why are oni and inner oni both using the same od? inner could be a bit higher (6.5?) so it's actually also more difficult accuracy wise
hp5 on muzu seems a bit low here, I think 6 or 5.5 would work better
how about putting an ending spinner on all diffs? would fit the sound really well and if you add some green lines with progressively reducing volume it would be great
kantan00:02:250 (1,2,3,4) - I don't really get your pattern here since there already is a much noticeable change on 00:03:670 -, so I think DDKK would work well while still being really simple
00:49:823 (78,79) - seems really weird as a lead into the chorus with how current starts only after the most pronounced sound and maps much less outstanding things. something like
https://i.imgur.com/51USD7s.jpg would be nicer and you already have a huge rhythm gap just a second before at 00:42:013 (68,69) - anyway
00:50:178 (79) - 01:24:261 (30) - having a finisher here but not at the start of the chorus feels really underwhelming :c
01:24:261 (30) - finish seems really overdone here, also the whole 5 note pattern feels a bit too connected even though song changes on, how about something like kkdkd ?
futsuu00:11:835 - music is so intense here, i think you could easily add something considering you already have a break at 00:14:676 -
00:50:178 (141) - 01:24:261 (243) - same as kantan. also most likely applies to higher diffs
01:00:474 (180,181,182,183) - 01:01:894 (184,185,186,187) - are both mapped in the exact same way even though song is so different, how about changing 01:01:894 (184,185,186,187) - to dkdk or dkkd ? if you do the first then you can also make 01:03:315 (188,189,190,191,192) - into ddkkd to get some more differentiation. or do something similar to 01:34:557 - which is bascially the same thing but executed better
muzukashii00:10:238 (10,11,12) - don't really see why the triple would be here when the 1/4 on 00:10:593 - is so outstanding, I think doing
https://i.imgur.com/orBG61L.jpg would fit better, considering the same sound repeats more intense on 00:11:658 (17,18,19) - where you mapped it as k triple, fully ignoring first time it happens seems weird.
00:34:912 - I don't think having the hardest pattern in the whole map in this part is very fitting, such a long chain of 1/2 and 1/4 rhythms which is even harder than the more intense parts of the song. there are multiple ways to handle this, how about deleting 00:36:155 (128) - which would also put nice emphasis on the vocalist change at 00:36:332 - . another solution would be simply deleting 00:35:711 (125,126) -
00:42:013 - triple placement feels kinda unintutive here since I don't get what they are supposed to follow or emphasize, you could try something like
https://i.imgur.com/zAkr7Wc.jpg which works well with vocals and drums imo
00:46:983 - similar siggestion here to use a triple starting on 00:47:161 - instead
oni00:18:581 (22,23,24) - mapping this triple like the one before doesn't seem too fitting since this has additional 1/4 melody. you could give something like
https://i.imgur.com/eNQML5x.jpg a try to reflect the difference
00:29:942 (84,85,86) - same here
inner oni00:18:581 (25,26,27) - similar to oni, this not being monocolor would be great for differentiation
also I don't really get why 00:29:232 - uses much more "complex" patterning even though both follow the same thing?
00:37:397 (155,156,157,158) - seems so overdone when you other 1/6 actually follow faster rhythms in the song. following the 1/4 in the song with a 1/4 triple seems much more fitting
00:46:273 - I think this stream feels a bit too similar to 00:34:912 - patterning wise. how about for example just using a kat at 00:46:362 - so it starts slightly different already?
01:35:622 - 1/1 gap when there is a noticeable pretty intense buzz seems so undermapped for this difficulty, why not at least add some 1/4?