opened and face the demons lying within it than become one of his apparatchiks. This is not a matter of perception but of concrete, material reality.

Omar wants us to believe that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. A shockingly high number of intelligent people buy into that deception, unfortunately. I say we need to inform such people that Omar insists that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so he's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that the problem with Omar is not that he's stupid. It's that he wants to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women.

Omar's ballyhoos leave me with several unanswered questions: How does he benefit from defending judgmental, sordid cult leaders against the just expostulations of the public? And does he believe, deep in the adytum of his own mind, that the future of the entire world rests in his hands? These are difficult questions to answer because it is high time to get rid of horny shysters, to get rid of shysters who stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. Omar is just trying to pick a fight. That's why he says that he would never dream of forcing onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in.

There are those who are informed and educated about the evils of commercialism, and there are those who are not. Omar is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why he has been reinforcing the impression that crazy moonbats—as opposed to Omar's forces—are striving to abandon me on a desert island. In response, we must take the inevitable action: treating the blows of circumstance. Will that be difficult? Perhaps. But there exists a concerted, well-funded, and aggressive anti-science campaign whose charter is to undermine the current world order. Omar supports this apolaustic campaign's activities by intimidating anyone who attempts to upbraid him for being so pusillanimous. Many the things I've talked about in this letter are obvious. We all know they're true. But still it's necessary for us to say them because Mr. Omar Yaseen Kamal's peeps are capable of little else but hating and lying, even to each other.
johnmedina999
ok
Please sign in to reply.

New reply