00:39 <Garven> : Well then
00:39 <Garven> : Let's start with Busters!
00:39 <Garven> : First, the beginning's combos feel off
00:40 <Kawayi Rika> : yeah
00:40 <Garven> : Since you use the combo changes for the pattern instead of the music
00:40 <Garven> : Then later change to the music instead of the patterns
00:40 <Garven> : Stick to one or the other to give a better feel of consistency
00:40 <Garven> : Personally I prefer keeping with the music
00:40 <Garven> : Makes more sense to me.
00:40 <Garven> : So if we do that, 00:03:790 (3) - new combo
00:40 <Garven> : 00:06:174 (5) - ^
00:40 <Garven> : 00:07:366 (1) - remove
00:40 <Garven> : 00:08:558 (2) - new
00:41 <Garven> : 00:07:366 (2,1,2) - Spacing feels too small amongst these
00:41 <Garven> : 00:15:909 (1) - May as well extend this spinner to 00:17:498 -
00:42 <Garven> : 00:24:452 (3) - It'd be cool if you could get this slider to not have the circle part to not be overlapping. It'll look a lot cleaner.
00:42 <Garven> : Even something like one grid left/right on the two sliders works fine
00:43 <Garven> : 00:31:604 (5) - new combo
00:44 <Garven> : 00:33:194 (3,4,5) - Well, I guess with this pattern maybe not new combo at that last one
00:44 <Garven> : This is why doing it to the pattern feels so wrong to me.
00:45 <Garven> : 00:52:664 (4) - Maybe something like this to break up the monotonous 1/1/1/1/1 rhythm you have going?
http://puu.sh/9Y5Z00:47 <Garven> :
http://puu.sh/9Y6d Try a technique like this if you're trying to acheive an elbow slider. Looks much cleaner this way. 01:04:982 (1) -
00:47 <Kawayi Rika> : 00:24:452 (3) - how to fixed this?
00:48 <Garven> : 01:07:366 (1) - So taht applies to this slider as well
00:48 <Garven> : 00:24:452 (3) - Move right one grid 00:23:260 (2) - move left one grid
00:49 <Kawayi Rika> : OK
00:49 <Garven> : 01:09:750 (1,3) - It'd be nice if you could position these so they dont' have that overlap apprear
http://puu.sh/9Y6C00:50 <Garven> : 01:15:313 (3) - New combo
00:50 <Garven> : 01:16:505 (1) - remove
00:50 <Garven> : 01:27:233 (3) - new combo
00:50 <Garven> : etc.
00:51 <Garven> : Try to have around 2 measure long combos
00:51 <Garven> : Er
00:51 <Garven> : two big white ticks
00:51 <Garven> : It will give a much better consistency feel
00:51 <Garven> : So you avoid awkward short combos like this one 01:29:617 (1) -
00:52 <Garven> : 01:35:578 (4,5) - soft hitsounds feel weak here
00:52 <Garven> : 01:44:717 - Move this break back to the default spot. It's positioned incorrectly. Just drag it all the way left
00:53 <Garven> : 01:55:843 (1,2) - Starting with a stack then moving on to a pattern makes for awkward play when the music doesn't change any to give
00:53 <Garven> : a good feel for the stop and go motion that you set up
00:53 <Garven> : 01:59:021 (5,6) - ^
00:54 <Garven> : 02:01:803 (3) - Don't recommend stacks under slider ends for the easiest of a set
00:54 <Garven> : 02:04:584 (4) - Add whistle to the end of this slider
00:54 <Garven> : 02:08:558 (1) - Too soon after a spinner for the easiest of the set
00:55 <Garven> : 02:08:558 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Honestly feels overmapped for such a softer part of the song. You use the exact same rhythm during the
00:55 <Garven> : stronger parts of the song, so this feels overly done.
00:57 <Garven> : Maybe a rhythm like this would work better to convey the softer tone of this part
00:57 <Garven> :
http://puu.sh/9Y7Q00:58 <Garven> : 02:33:988 (3,4) - Kinda ugly overlap and easily avoidable
00:58 <Garven> : 02:52:266 (3,4) - Same comment about the odd use of stacking when the music doesn't change any
00:59 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Why have the end silent when you have such a strong drum hit to finish it with?
01:00 <Garven> : On to [Rin]
01:00 <Garven> : 00:09:353 (2) - Why did you use this rhythm when you follow the guitar so well up until this point? Plays awkward
01:01 <Garven> : 00:10:942 (1) - Spinner ends in a strange spot and feels like it drags on too long. End it at 00:10:942 (1) -
01:01 <Garven> : 00:14:915 (1,2,3) - Set these notes to the same rhythm that was suggested due to the unranking
01:02 <Garven> : 00:15:710 (4) - End this slider at 00:17:498 -
01:02 <Garven> : 00:21:670 (1) - Why a normal finish when there's no percussion at all in the music?
01:03 <Garven> : 00:30:809 (1) - Yeah, see what you can do about the new combo usage to avoid short combos like this
01:04 <Garven> : 01:28:425 (5,6) - Strange pattern to make. I would have preferred them to be normal circles there and have sliders earlier in the combo
01:05 <Garven> : 01:33:392 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This looks really messy with all the overlap
01:06 <Garven> : 01:42:730 - Should add a slider tick sound here
01:06 <Garven> : 01:44:717 - Drag this break all the way to the left
01:07 <Garven> : 02:10:942 (1,3) - These sliders could look a lot better
01:07 <Garven> : 02:13:922 (3) - These short sliders are kinda meh. I like 'em better as stacked circles
01:08 <Garven> : 02:23:260 (3,5) - Please don't cover a circle so much with a slider. It's ugly and bad practice.
01:09 <Garven> : 02:31:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - The pattern looks fine, but it's too long for the phrase in the music so the combo feels wrong
01:10 <Garven> : 02:51:472 (5) - ctrl + h for better flow
01:10 <Garven> : 02:52:266 (7) - ^
01:10 <Garven> : 02:49:286 (1) - Can you position this so it doesn't overlap with 02:48:293 (9) - ?
01:11 <Garven> : 02:43:525 - Another thing: Why isthe slider speed still 1.5x here? The music has taken a step back in intensity, but the slider speed
01:11 <Garven> : doesn't reflect that
01:12 <Garven> : And it ends up causing strange spacing like at 02:46:704 (1) - that feels too big for how the music is flowing and compared to how you
01:12 <Garven> : mapped previous sections
01:13 <Garven> : 02:54:651 (1,2,3) - I would have preferred just more circle usage and patterns instead of just sitting in the middle clicking on stacked
01:13 <Garven> : kick sliders since it's such a huge buildup to that last note
01:13 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Same comment about the silenced spinner end
01:24 <Garven> : Okay, I'll do a forum post for the Taiko/Zero diffs
01:24 <Garven> : On to [Rika]
01:25 <Garven> : 00:14:915 (1,2,3,4) - Of course fix this rhythm
01:25 <Garven> : 00:08:558 (1,2,3,4,5) - Strange that you opted to do 1/1 rhythms after the beginning part
01:26 <Garven> : 00:34:088 - Snap this timing section to the end of the slider at 00:34:187 -
01:26 <Garven> : The slider slide is -really- noticible during that silent part of the song
01:27 <Garven> : 00:47:498 (1,2,3,4) - Pretty radical spacing for such a measured part of the music
01:29 <Garven> : 01:24:055 (1,2,3) - A really sudden jump after so much distance snapping
01:30 <Garven> : 01:49:485 (1,2,3,4) - At least position them so that they're not overlapping (or have them even looking as 4 looks further away from the
01:30 <Garven> : 2/3 than 1 does)
01:31 <Garven> : 01:50:876 (6,1) - Uncharacteristic jump during this part of the song
01:31 <Garven> : 01:51:074 (1) - This slider ends in a strange spot. Feels better ending at 01:51:074 (1) - or at 01:51:074 (1) -
01:32 <Garven> : 02:00:015 (3,4,5) - Uneven spacing like this is eh
01:32 <Garven> : 02:05:379 (1) - Why such a silent end of the spinner when you have a good drum beat there in the music?
01:34 <Garven> : 02:43:525 - Same comment about the 1.5x slider speed
01:34 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Why silent spinner end aaah
))))))