Well exactly as you say, there is nothing that STARTS EXISTING when stacking two of them together. It's just an increase of retardation! So be more careful when talking in absolute terms like "absolutely fine"
Especially
Momiji wrote:
WHATEVER dpi most likely
Momiji wrote:
most likely
with my consideration of DPI increases not necessarily not introducing anything negative, just
MOSTLY not introducing anything negative. You are likely to know by knowing what mouse you are using.
Endaris wrote:
As such it can't be safe to say that playing at 1200dpi with 1.0 and 6/11 is really better than playing at 800dpi with 1.5 and 6/11.
lol in that case it's the same problem, except "retarded" is the MOUSE. So be sure to pick the lesser evil if you
cannot possess a mouse that's able to accommodate your desired sensitivity natively.
Endaris wrote:
Not to mention that the top mouse player list shows impressively that a single multiplier is very commonly used with success.
Not to mention that top players would remain top players even if we applied way larger disadvantages to them. So remaining a top player with a very small disadvantage like non-integer sensitivities should be expected. Also there is stuff like 1.5x sensitivity being better than, for example, 1.23x sensitivity.
non-forced proportions top players, varying framerates among top players, 60hz monitor users... Stuff like "this random thing made you miss 0.00348% more circles during your entire career" won't make someone stop being a top player
