we live in it
a society
Can you debunk this?
a society
Can you debunk this?
forum
We Live In A Society
posted
Total Posts
40
Topic Starter
england is my society
So I got gifted an Xbox 360 (without the cords) and decided I would hide it by a ravine today. I came back a few hours later and it's been replaced by a PS3. WTF?!
Mishima Yurara wrote:
we live in it
a society
Can you debunk this?
Nope, sorry.
Congratulations, you received a better console!Some1 wrote:
So I got gifted an Xbox 360 (without the cords) and decided I would hide it by a ravine today. I came back a few hours later and it's been replaced by a PS3. WTF?!
what is there to debunk?Mishima Yurara wrote:
we live in it
a society
Can you debunk this?
I can only debunk you if you live in a bunkerMishima Yurara wrote:
we live in it
a society
Can you debunk this?
dubunk the bunk bed in bunker not the bunk bunking in bunkerPenguin Sanchez wrote:
I can only debunk you if you live in a bunker
omg
Big mappers are clinically insane interesting people
But I can understand vinxis. He's washed up and stuck in limbo. His shitposts need to be further examined and decoded.
But I can understand vinxis. He's washed up and stuck in limbo. His shitposts need to be further examined and decoded.
Australia built a wall, and we made the dingoes pay for it.
consider the following
Topic Starter
more proof that we live in a society... can't believe some people think like this...... absolutely This appointmentComfy Slippers wrote:
Big mappers areclinically insaneinteresting people
But I can understand vinxis. He's washed up and stuck in limbo. His shitposts need to be further examined and decoded.
We live in a society which is getting stupider and stupider as time passes.
So the above image has always been my signature.
xMelonadex wrote:
We live in a society which is getting stupider and stupider as time passes.
This is the exact thing you're talking about. It's "more stupid", not "stupider".xMelonadex wrote:
stupider
gamers rise up
ok but wheres mca
in another extra difficultyNathan wrote:
ok but wheres mca
Why is this thread not dead yet
still waiting for someone to debunk the opjohnmedina999 wrote:
Why is this thread not dead yet
goddamnit i don't understand top tier mappersRLC wrote:
still waiting for someone to debunk the opjohnmedina999 wrote:
Why is this thread not dead yet
Society is derive from the word sos and also meaty. To achieved a balance flavour, one have to find the correct balance of sos and meat. Too much meat it will feel like you are having a meat party (bad kind of course) where all the meat are meating each other and no moisture .Too much sos however it will overwhelm the meat causing it too moist and soggy meat. Nobody want a wet and soggy meat right? So, this is why ypu have to keep balance the ampunt of meat and sos to create the perfect symphony of meat
/threadlevesterz wrote:
Society is derive from the word sos and also meaty. To achieved a balance flavour, one have to find the correct balance of sos and meat. Too much meat it will feel like you are having a meat party (bad kind of course) where all the meat are meating each other and no moisture .Too much sos however it will overwhelm the meat causing it too moist and soggy meat. Nobody want a wet and soggy meat right? So, this is why ypu have to keep balance the ampunt of meat and sos to create the perfect symphony of meat
yeah /thread
woke
isn't society a word that derives from social, which means that we have to have lives to find the definition of said word?
and so if we have to do something to find the definition of a word to explain the process of another word, doesn't that mean that we have to be willing to do so?
and im pretty sure that nobody wants to go be social when it's hard to do so already in this time and day, because all people currently care about is shit irrelevant to me, which already says a lot for people my age. i think.
nonetheless, to debunk the theorem, we must be willing to go out and experiment that theorem, which already supports the theorem into becoming a fact. so by staying indoors, we are already debunking it.
and so if we have to do something to find the definition of a word to explain the process of another word, doesn't that mean that we have to be willing to do so?
and im pretty sure that nobody wants to go be social when it's hard to do so already in this time and day, because all people currently care about is shit irrelevant to me, which already says a lot for people my age. i think.
nonetheless, to debunk the theorem, we must be willing to go out and experiment that theorem, which already supports the theorem into becoming a fact. so by staying indoors, we are already debunking it.