forum

Women's Logic

posted
Total Posts
37
show more
B1rd
Maybe because underwear isn't designed for swimming, and can become see-through or fall off?

Brisk Clarity wrote:

Just because someone is conditioned to do something doesn't mean it's logical, though.
It's really not as simple as you think to determine how "logical" societal conventions are.
Softwarm
Okay, I've been sitting here for like 5 minutes trying to think of something to respond with to that comment but I'm just going to throw my hands up: I don't get what the point of what you said is. Okay, sure, it's hard to judge how ""logical"" certain actions are, whether they actually facilitate someone's goals or hinder them. I don't think I ever implied that task was easy?
ColdTooth

Brisk Clarity wrote:

Okay, I've been sitting here for like 5 minutes trying to think of something to respond with to that comment but I'm just going to throw my hands up: I don't get what the point of what you said is. Okay, sure, it's hard to judge how ""logical"" certain actions are, whether they actually facilitate someone's goals or hinder them. I don't think I ever implied that task was easy?
It's B1rd, he's a politically and logical person that I'm okay with him as long as he doesn't throw around the fact that the world is ending.

B1rd wrote:

Maybe because underwear isn't designed for swimming, and can become see-through or fall off?
Boxers are probably the word you're thinking! There are many other kinds of underwear that can hold on to your waist. It just depends on what size your waist is, or those long underwear that look like shorts but aren't really but hold on pretty damn good. Also speedos exist, but then again, why?

As long as the underwear doesn't have any loose holes in it, you're a-ok!

Why the fuck are we even talking about underwear to begin with? Are we talking female underwear or male underwear? I thought we were talking about male underwear, generally speaking, I think we should propose that all genders must wear the same underwear.
B1rd
It seemed like you were implying that there was no logical basis behind the whole bikini thing and it was just a result of societal conditioning.
Softwarm

ColdTooth wrote:

...I think we should propose that all genders must wear the same underwear.
Aren't mens' underwear larger overall, since women don't have a dick hanging off of their crotch? I don't think this would go well.
ColdTooth

Brisk Clarity wrote:

ColdTooth wrote:

...I think we should propose that all genders must wear the same underwear.
Aren't mens' underwear larger overall, since women don't have a dick hanging off of their crotch? I don't think this would go well.
WELL I DID HAVE A RESPONSE FOR THAT, BUT IT WILL HAVE TO GO INTO THE TRASH
Zekks
what if swim wear consists of skin tight latex body suits that cover your entire body
Topic Starter
Meah

[ - Zekks - ] wrote:

what if swim wear consists of skin tight latex body suits that cover your entire body
Never get near the water
abraker

ColdTooth wrote:

abraker wrote:

They are booby traps. Simple as that.
So you're telling me that people envision me, or my character, as an anthro because of these so-called booby traps you say?

Get me off this planet. Get me off of it. Get me off of this goddamn forsaken filth of a planet.
Oh it's still here. So my reply... Actually people envision you as a, but for the sake of clarity, an anthro is not only because of the mentioned, but booby traps is the response intended and expected to and that other.
Rurree
I can't tell if this question is serious or not
ColdTooth

abraker wrote:

ColdTooth wrote:

So you're telling me that people envision me, or my character, as an anthro because of these so-called booby traps you say?

Get me off this planet. Get me off of it. Get me off of this goddamn forsaken filth of a planet.
Oh it's still here. So my reply... Actually people envision you as a, but for the sake of clarity, an anthro is not only because of the mentioned, but booby traps is the response intended and expected to and that other.
Foxtrot
this thread is giving me a headache
Aurani
Foxtrot

Aurani wrote:

is it per tablet or per box? 600 mg is some crazy shit
Aurani
It's 600 per tablet.
I take 2 of those when I have a headache, and when I was having mysterious chest pains I was taking 3-4 per day and it still wasn't stopping the pain.
Foxi
i'm taking the whole box
B1rd
protip: if you experience chest pains, see a doctor
Topic Starter
Meah

B1rd wrote:

protip: if you experience chest pains, see a doctor
What if it's only their breast growing
Aurani
What do you hold me for?
I went to the three best doctors in the country, as well as having visited numerous specialists. I spent inordinate amounts of money and.... nothing.

They all came to various conclusions, none of which solved the problem.
At least they told me I'm an exceptionally healthy human, barring that specific problem.

In the end, the pain stopped as it had appeared... without a trace. My only assumption is that a mix of overwhelming mental pressure, the surroundings and the food I was eating created some kind of problem no professional could solve. It's as if I was imagining it, but trust me, the pain was so intense there were frequent episodes of blackouts due to either the intensity of it, or my running out of air, as breathing was heavily reduced as if someone was sitting on my lungs.
Surono
Im not a women
zero manners
or else you'd know that i wear padded bras
Please sign in to reply.

New reply