1. (Hyper) Don't Leave the Party Dying - 7Key (3.02 stars, 2067 notes)
2. (Insane) Get Up and Let Go - 7Key (4.89 stars, 3045 notes)
3. (Normal) Nice and Steady - 7Key (1.99 stars, 1268 notes)
4. Julie's Digger - 7Key (5.32 stars, 3146 notes)
5. Move It (7.5 stars, 1150 notes)

ZeroCalamity wrote:

IRC

2017-10-10 21:48 Mini Gaunt: Hi, would you be interested in doing a testplay? Its 7k
2017-10-10 21:48 ZeroCalamity: ok
2017-10-10 21:48 Mini Gaunt: ACTION is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1437403 Caravan Palace - Lone Digger (Ragtime Piano Cover)]
2017-10-10 21:49 ZeroCalamity: oh nice song choice
2017-10-10 21:49 Mini Gaunt: thanks owo
2017-10-10 21:53 ZeroCalamity: fun map
2017-10-10 21:53 ZeroCalamity: I like it
2017-10-10 21:53 ZeroCalamity: biggest problems are:
2017-10-10 21:53 Mini Gaunt: thanks
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: lack of structure
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: not enough clear patterns
2017-10-10 21:54 Mini Gaunt: ok
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: so it's harder to read and plays like a convert
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: similar to like
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: ACTION is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/839569 Excision & Pegboard Nerds - Bring The Madness (Noisestorm Nightcore Remix)]
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: then
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: you need to playtest more
2017-10-10 21:54 ZeroCalamity: patterns don't have enough flow
2017-10-10 21:55 ZeroCalamity: this is closely related to lack of structure
2017-10-10 21:55 Mini Gaunt: yeah, I have been gathering testplays from others because I am not really good enough to play it
2017-10-10 21:55 ZeroCalamity: usually fixing one means the other will be much better
2017-10-10 21:55 ZeroCalamity: yeah
2017-10-10 21:55 ZeroCalamity: gj on mapping it that well since you can't play it
2017-10-10 21:55 ZeroCalamity: then
2017-10-10 21:55 Mini Gaunt: thanks!
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: you need to think a little bit about how the fingers move
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: and not overdo each hand
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: when you move the chords
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: that kind of thing is very hard
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: to map and to play
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: ex: /np
2017-10-10 21:56 Mini Gaunt: is putting single key jacks on 1 or 7 too much in general?
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: ACTION is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/699696 shiraishi - True Millennium Queen]
2017-10-10 21:56 ZeroCalamity: nah
2017-10-10 21:56 Mini Gaunt: because I avoided doing those
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: it's better than 2 and 5 actually
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: but ... in moderation
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: outer fingers get tired more
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: spacebar is very hard
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: spacebar is hardest*
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: and thumb isn't good for jacking
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: but you didn't overdo it much there
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: best to spread it out
2017-10-10 21:57 ZeroCalamity: either evenly or with a slight bias to pointer and middle finger imo
2017-10-10 21:58 ZeroCalamity: but look at the patterns and think about how readable they are
2017-10-10 21:58 ZeroCalamity: making them more organised, structured could help
2017-10-10 21:58 Mini Gaunt: is it a good idea to switch from a left hand chord to a right hand chord with a space bar note?
2017-10-10 21:58 ZeroCalamity: can you give example, not sure what you mean
2017-10-10 21:59 Mini Gaunt: so having 123 4 567 with as 1/4ths in the map
2017-10-10 22:00 ZeroCalamity: yeah thats fine
2017-10-10 22:00 ZeroCalamity: kind of depends which hand you have spacebar on
2017-10-10 22:00 ZeroCalamity: not sure which one would be harder
2017-10-10 22:00 Mini Gaunt: yeah, somoneone mentioned they play left hand space bar and had some trouble
2017-10-10 22:00 ZeroCalamity: but it's similar to chordstreaming so you should be good
2017-10-10 22:00 Mini Gaunt: since left and right hand are seperated in the map
2017-10-10 22:01 ZeroCalamity: mhm
2017-10-10 22:01 ZeroCalamity: I'm left hand spacebar
2017-10-10 22:01 ZeroCalamity: also
2017-10-10 22:01 ZeroCalamity: you have a big section of just using 1 [23] repeating
2017-10-10 22:01 ZeroCalamity: it's annoying because your thumb doesn't play anything
2017-10-10 22:02 ZeroCalamity: and then when it has to, it's not ready
2017-10-10 22:02 ZeroCalamity: so maybe add variety there
2017-10-10 22:02 ZeroCalamity: and last thing
2017-10-10 22:02 ZeroCalamity: you have a resource usually people don't have
2017-10-10 22:02 ZeroCalamity: a scrolling midi picture of the notes
2017-10-10 22:02 ZeroCalamity: so you can use that to maybe adjust some chord sizes
2017-10-10 22:02 ZeroCalamity: like
2017-10-10 22:02 Mini Gaunt: yes, it has been really helpful with the mapping process
2017-10-10 22:03 ZeroCalamity: 00:30:125 -
2017-10-10 22:03 ZeroCalamity: you did that well
2017-10-10 22:03 ZeroCalamity: keep thinking of more ways to use that
2017-10-10 22:04 ZeroCalamity: and different ways
2017-10-10 22:04 ZeroCalamity: you'll get a long way like that
Implemented
2017-10-10 22:06 Mini Gaunt: I see
2017-10-10 22:06 Mini Gaunt: Thanks a lot for all the input though
2017-10-10 22:06 ZeroCalamity: np np
2017-10-10 22:19 ZeroCalamity: hey
2017-10-10 22:19 ZeroCalamity: I found a thing or 2 more
2017-10-10 22:20 Mini Gaunt: throw 'em at me
2017-10-10 22:20 ZeroCalamity: ok another thing you can do, is ctrl H some parts that you made
2017-10-10 22:20 ZeroCalamity: that repeat
2017-10-10 22:20 ZeroCalamity: so you have more balance for diferent spacebar users
2017-10-10 22:20 ZeroCalamity: 01:20:931 (80931|3,80931|6,80931|0,80931|5,80931|4,81052|4,81052|5,81052|3,81052|6,81173|1,81173|2,81294|6,81294|4,81294|5,81294|3,81415|0) -
Fixed, and flipped a couple parts
2017-10-10 22:20 ZeroCalamity: patterns like these
2017-10-10 22:20 ZeroCalamity: so both kinds of players get the chord experience
2017-10-10 22:21 Mini Gaunt: Oh, I never thought about that
2017-10-10 22:21 ZeroCalamity: it's a cool way to map faster and better
2017-10-10 22:21 ZeroCalamity: just don't overuse
2017-10-10 22:21 ZeroCalamity: anyway
2017-10-10 22:21 ZeroCalamity: patterns that are kinda hard
2017-10-10 22:21 ZeroCalamity: just so you get the idea
2017-10-10 22:21 ZeroCalamity: 01:27:705 (87705|4,87705|5,87826|4,87947|5,88068|4) -
2017-10-10 22:21 Mini Gaunt: hey if you want to post in my beatmap thread: t/652159 I can give you some kudosu for the time you are spending on this map
2017-10-10 22:22 ZeroCalamity: 02:09:560 (129560|5,129560|4,129681|5,129681|4,129802|5,129802|6) -
Fixed,
2017-10-10 22:22 ZeroCalamity: ok
2017-10-10 22:22 ZeroCalamity: I will
2017-10-10 22:22 ZeroCalamity: 02:15:125 -
2017-10-10 22:22 ZeroCalamity: 02:15:971 (135971|2,135971|4,136092|4,136092|2,136092|3,136213|4,136213|2) -
Fixed,and implemented
2017-10-10 22:23 ZeroCalamity: it's pretty much
2017-10-10 22:24 ZeroCalamity: if they look nice
2017-10-10 22:24 ZeroCalamity: they're probably easier to play
2017-10-10 22:24 ZeroCalamity: not always
2017-10-10 22:24 Mini Gaunt: hmm
2017-10-10 22:24 ZeroCalamity: but at least they're probably easier to read
2017-10-10 22:24 ZeroCalamity: and sometimes that's not the point
2017-10-10 22:24 ZeroCalamity: but if you want to make it as fun as you can
2017-10-10 22:25 Mini Gaunt: I played alot of bms converts so I played a lot of easy to read hard to play maps
2017-10-10 22:25 ZeroCalamity: ah
2017-10-10 22:25 ZeroCalamity: yeah I kinda get the feel of that
2017-10-10 22:25 Mini Gaunt: and a lot of years in music makes me care about the pitches of every note/chord/instrument
2017-10-10 22:26 Mini Gaunt: its not a good combination xd
2017-10-10 22:26 ZeroCalamity: hahah
2017-10-10 22:26 ZeroCalamity: pitch relevancy is cool
2017-10-10 22:26 ZeroCalamity: but hard to implement
2017-10-10 22:26 ZeroCalamity: usually best to put it when you have low density patterns
2017-10-10 22:26 ZeroCalamity: and when playability is not an issue
2017-10-10 22:26 ZeroCalamity: cus pitched patterns are sometimes very awkward
2017-10-10 22:27 Mini Gaunt: yeah, thats true, I should stop worrying about it when doing the chord jack sections
2017-10-10 22:27 ZeroCalamity: yeah
2017-10-10 22:27 Mini Gaunt: its a good baseline at least
2017-10-10 22:27 ZeroCalamity: playability is the most important
2017-10-10 22:27 ZeroCalamity: and testing gives you playability

YunoFanatic wrote:

mod

THIS ONE TAKE NOTE OF THIS AND THINK OF IT MANY TIMES LMAO
00:08:592 (8592|4,8592|1,8592|2) - THIS IS PLACED IN A WRONG SNAP YOU COULD EVEN HEAR IT OR FEEL IT WHEN YOU PLAYED THIS DIFF. IT SHOULD BE AT 00:08:623 (8623|4,8623|2,8623|1) - WITH a 1/16 SNAP. CHECK ALL THE SIMILAR SOUND ITS VERY DISTURBING I WONT BE LISTING IT ALL BUT IM SAYING YOURE USING IT ALL THROUGHOUT.
It might just be an error of the .mp3 file because I got the music from the cover, which was played by a midi player (i.e. Synthesia) from sheet music. The sheet music of that is here https://i.imgur.com/l9bu0C3.png there is no 1/32 rest between the last two notes. Also, the sound is heard before the hitsound when set to 1/16 snap on osu!


00:07:383 (7383|0,7383|6,7383|3) - as far as my mapping skills concern, this shouldn't have triples. it does not emphasize anything HOWEVER, i get the point on what youre trying to do. the triples or doubles should be at 00:07:262 (7262|4) - listen at 25% playback rate youll see the difference.
Thats because it is a treble clef note without any bass clef note to balance it, so it sounds "louder" but it is the same. To be clear this is the note you want me to put the triples or doubles on https://i.imgur.com/R7abk7g.png
However I agree that the following note should just be a double and not a triple. So that is changed

00:07:746 (7746|4) - this note maps something more than a one-noter. the sound is still the same as 00:07:625 (7625|5,7625|2,7625|1) - yet it just decreased by a little. so suggesting add another note to make it a double.
Managed to get that note in the end of my previous screen shot. Its the same reason why the other one is only a single. Refer back to music to check https://i.imgur.com/R7abk7g.png (its the last note)

00:07:867 (7867|0) - lmao ghost note alert. pls delete whats this even doing
???? There is a bass clef single there. It is also going to be expected by the player because it is following the left hand pattern

00:08:834 (8834|4,8834|0) - not even strong enough to be doubled.
Same issue as above, there is a both a bass clef note there and it follows the left hand pattern.

00:09:076 (9076|2,9076|1) - this is the time or sound when you have to map it with triples (BASED ON YOUR MAPPING SCHEME OR WHAT IVE OBSERVED SO FAR)
I have no idea why I would map that with triples, its the same volume and pitch as the triple below it, but its a double because it doesnt have a treble clef note

00:10:649 (10649|5) - you could make this double because theres no variation happening with your mappings because this is clearly louder than 00:10:770 (10770|0) - and yet you tend to map it both by single note
Same issue as the last time you pointed out that note https://i.imgur.com/R7abk7g.png that should not be a double

00:12:584 (12584|6) - missing two notes here listen.
? https://i.imgur.com/gRb66sh.png (last note in the screenshot) its just higher than the others, its the same as ever

00:12:947 (12947|1,12947|2) - your mapping is very inconsistent as far as i can see. this one has a loud sound yet you map it with a single note despite that you map these kinds of sounds with triples before
The note played there is ONLY a bass clef chord, so it is mapped how I mapped every other bass clef chord: with 12

00:13:794 - this seems strange to play. theres something wrong with the snappings i can clearly feel it check it out with playback rate 25
snappings are correct

00:13:431 (13431|0,13431|5,13431|3,13431|1) - IM PRETTY SURE THAT THIS ISNT APPLICABLE TO BE MAPPED AT FOUR NOTED ITS JUST SIMILAR AS OTHER LMAO
That part is correct.
What was actually incorrect was that 00:13:671 (13671|0,13671|2,13671|1) - was a triple (it should be double) and 00:13:913 (13913|3,13913|2,13913|1) - should be a quad

00:16:818 (16818|2,16818|1) - it has same sound as 00:16:334 (16334|1,16334|2,16334|4) - yet you mapped it with doubles only whatt..
Its not the same sound at all? ?????

00:17:544 (17544|0,17544|2,17544|1) - triples really? its not that even loud
Yes, it should be a double, I mentioned it on the last section. So, fixed.

00:24:076 (24076|6,24076|3,24076|2,24076|5,24076|1) - THIS ISNT EVEN AS LOUD AS 00:24:802 (24802|6,24802|4,24802|5,24802|0) - MAPPING THIS WITH 5 NOTES IS LIKE VERY BAD YOU COULD HEAR THE DIFFERENCE RIGHT.
00:24:076 (24076|6,24076|3,24076|2,24076|5,24076|1) - is both a larger chord and it is louder in the song if you wanted to argue volume,
so in every way here you are wrong. In reality it was mapped that way because 12 follows the left hand pattern and it happened to land on a 3 note chord for the right hand (if you use right hand space bar)

00:27:342 (27342|4,27463|4,27705|4) - UGHHHHHH whats the purpose of this jack exactly?
because its a jack https://i.imgur.com/OewBOqY.png

00:31:092 (31092|5,31092|4,31092|1,31092|3,31092|6,31213|3,31213|6,31213|4,31213|0,31213|5) - holy cow what the hell is this. it is overmapped nerf some notes im not gonna list similar things but please check it if its appropriate to the music or sound youre folllowing
A double forte two hand chord is certainly worthy of the way I mapped it. https://i.imgur.com/06vWcty.png

the jack should start here 01:04:479 (64479|0,64479|5) - and shouldnt be followed by 01:03:512 (63512|0,63512|5,63754|1,63754|2,63754|5,63996|0,63996|5,64238|2,64238|1,64238|5) - because those are irrelevant
but there IS VERY CLEARLY THAT SOUND THERE BEING REPEATED why would I not map a sound that is in the foreground???????

01:07:625 (67625|5,67746|5,67867|5) - if i were you i wouldnt prefer a jack here a stair pattern should be enough to emphasize
What you prefer and what is played are two different things https://i.imgur.com/ZpUbZv3.png

01:33:149 (93149|5,93149|3,93149|0,93149|4,93149|6) - oh my whats this
The same thing it has always been

01:53:834 (113834|5,113955|5,114076|5) - really? is this really even needed
Yes https://i.imgur.com/EChucI9.png

01:54:802 (114802|4,114802|6,114802|2,114802|0) - this is a no no no no no no no really nerf some ln
Ill reduce it to a 3 note ln https://i.imgur.com/lZYPKZR.png

01:56:738 (116738|0,116738|3) - loud and sign of opening new verse yet you mapped with doubles only
Because that is what is written



well i guess that should be all for now...

i keen reminder. be consistent.

map for the music not for the style.
That literally exactly what I did

avoid overmapping as much as possible.... if not needed kindly think of it despite youre mappinga MIDI something etc etc you should consider it becasue this is OSU and not something else
I thought it was a rythm game about music

check your snappings there are tons that is really off

map map map map map map and play play play play play moreeeee you could achieve great mapping skills with those

1. First of all, timing seems a bit early just from a little listen. It should be closer to 4,488ms offset
2. I don't think you use _ to connect words in tags...

1. 00:07:383 (7383|3,7746|3,8229|3,8592|3,8834|3) - feels pretty heavily anchored on the column 4
2. 00:13:915 (13915|5,13915|6,13915|4) - why is this here when there is no melody playing
3. 00:17:786 (17786|4,17786|6,17786|5) - here too
4. 00:23:471 (23471|1,23471|2,23471|4,23471|5,23471|6,23471|0,23834|0,23834|3,23834|5,23834|4,23834|6) - similar type of chord so why is the offbeat one a 6-note chord while the on-beat one a 5-note chord? Would be better to stick with the same chord size for both
5. 00:36:536 (36536|2,36657|2) - awkward minijack while holding an LN on column 2 - might be an idea to find a better solution
6. 00:39:076 (39076|0) - you miss notes for the melody/chord here
7. 00:45:367 (45367|2,45367|0,45850|0,45850|1,45850|2) - same bass chord but you use a 2-note chord and a 3-note chord
8. 00:52:867 (52867|1,52867|0,53834|2,53834|1) - might be picky, but considering you've been strictly following pitch, why are these two the flipped around?
9. 01:07:383 (67383|0,67383|1) - one note in the bass in the song, but you use two LN
10. 01:07:867 (67867|1) - in fact this is same as 01:07:383 (67383|0,67383|1) - in sound
11. 01:10:165 (70165|3,70286|3) - I don't think this jack is necessary musically
12. 01:13:431 (73431|3,73431|5) - ghost notes - only bass plays
13. 01:15:488 (75488|3,75488|6,75488|4,75850|6,75850|4) - same melody chord but you use a 2-note chord and a 3-note chord
14. 01:25:770 (85770|5,85770|0,85770|3,85770|4,85770|2,85891|5,86012|3,86012|1,86012|6,86012|2,86012|4) - vs. 01:33:391 (93391|0,93391|1,93391|3,93391|5,93391|4,93391|6,93633|5,93754|6,93754|3,93754|4,93754|1,93754|2) - not consistent with each other, furthermore here you randomly decided to use a 6-note chord
15. 01:35:447 (95447|4,95447|6,95447|5,95447|3,95689|6,95689|3,95689|4) - same chord in the right hand but you use a 3-note chord and a 4-note chord
16. 01:39:802 (99802|1,99802|4,99802|2,99802|6) - you miss a chord 1/6th before this
17. 01:41:012 (101012|3) - you miss the melody chord
18. 01:45:125 (105125|1,105125|2,106092|2,106092|1) - these are slightly different chords in the music, not the same
19. 01:51:899 (111899|2,111899|3,111899|1,113834|1,113834|3,113834|2,113834|0) - why is one a 3-note chord and one a 4-note chord?
20. 02:11:133 (131133|2,131133|5,131133|4) - unnecessary jack, the two chords are not the same sound in the music too
21. 02:11:496 (131496|3,131496|1,131496|4) - no melody here, only bass chord
22. 02:18:512 (138512|2,138512|3,138512|1,138633|3,138633|2,138633|4,138754|3,138754|5,138754|4,138875|6,138875|4,138875|5) - very awkward to play considering the implicit triple jacks (e.g. 02:18:512 (138512|3,138633|3,138633|4,138754|3,138754|4,138875|4) - )
23. 02:18:270 (138270|4,138391|4,138633|4,138754|4,138875|4) - also this anchor
24. 02:22:867 (142867|2,142988|2,143109|2,143229|2) - why is this now in the left hand? I know you might want to make it more interesting but considering the style you've been going for, it doesn't seem to fit very well - also awkward to play because of the held LN on the same hand
25. 02:23:109 (143109|1,143109|5,143109|2) - that is not the chord size you used before for the same sound
26. 02:38:350 (158350|2,158350|4) - only one note in the left hand of the song, no melody
27. 02:39:802 (159802|5,160044|4,160165|4) - pitch? Especially because you use proper pitch for the same jacks here: 02:41:496 (161496|5,161617|5,161979|5,162100|5) -
28. 02:43:189 (163189|5,163189|1,163189|4,163189|0,163189|6,163189|3,163431|4,163431|3,163431|1,163431|5,163431|0,163431|6) - different chords in the music so I suggest changing the chords here too
29. 02:44:963 (164963|4) - wrong timed
30. 02:50:931 (170931|6,170931|0,170931|3,170931|1,170931|5,171173|5,171173|0,171173|2,171173|6,171173|3,171173|1) - similar chords in the music but in one you use a 5-note chord and one you use a 6-note chord - just to clarify on top of pointing this out before, this doesn't make sense especially as you've put the 6-note chord off-beat too
31. 02:52:141 (172141|1,172141|2,172383|0,172625|2,172625|1) - I know this happens before, but it's strange that the similar bass chords you represent with two LN and one LN for seemingly no reason other than because u couldn't find room
32. 02:56:012 (176012|3,176254|3,176738|3,176979|3) - different pitches so not necessary anchor
33. 02:58:673 (178673|6,178673|4,178673|2,178673|3,178673|0,178794|5,178915|4,178915|3,178915|0,178915|1,178915|2) - not an issue but now you use two 5-note chords... Just be consistent with all the scenarios earlier
34. 03:07:625 (187625|5) - perhaps lane 5 because same pitch (creates a jack)
35. 03:25:044 (205044|3,205044|5) - talked about this before
36. 03:24:802 (204802|5,204802|3,204923|3,204923|5,205044|5,205044|3,205165|3,205165|5,205286|5,205407|3,205528|3,205528|5) - I know you're trying to follow pitch as close to perfect as you can here, but these dense anchors on these lanes while the surrounding lanes are nowhere near as dense makes the pattern awkward to play
37. 03:30:609 (210609|4,210729|4,210850|4,210971|4,211092|4) - unnecessary 5-note jack - the music doesn't play the same note five times

1. Maybe rename 7K Extra?
2. 00:07:141 (7141|5) - you miss a note on the blue tick after this (on 1/4 snap)
3. 00:07:625 (7625|3) - you miss a note on the blue tick after this too
4. 00:11:012 (11012|5) - this too
5. 00:11:738 (11738|6) - ghost note
6. 00:15:125 (15125|4,15246|3,15367|4,15488|5,15609|6,15729|3,15850|4,15971|5,16092|6,16213|5,16334|4) - straight up copy paste from earlier - not even musically relevant
7. 00:23:471 (23471|4,23471|0,23471|2,23471|1,23834|5,23834|6,23834|3) - absolutely makes no sense for the LN chord to be a 4-note chord but the dopwnbeat to be a 3-note chord when they both are similar chord structures
8. 00:24:076 (24076|5,24076|1,24076|2,24076|6,24076|3) - similar to previous bullet point, not consistent because similar chord structure
9. 00:24:076 (24076|5,24076|1,24076|2,24076|6,24076|3) - should be 4 notes in the right hand
10. 00:31:092 (31092|3,31092|4,31092|5,31213|3,31213|4,31213|5) - I think it might be better to use a change of chords in the right hand rather than the same one twice
11. 00:35:205 (35205|5,35205|3,35205|4) - mentioned before
12. 00:37:383 (37383|2,37383|1,37383|4,37544|3,37625|6,37625|0,37625|5,37786|2,37867|4,37867|1,37867|5,38028|3,38109|2,38109|6,38109|5,38270|1,38270|4) - layering mess
13. 00:38:512 (38512|3,38592|5,38592|4,38754|2,38834|4,38834|6,38834|5,38996|2,38996|3,39076|5,39076|1,39076|4,39076|6,39238|6) - this too actually
14. 00:40:770 (40770|4,41012|6) - stepwise pitch
15. 00:46:738 (46738|5,46818|3) - I think these LN are unnecessary
16. 00:54:318 (54318|5,54560|6) - pitch?
17. 01:08:350 (68350|1,68350|5,68350|4,69318|3,69318|0,69318|6) - the second chord is stronger - I think first chord should be two notes
18. 01:09:802 (69802|5,69923|4,70044|5,70165|6) - maybe consider trill for musical relevance?
19. 01:11:496 (71496|5,71496|4,71617|5,71617|4) - not necessary jack considering the music alternates two chords there
20. 01:11:738 (71738|3,71859|4,71979|3,72100|4) - perhaps flip horizontally because the alternating 'trill' starts from the higher pitch note first
21. 01:12:705 (72705|4,72705|6,72705|5,72826|4,72826|5,72826|3) - you could have used the same chord here to follow the music
22. 01:13:189 (73189|5,73189|4,73310|4,73310|5,73431|5,73431|4,73552|4,73552|5) - absolutely unnecessary 4-note long jack. 01:13:431 (73431|4,73431|5) - This one doesn't even try to fit
23. 01:13:794 (73794|4,73794|5,73915|5,73915|4) - after that 4-note jack, I highly don't recommend using the same two notes right after
24. 01:18:149 (78149|4,78270|4,78391|4) - again unnecessary anchor
25. 01:18:996 (78996|4,78996|6,78996|5,79117|6,79117|5,79117|4) - the jack is actually in the bass, so maybe you could reflect that in the mapping?
26. 01:20:931 (80931|1,80931|0,80931|2,81052|0,81052|1,81052|2) - no the bass doesn't do this
27. 01:22:867 (82867|4,82867|5,82988|5,82988|4,83109|4,83109|5,83229|5,83229|4) - perhaps in the bass
28. 01:23:834 (83834|2,83996|2,84318|5,84479|5,85044|2,85205|2) - these subtle jacks don't make sense
29. 01:25:407 (85407|5,85407|3,85407|0,85407|1,85407|4,85770|6,85770|0,85770|4) - again this doesn't make sense, downbeat is a 3-chord?
30. 01:25:770 (85770|4,85770|6,85891|4,85891|6,86012|5,86012|3) - pitch?
31. 01:25:770 (85770|4,85770|6,85891|4,85891|6,86012|5,86012|3) - vs. 01:27:705 (87705|6,87705|5,87705|4,87826|3,87947|4,87947|6,87947|5) - inconsistent mapping
32. 01:29:762 (89762|5,89883|4) - pitch?
33. 01:30:689 (90689|3,90729|5) - stepwise grace note, maybe good to represent that
34. 01:30:689 (90689|3,91092|3) - these two aren't same pitch, and you can definitely do better than that
35. 01:31:576 (91576|5,91576|1,91697|4,91697|0) - that's not what you did before...
36. 01:32:060 (92060|6,92302|5,92302|6,92544|5,92544|6,92786|5,92786|6,93028|6,93028|5,93149|5,93149|6,93391|5,93391|6) - oh god
37. 01:33:754 (93754|1,93754|5,93754|6,93754|3,93754|2) - maybe not repeat the same notes as the LN?
38. 01:39:479 (99479|2,99479|4,99560|5,99560|1,99721|3,99802|6,99802|2,99802|4,99802|5,99963|4,99963|5,99963|6,100044|2,100044|1,100044|3,100205|2,100205|5,100205|4,100205|0,100447|4,100447|0,100447|3,100528|5,100528|6,100528|2,100689|3,100689|1,100689|2,100770|5,100770|6,100770|4,100931|2,100931|1,100931|0,101012|6,101012|4,101012|5,101173|3) - layering issues
39. 01:41:254 (101254|2,102221|2) - no the bass doesn't play the same note twice
40. 01:43:189 (103189|1,104157|1) - again same, and why is the space between them different from the previous bullet point?
41. 02:10:649 (130649|4,130770|4,131254|4,131375|4,131617|5,131738|5,131979|5,132100|5) - clear bias in righthand for the implicit jacks :/
42. 02:10:891 (130891|2,130891|1,130891|6,131012|4,131012|0,131012|5,131133|2,131133|1,131133|6) - not relevant musically and why are these not jacks when most of the rest are? Don't choose or choose not to use jacks randomly
43. 02:15:971 (135971|1,135971|3,135971|2,136092|2,136092|1,136092|3) - not relevant musically
44. 02:18:028 (138028|1,138028|2,138028|0,138149|3,138149|2,138149|1,138270|2,138270|4,138270|3,138391|3,138391|5,138391|4,138512|4,138512|6,138512|5,138633|6,138633|5,138633|2) - probably better to use a different set of chords because the implicit jacks in this is STRONG (e.g. 02:18:149 (138149|3,138270|4,138270|3,138391|4,138391|3,138391|5,138512|4,138512|5,138633|5) - for a right hand user)
45. 02:20:810 (140810|4,140931|4) - unnecessary jack
46. 02:27:221 (147221|3,147221|1,147221|2,147221|0,147342|2,147342|1,147342|0,147342|3) - recommend changing the two chords up
47. 02:27:826 (147826|4,147947|4) - jack not relevant musically
48. 02:28:552 (148552|4,148673|4) - this too
49. 02:40:286 (160286|3) - ghost note
50. 02:43:189 (163189|0,163189|6,163189|5,163189|4,163189|2,163431|2,163431|3,163431|5,163431|4,163431|6,163431|0) - my chords sizes zzzzz

Applequestria wrote:

1. First of all, timing seems a bit early just from a little listen. It should be closer to 4,488ms offset
   Fixed!
2. I don't think you use _ to connect words in tags...
   haha, you are right

7k Extra

1. Maybe rename 7K Extra?
   Will think on this, don't have too many ideas, will change though
2. 00:07:141 (7141|5) - you miss a note on the blue tick after this (on 1/4 snap)
   Both were fixed in a previous update (bad timing xd)
3. 00:07:625 (7625|3) - you miss a note on the blue tick after this too
   Both were fixed in a previous update (bad timing xd)
4. 00:11:012 (11012|5) - this too
   Same here
5. 00:11:738 (11738|6) - ghost note
   I am thinking on this one
6. 00:15:125 (15125|4,15246|3,15367|4,15488|5,15609|6,15729|3,15850|4,15971|5,16092|6,16213|5,16334|4) - straight up copy paste from earlier - not even musically relevant
   Do you want it to have variation? Because musically it is the same but it isnt varied.
7. 00:23:471 (23471|4,23471|0,23471|2,23471|1,23834|5,23834|6,23834|3) - absolutely makes no sense for the LN chord to be a 4-note chord but the dopwnbeat to be a 3-note chord when they both are similar chord structures
   Fixed!
8. 00:24:076 (24076|5,24076|1,24076|2,24076|6,24076|3) - similar to previous bullet point, not consistent because similar chord structure
   Now that I changed the previous issue, this chord makes more sense
9. 00:24:076 (24076|5,24076|1,24076|2,24076|6,24076|3) - should be 4 notes in the right hand
   Fixed!
10. 00:31:092 (31092|3,31092|4,31092|5,31213|3,31213|4,31213|5) - I think it might be better to use a change of chords in the right hand rather than the same one twice
    Fixed!
11. 00:35:205 (35205|5,35205|3,35205|4) - mentioned before
    Fixed!
12. 00:37:383 (37383|2,37383|1,37383|4,37544|3,37625|6,37625|0,37625|5,37786|2,37867|4,37867|1,37867|5,38028|3,38109|2,38109|6,38109|5,38270|1,38270|4) - layering mess
    Fixed!
13. 00:38:512 (38512|3,38592|5,38592|4,38754|2,38834|4,38834|6,38834|5,38996|2,38996|3,39076|5,39076|1,39076|4,39076|6,39238|6) - this too actually
    Fixed!
14. 00:40:770 (40770|4,41012|6) - stepwise pitch
    Fixed!
15. 00:46:738 (46738|5,46818|3) - I think these LN are unnecessary
    Fixed!
16. 00:54:318 (54318|5,54560|6) - pitch?
    Fixed!
17. 01:08:350 (68350|1,68350|5,68350|4,69318|3,69318|0,69318|6) - the second chord is stronger - I think first chord should be two notes
    added another note to the second chord, layering is better now
18. 01:09:802 (69802|5,69923|4,70044|5,70165|6) - maybe consider trill for musical relevance?
    Sure, added
19. 01:11:496 (71496|5,71496|4,71617|5,71617|4) - not necessary jack considering the music alternates two chords there
    Fixed!
20. 01:11:738 (71738|3,71859|4,71979|3,72100|4) - perhaps flip horizontally because the alternating 'trill' starts from the higher pitch note first
    Fixed!
21. 01:12:705 (72705|4,72705|6,72705|5,72826|4,72826|5,72826|3) - you could have used the same chord here to follow the music
    Kinda fixed
22. 01:13:189 (73189|5,73189|4,73310|4,73310|5,73431|5,73431|4,73552|4,73552|5) - absolutely unnecessary 4-note long jack. 01:13:431 (73431|4,73431|5) - This one doesn't even try to fit
    Fixed!
23. 01:13:794 (73794|4,73794|5,73915|5,73915|4) - after that 4-note jack, I highly don't recommend using the same two notes right after
    Fixed!
24. 01:18:149 (78149|4,78270|4,78391|4) - again unnecessary anchor
    Fixed!
25. 01:18:996 (78996|4,78996|6,78996|5,79117|6,79117|5,79117|4) - the jack is actually in the bass, so maybe you could reflect that in the mapping?
    The jack is still done with the right hand, but lower on the piano, so I am moving the jack down, but keeping it right hand
26. 01:20:931 (80931|1,80931|0,80931|2,81052|0,81052|1,81052|2) - no the bass doesn't do this
    Flipped!
27. 01:22:867 (82867|4,82867|5,82988|5,82988|4,83109|4,83109|5,83229|5,83229|4) - perhaps in the bass
    Flipped!
28. 01:23:834 (83834|2,83996|2,84318|5,84479|5,85044|2,85205|2) - these subtle jacks don't make sense
    Sure! Fixed!
29. 01:25:407 (85407|5,85407|3,85407|0,85407|1,85407|4,85770|6,85770|0,85770|4) - again this doesn't make sense, downbeat is a 3-chord?
    Fixed!
30. 01:25:770 (85770|4,85770|6,85891|4,85891|6,86012|5,86012|3) - pitch?
    Fixed!
31. 01:25:770 (85770|4,85770|6,85891|4,85891|6,86012|5,86012|3) - vs. 01:27:705 (87705|6,87705|5,87705|4,87826|3,87947|4,87947|6,87947|5) - inconsistent mapping
    Made more consistent
32. 01:29:762 (89762|5,89883|4) - pitch?
    Fixed!
33. 01:30:689 (90689|3,90729|5) - stepwise grace note, maybe good to represent that
    Fixed!
34. 01:30:689 (90689|3,91092|3) - these two aren't same pitch, and you can definitely do better than that
    Fixed?
35. 01:31:576 (91576|5,91576|1,91697|4,91697|0) - that's not what you did before...
    Fixed!
36. 01:32:060 (92060|6,92302|5,92302|6,92544|5,92544|6,92786|5,92786|6,93028|6,93028|5,93149|5,93149|6,93391|5,93391|6) - oh god
    Fixed!
37. 01:33:754 (93754|1,93754|5,93754|6,93754|3,93754|2) - maybe not repeat the same notes as the LN?
    Fixed!
38. 01:39:479 (99479|2,99479|4,99560|5,99560|1,99721|3,99802|6,99802|2,99802|4,99802|5,99963|4,99963|5,99963|6,100044|2,100044|1,100044|3,100205|2,100205|5,100205|4,100205|0,100447|4,100447|0,100447|3,100528|5,100528|6,100528|2,100689|3,100689|1,100689|2,100770|5,100770|6,100770|4,100931|2,100931|1,100931|0,101012|6,101012|4,101012|5,101173|3) - layering issues
    Fixed!
39. 01:41:254 (101254|2,102221|2) - no the bass doesn't play the same note twice
    Fixed!
40. 01:43:189 (103189|1,104157|1) - again same, and why is the space between them different from the previous bullet point?
    Fixed!
41. 02:10:649 (130649|4,130770|4,131254|4,131375|4,131617|5,131738|5,131979|5,132100|5) - clear bias in righthand for the implicit jacks :/
42. 02:10:891 (130891|2,130891|1,130891|6,131012|4,131012|0,131012|5,131133|2,131133|1,131133|6) - not relevant musically and why are these not jacks when most of the rest are? Don't choose or choose not to use jacks randomly
43. 02:15:971 (135971|1,135971|3,135971|2,136092|2,136092|1,136092|3) - not relevant musically
    Fixed!
44. 02:18:028 (138028|1,138028|2,138028|0,138149|3,138149|2,138149|1,138270|2,138270|4,138270|3,138391|3,138391|5,138391|4,138512|4,138512|6,138512|5,138633|6,138633|5,138633|2) - probably better to use a different set of chords because the implicit jacks in this is STRONG (e.g. 02:18:149 (138149|3,138270|4,138270|3,138391|4,138391|3,138391|5,138512|4,138512|5,138633|5) - for a right hand user)
    Fixed!
45. 02:20:810 (140810|4,140931|4) - unnecessary jack
    Fixed!
46. 02:27:221 (147221|3,147221|1,147221|2,147221|0,147342|2,147342|1,147342|0,147342|3) - recommend changing the two chords up
    Fixed!
47. 02:27:826 (147826|4,147947|4) - jack not relevant musically
    Fixed!
48. 02:28:552 (148552|4,148673|4) - this too
    Fixed!
49. 02:40:286 (160286|3) - ghost note
    Fixed!
50. 02:43:189 (163189|0,163189|6,163189|5,163189|4,163189|2,163431|2,163431|3,163431|5,163431|4,163431|6,163431|0) - my chords sizes zzzzz
    Fixed!

The rest of the map is basically same issues so I will stop there.
Ok, will go back and try to fix repeated errors

Applequestria wrote:

1. First of all, timing seems a bit early just from a little listen. It should be closer to 4,488ms offset
2. I don't think you use _ to connect words in tags...

Julie's Digger

1. 00:07:383 (7383|3,7746|3,8229|3,8592|3,8834|3) - feels pretty heavily anchored on the column 4 Moved the 2 last notes on the 5th column~
2. 00:13:915 (13915|5,13915|6,13915|4) - why is this here when there is no melody playing Alright, fix + bookmark it for my future use owo. It was mostly because of the many low pitch chord, since 2 tapping note seem like not enough at all. So I'm just going to delete one
3. 00:17:786 (17786|4,17786|6,17786|5) - here too ^
4. 00:23:471 (23471|1,23471|2,23471|4,23471|5,23471|6,23471|0,23834|0,23834|3,23834|5,23834|4,23834|6) - similar type of chord so why is the offbeat one a 6-note chord while the on-beat one a 5-note chord? Would be better to stick with the same chord size for both Added one more notes,
   mostly because of the left hand should always be 2 notes -> 3 notes, but in this chart I did 1 -> 2. so it end up being the LN + 2 notes xD. Nice spot.
5. 00:36:536 (36536|2,36657|2) - awkward minijack while holding an LN on column 2 - might be an idea to find a better solution Alright fix,
   gotta admit is weird in a situation where the left hand seem to be really consistent owo
6. 00:39:076 (39076|0) - you miss notes for the melody/chord here Added a note
7. 00:45:367 (45367|2,45367|0,45850|0,45850|1,45850|2) - same bass chord but you use a 2-note chord and a 3-note chord Woops accident mistake, nice thanks XD.
8. 00:52:867 (52867|1,52867|0,53834|2,53834|1) - might be picky, but considering you've been strictly following pitch, why are these two the flipped around? Not sure if I understand, but I think you want me to flip for the pitch with these 2 00:53:834 (53834|2,53834|1) - , reason I end up not following the pitch was because of the LN after the 2 long LN will end up jacking each other, but fix it owo, moved the short LN that was after as well !!
   Thanks x3
9. 01:07:383 (67383|0,67383|1) - one note in the bass in the song, but you use two LN Answer below
10. 01:07:867 (67867|1) - in fact this is same as 01:07:383 (67383|0,67383|1) - in sound This sound is the same as the lower pitch on the top 2 notes, while that part on top have 2 low chord, that's why I put 2 LN.
11. 01:10:165 (70165|3,70286|3) - I don't think this jack is necessary musically Fix
12. 01:13:431 (73431|3,73431|5) - ghost notes - only bass plays Gotta admit it really does sound like that only, but the 2 notes jack should be the same pitch as the one in the bottom, is just they both sound much lower, but if we put keysound, you'll hear the bass overide it more.
13. 01:15:488 (75488|3,75488|6,75488|4,75850|6,75850|4) - same melody chord but you use a 2-note chord and a 3-note chord Nice catch,
    both have the exact same pitch, but like I said the top one, you can hear that part is a bit louder then this one, because of the E5 + A#5 owo
14. 01:25:770 (85770|5,85770|0,85770|3,85770|4,85770|2,85891|5,86012|3,86012|1,86012|6,86012|2,86012|4) - vs. 01:33:391 (93391|0,93391|1,93391|3,93391|5,93391|4,93391|6,93633|5,93754|6,93754|3,93754|4,93754|1,93754|2) - not consistent with each other, furthermore here you randomly decided to use a 6-note chord Fix, thought Im not sure if you want me to remove instead of adding due to the "random 6"
15. 01:35:447 (95447|4,95447|6,95447|5,95447|3,95689|6,95689|3,95689|4) - same chord in the right hand but you use a 3-note chord and a 4-note chord Oh is actually like this, first one is G#5, A#5, C#6, F6. 2nd one is A#5, C#6, G#6
16. 01:39:802 (99802|1,99802|4,99802|2,99802|6) - you miss a chord 1/6th before this Woops added one note.
17. 01:41:012 (101012|3) - you miss the melody chord Hmm I just feel like I kinda want to make it different due to the lower pitch that is really clear, compare to the other triple for the melody that sound super clear, we barely hear it here. Also I'll move that one note on the left more owo
18. 01:45:125 (105125|1,105125|2,106092|2,106092|1) - these are slightly different chords in the music, not the same Nice catch, fixed
19. 01:51:899 (111899|2,111899|3,111899|1,113834|1,113834|3,113834|2,113834|0) - why is one a 3-note chord and one a 4-note chord? Woops, removed the 2nd LN on that 4-note chord, since too much 2nd column. Was probably me wanting too much different from 01:54:802 - .
20. 02:11:133 (131133|2,131133|5,131133|4) - unnecessary jack, the two chords are not the same sound in the music too True, alright only kept on note jack, might remove that one as well if people question it in the future.
21. 02:11:496 (131496|3,131496|1,131496|4) - no melody here, only bass chord I don't know if is me, but I do hear the melody that is nearly the same volume as here 02:11:617 - .
22. 02:18:512 (138512|2,138512|3,138512|1,138633|3,138633|2,138633|4,138754|3,138754|5,138754|4,138875|6,138875|4,138875|5) - very awkward to play considering the implicit triple jacks (e.g. 02:18:512 (138512|3,138633|3,138633|4,138754|3,138754|4,138875|4) - ) Toughest part,
    if we follow the piano keys, it should have start here 02:18:028 - , but I start it later when the high pitch is more audible.
23. 02:18:270 (138270|4,138391|4,138633|4,138754|4,138875|4) - also this anchor Moved this 02:18:391 (138391|4) - to the right.
24. 02:22:867 (142867|2,142988|2,143109|2,143229|2) - why is this now in the left hand? I know you might want to make it more interesting but considering the style you've been going for, it doesn't seem to fit very well - also awkward to play because of the held LN on the same hand Was me lacking of space xD, fixed~
25. 02:23:109 (143109|1,143109|5,143109|2) - that is not the chord size you used before for the same sound Same reason, is E5 and A#5.
26. 02:38:350 (158350|2,158350|4) - only one note in the left hand of the song, no melody Fix~
27. 02:39:802 (159802|5,160044|4,160165|4) - pitch? Especially because you use proper pitch for the same jacks here: 02:41:496 Oh woops,
    fix~ (161496|5,161617|5,161979|5,162100|5) -
28. 02:43:189 (163189|5,163189|1,163189|4,163189|0,163189|6,163189|3,163431|4,163431|3,163431|1,163431|5,163431|0,163431|6) - different chords in the music so I suggest changing the chords here too Agree~ fix
29. 02:44:963 (164963|4) - wrong timed Hmm, I do hear that piano sound, is lower pitch the the one after.
30. 02:50:931 (170931|6,170931|0,170931|3,170931|1,170931|5,171173|5,171173|0,171173|2,171173|6,171173|3,171173|1) - similar chords in the music but in one you use a 5-note chord and one you use a 6-note chord - just to clarify on top of pointing this out before, this doesn't make sense especially as you've put the 6-note chord off-beat too This part is kinda different from the other one above that I fix, this one is actually a 5 chord notes follow up by a 6 notes chord xD.
31. 02:52:141 (172141|1,172141|2,172383|0,172625|2,172625|1) - I know this happens before, but it's strange that the similar bass chords you represent with two LN and one LN for seemingly no reason other than because u couldn't find room Agree, fix, also fix for here too 02:56:012 -
32. 02:56:012 (176012|3,176254|3,176738|3,176979|3) - different pitches so not necessary anchor Fix
33. 02:58:673 (178673|6,178673|4,178673|2,178673|3,178673|0,178794|5,178915|4,178915|3,178915|0,178915|1,178915|2) - not an issue but now you use two 5-note chords... Just be consistent with all the scenarios earlier My bad, should be a 5 follow up by a 6 like the reason I point out above,fix~
34. 03:07:625 (187625|5) - perhaps lane 5 because same pitch (creates a jack) Hmm, I hear it different.
35. 03:25:044 (205044|3,205044|5) - talked about this before Same reason owo
36. 03:24:802 (204802|5,204802|3,204923|3,204923|5,205044|5,205044|3,205165|3,205165|5,205286|5,205407|3,205528|3,205528|5) - I know you're trying to follow pitch as close to perfect as you can here, but these dense anchors on these lanes while the surrounding lanes are nowhere near as dense makes the pattern awkward to play Yeah is like that, but fixed that 5 notes jack, there no 5 notes jack on the piano only 4.
37. 03:30:609 (210609|4,210729|4,210850|4,210971|4,211092|4) - unnecessary 5-note jack - the music doesn't play the same note five times There actually a 5 notes jackl which is the g#5 xD.

Overall I like this difficulty, just some mistakes or problems occasionally Thanks, been a long time I haven't had such nice and details mods. Really amazing

Lokovodo wrote:

Get Up and Let Go

Really well polished chart, I'd suggest upping the OD to like 9 though tbh
OWO Thank you
Changed to OD 9

00:25:052 - add note on key4
Fixed!
00:28:923 - add note on key4
Fixed!
00:32:794 - add note on key4
Fixed!
00:36:907 - add note on key3??
Sounds good! Fixed!
01:31:100 - add a LN on key7 that starts on this tick and ends on 01:31:463 - ??
Sure, Fixed!

Lokovodo wrote:

Julie's Digger

00:40:294 - add note on 7 Isn't the highest chord same pitch as 00:40:536 (40536|4,40778|4) - .
00:43:197 - add note on 5 I don't hear this pitch 00:42:471 (42471|3,42713|3,42955|3) - here.
00:46:100 - add note on 5 Only hear one high pitch note xD
00:47:068 - add note on 6
00:48:036 - add note on 7
00:49:971 - add note on 7
00:51:907 - add note on 6All kinda the same reason as above xD

00:54:810 - 01:08:358 - follow above ^^
I think you should flesh out these section both to add emphasis where is needed, but also to keep density more consistent since as is now it is quite bursty (not in a bad way though, very fun chart)

01:11:383 (71383|4) - remove, this isn't going with the song Trust me that's how the piano go xD. Tons of 5 notes jack
01:11:625 - add note on 7 No this sound 01:11:262 (71262|6,71504|6) -
^^
this pattern is -> 1,12 and you aren't representing it properly

02:21:060 (141060|4) - remove
02:21:302 - add note on 7
same as above

03:22:996 (202996|4) - remove
03:23:237 - add note on 7 Same reason