incandescence wrote:

happy to say i can bring this back around. sr still broken, but oh well

i was able to catch that 1.39999x sv error too lol nice

HOLYYYYYY IT'S HAPPENING!
O aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
L aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Y aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Surono wrote:

00:16:463 -lol because the impact sound related in here so I think its fine :weary: :sweat: inb4 dq incoming due camel-lie XD

goheegy wrote:

00:16:635 (78) - why is this not a finisher but 02:22:806 (109) - is
angery

Raiden wrote:

no really do you need dq for that finisher

goheegy wrote:

goheegy wrote:

Axer wrote:

Axer wrote:

Gezoda wrote:

im gonna get thrown out of top 200 with this map

don't worry, it seems it's not going to get ranked anytime soon.

Mayuzumi Sayaka wrote:

delete this

incandescence wrote:

Mayuzumi Sayaka wrote:

delete this

delete yourself and apparition while you're at it

1. 00:36:692 - Why this build-up have a SV change while the others don't? It's inconsistent, and there are a lot of occurences for this build-up in the map.
2. 00:49:035 - Dropping the SV here while there is a note snapped on 1/4 makes it look a bit weird, while the other changes are 1/2 only.
3. 01:43:892 - I get that there is a drop down on the music and then it goes intense again but this doesn't give you the right to make the SV unsmooth as... well basically it's not smooth. 01:44:492 - It drops down from 1.25x to 1.07x, goes on 1.07x for 3 notes and increases back, which makes it look like pretty irritating to me.

1. 00:12:520 - Inconsistent pattern, should be ddk due to every other usage. Or variate them all.
2. 00:14:749 - This is just a single note, why does it have finisher? There is not like a cymbal sound on it like 00:12:006 - this one. Same goes for 00:17:492 - this one.
3. 01:39:092 - Simple snare sound should not be emphasized with a finisher.
4. 02:33:949 - There should be a ddddK here, the sounds are pretty much the same compared to 00:27:777 - these ones.
5. 02:42:863 - Not really a problem, but kdkdkdk instead of kkddkkdd would be much better.
6. 02:45:263 - 1/8 duplet is unneccessary, the hit is single.
7. 03:06:177 ~ 03:07:206 - Between these spots I'm not sure I can hear any 1/4 sounds, so why mapping the calmer part more denser while you mapped 03:00:692 - this one for example, less dense?
8. 03:45:435 - 03:45:606 - 03:48:349 - I'm pretty sure you emphasized the snare sound with finishers (which I don't think they are neccessary), but 03:50:406 - 03:50:749 - 03:50:920 - why aren't these emphasized too? Creates inconsistency for no reason. My suggestion would be adding the latter since you pretty much used the finishers on such emphasizes.
9. 03:59:320 - Finisher is unneccessary, emphasizes nothing.
10. 04:39:435 (316,317,318,319,320) - The music goes calmer and yet you used finishers on all of them. Doesn't make sense to me sorry. Especially after a SV drop.
11. 04:49:377 (402,403,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - This pattern seemed a bit too long for me considering you have used maximum of 7-plets to make variations. Consider removing one or two notes.
12. 05:01:720 (532,533,534) - These three also don't emphasize a particular sound. Removing finishers is a good idea.
13. 05:05:149 (546,547,548,549,550,551) - The most prominent sounds are only 05:06:177 (552,553,554) - these three so I recommend deleting finishers on the former one.

Axer wrote:

top 10 anime deaths

Raiden wrote:

as requested

SPOILER

frukoyurdakul wrote:

I wouldn't want to do this so late but I just played the map and I have some concerns.

[SV]

1. 00:36:692 - Why this build-up have a SV change while the others don't? It's inconsistent, and there are a lot of occurences for this build-up in the map.
2. 00:49:035 - Dropping the SV here while there is a note snapped on 1/4 makes it look a bit weird, while the other changes are 1/2 only.
3. 01:43:892 - I get that there is a drop down on the music and then it goes intense again but this doesn't give you the right to make the SV unsmooth as... well basically it's not smooth. 01:44:492 - It drops down from 1.25x to 1.07x, goes on 1.07x for 3 notes and increases back, which makes it look like pretty irritating to me.

[Notes]

1. 00:12:520 - Inconsistent pattern, should be ddk due to every other usage. Or variate them all. Fixed
2. 00:14:749 - This is just a single note, why does it have finisher? There is not like a cymbal sound on it like 00:12:006 - this one. Same goes for 00:17:492 - this one. Fixed
3. 01:39:092 - Simple snare sound should not be emphasized with a finisher. 03:53:835 (190) -
4. 02:33:949 - There should be a ddddK here, the sounds are pretty much the same compared to 00:27:777 - these ones. Fixed
5. 02:42:863 - Not really a problem, but kdkdkdk instead of kkddkkdd would be much better. Ok ><
6. 02:45:263 - 1/8 duplet is unneccessary, the hit is single. Fixed
7. 03:06:177 ~ 03:07:206 - Between these spots I'm not sure I can hear any 1/4 sounds, so why mapping the calmer part more denser while you mapped 03:00:692 - this one for example, less dense? There are 1/4 sounds there, all you have to do is listen carefully, that small fraction had only doubles that followed the synth before but I decided to fix them and follow the beat in the background.
8. 03:45:435 - 03:45:606 - 03:48:349 - I'm pretty sure you emphasized the snare sound with finishers (which I don't think they are neccessary), but 03:50:406 - 03:50:749 - 03:50:920 - why aren't these emphasized too? Creates inconsistency for no reason. My suggestion would be adding the latter since you pretty much used the finishers on such emphasizes. Thing is, I could make those finisher but it makes it harder to read and I feel like they're not intense enough to be made finishers.
9. 03:59:320 - Finisher is unneccessary, emphasizes nothing. Emphasizes the same way 03:48:349 (159) - and 03:53:835 (190) - do
10. 04:39:435 (316,317,318,319,320) - The music goes calmer and yet you used finishers on all of them. Doesn't make sense to me sorry. Especially after a SV drop. Fixed, and changed pattern to k k d d k
11. 04:49:377 (402,403,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - This pattern seemed a bit too long for me considering you have used maximum of 7-plets to make variations. Consider removing one or two notes. Fixed
12. 05:01:720 (532,533,534) - These three also don't emphasize a particular sound. Removing finishers is a good idea.
13. 05:05:149 (546,547,548,549,550,551) - The most prominent sounds are only 05:06:177 (552,553,554) - these three so I recommend deleting finishers on the former one.

I really liked those last finishers, what a shame, fixed

And there is a finisher usage problem that has been mentioned before. I'm not putting that out on this mod. angery

babysnakes wrote:

Pls u be my best friend if u no requalify

ARGENTINE DREAM wrote:

This map has received A LOT of modding already and much of the things yet to say are a matter of personal taste... Still if I have the chance to speak one more time now that it is DQ'ed I would like you to:

01:39:606 - delete this note, there is no sound there and also it is a good place for a rest
01:52:463 - I think this would work a lot better as a d both regarding sound and gameplay

03:43:206 - this shouldn't be a big note
03:45:949 - same as above

04:28:377 - add a don here, that stream looks like shortened for some unmusical reason and gameplay a 13 note stream shouldn't be a problem since this is the longstreams part and you used a lot of 13 note streams.

Hope you are OK with this. o7