gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. LUZE) & gmtn. (witch's slave) - squart

posted
Total Posts
78
show more
hikiko-
yeah i'm aware you copied from std and i checked that ranked set, but i don't think that timing is correct from a technical standpoint \:
i'll leave now that i've put in my two cents
gl with rank, i really like how you mapped this
frukoyurdakul
Hello, I'm here for a small timing check.

  1. 01:40:797 - This needs an 3/4 red point, measure start is noticeable at the middle of 6/4.
  2. 01:42:797 - This needs 4/4 red point since the measure overlaps with the next section and there's a prominent rhythm on the 2nd measure start.
  3. 03:24:462 - This timing point should be 03:24:056 - here and next one (03:25:462 - ) should be deleted since there is not really a measure change there.
  4. 04:29:463 - There isn't any offset or measure change here so this red point is unneccessary hence it should be deleted.
  5. 04:40:129 - This 7/4 timing point is unneccessary, the song goes on 4/4 exactly until the low point at 04:42:795 - this, so that one and 04:42:462 - this should be deleted, and 04:43:213 - this one should be omitted since the measure change is actually at 04:43:879 - this spot which should be kept.
Topic Starter
Rhytoly

hikikochan wrote:

main time signature issue got fixed so it's just minor things at this point (please bear with me sorry)

the two bars from 01:42:797 - to 01:45:464 - are 4/4, no,I using fruko's mod evident in the rhythmic structure changing from the previous part
for the slowdown part it looks like you did half of the fix so there's currently two barlines at 03:20:463 - and 03:20:797 - so i'd suggest removing the second. it looks like you also deleted a timing point somewhere so that there's no longer a barline at 03:24:056 - ?<- timing changed to 147.30 bpm not too big of a deal, but i'd suggest removing the line at 03:24:462 - since it's not a downbeat (correlates with 03:35:130 (34) - this note, which clearly isn't a downbeat) note they're late if remove this timing
didn't notice this the first time around but 04:40:129 - to 04:42:795 - is actually also two 4/4 bars, so you'd have to 1) delete the timing point @ 04:40:129 - , 2) move the one @ 04:42:462 - to 04:42:795 - , then 3) set the point @ 04:43:211 - to omit first barline <-already with fruko's mod

feel free to corroborate with qats
thanks for putting up with my posts lol, multi time signature stuff is my favorite so i'm just trying to help out the best i can

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hello, I'm here for a small timing check.

  1. 01:40:797 - This needs an 3/4 red point, measure start is noticeable at the middle of 6/4. fixed
  2. 01:42:797 - This needs 4/4 red point since the measure overlaps with the next section and there's a prominent rhythm on the 2nd measure start. fixed
  3. 03:24:462 - This timing point should be 03:24:056 - here and next one (03:25:462 - ) should be deleted since there is not really a measure change there. deleted 03:25:462 only cause note they will unsnap if move timing point to 03:24:056 it's hard to read and look strange.->added 03:25:462 again cause I tried with new update and it's feel strange
  4. 04:29:463 - There isn't any offset or measure change here so this red point is unneccessary hence it should be deleted. fixed
  5. 04:40:129 - This 7/4 timing point is unneccessary, the song goes on 4/4 exactly until the low point at 04:42:795 - this, so that one and 04:42:462 - this should be deleted, and 04:43:213 - this one should be omitted since the measure change is actually at 04:43:879 - this spot which should be kept. fixed
thank you froko,you didn't like this song and hate me but you're still chack this. :^)
thank you. you too hikikochan :)
Stefan
hi

[Witch]
00:22:798 - 00:38:464 - Something that bugs me is the non-continious mapping that feels out of place. I mean, it can work but.. I'd at least make something else as focus to set the break between each combo chain: 00:25:464 - and 00:26:797 - have sounds that emphasize and works well with a 1/2 break, 00:28:797 - also have such a sound so removing 00:28:964 - would give that little emphasis that's missing. 00:28:297 - could be mapped instead. Just make some thoughts about my opinion/idea/thoughts.
02:23:963 (844) - isn't the note actually slightly weaker? I believe that is a small note instead of a big.
02:45:296 (1056,1059) - Shouldn't they be also kat notes? 02:44:463 (1047,1052) - were kat notes so it would only make sense to follow the piano with kat notes fully.
03:25:462 - 03:35:462 - 03:35:795 - ultra minor but increase the SV increase by 0.01x, merely to have a constant increase of 0.08x per line. Or you could include 03:35:128 - to increase the SV, whatever you prefer.
04:29:461 - any practicular reason for that SV drop? Would just remove it.
05:27:876 (1) - imo you can end the spinner at 05:29:876 - already but it's not urgent at all.

call me back
Topic Starter
Rhytoly

Stefan wrote:

hi

[Witch]
00:22:798 - 00:38:464 - Something that bugs me is the non-continious mapping that feels out of place. I mean, it can work but.. I'd at least make something else as focus to set the break between each combo chain: < I don't know that but fixed some pattern
00:25:464 - and 00:26:797 - have sounds that emphasize and works well with a 1/2 break, 00:28:797 - also have such a sound so removing 00:28:964 - would give that little emphasis that's missing. 00:28:297 - could be mapped instead. Just make some thoughts about my opinion/idea/thoughts. it's seem fine now
02:23:963 (844) - isn't the note actually slightly weaker? I believe that is a small note instead of a big. It's prefect now
02:45:296 (1056,1059) - Shouldn't they be also kat notes? 02:44:463 (1047,1052) - were kat notes so it would only make sense to follow the piano with kat notes fully. fixed overall
03:25:462 - 03:35:462 - 03:35:795 - ultra minor but increase the SV increase by 0.01x, merely to have a constant increase of 0.08x per line. Or you could include 03:35:128 - to increase the SV, whatever you prefer. I don't need to fix SVs for this point
04:29:461 - any practicular reason for that SV drop? Would just remove it. I just want to make it look cool.
05:27:876 (1) - imo you can end the spinner at 05:29:876 - already but it's not urgent at all. no,I just wany spinner end 05:31:876 cause music is stoped here

call me back
thank you stefan
Stefan
re
zigizigiefe
mfw surono stole my madnuts emojis dflkjhgasdfjlkasf


H Y P E
Topic Starter
Rhytoly

zigizigiefe wrote:

mfw surono stole my madnuts emojis dflkjhgasdfjlkasf


H Y P E
<3 hope it's ranked tomorrow
Surono
back, good luck little bro.
davidminh0111
Gratz Cocoaaa, fuk my 1st ranked map got dq!
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Topic Starter
Rhytoly

davidminh0111 wrote:

fuk my 1st ranked map got dq!
sad but thank you! (╯°□°)╯
Lama Poluna
wtf BMS in source
Topic Starter
Rhytoly

Lama Poluna wrote:

wtf BMS in source
they're need me add in source. before I don't add it
Kurai
Disqualified for metadata issues!
Kurai
Requalification time /o/
Lanturn
nice color Kurai. <3

and regrats Cocoaaa
Topic Starter
Rhytoly

Lanturn wrote:

nice color Kurai. <3

and regrats Cocoaaa
<3
davidminh0111
Another congratz

I have just had a qualified beatmap too OwO
[R]
really ? it almost move to ranked
anyway Gratz
-Kazu-

Kurai wrote:

Disqualified for metadata issues!
squartatrice is from bof2011 and disperagioia is from bofu 2017 though..
but yeah you're probably right this track on its own isn't from BMS but a mashup made by an osu player idk xd
Please sign in to reply.

New reply