1. I don't think that following the lyrics is a very nice idea, at least not with every difficulty because it's hard to follow (you have to hit more accurately) also personally I just don't like to follow lyrics that much
2. Following lyrics seems more like your style which is not my style, this is my style of mapping, this is how I map, this is what I like (sorry if I sound rude). However, I played/tested your map and it was pretty nice, I think I will consider some of the tips of following the lyrics but not that much, I just don't like it
3. You say that following lyrics make more sense when mapping but ... not for me, not that much, sorry. Yes, it's good to do so, but there are different kinds of mappers, me, personally I don't like to do it that much
4. For the hitsounds ... I like to use that pattern, patterns make me feel good, I can try to use more whistles ... I guess. Would that make it ?
5. I like my streams ... ok, I will change it ... ok
6. About the spoilers ..................................................... I just wanted to share my thoughts, I didn't think about it being spoilers ......................................................................................................... ok, changed, hope it's better now, less words uh ?

ZzzBlackLight wrote:

Fantastic beatmaps. Why is it still unranked?

Nyancelot wrote:

DONG BANG SHIN KI!!!!!!!!!! ♥♥♥

I love you ♥ thanks for your beatmap! :3

Always keep the faith Cassiopeia! <3

Gabe wrote:

If you ever revives it, do you want me to do a recheck? My last mod wasn't really good.
So yeah, you can pm me anytime for a recheck~

lovhin456 wrote:

Gabe wrote:

If you ever revives it, do you want me to do a recheck? My last mod wasn't really good.
So yeah, you can pm me anytime for a recheck~

Oh, thank you! I will revive this someday (soon I hope) I will PM you then ^^

[Yue] wrote:

Que bueno que hayas revivido este mapa :3!
Estoy ansioso por verlo rankeado *-* te dejo unas estrellas para que te den animo lovhin!!

XinCrin wrote:

oh .. Tambien esperaba que lo reviviera lo intentare modear aunque sera un reto para mi

Kiiwa wrote:

OMG TVXQ XD
I didn't know they sang a song for OP w

1. 00:08:380 (3) - I don't like the way this slider is placed, it's the same as the previous one. The direction of the slider (2) goes at the left when you need to go at the right, it can be confusing for some and the flow is broken. I suggest you to move these objects somewhere else. Oh also, the slider (2,3) are not symmetric.
2. 00:28:380 (1) - This slider makes some kind of weird overlaps with the two previous circles. Can you move this slider somewhere else to avoid this overlap?
3. 00:32:380 (1) - It looks like this circle can be hidden by the previous slider's burst. I think you should move this circle so it won't be stacked with the slider and won't be hidden by it.
4. 00:34:880 (5,1) - These sliders are going offscreen! Move them somewhere else. It's unrankable to have off-screens objects:
   
   Example

   
5. 00:44:380 (1) - I personally don't suggest to have stacked notes on an Easy difficulty. Some beginners can be confused by this stack.
6. 00:56:880 (2) - This slider is obviously not symmetric. I suggest you to fix it, it will look better if it's symmetric. To fix it: Move the second node one grid up and the last node, one grid at the left.
7. 01:03:380 (2,3) - Like said two points above.
8. 01:59:880 (3) - Same like this one ^, but actually, this circle is placed right at the end of the slider, which is worse. The burst can hide the circle and yeah..

1. 00:59:880 - To keep the consistency with your upbeats sounds, add a clap here.
2. 01:30:380 (3,4) - Erm.. shouldn't these claps be at the end of these sliders instead of the beginning? I think it makes me sense and more consistent if they were at the end.

1. 00:10:880 (3) - For here, you could do like Insane by adding a new combo. It will be more consistent with your difficulties
2. 00:34:380 (1) - You could make a better blanket here, it would look a bit better; (of course, if you do like the picture below, make sure the spacing is consistent after it!~)
   
   Example

   
3. 00:45:380 (4,5) - Since these are stacked, can you move them some grids up? Right now, these objects are overlapping one of the previous sliders (00:44:380 (2) - ). by moving it, it will avoid the stack.
4. 01:26:130 (1) - Actually, this two-reversed slider should have only one reverse arrow. It will be consistent with one of the sliders at the beginning: 00:26:380 (7) -
5. 01:28:630 (6) - That's just an opinion: With this slider, you could be able to stack the end of the slider with the previous slider (3). But you surely have a reason why it isn't like that, so I will just keep it here.
6. 02:13:880 - Forgot to add a clap here?
7. 02:27:380 (5,6,7,8) - I personally think you should convert these circles by two sliders, like you've done to 02:23:380 (3,4) - . You could try to make the same thing since these are perfect. c:

1. 00:08:130 (1) - This slider looks symmetrical and I think you should make it symmetrical, so it will look better. You can fix it easily by moving it a bit and reshape it a bit. Well, to fix it, move the second and last node one grid at the right and then, make it centered.
2. 00:10:380 (3) - I don't know how to explain that but, this circle should have been one grid at the right, so if you stack it with the previous circle and do Ctrl+H, it will go at the same place. (The next suggestion is related with this one)
3. 00:10:880 (1,2,3,4) - One of these {(1,2) (3,4)} aren't proportional with the previous circles (look on the spoilerbox for more information). So actually, to make them proportional, highlight these objects and move them one grid at the left. It's like what I said above. Actually, you copy/paste the objects (1,2) and did a Ctrl+H, to make it symmetrical, I guess. But since the previous circles are not "symmetrical", it won't have the same proportion.
   
   Example

   
   
4. 00:27:880 (5) - This circle is not making a great flow with the previous objects. To be honest, you should maybe move it at around x:0 y:172, so the previous slider will be able to catch this circle easily and then, it continue with the next objects.
5. 00:40:755 (x) - With the vocal, it sounds like there's missing a word here and I think you should add a circle here to emphasize it. I suggest you to add it to x:368 y:28, so it will be between the next and the previous slider. Of course, there will be a jump, but do Ctrl+G, the slider will be reversed, so there won't be any jumps.
6. 00:41:880 (5) - Forgot to add a clap here? Actually, I think you do. If not, you should add a clap here to keep the consistency with your upbeats sounds.
7. 01:07:130 - Like said some suggestions above, it should emphasize the vocal. But actually, there's a slider at this place, and you should have added something to 01:07:255, so it could emphasize the vocals. I suggest you to make the slider shorter, so it could start at 01:07:255 and finish at 01:07:630. After that, stack a circle to the slider, at the same place where the slider was before (01:07:130). By doing this, the vocals will be followed;
   
8. 01:23:380 (3,4,5,6,7) - Just a point of view, wouldn't it flows better if these objects were placed that way?
   
   Example

   
9. 01:28:880 - Forgot to add a clap here?
10. 02:12:880 (2,3,4) - These objects are not placed in a good way, I mean't, it doesn't sounds pretty good here. There shouldn't have any objects to 02:13:380. I suggest you to make something else to make it sound better: Delete the circle (3) and move the next slider here and enlarge the slider in a way that it should end to 02:13:880 (Where it was ending).
    
    Example

    
11. 02:17:880 (5,6) - These objects aren't aligned with one of the previous pattern, which is the same thing (02:15:880 (1,2) - ). So actually, move them one grid at the left.

Gabe wrote:

okgo?

Easy

1. 00:08:380 (3) - I don't like the way this slider is placed, it's the same as the previous one. The direction of the slider (2) goes at the left when you need to go at the right, it can be confusing for some and the flow is broken. I suggest you to move these objects somewhere else. Oh also, the slider (2,3) are not symmetric. I changed the direction of (2) but kept the formation
2. 00:28:380 (1) - This slider makes some kind of weird overlaps with the two previous circles. Can you move this slider somewhere else to avoid this overlap? Moved objects a bit
3. 00:32:380 (1) - It looks like this circle can be hidden by the previous slider's burst. I think you should move this circle so it won't be stacked with the slider and won't be hidden by it. Moved the circle
4. 00:34:880 (5,1) - These sliders are going offscreen! Move them somewhere else. It's unrankable to have off-screens objects:[/color]
   
   Example

   
5. 00:44:380 (1) - I personally don't suggest to have stacked notes on an Easy difficulty. Some beginners can be confused by this stack.Unstacked
6. 00:56:880 (2) - This slider is obviously not symmetric. I suggest you to fix it, it will look better if it's symmetric. To fix it: Move the second node one grid up and the last node, one grid at the left. Fixed
7. 01:03:380 (2,3) - Like said two points above. Done
8. 01:59:880 (3) - Same like this one ^, but actually, this circle is placed right at the end of the slider, which is worse. The burst can hide the circle and yeah.. Fixed

Normal

1. 00:59:880 - To keep the consistency with your upbeats sounds, add a clap here. Done
2. 01:30:380 (3,4) - Erm.. shouldn't these claps be at the end of these sliders instead of the beginning? I think it makes me sense and more consistent if they were at the end. Done

This difficulty has completely nothing wrong. Just these two hitsounds inconsistencies.
If I ever find something else, I will poke you ingame owo

Hard

1. 00:10:880 (3) - For here, you could do like Insane by adding a new combo. It will be more consistent with your difficulties Done
2. 00:34:380 (1) - You could make a better blanket here, it would look a bit better; (of course, if you do like the picture below, make sure the spacing is consistent after it!~) Done
   
   Example

   
3. 00:45:380 (4,5) - Since these are stacked, can you move them some grids up? Right now, these objects are overlapping one of the previous sliders (00:44:380 (2) - ). by moving it, it will avoid the stack. Done
4. 01:26:130 (1) - Actually, this two-reversed slider should have only one reverse arrow. It will be consistent with one of the sliders at the beginning: 00:26:380 (7) - Done
5. 01:28:630 (6) - That's just an opinion: With this slider, you could be able to stack the end of the slider with the previous slider (3). But you surely have a reason why it isn't like that, so I will just keep it here. Hehe, done
6. 02:13:880 - Forgot to add a clap here? Opps, yeah
7. 02:27:380 (5,6,7,8) - I personally think you should convert these circles by two sliders, like you've done to 02:23:380 (3,4) - . You could try to make the same thing since these are perfect. c: Changed

Insane

1. 00:08:130 (1) - This slider looks symmetrical and I think you should make it symmetrical, so it will look better. You can fix it easily by moving it a bit and reshape it a bit. Well, to fix it, move the second and last node one grid at the right and then, make it centered. Done
2. 00:10:380 (3) - I don't know how to explain that but, this circle should have been one grid at the right, so if you stack it with the previous circle and do Ctrl+H, it will go at the same place. (The next suggestion is related with this one) Got it, done and the next one too haha
3. 00:10:880 (1,2,3,4) - One of these {(1,2) (3,4)} aren't proportional with the previous circles (look on the spoilerbox for more information). So actually, to make them proportional, highlight these objects and move them one grid at the left. It's like what I said above. Actually, you copy/paste the objects (1,2) and did a Ctrl+H, to make it symmetrical, I guess. But since the previous circles are not "symmetrical", it won't have the same proportion.
   
   Example

   
   
4. 00:27:880 (5) - This circle is not making a great flow with the previous objects. To be honest, you should maybe move it at around x:0 y:172, so the previous slider will be able to catch this circle easily and then, it continue with the next objects.Moved not as you said but yeah, moved it
5. 00:40:755 (x) - With the vocal, it sounds like there's missing a word here and I think you should add a circle here to emphasize it. I suggest you to add it to x:368 y:28, so it will be between the next and the previous slider. Of course, there will be a jump, but do Ctrl+G, the slider will be reversed, so there won't be any jumps. Done
6. 00:41:880 (5) - Forgot to add a clap here? Actually, I think you do. If not, you should add a clap here to keep the consistency with your upbeats sounds. Added
7. 01:07:130 - Like said some suggestions above, it should emphasize the vocal. But actually, there's a slider at this place, and you should have added something to 01:07:255, so it could emphasize the vocals. I suggest you to make the slider shorter, so it could start at 01:07:255 and finish at 01:07:630. After that, stack a circle to the slider, at the same place where the slider was before (01:07:130). By doing this, the vocals will be followed; Done
   
8. 01:23:380 (3,4,5,6,7) - Just a point of view, wouldn't it flows better if these objects were placed that way? Umm, I will keep this
   
   Example

   
9. 01:28:880 - Forgot to add a clap here? Yesss
10. 02:12:880 (2,3,4) - These objects are not placed in a good way, I mean't, it doesn't sounds pretty good here. There shouldn't have any objects to 02:13:380. I suggest you to make something else to make it sound better: Delete the circle (3) and move the next slider here and enlarge the slider in a way that it should end to 02:13:880 (Where it was ending). Yup, done
    
    Example

    
11. 02:17:880 (5,6) - These objects aren't aligned with one of the previous pattern, which is the same thing (02:15:880 (1,2) - ). So actually, move them one grid at the left. Done

This map should have its second chance and be ranked asap! D:

Gabe wrote:

Again graveyarded..? You must be kidding me D:!

Frostmourne wrote:

not grave anymore

Gabe wrote:

I'll help you

Gabe wrote:

I'll help you

SPOILER

SPOILER

SPOILER

Frostmourne wrote:

Gabe wrote:

I'll help you

as you helped me twice in the past

Frostmourne wrote:

Gabe wrote:

I'll help you

as you helped me twice in the past Thank you so much T T

General
missing score-comma.png, maybe you will need it to make a full set of the skin The score-comma is not necessary because it doesn't afffect the gameplay at all

Easy
02:04:380 (1) - this note after the spinner comes too fast for the easy diff I guess, I think you can remove these two notes 02:04:380 (1,2) - and extend the spinner ends at 02:04:380 so the heavy beat on this spinner's end will still be alive
it leaves a gap like this one 00:53:880 (1,1) -
you will surely remove NC on 02:06:380 (1) - if you did this above^ I feel like if I do this there won't be the same feeling of climax as of how it is now, but if it's pointed out in the future then I will take your suggestion

Normal
00:51:380 (2) - a bit uncomfortable to move from (1) to (2) , I would move this slider to x:404 y:208 and rotate it about 13 degree like this Done

SPOILER

Hard
00:09:880 (1) - I think this slider better end with soft hitsound , it sounds a bit tough here.. if you compare the vocal from the start of slider here
00:28:630 (3) - it would be nice if you can follow this rhythm as it will follow the guitar in the music
first, remove this note 00:28:630 (3) - , drag 00:28:880 (4) - starts at 00:28:755 (1/4 back) instead and end at 00:29:130 Done

SPOILER

01:47:255 (3) - it would be nice if you delete this one and move 01:47:380 (3) - back 1/4 and end at the 01:47:880
this will correspond perfectly with 01:48:880 (6,7) - as you are following the vocal Done

SPOILER

02:11:880 (9) - this jump is a bit far in my opinion. I would reduce from 2.84x to 2.0x , it will play better because the direction from 02:11:130 (8) - is opposite from this note here Done

Insane
00:31:880 (6) - whistle fits really well on the head (because of the vocal "now!") but for the tail. It doesn't fit in that way so I think it would sound better without them
00:47:380 (6) - whistle head ?
02:07:880 (6) - whistle as you did in Hard diff
All done ~~

I hope this helps , leave the bubble to Gabe
fight fight lovhin !