scanter wrote:

Insane

1. 01:41:682 - 개인적으로는 서클 하나 추가해도 그렇게 어려워지지는 않을 것 같음 이건 나은 배치가 떠오르지 않네요. 그리고 서클 패턴도 괜찮아 보이구요
2. 02:27:764 (9,13) - 02:27:764 - 여기부터 음 패턴이 바끼는데 저 부분에 각각 뉴콤 쳐보는 건 어떨까요? 전 개인적으로 02:27:931 (11) - 에 뉴콤보 넣는게 좋다고 생각했었는데, 막상 해보니까 별로더라구요. 차라리 할로윈님 난이도처럼 뉴콤보 없이 찍는게 낫다고 생각해요.
   
   SPOILER

   

Moa wrote:

Easy
딱봐도 잡을거 별로 없어보이지만 함 보겠음 근데 이지에서 1/2박자 써도됨? 과도하지만 않으면 상관없죠
00:24:101 (2) - 이지에선 깔끔하게 5틱 S자 만드는게 나아보임 가운데 빨간점 있는거 ㅋㅋ ㄱㅊ음
03:57:430 - ^ 얘는 ㄱㅊ음

Hard
02:08:431 - 차임(확실한 소리)은 여기서 울리는데 서클이 02:08:598 - 여기있으니 헷갈림 벨 말고 신스음이라고하나요 그거 따라감

Collab Hyper
01:18:682 - 여기도 서클 넣는편이 나아보임 01:20:682 (4) - 여기도 넣었으니 다른곳은 다 넣으셧네용 여긴 드럼이업슴

Insane
일단 키아이 스냅 해주시구
02:27:431 - 하이퍼에선 이런소리 1/8슬라로 잡아주셧는데 인세인도 잡아주시는게 어떠신지 하이퍼 바꿈

Cubbby wrote:

Insane: 00:09:268 (1,2,3) - these should be stacked properly i think it's okay
02:51:264 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - make this more comfortable intended it
01:16:766 (1,2,3) - 1/8 reverse slider here would have been better i didn't want to make it complex

joker- wrote:

Normal
- 03:17:764 (1) - idk the reason why you put nc here cuz you dont nc each 1 measure 04:28:097 (1) - same to emphasize the pattern

WISPG_G wrote:

Collab Hyper
00:45:601 (4,5,6,7,1) - some kind of this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10349407 patterns would be nice for comfortable movement changed a bit
01:09:267 (4,5,6,7) - triple covers almost half of slider, hard to notice. May be move 7 somewhere a bit? added nc on it
02:29:264 (4,1) - thats a "huge" jump to triple dont you think? There is no reasons for such spacing a long with 02:36:431 (1,2,3) - this emphasizing. May be here 02:39:931 (3,1) - as wellthe diff is hard enough so it's fine

C O I N wrote:

Hard

1. 03:41:930 (2) -
   
   
   
   이부분 이거 괜찮지 않을까요? 각도는 -20도 한건데
   
   뒤에 오는 슬라는 슬라 꼭지에 붙이면 될것같아오
   
   이것은 ㄱㅊ아보입니다

scanter wrote:

Skystar's Descent

1. 01:45:098 (7,8,9,1) - before you did high jumps, but here seems too short. what about to extend like this? oki
   
   SPOILER

   

Lasse wrote:

skystar
03:24:431 - missing hs on spinner end me irl

ailv wrote:

HLW:

02:27:931 (11) - i think it's cool to nc here to show off the piano. Not so bad, but in my opinion, it is already emphasized as changing spacing.
so, I want to keep it.

04:08:930 (5) - can you reduce the spacing of this? it's quite weird to play 04:08:930 (5) - moving it down to blanket it is okay i guess ok

04:15:097 - skipping this white tick here doens't make much sense, it completes the piano, the emphasis is on the blue and the white , so if anything a double move 1 tick later would fit better. fixed

ailv wrote:

Skystar:

01:00:934 (2,1) - emphasis is on the blue tick here, i'd suggest this rhythm https://i.imgur.com/8AfR343.png, and stacking 2 on top of 01:01:101 (1) - yea

04:35:098 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - this rhythm is completely overmapped, there no notes 04:35:180 - and 04:35:847 - here. It's not like the over overmaps, this one essentially ignores the rhythm and doesn't support it, so i'd like to see it changed. yea

02:36:264 (1) - remove nc? it's the same phrase as 1. nah

04:15:097 - adding a note here to complete the piano is a good rhythm here, or removing 04:14:930 (2) - since it has no drum would be okay as well.. nah