Look im sad now_SkyFall wrote:
Oh, I'm really sorryRifdi wrote:
You're gonna make me sad stop
Look im sad now_SkyFall wrote:
Oh, I'm really sorryRifdi wrote:
You're gonna make me sad stop
I don't think that's what you're supposed to do with itRifdi wrote:
Thanks dad.
Imma hang the clothes now
Keeping it legal dad!_SkyFall wrote:
I don't think that's what you're supposed to do with itRifdi wrote:
Thanks dad.
Imma hang the clothes now
You're welcome son!
What do you mean? I think we can hang on the ceiling together. After all, it's a family rope! Otherwise, what's the point on having a family if you can't even hang out together to enjoy lifeRifdi wrote:
Keeping it legal dad!
Did u just_SkyFall wrote:
What do you mean? I think we can hang on the ceiling together. After all, it's a family rope! Otherwise, what's the point on having a family if you can't even hang out together to enjoy lifeRifdi wrote:
Keeping it legal dad!
The limit, as the number of people I'm dividing cake for approaches zero, the number of slices approaches...abraker wrote:
As a workaround, take the limit of the thing you are trying to divide the thing by 0 and divide it by x as x approaches 0
Yeah thats the fastest way to answer it, for more proof and whatnot youtube has some videos for thatjohnmedina999 wrote:
LOL
Blitz has a point, if we are taking the cake example, you can't do limits, this is a real life scenario.
cake goes to infinityBlitzfrog wrote:
The limit, as the number of people I'm dividing cake for approaches zero, the number of slices approaches...abraker wrote:
As a workaround, take the limit of the thing you are trying to divide the thing by 0 and divide it by x as x approaches 0
I just found to never run out of cakeskai99 wrote:
cake goes to infinityBlitzfrog wrote:
The limit, as the number of people I'm dividing cake for approaches zero, the number of slices approaches...
The old fashioned notion of dividing a whole slice for N people is not going to do us good in this, we need to break the problem down to its core. When you are slicing a cake, you are taking and series of angles of a circles in parts and distributing them one by one. The procedure is the following: You take the whole 360 deg angle and divide it by the number of people you want to give it to, then you trace that much from the starting point around it, and give that much you traced to the first person. Then repeat until you got no cake left. So consider this:Blitzfrog wrote:
The limit, as the number of people I'm dividing cake for approaches zero, the number of slices approaches...abraker wrote:
As a workaround, take the limit of the thing you are trying to divide the thing by 0 and divide it by x as x approaches 0
3D is irrelevant when cutting the cake because of the subsection nature of the cut. If you have a 4D knife and cake on the other hand, then would play a role.Rifdi wrote:
Well assuming its a regular cylindrical cake
It should have 2pi*r^2*h of edible volume available.
Why not?kai99 wrote:
my god
why would you have 2pi of a cake tho
I'm sorry I can't take this anymore, I need to tell you the truth.Rifdi wrote:
Did u just
Wow
Im speechless dad
*cries in 1x100*_SkyFall wrote:
I'm sorry I can't take this anymore, I need to tell you the truth.Rifdi wrote:
Did u just
Wow
Im speechless dad
You, my son, are adopted.
How so? How would you even know what a 4D shape looks like? Let alone cut it. The motion of cutting implies 3D. How do you cut a 2D cake with a 2D knife without going to the 3rd Dimension?? (Slicing doesn't count)abraker wrote:
3D is irrelevant when cutting the cake because of the subsection nature of the cut. If you have a 4D knife and cake on the other hand, then would play a role.Rifdi wrote:
Well assuming its a regular cylindrical cake
It should have 2pi*r^2*h of edible volume available.
First off, it's 2pi radians of a cake. Things need units depending on what you're measuring. For example, when measuring your dick, you would say x dx long. Now if you don't know what radians are, you obviously haven't played enough MMORPG to know what raids are, which means you should go play more. Now since I'm a nice person, I'll explain what radians are. It's basically a unit that we use to see whether we hit the G spot or notabraker wrote:
Why not?kai99 wrote:
my god
why would you have 2pi of a cake tho
First if you cut a 2D cake with a 2D knife, then your are effectively squashing it and not cutting it, because you know, like you said how would that go to the 3rd Dimension? It would make more sense to cut a 1D cake with a 2D knife. A 4D cake is impossible for a 3D being to comprehend, but it would would be a 4D cylinder. Here is a 4D cylinder being rotated in a crossection of 3D space:Blitzfrog wrote:
How so? How would you even know what a 4D shape looks like? Let alone cut it. The motion of cutting implies 3D. How do you cut a 2D cake with a 2D knife without going to the 3rd Dimension?? (Slicing doesn't count)
Plus, what does a 4D cake even look like?? A 2D cake is pi*r^2, a 3D cake is pi*r^2*h, but the 2 shapes are different. The equivalent of a circle in 3D is a sphere, not some puny cylinder. Note: we can consider a cylinder as 2-2D objects: circles and a rectangle. So what is the combination for a 4D cake??
Cylinder + rectangular prism??(which is the equivalent of 2*circle*rectangle + rectangle*6 in 2D world). Cylinder + Sphere?
Please see this post and consider signing up to OT University's OT unit theory course.Blitzfrog wrote:
First off, it's 2pi radians of a cake. Things need units depending on what you're measuring. For example, when measuring your dick, you would say x dx long. Now if you don't know what radians are, you obviously haven't played enough MMORPG to know what raids are, which means you should go play more. Now since I'm a nice person, I'll explain what radians are. It's basically a unit that we use to see whether we hit the G spot or not
This thread will need to be divided by 0 before that happensColdTooth wrote:
This thread will be locked in 6 posts.
That's why you you invent stuff to work with the impossible in real lifesilmarilen wrote:
You can't divide by 0 because if you could you would be able to make a lot of contradictions.
Using real life examples is bad because you can do a lot of things in maths that don't work in real life.
But what can't be done in real life would fall in the category of theories or something that is "mathematically possible". Math is the language of the universe and since the universe is real, I don't see why we can't take examples from the real world. It's much more intuitive that way.silmarilen wrote:
You can't divide by 0 because if you could you would be able to make a lot of contradictions.
Using real life examples is bad because you can do a lot of things in maths that don't work in real life.