this is a bubble
you don't add ''vietnamese'' to tags? :'(oh, you are right! i will add it before qualification for sure
01:23:919 (1,1,1) - and 01:32:918 (1,1,1) - has a spacing like triplets, this can confusing. NC's indicate that this has different rhythm than the triple before, i wanna keep this because it forces the player to actually pay attention to the song (since the sounds are special)
In the rest there is nothing to complain about, this is the perfect difficulty!
01:15:856 (4,5,6) - just visual thing - on my opinion this looks strange dont think its a reason to change when it only comes up to personal perference
Yeap, nothing to add, everything is fine.
Perfect mapset, good luck in ranking! Thank You!
The mapset is really good, but the Insane leaves a bad taste in my mouth in a few ways.Thank you for your concern, I hope I made things clear. Some points I already explained in earlier posts in this thread so you might wanna check them out too if smth isnt clear00:07:794 (1,1,1) - Why are these all new combos? i skip sounds and use a rhythm that is different from to music to emphasize a special piece of the music (along with the decreasing spacing although its 1/1 snapped), to indicate that I use NC's so the player instantly knows that this part is something different and special
00:10:231 (6,7) - There is no sound here. of course there is, you dont exactly hear it at 25% (you still do hear it) but there is clearly the piano (? im not musician i tihnk its piano) sound - i can even count it while listening at full speed that there are 3 sounds
00:20:919 (1,1,1) - The three 1/2 notes you have like this are, in my opinion, obnoxious. The spacing is the same as for the triplet that occurs a beat before this, and I can't see how the song supports it, let alone the new combo spam. Please consider revising. the NC spam is the same concept i mentioned before, to indicate the player that he has to pay attention on what actually is going on in the song (and no blind sightread). along with that this is used to empahsize those 3 sounds (since they seem really important and unique to me) in a special way. I'm 100% sure you didnt missread this while playing, even on first time and since it is consistent throughout the map I dont see an issue using this method. Yes, you dont see same visual spacing for different rhythm in the same pattern in many maps, but who says its forbidden if its used in a neat way?
00:23:544 (1,1) - Why are these both new combos? i think both sounds (the first for the clap and the following clap, and second for strong finsih and end of section) deserve special empahsis through NC
00:37:794 (5,6) - Why did you stray from using the triplets/kicksliders that you've already introduced? Unless I'm mistaken, this pattern isn't used anywhere else in the map, and there's no reason to change it up here. Hell, you even use a different pattern on the same sound at 00:31:794 (3) - . they are not 100% the same sounds. yes, they both share the same sound but each spot has an individual addition to that sound, while 00:31:794 (3) - has sounds that are also on 00:31:419 (1,2) - (so you get what sound i mean), 00:37:794 (5,6) - has important sounds on the red and white tick (so i use sliderend for thje middle blue tick because its not improtant). Also i want to have 00:37:231 (2,3,4) - and 00:37:794 (5,6) - being different because 00:37:231 (2,3,4) - has the loud piano sounds on it which fit perfectly with triple, unlike the other spot which only supports clickable objects on the red and white tick
There are things I personally disagree with, like the AR, HP, and some rhythm choices, but that stuff boils down to style, in most cases. Here, I just wanted to point out issues I think are pretty significant.
New combos are used to distinguish different parts of the song. Using them to emphasize different, individual sounds (on their own) is not effective. Use spacing for that instead.Its not my fault that you dont agree with my interpretation of the song, seriously. Who says that NC can only be used to indicate sections of a song, and not in any other way? Also many of your complaints got considered before the map got qualified and I explained why I dont agree with a suggestion, apparently people understood what my point is.
Your answers are further from satisfying than I thought they would be. It seems like you care more about getting this set ranked rather than improving it. Or maybe you're seeing something that I'm not.
Either way, it's not like I'm in position to do anything more than I already have. Best of luck with your future mapsets.
Its not my fault that you dont agree with my interpretation of the song, seriously.Never said it was.
Who says that NC can only be used to indicate sections of a song, and not in any other way?No one. At least, I never did. I just said it is more effective to use spacing for individual note emphasis. Moreover, you said that your usage of new combos help with readability by indicating that the new combo has a different timing, which is fine. The wiki supports that. However, you should not have had all three of those 1/2 notes be new combos -- just the first. With the way it is now, it is implying that each of them has a different timing than one another.
Claiming that my one and only goal is to rank the mapset is very cheeky and disrespectful.Again, I never did. I said that it seems like you're focusing on ranking. Please do not put words into my mouth.
I'm really satisfied with how the mapset turned out (especially the Insane) and I don't see any improvements.If you don't see improvements, cool. That's kind of the point of modding: to get others' opinions on the mapset. I could even argue that the point of qualification is to give the map some exposure to the playerbase and see if any issues (particularly issues that you can't see) make themselves clear.