1. I think for all diffs other than insane, 02:05:907 - kiai should last till 02:06:802 - like the one before first chorus

1. 00:50:683 (3) - 01:05:011 (3) - etc. i find them a bit inconsistent cuz sometimes you're following vocal (01:01:429 (3) - for example), https://puu.sh/yRMeJ/ed0c2d95df.png might be a good alternative
2. 01:42:175 (4,1) - 01:59:638 (5,1) - 02:30:086 (2) - 03:36:354 (2) - 03:49:339 (4) - 03:51:578 (3) - spacing umm, some are really off
3. 02:47:101 (2) - sure there is sth on the blue tick but following 02:47:996 - sound seems more intuitive? you don't have to force a 1/1 gap imo

1. 00:08:481 (3) - do some rotation so it could be closer to 1.4x? https://puu.sh/yRMQU/8624269664.png
2. 00:14:078 (6,7,8) - 01:32:884 (6,7) - 04:26:392 (5,6) - well i know the drum patterns are different but imo following the melody would still be the best and most intuitive for players to follow after those buildups in this section, current rhythm pattern just seems off if you don't listen carefully to the drums (00:30:198 (5,6) - are just fine to me cuz there are no buildups)
3. 00:23:369 (4,1) - larger spacing? the 1/2 pause isn't obvious enough
4. 00:49:675 (5,6,7) - 00:56:056 (1,2,3) - 00:57:847 (1,2,3) - and etc. imo these overlaps are not arranged in a neat way, can you do sth else if possible?
5. 01:26:504 - to 01:32:884 - add hitsoundss
6. 01:26:504 (1,3) - hey if you're not forcing a blanket it's easy to move 3 farther for a decent ds
7. 02:04:116 (1,2,3) - you'll need to rearrange hitsounding a bit based on ur rhythm patterns, obviously now it provides weird feedbacks
8. 02:47:548 (2,3,4) - https://puu.sh/yRNw1/14b00b844e.png might look better visually
9. 02:55:496 (6) - this is totally offbeat, you might wanna try https://puu.sh/yRNBG/dde87ca172.png instead
10. 03:30:086 - no note here?
11. 03:43:519 (3) - this note is mapped to nothing, I suggest turning 2 into a 1/2 slider and delete this one

1. 00:00:198 (1) - ctrl-g? i find stacking at tail more intuitive to read, also the drum pitch is going upwards so an upward movement might be better
2. 00:38:593 (5,6) - etc. I suggest lowering the slider velocity of 6 to better emphasize the trumpet sound at 00:38:593 - , unlike other spots, the intensity change here is pretty obvious
3. 01:34:675 (1,2) - ctrl-g like other two similar patterns? the bass sounds seem exactly same to me
4. 02:40:832 (1) - consider making it clockwise for some variation like 01:21:131 (1,1) - ? also the flow seems kinda weird for me to play, this can be personal tho
5. 04:08:593 (1) - similar point

1. 00:14:078 (2,3) - ctrl-g rhythm? similar point as i mentioned in hard, the transition from melody track to drums is too sudden
2. 00:45:310 (1) - missing finish, also the volume is too low..
3. 00:46:653 (1,2,3,4) - why not make the stream smoother?
4. 00:53:145 (4) - better stack under 00:52:474 (1) - so the 00:53:257 - vocal is better emphasized with spacing (also it would improve playability a lot imo, with current spacing i played the patterns as if it's a 268bpm jumpy map which is super tiring), this can apply to many other similar spots too.
5. 01:21:578 - 01:22:474 - etc. add some hitsounds? now the vocal has same feedback as 01:21:466 -
6. 01:24:489 (4,5) - the spacing doesn't really indicate the music intensity well, it's even larger than those in the chorus
7. 02:41:728 - 02:43:519 - 02:45:310 - 02:50:683 - 02:52:474 - finish?
8. 03:06:131 - maybe add a finish to highlight the vocal like 03:02:548 (2,3,4) -
9. 03:46:205 (1,2) - try this maybe https://puu.sh/yRXXF/cd66e93ae7.png emphasize is nice but playability is also important? maybe it's just me but i think this pattern is quite hard to hit
10. 04:04:116 - 04:05:907 - missing finish it seems

Garden wrote:

adrenaline is pumpin
sdafsf's Hard

1. 00:08:481 (3) - do some rotation so it could be closer to 1.4x? https://puu.sh/yRMQU/8624269664.png did something
2. 00:14:078 (6,7,8) - 01:32:884 (6,7) - 04:26:392 (5,6) - well i know the drum patterns are different but imo following the melody would still be the best and most intuitive for players to follow after those buildups in this section, current rhythm pattern just seems off if you don't listen carefully to the drums i feel like the drums stand out enough(00:30:198 (5,6) - are just fine to me cuz there are no buildups)
3. 00:23:369 (4,1) - larger spacing? the 1/2 pause isn't obvious enough yes
4. 00:49:675 (5,6,7) - 00:56:056 (1,2,3) - 00:57:847 (1,2,3) - and etc. imo these overlaps are not arranged in a neat way, can you do sth else if possible? moved some things in the last 2 around but i think the patterns are clear enough and not problematic
5. 01:26:504 - to 01:32:884 - add hitsoundss section deleted cus its not in the topdiff either
6. 01:26:504 (1,3) - hey if you're not forcing a blanket it's easy to move 3 farther for a decent ds yea kinda done
7. 02:04:116 (1,2,3) - you'll need to rearrange hitsounding a bit based on ur rhythm patterns, obviously now it provides weird feedbacks done
8. 02:47:548 (2,3,4) - https://puu.sh/yRNw1/14b00b844e.png might look better visually made it less curved but didnt do the blanket
9. 02:55:496 (6) - this is totally offbeat, you might wanna try https://puu.sh/yRNBG/dde87ca172.png instead changed the rhythm but bot to this
10. 03:30:086 - no note here? no this rhythm isnt based on the vocals but on the cymbals
11. 03:43:519 (3) - this note is mapped to nothing, I suggest turning 2 into a 1/2 slider and delete this one done

[]
top diff looks ok, but not my dish when it comes to this bpm range.. good luck!

1. 00:41:168 (2,3) - Kind of bothers me a bit that the structure of these sliders are very similar to 00:41:728 (1,2) - despite having so much contrast within the song.
2. 00:51:019 (2) - triggered
3. 03:24:713 (1) - Emphasising pauses like these would perform better when stacked on the following object 03:24:936 (2) imo. Same with 03:22:922 (1,2)
4. 03:27:847 (1,2,1) - flow zzz
5. 03:35:459 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ok I have an idea on how to spice things up. You can split this into 2 groups with 03:35:459 (1,2,3,4) and 03:37:250 (1,2,3,4) being one group and the other 8 circles being another group. Because when you listen to the music the 1st group is very similar with the way the drums and the vocals, the same can be said for the second group. And having the groups structured similar to themselves would be a nice idea imo. This is like one of the few times where I try to put my ideas forward to another mapper w
6. 04:16:653 (1,2) - why is this spacing so big? 2 isn't exactly emphasised
7. 04:24:041 (2) - ^
8. 04:28:742 (1) - looks more weird than good, sorry

Garden wrote:

adrenaline is pumpin

General

1. I think for all diffs other than insane, 02:05:907 - kiai should last till 02:06:802 - like the one before first chorus

Easy

1. 00:50:683 (3) - 01:05:011 (3) - etc. i find them a bit inconsistent cuz sometimes you're following vocal (01:01:429 (3) - for example), https://puu.sh/yRMeJ/ed0c2d95df.png might be a good alternative - those are for the trumpet things in the back.. i think they're fine?
2. 01:42:175 (4,1) - 01:59:638 (5,1) - 02:30:086 (2) - 03:36:354 (2) - 03:49:339 (4) - 03:51:578 (3) - spacing umm, some are really off
3. 02:47:101 (2) - sure there is sth on the blue tick but following 02:47:996 - sound seems more intuitive? you don't have to force a 1/1 gap imo - this was probably a mistake

me irl

1. 00:14:078 (2,3) - ctrl-g rhythm? similar point as i mentioned in hard, the transition from melody track to drums is too sudden
2. 00:45:310 (1) - missing finish, also the volume is too low..
3. 00:46:653 (1,2,3,4) - why not make the stream smoother?
4. 00:53:145 (4) - better stack under 00:52:474 (1) - so the 00:53:257 - vocal is better emphasized with spacing (also it would improve playability a lot imo, with current spacing i played the patterns as if it's a 268bpm jumpy map which is super tiring), this can apply to many other similar spots too.
5. 01:21:578 - 01:22:474 - etc. add some hitsounds? now the vocal has same feedback as 01:21:466 -
6. 01:24:489 (4,5) - the spacing doesn't really indicate the music intensity well, it's even larger than those in the chorus
7. 02:41:728 - 02:43:519 - 02:45:310 - 02:50:683 - 02:52:474 - finish?
8. 03:06:131 - maybe add a finish to highlight the vocal like 03:02:548 (2,3,4) -
9. 03:46:205 (1,2) - try this maybe https://puu.sh/yRXXF/cd66e93ae7.png emphasize is nice but playability is also important? maybe it's just me but i think this pattern is quite hard to hit
10. 04:04:116 - 04:05:907 - missing finish it seems

[]
top diff looks ok, but not my dish when it comes to this bpm range.. good luck!

Kisses wrote:

Top

1. 00:41:168 (2,3) - Kind of bothers me a bit that the structure of these sliders are very similar to 00:41:728 (1,2) - despite having so much contrast within the song.
2. 00:51:019 (2) - triggered
3. 03:24:713 (1) - Emphasising pauses like these would perform better when stacked on the following object 03:24:936 (2) imo. Same with 03:22:922 (1,2) - this definitely isn't a pause in the song so i didn't stack it
4. 03:27:847 (1,2,1) - flow zzz - what about it? it's fine
5. 03:35:459 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ok I have an idea on how to spice things up. You can split this into 2 groups with 03:35:459 (1,2,3,4) and 03:37:250 (1,2,3,4) being one group and the other 8 circles being another group. Because when you listen to the music the 1st group is very similar with the way the drums and the vocals, the same can be said for the second group. And having the groups structured similar to themselves would be a nice idea imo. This is like one of the few times where I try to put my ideas forward to another mapper w - maybe you see it that way but i just see those two groups of 8 as different phrases, thus they're mapped slightly differently
6. 04:16:653 (1,2) - why is this spacing so big? 2 isn't exactly emphasised
7. 04:24:041 (2) - ^ - it's like 134 bpm 1/2 it's very easy to hit this and isn't much different than 04:26:392 (1,2) - only difference is 1 is a circle. that said nerfed the first, but not the second
8. 04:28:742 (1) - looks more weird than good, sorry - subjective :dab:

[]
I think a problem with this map is that there isn't much creativity within it, as seen in both the rhythms and structure. Sorry to say it is pretty bland overall and is way too consistent, more variety would go well received. For example with 00:38:145 (1,2) , it's not particularly impressive to play such a pattern throughout the entire section and repeated for the other sections.

The song isn't very different rhythm wise, it's almost tearfully simple to map since it barely varies that much. The consistency is because the song is very consistent in what it does rhythmically and just generally within sections. The same melody repeats god knows how many times with different backing stuff but it's essentially the same thing. The map does have slight variations in it but nothing too massive. I don't think making a varied map over such a consistent song works imo but thats just how I see it

kwk wrote:

random play thoughts
top diff

00:31:429 - my god that durm whistle is the most irritating thing ive ever heard, literally cant hear anything else when its spammed in this section - lowered it a lot
01:02:436 (2,3) - uhh spacing? this is actually ridiculously hard to hit

i dont think its particularly bland, overall its good but i do think some of the slider sv changes are just cruel, lacks a lot of predictability - could you give some examples if you have some time (i can discord pm you)

no kd

Yuii- wrote:

I wont doubt mir; hes that experienced he probably fucked the blanket up on purpose just to have extra points for the modders to make