Hi!
[General]
For anyone wondering, Yes this map is 5 minutes long and can be ranked, the osu!website just doesnt count the spinner.
Your audio file exceeds the rankable limit of 192kb/s : Yours is 260kb/s Please compress it and watch out for changed offset in your map afterwards.
00:05:769 - Please put the Red lines volume to 40% too so it matches the green lines volume.
04:44:181 - Delete this Green line, and put the Red lines Volume to 50%, putting a green line on a red line is only allowed to change SV, not Volume.
[Diff]
00:25:419 (26,27) - Change to dd? I dont believe a downpitched snare should deserve a k as emphasis, a dd would represent that a lot better; Its similar to how you mapped the same downpitched snare as d here: 00:26:694 (37,38) -
00:25:644 (28,29,30,31) - Change to ddkk? This goes by the same logic as above; note 28 and 29 are the said low snares, and 30/31 are high snares, the kddk pattern doesnt really capture any of that.
00:27:819 (49,50) - dd because note 50 (again) lies on a downpitched snare and a k on it doesnt differentiate it from the higher snares a lot, making it sound very weird.
00:29:544 (66) - I suggest you color this d? This stream is is mostly just kick-drum spam and i do not hear any snare on this tick. Even so, the snare is barely audible is very blurred, so putting 2 k's for something that is pretty silent and overshadowed by the kick-drums in the background is too much and sounds wrong. Having only a single kat works just fine aswell.
00:29:769 (68) - There is a clear Cymbal crash sound audible here. Please consider making this a kat finisher note.
00:30:219 (72,73) -; same as 00:25:419 (26,27)
00:30:444 (74,75,76,77) -; same as 00:25:644 (28,29,30,31)
00:32:619 (95,96) - This pattern does contradict how you mapped earlier. Yes, it emphasizes the downpitched snare on 96, but you have always mapped the kick-drum as d, so i dont understand why you mapped it like this now. i suggest change to dd.
00:33:444 (102) - make this a k? You can still hear the snare from 00:33:369 (101) - sound over to this note very clearly.
00:33:519 (103,104,105) - Similar to the stream at 00:28:869 - ; There is a 1/6 to be heard here. It would be nice if you could map it too as a (kkkd), as there is a highpitched snare here.
00:33:744 (106) - color to d? There is no special sound to be heard here, only a kickdrum so there isnt really a reason to make this a kat.
00:34:044 (111,112,113,114,115,116) - make this piece of pattern dkdkdk? There is no special sound to be heard on 113 and 115 and that warrants this pattern to be ddkdkk. You can much more clearly hear the snare on 112, 114 and a high pitched ting on 116 that would warrant a kat much more.
00:34:569 (117) - Another opportunity to place a finisher. Please consider, its a really distinct sound and should be finished.
00:37:419 (144,145) - dd, same as 00:27:819 (49,50)
00:35:244 (123,124,125,126) - ddkk, same as 00:25:644 (28,29,30,31)
00:35:019 (121,122) - dd, same as 00:25:419 (26,27)
00:38:544 (153) - color to kat? You can again hear a snare sound.
00:38:769 (157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165) - I do not understand what this is mapped to. If its mapped to the drums, then i would consider you would map a kat to the highpitched snares, which are audible at 00:38:769 - ; 00:38:994 - and maybe 00:39:219 -. That would result in this little pattern becoming kddkddkdk, which sounds a lot nicer.
00:39:369 (165) - again make this a finisher? If you want you can remove 00:39:294 (164) - to avoid a finisher that plays a bit weird.
00:39:819 (169,170) - dd again because you know why xD
00:40:569 (174,175,176,177,178,179) - why are these sounds suddenly so connected? i dont hear a sound on 00:40:644 - and 00:40:794 - ; so why are there notes? The rest of the section you never really added notes where there were no sounds. same for 01:07:119 (192,193,194,195,196,197) -
00:43:869 (1) - make this a kat finisher? I dunno but a clap noise would be more like a kat finisher instead of a don finisher. Making this a kat finisher would also make contrast to 00:44:169 (2) - this note.
00:44:169 (2) - Make this a don finisher too, you can hear the good old finisher-esque sound used in many songs.
00:44:469 (3) - theres a clap lying here, why isnt it a kat?
00:48:144 (32,33,34) - the kat that these 2 dons lead up to is a very weak echo of a clap. Its emphasized too much imo and you can delete 00:48:144 (32) - to make the clap not that much emphasized compared to 00:48:069 (31) -; which is a much louder clap.
00:50:694 - put a kat here? I can hear an echo of a clap that shouldnt be left out.
01:00:219 (135,136,137,138,139) - i find this ddkkd to be quite a dense pattern mapped to relatively silent sounds. Splitting it up into dk kd would be much better to fit the claps.
01:02:094 - another clap that has been left out. Maybe map it as dkd as youve done before with 01:00:819 (140,141,142) - ?
01:03:369 (165) - make this a kat finisher? You really missed a lot of opportunities to make finishers....
01:09:969 (216) - shift this note over to 01:09:894 -? This results in a dk kd; which suits the claps even better.
01:12:069 (235,236) - make this to a kd? This piano rises in pitch, but at a lower pitch than 01:12:369 (239,240) - So a single kat inside the stream would be appropiate to represent that.
01:20:169 (306,307) - color these 2 don? They only have strong kicks lying behind them and dont really fit to a k, since you mapped the section so that a kat usually belongs to a clap sound.
01:20:469 (308) - color k because clap sound, gives nice emphasis if you combine with my previous suggestion.
01:22:419 (331) - color kat? The piano noise picks up on pitch right before the stream ends so it would be a nice fit to add a kat here.
01:26:169 - shift this green line over to 01:22:869 - ? It will make all barlines move slower, which is more appropiate for a silent part. Also if someone plays the drum in this break it will silence those sounds too.
01:36:369 (352) - make this a kat too? This will have a very nice effect that only background piano sounds are d and foreground piano is d in this section giving it a nice structure.
02:05:769 (1) - Finisher please.
02:05:769 - to 02:24:969 -
->For me this section sounds very confused on what was mapped to. A few notes fit to the claps, and a few listen to the drums again. Please make your intentions with this part clearer/explain them to me so i can follow up in a next post.
02:28:194 (216) - color this a kat? the piano starts to pick up on pitch yet again and should be emphasized by putting a kat here.
02:28:569 (221,222) - swap these 2 notes? Then 02:28:494 (220,221) - these 2 notes will capture the sudden piano pitch rise much more clearly as it sounds sharper, just like the piano.
02:31:869 (263) - color this kat to make a double k leading into a white tick similar to 02:31:494 (258,259) - and the kind?
02:35:769 - from this point the piano chords you mapped to in this little pause section change a bit until 02:36:519 - . The strong sounds you ignored lie on 02:35:769 - and 02:36:219 - which i dont find properly emphasized with the patterns you carried over from the previous few seconds.
02:39:819 (356,357,358,359,360,361,362) - why is this suddenly mapped to the claps when you can hear some 1/4 piano in the background you can map to? Please map this little section to the piano to not abruptly change focus.
02:47:544 (442) - color this don so it reflects the pitch of the piano going down in relation to 02:46:869 (433,434) - and 02:47:169 (437,438) - better?
02:52:344 (495) - same as above.
02:56:619 - to 03:00:819 -
-> Why is there mapping to the clap pattern again when you can orient yourself on the piano background once more just like you did at 02:34:719 -
03:06:744 (651) - change to don for pitch, reason already given.
03:11:544 (706) - ^
03:16:344 (763) - ^
03:18:894 (788) - color this don to emphasize the very high pitched piano chord at 03:18:969 (789) - more?
03:19:044 (790) - shift this over to 03:19:119 - to make said high pitched piano chord stand out more by giving a 1/2 break after? Also make the dkd triplet that comes when you apply to a ddk to fit the snare as a filler rhythm.
03:22:494 (834) - making this to a kat will make this last part before the last very strong note a bit more intense, fitting to a buildup, and also make the last note stand out more since all notes around the last sound will be a kat if you apply this.
03:36:219 - why is this diddling noise left out when you mapped something to it at? You can atleast map something to it, it doesnt have to be a 1/4 stream or something. Just some notes to acknowledge its existence.
03:53:169 - why is this note here? there is no sounds in the music and it would be better if this part that in relatively sparse in drums would be mapped precisely to the drums to capture the rhythm better.
03:57:069 (908) - theres a higher pitched snare that should be a kat, as you mapped all higher pitched snares with a kat in this section.
03:54:069 (892) - also this should be a kat too, to differ it as a high pitched snare from the others.
03:55:644 (900) - same goes for here
03:57:444 (912) - same here.
03:59:919 (1) - shorten this spinner to 04:00:594 - and put a kat finisher 04:00:669 - here. Similar to how you handled this musical pattern at 00:43:119 -
04:04:344 (46) - make this a don pleaaaaase; it makes the piano pitch thats going down clearer again!
04:09:144 (101) - same here.
04:14:919 (170,171) - swap these two notes to fit better to the clap filler rhythm you made here?
04:17:994 (196,204) - I suggest you make these two notes a kat, the piano changes pitch at each beat and it would play better and make more sense in general to have the color change on a beat.
04:23:544 (272) - d because the pitch ive explained like 100 times now.
04:28:419 (330) - make this a don because the pitch is not going up here, nor is there any other important sound, it goes strictly down and i dont know why there is a kat.
04:33:144 (390) - blaaah make this don.
04:36:894 (434) - make this a kat because the piano pitch rises up quite sharply here, which would fit to a triple kat inside this stream much better than a kdk.
04:39:294 (467) - make this a kat to emphasize the last note more by differing it as a don, and also to emphasize the buildup by making kats more frequent as the piano ramps up.
This map needs a lot of work in patterns/consistency. I hope you can move forward with this. Good luck.
[General]
For anyone wondering, Yes this map is 5 minutes long and can be ranked, the osu!website just doesnt count the spinner.
Your audio file exceeds the rankable limit of 192kb/s : Yours is 260kb/s Please compress it and watch out for changed offset in your map afterwards.
00:05:769 - Please put the Red lines volume to 40% too so it matches the green lines volume.
04:44:181 - Delete this Green line, and put the Red lines Volume to 50%, putting a green line on a red line is only allowed to change SV, not Volume.
[Diff]
00:25:419 (26,27) - Change to dd? I dont believe a downpitched snare should deserve a k as emphasis, a dd would represent that a lot better; Its similar to how you mapped the same downpitched snare as d here: 00:26:694 (37,38) -
00:25:644 (28,29,30,31) - Change to ddkk? This goes by the same logic as above; note 28 and 29 are the said low snares, and 30/31 are high snares, the kddk pattern doesnt really capture any of that.
00:27:819 (49,50) - dd because note 50 (again) lies on a downpitched snare and a k on it doesnt differentiate it from the higher snares a lot, making it sound very weird.
00:29:544 (66) - I suggest you color this d? This stream is is mostly just kick-drum spam and i do not hear any snare on this tick. Even so, the snare is barely audible is very blurred, so putting 2 k's for something that is pretty silent and overshadowed by the kick-drums in the background is too much and sounds wrong. Having only a single kat works just fine aswell.
00:29:769 (68) - There is a clear Cymbal crash sound audible here. Please consider making this a kat finisher note.
00:30:219 (72,73) -; same as 00:25:419 (26,27)
00:30:444 (74,75,76,77) -; same as 00:25:644 (28,29,30,31)
00:32:619 (95,96) - This pattern does contradict how you mapped earlier. Yes, it emphasizes the downpitched snare on 96, but you have always mapped the kick-drum as d, so i dont understand why you mapped it like this now. i suggest change to dd.
00:33:444 (102) - make this a k? You can still hear the snare from 00:33:369 (101) - sound over to this note very clearly.
00:33:519 (103,104,105) - Similar to the stream at 00:28:869 - ; There is a 1/6 to be heard here. It would be nice if you could map it too as a (kkkd), as there is a highpitched snare here.
00:33:744 (106) - color to d? There is no special sound to be heard here, only a kickdrum so there isnt really a reason to make this a kat.
00:34:044 (111,112,113,114,115,116) - make this piece of pattern dkdkdk? There is no special sound to be heard on 113 and 115 and that warrants this pattern to be ddkdkk. You can much more clearly hear the snare on 112, 114 and a high pitched ting on 116 that would warrant a kat much more.
00:34:569 (117) - Another opportunity to place a finisher. Please consider, its a really distinct sound and should be finished.
00:37:419 (144,145) - dd, same as 00:27:819 (49,50)
00:35:244 (123,124,125,126) - ddkk, same as 00:25:644 (28,29,30,31)
00:35:019 (121,122) - dd, same as 00:25:419 (26,27)
00:38:544 (153) - color to kat? You can again hear a snare sound.
00:38:769 (157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165) - I do not understand what this is mapped to. If its mapped to the drums, then i would consider you would map a kat to the highpitched snares, which are audible at 00:38:769 - ; 00:38:994 - and maybe 00:39:219 -. That would result in this little pattern becoming kddkddkdk, which sounds a lot nicer.
00:39:369 (165) - again make this a finisher? If you want you can remove 00:39:294 (164) - to avoid a finisher that plays a bit weird.
00:39:819 (169,170) - dd again because you know why xD
00:40:569 (174,175,176,177,178,179) - why are these sounds suddenly so connected? i dont hear a sound on 00:40:644 - and 00:40:794 - ; so why are there notes? The rest of the section you never really added notes where there were no sounds. same for 01:07:119 (192,193,194,195,196,197) -
00:43:869 (1) - make this a kat finisher? I dunno but a clap noise would be more like a kat finisher instead of a don finisher. Making this a kat finisher would also make contrast to 00:44:169 (2) - this note.
00:44:169 (2) - Make this a don finisher too, you can hear the good old finisher-esque sound used in many songs.
00:44:469 (3) - theres a clap lying here, why isnt it a kat?
00:48:144 (32,33,34) - the kat that these 2 dons lead up to is a very weak echo of a clap. Its emphasized too much imo and you can delete 00:48:144 (32) - to make the clap not that much emphasized compared to 00:48:069 (31) -; which is a much louder clap.
00:50:694 - put a kat here? I can hear an echo of a clap that shouldnt be left out.
01:00:219 (135,136,137,138,139) - i find this ddkkd to be quite a dense pattern mapped to relatively silent sounds. Splitting it up into dk kd would be much better to fit the claps.
01:02:094 - another clap that has been left out. Maybe map it as dkd as youve done before with 01:00:819 (140,141,142) - ?
01:03:369 (165) - make this a kat finisher? You really missed a lot of opportunities to make finishers....
01:09:969 (216) - shift this note over to 01:09:894 -? This results in a dk kd; which suits the claps even better.
01:12:069 (235,236) - make this to a kd? This piano rises in pitch, but at a lower pitch than 01:12:369 (239,240) - So a single kat inside the stream would be appropiate to represent that.
01:20:169 (306,307) - color these 2 don? They only have strong kicks lying behind them and dont really fit to a k, since you mapped the section so that a kat usually belongs to a clap sound.
01:20:469 (308) - color k because clap sound, gives nice emphasis if you combine with my previous suggestion.
01:22:419 (331) - color kat? The piano noise picks up on pitch right before the stream ends so it would be a nice fit to add a kat here.
01:26:169 - shift this green line over to 01:22:869 - ? It will make all barlines move slower, which is more appropiate for a silent part. Also if someone plays the drum in this break it will silence those sounds too.
01:36:369 (352) - make this a kat too? This will have a very nice effect that only background piano sounds are d and foreground piano is d in this section giving it a nice structure.
02:05:769 (1) - Finisher please.
02:05:769 - to 02:24:969 -
->For me this section sounds very confused on what was mapped to. A few notes fit to the claps, and a few listen to the drums again. Please make your intentions with this part clearer/explain them to me so i can follow up in a next post.
02:28:194 (216) - color this a kat? the piano starts to pick up on pitch yet again and should be emphasized by putting a kat here.
02:28:569 (221,222) - swap these 2 notes? Then 02:28:494 (220,221) - these 2 notes will capture the sudden piano pitch rise much more clearly as it sounds sharper, just like the piano.
02:31:869 (263) - color this kat to make a double k leading into a white tick similar to 02:31:494 (258,259) - and the kind?
02:35:769 - from this point the piano chords you mapped to in this little pause section change a bit until 02:36:519 - . The strong sounds you ignored lie on 02:35:769 - and 02:36:219 - which i dont find properly emphasized with the patterns you carried over from the previous few seconds.
02:39:819 (356,357,358,359,360,361,362) - why is this suddenly mapped to the claps when you can hear some 1/4 piano in the background you can map to? Please map this little section to the piano to not abruptly change focus.
02:47:544 (442) - color this don so it reflects the pitch of the piano going down in relation to 02:46:869 (433,434) - and 02:47:169 (437,438) - better?
02:52:344 (495) - same as above.
02:56:619 - to 03:00:819 -
-> Why is there mapping to the clap pattern again when you can orient yourself on the piano background once more just like you did at 02:34:719 -
03:06:744 (651) - change to don for pitch, reason already given.
03:11:544 (706) - ^
03:16:344 (763) - ^
03:18:894 (788) - color this don to emphasize the very high pitched piano chord at 03:18:969 (789) - more?
03:19:044 (790) - shift this over to 03:19:119 - to make said high pitched piano chord stand out more by giving a 1/2 break after? Also make the dkd triplet that comes when you apply to a ddk to fit the snare as a filler rhythm.
03:22:494 (834) - making this to a kat will make this last part before the last very strong note a bit more intense, fitting to a buildup, and also make the last note stand out more since all notes around the last sound will be a kat if you apply this.
03:36:219 - why is this diddling noise left out when you mapped something to it at? You can atleast map something to it, it doesnt have to be a 1/4 stream or something. Just some notes to acknowledge its existence.
03:53:169 - why is this note here? there is no sounds in the music and it would be better if this part that in relatively sparse in drums would be mapped precisely to the drums to capture the rhythm better.
03:57:069 (908) - theres a higher pitched snare that should be a kat, as you mapped all higher pitched snares with a kat in this section.
03:54:069 (892) - also this should be a kat too, to differ it as a high pitched snare from the others.
03:55:644 (900) - same goes for here
03:57:444 (912) - same here.
03:59:919 (1) - shorten this spinner to 04:00:594 - and put a kat finisher 04:00:669 - here. Similar to how you handled this musical pattern at 00:43:119 -
04:04:344 (46) - make this a don pleaaaaase; it makes the piano pitch thats going down clearer again!
04:09:144 (101) - same here.
04:14:919 (170,171) - swap these two notes to fit better to the clap filler rhythm you made here?
04:17:994 (196,204) - I suggest you make these two notes a kat, the piano changes pitch at each beat and it would play better and make more sense in general to have the color change on a beat.
04:23:544 (272) - d because the pitch ive explained like 100 times now.
04:28:419 (330) - make this a don because the pitch is not going up here, nor is there any other important sound, it goes strictly down and i dont know why there is a kat.
04:33:144 (390) - blaaah make this don.
04:36:894 (434) - make this a kat because the piano pitch rises up quite sharply here, which would fit to a triple kat inside this stream much better than a kdk.
04:39:294 (467) - make this a kat to emphasize the last note more by differing it as a don, and also to emphasize the buildup by making kats more frequent as the piano ramps up.
This map needs a lot of work in patterns/consistency. I hope you can move forward with this. Good luck.