1. some of your break spots need fixing
2. 01:20:535 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - can you make this a proper equilateral thanks
3. 01:41:450 (4,5) - 01:43:140 (4,5) - 01:44:830 (4,5) - 01:46:520 (4,5) - honestly you could Ctrl + G these for a similar effect to the first pre-chorus; feels odd to make the second pre-chorus more of a reading challenge
4. 01:48:211 (5,6) - 01:49:902 (5,6) - really don't get why you would want to establish this pre-chorus as more technically challenging when all your other patterning for this song doesn't do anything of the sort
5. 01:54:126 (2,3) - should have more spacing tbh
6. 02:55:816 (4,5) - should be Ctrl + G to match the other patterns, hoyl
7. 02:59:196 (4,5,6,7) - betrays the patterning that you wanted to go for with 02:54:126 (3,4) - 02:57:506 (4,5) -
8. 03:25:183 (1) - finish
9. 04:26:021 (3,4,5) - 05:56:374 (3,4,5) - should have equal spacing on all notes imo, it'd look nicer with the pattern you're trying to go for here
10. 05:19:668 (3,1) - stack slider end on the (3) lol
11. 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) - would look neater if you made it into a square tbh. copy 06:45:786 (3,4) - and rotate by 90 degrees on its selection centre, then just move 06:46:138 (6,1) - to those coordinates
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 07:25:844 (3,3) - shouldn't the orientation of these sliders be in the same general direction? feels really off to change the pattern like this this late into the song
13. 07:34:844 (2,3,4,5,6) - centre the (6) in the square hoyl
14. 08:40:953 (1,2,3,4) - these kicks all have equal emphasis on them so it feels pretty bad for 3->4 to be so weak in comparison to the other 3. same with 08:45:837 (3,4) - to some extent
15. 08:44:441 (2) - what is this aesthetic here LOL you're better off stacking this with 08:43:918 (2) -
16. 08:43:744 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^speaking of which, make this into a better square shape, similar to what i suggested at 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) -
17. 08:47:930 (3,4) - should decrease the spacing here similar to what 08:48:802 (6,7) - is
18. 09:12:348 (7) - actually if you listen closely, there's no sound on the blue tick 09:12:435 - . there is a sound on 09:12:610 - though, so a rhythm like this would be more fitting:
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 09:40:168 - umm hello why did you skip the drum here
20. 11:00:488 (1) - i get that it's a slow section but there's still a finish here :/
21. 09:58:395 (5,1) - 11:22:116 (1,2) - swap NCs here lol
22. 09:08:162 (3) - 09:19:325 (4) - 10:09:558 (2) - 10:10:953 (5) - 11:29:092 (2) - 11:31:185 (3) - shouldn't these be NCed?

Doormat wrote:

why

[OneDiff]

1. some of your break spots need fixing
2. 01:20:535 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - can you make this a proper equilateral thanks
3. 01:41:450 (4,5) - 01:43:140 (4,5) - 01:44:830 (4,5) - 01:46:520 (4,5) - honestly you could Ctrl + G these for a similar effect to the first pre-chorus; feels odd to make the second pre-chorus more of a reading challenge tbh i have not seen anyone have issues with this, since it's the same rhythm they can recognize that and play it properly. also the followpoints look kinda bad xd
4. 01:48:211 (5,6) - 01:49:902 (5,6) - really don't get why you would want to establish this pre-chorus as more technically challenging when all your other patterning for this song doesn't do anything of the sort same as above.. i don't think is is particularly hard cuz the rhythm was already introduced lol. and i do this in the one at 02:57:010 - too
5. 01:54:126 (2,3) - should have more spacing tbh since it's not a vocal, i wanted to make a really clear pattern based separation to the part with the vocal - 01:54:549 (1,2,3,4,5) - . spacing wasn't that important here.
6. 02:55:816 (4,5) - should be Ctrl + G to match the other patterns, hoyl
7. 02:59:196 (4,5,6,7) - betrays the patterning that you wanted to go for with 02:54:126 (3,4) - 02:57:506 (4,5) - yea cuz theres drums there >.> so i changed the pattern cuz the song was different
8. 03:25:183 (1) - finish
9. 04:26:021 (3,4,5) - 05:56:374 (3,4,5) - should have equal spacing on all notes imo, it'd look nicer with the pattern you're trying to go for here
10. 05:19:668 (3,1) - stack slider end on the (3) lol
11. 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) - would look neater if you made it into a square tbh. copy 06:45:786 (3,4) - and rotate by 90 degrees on its selection centre, then just move 06:46:138 (6,1) - to those coordinates
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 07:25:844 (3,3) - shouldn't the orientation of these sliders be in the same general direction? feels really off to change the pattern like this this late into the song
13. 07:34:844 (2,3,4,5,6) - centre the (6) in the square hoyl
14. 08:40:953 (1,2,3,4) - these kicks all have equal emphasis on them so it feels pretty bad for 3->4 to be so weak in comparison to the other 3. same with 08:45:837 (3,4) - to some extent
15. 08:44:441 (2) - what is this aesthetic here LOL you're better off stacking this with 08:43:918 (2) -
16. 08:43:744 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^speaking of which, make this into a better square shape, similar to what i suggested at 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) -
17. 08:47:930 (3,4) - should decrease the spacing here similar to what 08:48:802 (6,7) - is
18. 09:12:348 (7) - actually if you listen closely, there's no sound on the blue tick 09:12:435 - . there is a sound on 09:12:610 - though, so a rhythm like this would be more fitting:
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 09:40:168 - umm hello why did you skip the drum here uhh cuz its super quiet imo the other 3 are much louder
20. 11:00:488 (1) - i get that it's a slow section but there's still a finish here :/
21. 09:58:395 (5,1) - 11:22:116 (1,2) - swap NCs here lol 2nd one is correct, theres a vocal there. matches with other stuff like 10:03:104 (8,1) -
22. 09:08:162 (3) - 09:19:325 (4) - 10:09:558 (2) - 10:10:953 (5) - 11:29:092 (2) - 11:31:185 (3) - shouldn't these be NCed? spent 20 minutes fixing the color haxing after applying this.. and made all ncs consistent cuz i cant nc properly lol

do what you need to do i guess