Hi. Here from Christmas Queue. Hope this finds you well!
[Wonder]
00:08:032 (4) - This was an important note to me because of the strong vocal on the downbeat, so I was a bit disappointed there was nothing to emphasize or contrast this.
01:08:969 (3) – This was a strong note, so it felt strange that the DS into was smaller than the DS on the weak note at 01:08:735 (2) - .
01:16:235 (2) – This is a strong note in the song, but it didn't feel that strong in the map. I think it would actually be more exciting if you lowered the DS between 01:15:063 (1,2,1,2,1) – a bit so that the note at 01:16:235 (2) – can really stand out. Alternatively, you can make the flow/pattern different at (2) to offer contrast/emphasis that way.
There are other places where I feel this way, but I will only mention this one.
01:30:532 (1,2) – I didn't like the aesthetics, consider making the (2) slider go into (1) more like
https://puu.sh/ycz9o/ad6f805048.jpg01:33:344 (5,1,2) – I didn't get this. Compare to places like 00:27:719 (5,1,2) – and 00:31:469 (5,1,2) – etc. It felt like your shtick was to change the position of the slider heads from the typical pattern. But instead at 01:33:344 (5,1,2) – , there's no change, and it's exactly a line, and I thought you were trying to not do that.
01:35:922 (3,1) – This DS felt a bit big.
03:26:782 (1) – The reverse sliders felt like they were simplifying the rhythm a lot, so it felt like there were some cool beats I was kind of glossing over. When I played the Hard, I was like "yeah this rhythm felt more engaging. The Wonder diff would be nicer if you just copied this into it instead," so try some other rhythms.
03:42:719 (2) – Spinner might be a good way to express the fade out section. Same for Hard
Edit: Some of the changes you made after Chewin's map made me want to give an alternative viewpoint.
00:30:532 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't think the problem was the flow since similar parts where you fanned out at 01:13:657 (1,2,3) - are nice to play. I think it was just too big an angle at (3,4,5), so if you close that up sharpen up that angle like
this you could do that flow if you wanted.
00:38:032 (1,2,3,4) - I like what you had before. The anti-jump was clearly bringing out the background vocal in a detailed way, and its that kind of detailed expression that I like seeing in maps.
Good luck!