Leonid Beckman - V Lesu Rodilas Yolochka (Jazz Ver.)

posted
Total Posts
72
show more
SinDemonDragon13
Modding~

Ryuuesy~
-Overal Difficulty +1
-HP Drain rate +1

Normal~
-Circle size +1

Insane~
-Overal Difficulty +1

The map is pretty good mapped, so I couldnt find any spacing error by now. (Im still a noob modder XD)
I would star this map but I run out of Kudosu...
You dont have to give me Kudosu for this mod if you dont want to. ^^
Greetings from Serbia~ :3
SinDemonDragon13
Thank you for the Kudosu! ^^
+star
wcx19911123
someone call me to check this timing
I feel offset is fine to me , and all timing sections are following downbeat
I'm not so good at timing but this timing is fine to me
anyway , good luck on this ;)
IceBeam
няшки!
ryuu
спасибо,айсбим >w<

p.s. сам няша *3*
Topic Starter
rockleejkooo
спасибо, бака-бимси-кун же ну!!! >:3
бимси-тян
Garven
Um, can you try and find the real artist? I'm thinking "Children's song" is not the group that performed this and I have no idea what to look for here.
ryuu
b-but..

Aleks719 wrote:

for next modder/ checker : title is fine as is, it was discussed with BATs (naraku, icebeam)
Louis Cyphre
Artist: Leonid Beckman - V lesu rodilas yolochka (Male Jazz ver.)
Leonid Beckman is an artist of the very original version of 1898 year. I think such title suits very well with osu! quialities, isn't it?
Garven
I suppose that'll do if we can't find the artist. The original composer will be better than "Children's Song" in any case. btw should we capitalize the Russian words? I don't know if they are nouns etc. or just particles (don't know any Russian at all, heh).
IceBeam
I suggested to use (Jazz Ver.) instead of (Male Jazz Ver.) as there was a female vocal as well

rebub
ryuu
аааааааааав. спасибо,луис и айсбим Q___________________Q
Garven
[Ryuusy]
00:38:290 (1) - Way too soon after a spinner for an Easy of this caliber.

[Normal]
00:37:739 (1) - This would read better if it wasn't stacked
00:43:246 (3,4) - Eeh, I'm not so sure its a good idea to have such short repeating sliders with different repeats consecutively like this. Especially on a Normal.

[Hard]
This is.. really hard compared to the Normal. Think you could reduce the spacing a bit in general, and maybe reduce some of the jumps? It's kinda borderline insane right now.
00:46:551 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - I really didn't like the spacing here though
00:46:551 (1) - Kind of soon after the spinner... maybe end the spinner at 00:45:862 - ?
01:02:797 (1) - Same situation here
01:25:100 (2,3) - These sound so wrong since you're not quite following what's going on with the drum set. You end late on the first one, then start late on the next.

[Insane]
The exact same slider velocity as Hard... Makes this feel artificially slow compared to the hard. That or the Hard way too fast, which is the more accurate conclusion.
00:23:421 (1) - Uh, check your claps here
00:48:203 (1) - Remove new combo
00:48:754 (6) - new combo
00:49:304 (1) - remove
01:26:270 (2) - I'm really wary of this last stream. Trying to follow that piano when it's not quite with the metronome is dangerous. It'd be best to stick with the spinner like the other difficulties.
ryuu
Topic Starter
rockleejkooo
almost all changed~ thank you.. waiting for recheck


Garven wrote:

[Ryuusy]
00:38:290 (1) - Way too soon after a spinner for an Easy of this caliber. changed

[Normal]
00:37:739 (1) - This would read better if it wasn't stacked unstucked
00:43:246 (3,4) - Eeh, I'm not so sure its a good idea to have such short repeating sliders with different repeats consecutively like this. Especially on a Normal. remapped

[Hard]
This is.. really hard compared to the Normal. Think you could reduce the spacing a bit in general, and maybe reduce some of the jumps? It's kinda borderline insane right now. no, i think, it's rankable spacing. anyway, it's only 109 bpm.
00:46:551 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - I really didn't like the spacing here though placed a bit further
00:46:551 (1) - Kind of soon after the spinner... maybe end the spinner at 00:45:862 - ? yes
01:02:797 (1) - Same situation here yes
01:25:100 (2,3) - These sound so wrong since you're not quite following what's going on with the drum set. You end late on the first one, then start late on the next. changed

[Insane]
The exact same slider velocity as Hard... Makes this feel artificially slow compared to the hard. That or the Hard way too fast, which is the more accurate conclusion. the hardness of ins-diff isn't at slider speed here sooo i left it as it is. anyway, i don't want to remake distance here or in hard after speed-changing
00:23:421 (1) - Uh, check your claps here okay
00:48:203 (1) - Remove new combo okay
00:48:754 (6) - new combo okay
00:49:304 (1) - remove okay
01:26:270 (2) - I'm really wary of this last stream. Trying to follow that piano when it's not quite with the metronome is dangerous. It'd be best to stick with the spinner like the other difficulties. yes, i tried to listen to it at 25% and made some changes so i hope it'll satisfy you
Garven
[Hard]
The spacing is still huge, plus you use quite a few very large jumps. On its own, yes, this difficulty is rankable, but if you're including it in this set, I'd beg to differ. The difficulty ramping from Easy -> Normal is very slight. It's nice and fits the laid-back nature of the song. Normal -> Hard, on the other hand, is a completely different world. Instead of a slight increase in SV by about 33%, you increase it by 100%. You do have a slightly lower distance snap, but that doesn't help with such a huge increase in general velocity to be based on, PLUS you have a lot of pretty far jumps with very little time between. This is what I am worried about. I really recommend that you tone this difficulty down - mainly in the general velocity department.

01:25:100 (2,3) - Remove the whistle on the repeat arrow on the first slider, then remove the whistle on the 3rd hit on the second slider.

[Insane]
That last stream is really awkward to play still, but it feels more in how you placed the repeat sliders in the middle of the stream like that. They're hard to see, and really don't settle with the alternation of hitting for me.
Topic Starter
rockleejkooo

Garven wrote:

[Hard]
The spacing is still huge, plus you use quite a few very large jumps. On its own, yes, this difficulty is rankable, but if you're including it in this set, I'd beg to differ. The difficulty ramping from Easy -> Normal is very slight. It's nice and fits the laid-back nature of the song. Normal -> Hard, on the other hand, is a completely different world. Instead of a slight increase in SV by about 33%, you increase it by 100%. You do have a slightly lower distance snap, but that doesn't help with such a huge increase in general velocity to be based on, PLUS you have a lot of pretty far jumps with very little time between. This is what I am worried about. I really recommend that you tone this difficulty down - mainly in the general velocity department. remapped. hope, it's nice

01:25:100 (2,3) - Remove the whistle on the repeat arrow on the first slider, then remove the whistle on the 3rd hit on the second slider.

[Insane]
That last stream is really awkward to play still, but it feels more in how you placed the repeat sliders in the middle of the stream like that. They're hard to see, and really don't settle with the alternation of hitting for me. made some changes~
thank you again~ and waiting for recheck
Garven
[Hard]
00:27:276 (6,1) - Kind of a big jump
00:56:188 (5) - Repeat is covered by 00:55:637 (3) - 's hitburst
01:04:655 (4,1) - Kind of a big jump

[Insane]
00:04:973 (3,4) - Jump felt awkwardly placed, if not rather large considering what's going on the in music.
00:10:480 (6,7) - Why not stacked?
00:14:885 (1,2,3,4) - These are the first jumps in this map that I felt actually fit what's going on in the song.
00:17:639 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - And it goes right back to nonsensical spacing. Accelerated spacing for a cooling down of a phrase? Feels really wrong.
01:20:419 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Every single note in this combo has a different spacing. Why?
01:26:201 (1) - Start the sliders here.

This map... feels really random for the most part. You stick with a bland 1/2 rhythm for most of the song, and I'm getting the feeling that you feel constrained with patterns when using consistent spacing. Unfortunately, this has caused your map to feel as if most beats are placed with little thought to the music and leads to a very poor play experience.

Edit:

Talked with the mapper via IRC, and he doesn't wish to make any more major changes. That is fine, but as I said, I cannot put my name behind this map as it is now, sorry.
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply