forum

Mitsuha Miyamizu(CV: Kamishiraishi Mone) - Nandemo Nai ya (m

posted
Total Posts
72
show more
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Cris_1 wrote:

Hi, NM from #modreqs

Just a Little More
Check the AiMod, if you see this had a few problems that should be fixed (Kiai, audio and size of the beatmap) )b
  1. 00:00:877 (1,2) - This patterns at the start don't represet correctly the vocals, imo you can put more notes here instead of a 1/2 and a loong slider I'm working on a permanent fix for this issue, as I'm thinking of moving slider arts to the big break and putting in ur suggestion in the beginning, or maybe some other ideas idk for now but something will be done
  2. 01:25:895 (1) - This ruins the low intensity of this section, try to keep more consistency hopefully fixed by using 1/12 reverse slider instead of 1/18
  3. 01:27:502 (2) - NC )b
  4. 01:27:502 (2,3,4,5) - Imo you can do a better pattern here I think it's fine as it is
  5. 01:31:430 (5,1) - Stack? I think looks nice because the piano I'll keep it as it is to emphasize the sound and timing pattern change
  6. 01:40:359 (7) - NC fixed nc problem in that whole area
  7. 01:41:609 (3,4,5,6) - The flow here is really bad :/ intentional for the change in vocal syntax (to which vocals I mapped in a horizontal motion flow)
  8. 02:37:145 (1,1,1) - In this streams please reduce the space between this will keep for now until more people complain
  9. 02:40:359 - In this point you follow the piano but 03:03:216 - here you follow the fiddle when the piano is most predominant I followed fiddle since it was the most dominant imo with sliders, and circles with significant vocals because the song slows down there
  10. 03:43:216 (8) - NC )b
  11. 03:40:359 (1) - Imo a 1/2 slider here and a circle 03:41:073 here sounds better nah, start of a new measure want to keep a long slider
  12. 03:45:716 (1,1,1,1) - Same as above same as above as well
  13. 03:47:502 (5) - This slider up looks better looks better this way
  14. 05:06:251 (7,1) - Add space between this notes please spaced a little more
  15. 05:44:644 - 5% volume inhirited here)b
GL~

Mou sukoshi dake de ii ato sukoshi dake de ii mou sukodhi dake de ii kara
Mou sukoshi dake de ii ato sukoshi dake de ii mou sukoshi dake kuttsuite iyou yo~<333
Thanks for the mod!


Asuka_- wrote:

nm
im not good at english sorry xd

General
uncheck countdown
pls set custom combocolor

you have meta sourse..?? thank you!~~

UniArtist:上白石萌音
Artist:Kamishiraishi Mone
UniTitle:なんでもないや(movie ver.)
Title:Nandemo Nai ya (movie ver.)

refs
http://kamishiraishimone.com/discography/cd.html
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/514204
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/515939

01:25:359 (7,8,1) - spacing issue fixed, I hope
01:44:823 (6) - if you follow vocal, remove this better because there is a big vocal at 01:45:002 - , so 01:44:823 (6) - before big vocal does not good work. fixed
02:25:538 - why did you skip big piano? xd (i think you follow piano mainy in this part) fixed
02:46:073 (1) - move to down better, because players may confuse 1/4 gap at 02:45:716 (4,1) - fixed i hope again
04:31:966 (1) - start at 04:31:788 - better imo. )b
05:03:930 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - tbh, placement of these dont match kiai time. I think that aim will not move so players will get bored. pls consider rework placement. fixed all of it, hope it's good
05:06:251 (7) - why did you follow not vocal only here? fixed, but idk if this is better. Both seem okay so I'll stick the changed one

[]
short mod. i think the diff need more mod. but not bad map. good luck.>w<//
Thank you~~~
makisokk
Hello from my que
[Just a Little More]
  • 00:29:645 (4) - hmm i think you can use here nc
    00:34:645 (1) - delete nc
    00:39:823 (4,5) - In my opinion it's better to swap them, because it's a quiet moment, and it's not so necessary jump 5-6
    00:54:645 (1,2,3,4,5) - I do not really understand this moment, I certainly saw what you did in the beginning for vocals, but almost in the whole part of the map you use the instrumental, so I think that you need to do here either one note or a slider
    01:25:954 (1) - Extend this slider by one tick, the sound ends here 01:26:133 -
    02:11:788 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Here you have the wrong arrangement of the notes, you need to do this either in 1/12 or you do not have the correct timing/In my opinion, this is true throughout the map. Ask someone who knows this
    02:44:645 (6) - Raise the note above, for a better flow
    02:50:180 (4,5) - Do blanket?
    02:52:145 (3) - Raise Up, for a Straight Line
    02:52:859 (5,7) - fix blaket
    02:58:930 (6) - Move to the left
    03:28:930 (1,2,3) - before you did straight lines, why did you decide to do it differently this time?
    03:45:954 (1,1) - why big space?
    03:47:502 (5) - make the curve the other way
    04:18:216 (2,3,4) - move down
    05:01:787 (4,5,6) - In my opinion this is a bad flow
    05:11:430 (6) - maybe crtl+G?
okay it's all
Good luck
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

makisokk wrote:

Hello from my que
[Just a Little More]
  • 00:29:645 (4) - hmm i think you can use here nc sure
    00:34:645 (1) - delete nc ok
    00:39:823 (4,5) - In my opinion it's better to swap them, because it's a quiet moment, and it's not so necessary jump 5-6 the jump isn't so big that it's very surprising to the player, and i want a faster cursor movement before the piano triple
    00:54:645 (1,2,3,4,5) - I do not really understand this moment, I certainly saw what you did in the beginning for vocals, but almost in the whole part of the map you use the instrumental, so I think that you need to do here either one note or a slider fixed
    01:25:954 (1) - Extend this slider by one tick, the sound ends here 01:26:133 - done
    02:11:788 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Here you have the wrong arrangement of the notes, you need to do this either in 1/12 or you do not have the correct timing/In my opinion, this is true throughout the map. Ask someone who knows this will look into this
    02:44:645 (6) - Raise the note above, for a better flow fine as it is since 5 is lowered from 4
    02:50:180 (4,5) - Do blanket? soft blanket is fine
    02:52:145 (3) - Raise Up, for a Straight Line check again, it is a straight line already
    02:52:859 (5,7) - fix blaket edged over 2 pixels
    02:58:930 (6) - Move to the left no need for such a soft curve
    03:28:930 (1,2,3) - before you did straight lines, why did you decide to do it differently this time? 03:29:288 (3) - was placed like so instead of following a straight path so that I can make a triangle out of the shapes 03:29:109 (2,3,4) -
    03:45:954 (1,1) - why big space? to emphasize 03:46:073 (1) -
    03:47:502 (5) - make the curve the other way fine as it is imo
    04:18:216 (2,3,4) - move down done
    05:01:787 (4,5,6) - In my opinion this is a bad flow ok to me
    05:11:430 (6) - maybe crtl+G? sure
okay it's all
Good luck
Thanks for the mod~~
Avenora
from my mod queue

Just A Little More
Ask AiMod first

00:34:645 (6,1) - switch NC (downbeat/long white tick reason)
03:46:125 (1) - move this closer to others so it makes a straight line
02:45:232 (1) - no NC
02:50:947 (1) - ^
05:38:132 - Red line here and move note here to sync with piano

that's all I can get, not enough skill to mod this beautiful map, sorry :s
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

C-Yuyuko wrote:

from my mod queue

Just A Little More
Ask AiMod first )b

00:34:645 (6,1) - switch NC (downbeat/long white tick reason))b
03:46:125 (1) - move this closer to others so it makes a straight line fine as it is, as the next notes follow a straight line
02:45:232 (1) - no NC )b
02:50:947 (1) - ^ )b
05:38:132 - Red line here and move note here to sync with piano Fixed whole area, as I noticed a mistake there as you mentioned that. :p

that's all I can get, not enough skill to mod this beautiful map, sorry :s it's ok <3
Thanks for the mod!!~~
blueloniess
00:20:560 (1) - 00:14:846 (1) - wired slider
00:28:931 (1) - 01:25:954 (1) - Add flow in this part pls. too straight forward,maybe add some curved slider
01:27:680 (2,3) - why jump
01:46:430 (7) - Ctrl+G
01:48:930 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1) - I think you can set a break time here to enjoy the music
02:11:838 - 02:33:980 - no flow here, too straight forward.
02:34:695 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can make these six slider into two Triangle,that may looks better.you can make sliders like this one:02:40:768 (3,4,5) -
02:37:264 (1,1) - why nc here?
02:38:335 (1,1) - ^
02:46:125 (1,2,3,4,5) - bad blanket
03:46:840 (3,4,5) - you want to make a triangle here? Well this part is wired, I can hardly find flow here. use ctrl+G at 03:47:197 (4,5) - . then I think it can make much more sense

05:15:001 (10) - Ctrl+G. I can hardly get your thought at here. IDK why you break your flow here
05:17:901 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - maybe separate a little
05:23:640 (11) - Ctrl+G
05:32:144 (3) - nice slider.

Good luck!!! :)
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

blueloniess wrote:

00:20:560 (1) - 00:14:846 (1) - wired slider ?
00:28:931 (1) - 01:25:954 (1) - Add flow in this part pls. too straight forward,maybe add some curved slider straight sliders = piano there.
as u see in 00:54:645 (1,2,3) - , only these are curved in that section because that followed the distinct vocals there

01:27:680 (2,3) - why jump 01:27:502 (1,2) - and 01:27:859 (3,4) - are in pairs. thus a jump between the two
01:46:430 (7) - Ctrl+G ok
01:48:930 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1) - I think you can set a break time here to enjoy the music the slider only part is calm enough to let the player enjoy the music
02:11:838 - 02:33:980 - no flow here, too straight forward. rhythm is simple, and what do you mean no flow?
02:34:695 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can make these six slider into two Triangle,that may looks better.you can make sliders like this one:02:40:768 (3,4,5) - fine as it is
02:37:264 (1,1) - why nc here? the quad is 1/3 rhythm
02:38:335 (1,1) - ^ ^
02:46:125 (1,2,3,4,5) - bad blanket wasn't blanketing, i was making symmetry
03:46:840 (3,4,5) - you want to make a triangle here? Well this part is wired, I can hardly find flow here. use ctrl+G at 03:47:197 (4,5) - . then I think it can make much more sense I just wanted to emphasize 03:47:554 (5) -

05:15:001 (10) - Ctrl+G. I can hardly get your thought at here. IDK why you break your flow here flow is consistent before the new combo.
after new combo, i wanted that flow break because look at the timing on the NC slider...

05:17:901 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - maybe separate a little no. i don't want a big diff spike like that. This is big enough
05:23:640 (11) - Ctrl+G ok
05:32:144 (3) - nice slider.<3

Good luck!!! :)
Thanks for the mod >w<//
Jemzuu
hi from my Q (quite late but better late than never)

optional to change | unrankable | suggested to change

General
  1. i approve the tags :^)
  2. increase ar by .1 pls
  3. please change combo colors D: choose something that blends with the bg
Just a Little More
  1. 00:29:823 (2,3) - i feel like u could ctrl g these to be consistent with 00:35:359 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
  2. 00:36:073 (5) - nc would fit here
  3. 00:36:788 (4) - ^
  4. 01:05:716 - ur missing the sound here :c i'd make this repeat instead
  5. 01:13:216 (5) - idk but i feel like u could emphasize the blue tick as well by making it a slider instead to acoid repititiveness for this part lo then make nescessary spacing adjustments after
  6. 01:16:788 (4) - same as what i pointed out on 01:05:716 -
  7. 01:27:859 (3,5) - i'd nc for emphasis
  8. 01:29:109 (2) - delet this note to follow the music like what u did on 01:31:609 - and other parts
  9. 01:45:002 (1,2) - swap ncs for consistency
  10. 01:48:216 (5) - u could overlap this to 01:47:145 (2) - imo for better spacing emphasis
  11. 01:56:131 - u could add a note here to make the transition of the music more emphasized
  12. 02:00:059 - here u could emphasize the bass of the violin whynot add a note here as well
  13. 02:12:195 (3) - quite underspaced imo make it simillar as 02:14:695 (1,2,3) -
  14. 02:33:266 (5,6) - would prefer a 1/2 slider instead
  15. 03:49:518 (2) - delet note to avoid overmapping
  16. 03:51:304 (10) - i'd delete this note too and make a repeat instead make necessary adjustments after
  17. 03:52:375 (2) - pls delet note here and extend the slider instead make adjustments for the next sliders after
  18. 03:55:232 (2) - like what i mentioned before delet this note cus there's no specific sound on this part that supports the music at all and to avoid overmapping
  19. 03:59:518 (6) - ^
  20. 04:03:804 (2) - ^
  21. 04:20:054 (1) - place this on the right side instead to emphasize the spacing
  22. 04:27:554 - missing note add circle here then stack it as well
  23. 04:54:518 (1) - add a timing point here and lower the volume to emphasize the piano sound
  24. 04:55:054 - spinner should start here and end 04:57:554 - here
  25. 05:07:680 (2,5) - these notes seems unncessary for me tbh cus it doesnt emphasizes nor clicks a specific sound cus the most prominent sound here is the vocals delet thiese two instead
  26. 05:08:930 (4) - make this a repeat slider instead then add 2 circles for 05:09:466 (5) -
  27. 05:09:823 (1) - delete this note after
  28. 05:17:723 (6) - pls delete this too
  29. 05:17:902 - aaaaaaaa i love this part <3
  30. 05:34:286 (1) - overlap the sliderend of this to 05:32:144 (3) -
  31. 05:38:130 (2) - remove finish sounds better imo or just add a timing point here and lower the volume

    NCs
    1. 01:35:895 (5) -
    2. 02:41:840 (6) -
    3. 02:16:480 (6) - nc perhaps cus it has different sound
    4. 02:19:338 (5) - ^
    5. 02:21:838 (5) - ^
    6. 02:30:409 (5) -
    7. 02:41:840 (6) -
    8. 02:44:697 (6) -
    9. 02:58:982 (6) -
    10. 03:56:125 (6) -
    11. 04:04:697 (6) -
    12. 05:02:501 (7) -
    13. 05:10:358 (1) - remove nc
    14. 05:10:001 (7) -
    15. 05:13:930 (6) -
    16. 05:22:568 (7) -

welp that's about it I hope i helped!! <3
goodluck~~
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru
Idk why but I can't reply to you @AJamez so I'll do a budget reply :3



hi from my Q (quite late but better late than never)

optional to change | unrankable | suggested to change

General
i approve the tags :^) :^)
increase ar by .1 pls hmmm I'll ask around for more opinions on that
please change combo colors D: choose something that blends with the bg I don't think that's a good idea, since people playing with dim (myself included) will have trouble reading if the circles are similar colors to the bg

Just a Little More
00:29:823 (2,3) - i feel like u could ctrl g these to be consistent with 00:35:359 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - the pitch pattern changes from climbing to falling, so a rotational flow change is warranted
00:36:073 (5) - nc would fit here sure
00:36:788 (4) - ^ mmm ok
01:05:716 - ur missing the sound here :c i'd make this repeat instead I dont hear anything there
01:13:216 (5) - idk but i feel like u could emphasize the blue tick as well by making it a slider instead to acoid repititiveness for this part lo then make nescessary spacing adjustments after I think it's fine as it is
01:16:788 (4) - same as what i pointed out on 01:05:716 - it's just the "eto" part is a vocal that pops out more to the listener
01:27:859 (3,5) - i'd nc for emphasis hmm, it'll also help with reading, yeah that's a good idea
01:29:109 (2) - delet this note to follow the music like what u did on 01:31:609 - and other parts fine as it is
01:45:002 (1,2) - swap ncs for consistency ok
01:48:216 (5) - u could overlap this to 01:47:145 (2) - imo for better spacing emphasis nah, I'm avoiding overlaps
01:56:131 - u could add a note here to make the transition of the music more emphasized i'm only following violin here
02:00:059 - here u could emphasize the bass of the violin whynot add a note here as well eh ,it's fine as it is
02:12:195 (3) - quite underspaced imo make it simillar as 02:14:695 (1,2,3) - 02:14:695 - is stronger, thus a change from before. Also it's right after a spinner, so i want to ease into spacing and start small after the "break" (ie where i was just following violin with slow sliders)
02:33:266 (5,6) - would prefer a 1/2 slider instead mmm the slider end would land on a pretty significant note
03:49:518 (2) - delet note to avoid overmapping kiai justifies it
03:51:304 (10) - i'd delete this note too and make a repeat instead make necessary adjustments after fine as it is
03:52:375 (2) - pls delet note here and extend the slider instead make adjustments for the next sliders after ^
03:55:232 (2) - like what i mentioned before delet this note cus there's no specific sound on this part that supports the music at all and to avoid overmapping as said before, and deleting that is awkward as the pause can be weird in the kiai
03:59:518 (6) - ^ .
04:03:804 (2) - ^
04:20:054 (1) - place this on the right side instead to emphasize the spacing it's ok as it is
04:27:554 - missing note add circle here then stack it as well no violin sound there
04:54:518 (1) - add a timing point here and lower the volume to emphasize the piano sound ok
04:55:054 - spinner should start here and end 04:57:554 - here ok
05:07:680 (2,5) - these notes seems unncessary for me tbh cus it doesnt emphasizes nor clicks a specific sound cus the most prominent sound here is the vocals delet thiese two instead kiai filler rhythm
05:08:930 (4) - make this a repeat slider instead then add 2 circles for 05:09:466 (5) - sliders follow vocals, it's good as it is
05:09:823 (1) - delete this note after ^
05:17:723 (6) - pls delete this too ^
05:17:902 - aaaaaaaa i love this part <3 :D
05:34:286 (1) - overlap the sliderend of this to 05:32:144 (3) - it's already overlapping?
05:38:130 (2) - remove finish sounds better imo or just add a timing point here and lower the volumegood as it is, aka i really dont want to change every finish volume

the NC i I think as long as I'm consistent I'm fine, so no changes as of yet


Thanks for the mod!~~ >w<//
Einja
highlight all green and red lines at once and switch the sample to S:C1

enjoy your muted slider sound
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Einja wrote:

highlight all green and red lines at once and switch the sample to S:C1

enjoy your muted slider sound

:eyes:
Chihara Minori
the timing killed me with how unorganized it is

lol
[TimingPoints]
810,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
7410,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
13990,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
20740,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
28960,714.285714285714,4,2,1,60,1,0
337174,923.076923076923,4,2,1,60,1,0

if you does apply that new timing section I may back and give some words
btw its only bpm points
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Time Capsule wrote:

the timing killed me with how unorganized it is

lol
[TimingPoints]
810,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
7410,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
13990,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
20740,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
28960,714.285714285714,4,2,1,60,1,0
337174,923.076923076923,4,2,1,60,1,0

if you does apply that new timing section I may back and give some words
btw its only bpm points
I didn't copy paste your timing points, but some of the sections u noted were mistimed, so I fixed them with the help of a couple other mappers >w<//

Thanks!
Hari
kwk
q
~
Not really a fan of the intro but, not much you can do about it if you dont want it to be skippable
00:40:051 (5,6) - not too sure about making this a jump, doesnt really feel like its warranted since it is a bit sudden.
01:13:262 (5) - i think whistles here a bit better since the claps are pretty noisy
01:16:834 (4) - im guessing this is for the vocals, so why do these get ignored? 01:20:941 - 01:22:369 - ? I think its fine to just keep it as a note imo, dont really see the need to overcomplicate it
01:30:226 (5) - i think it would be nice if this was deleted so you get a pause between 01:29:691 (4,1) - since the vocal here is rather quiet and not very noticeable. it'll emphasise 01:30:405 (1) - very nicely
01:35:048 (2,3,4) - you have same ds here 01:32:191 (2,3,4) - but why not here as well ? 01:35:048 (2,3,4) -
01:43:976 (4) - split this into 2 notes? vocals on slider ends is a bit mm, if you change it, it'll be more consistent with 01:41:476 (5,6,1,2) - rhythm wise and contrasts with 01:42:548 (4,5,6) -
01:45:405 (2,6) - these arent symmetrical if your intending them to be
02:12:195 (3) - same thing as earlier, i still think keeping the section entirely whistles is better but up to you
02:48:804 (8,1) - not too sure about the jump here, its like the biggest jump so far in such a calm section
02:54:518 (9) - unecessary note? not sure what its mapped to. Besides i think a pause is a nicer feeling here
02:56:661 (2,3,4,5) - be cool if you made this similar to 02:45:232 (7,8,9,10) - 02:50:947 (6,7,8,9) -
03:03:268 (1) - is slider tail meant to be snapped to blue tick?
03:03:269 the transition to the undermapping here is a bit strange, cause to me, the sectionw before to this is basically the same, yet the transition is very sudden, its not like the music disappeared
03:05:411 (2,3) - i think it would be better if u change 3 to a slider and delete 2 if your trying to follow vocals since theres nothing on the white tick
03:08:269 (2) - same here about the white tick thing, nothing happens here but you hitsounded a clap on it :?:
03:29:340 (3) -03:30:768 (7) - would be cool if you ctrl+g this maybe
03:48:982 (1,2) - maybe extend the slider to where 2 is or delete 2? i dont think it really needs to be clickable
03:49:697 (3,4,8) - the fact that this isnt a triangle but 03:50:054 (5,6,8) - is tilts me
03:51:840 (1,2,3) - why is this so different to 03:53:268 (5,6,7) - with regards to spacing? i noticed you kinda repeat it a bit later too , but i do think having similar spacing would be better
04:08:268 (2) - whats happening on this beat? would follow piano if it was on the blue or vocal on the red..
05:13:394 (3,4,5,6) - not really a fan of how this is a curve after all the triangle/linear patterns it seems a bit inconsistent, maybe something like this is better slightly? http://puu.sh/xIczD/98a8dbe8f6.png
hmm 2nd half of the last kiai seems a bit rushed..
your long sliders at the end are unrankable since u cant tell which direction it goes, try and unstack the head/tail slightly
~
cool style
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

kwk wrote:

q
~
Not really a fan of the intro but, not much you can do about it if you dont want it to be skippable I will look for fix when I get ideas uwu
00:40:051 (5,6) - not too sure about making this a jump, doesnt really feel like its warranted since it is a bit sudden. ctrl+g 4 and 5
01:13:262 (5) - i think whistles here a bit better since the claps are pretty noisy )b
01:16:834 (4) - im guessing this is for the vocals, so why do these get ignored? 01:20:941 - 01:22:369 - ? I think its fine to just keep it as a note imo, dont really see the need to overcomplicate it )b
01:30:226 (5) - i think it would be nice if this was deleted so you get a pause between 01:29:691 (4,1) - since the vocal here is rather quiet and not very noticeable. it'll emphasise 01:30:405 (1) - very nicely imo instead of emphasizing, i think the dead air is just awkward
01:35:048 (2,3,4) - you have same ds here 01:32:191 (2,3,4) - but why not here as well ? 01:35:048 (2,3,4) - 01:32:191 (2,3,4) - the slider is different in this pattern that the other ones with bigger spacing (vocal is softer)
01:43:976 (4) - split this into 2 notes? vocals on slider ends is a bit mm, if you change it, it'll be more consistent with 01:41:476 (5,6,1,2) - rhythm wise and contrasts with 01:42:548 (4,5,6) - )b i don't know why i ignored the vocal when I mapped it, as I was following the vocals :/
01:45:405 (2,6) - these arent symmetrical if your intending them to be no i was just following a honeycomb structure
02:12:195 (3) - same thing as earlier, i still think keeping the section entirely whistles is better but up to you mm this section i think the claps are fine
02:48:804 (8,1) - not too sure about the jump here, its like the biggest jump so far in such a calm section fixed
02:54:518 (9) - unecessary note? not sure what its mapped to. Besides i think a pause is a nicer feeling here filler rhythm
02:56:661 (2,3,4,5) - be cool if you made this similar to 02:45:232 (7,8,9,10) - 02:50:947 (6,7,8,9) - changed
03:03:268 (1) - is slider tail meant to be snapped to blue tick? sv change didnt register D: i fixed the sv so its good now
03:03:269 the transition to the undermapping here is a bit strange, cause to me, the sectionw before to this is basically the same, yet the transition is very sudden, its not like the music disappeared ^
03:05:411 (2,3) - i think it would be better if u change 3 to a slider and delete 2 if your trying to follow vocals since theres nothing on the white tick
03:08:269 (2) - same here about the white tick thing, nothing happens here but you hitsounded a clap on it :?: short sliders are violin oscillations, circles are vocals
03:29:340 (3) -03:30:768 (7) - would be cool if you ctrl+g this maybe will keep that in mind, but for now I like the pattern i have
03:48:982 (1,2) - maybe extend the slider to where 2 is or delete 2? i dont think it really needs to be clickable filler rhythm since the slider being that long is a bit awkward imo
03:49:697 (3,4,8) - the fact that this isnt a triangle but 03:50:054 (5,6,8) - is tilts me 8 is supposed to be right in the center between 03:50:232 (6,7) - , just coincidence it makes a triangle lol
03:51:840 (1,2,3) - why is this so different to 03:53:268 (5,6,7) - with regards to spacing? i noticed you kinda repeat it a bit later too , but i do think having similar spacing would be better im emphasizing the finishes
04:08:268 (2) - whats happening on this beat? would follow piano if it was on the blue or vocal on the red.. i tried both options, and everyone that playtested said it was weird af since it doesnt follow rhythm (the song itself is weird as it doesnt follow music intuition). Just having equal timing space between the sliders and the circle sounds best
05:13:394 (3,4,5,6) - not really a fan of how this is a curve after all the triangle/linear patterns it seems a bit inconsistent, maybe something like this is better slightly? http://puu.sh/xIczD/98a8dbe8f6.png )b
hmm 2nd half of the last kiai seems a bit rushed.. uwu
your long sliders at the end are unrankable since u cant tell which direction it goes, try and unstack the head/tail slightly )b
~
cool style
Thanks for the mod!~~~
Eir_DELETED
mitsuha ver.

Just a Little More

  1. default soft finish and clap are clearly improper stuffs with the song like composed one. i suggest you prepare custom hitsounds for them at least.
     
  2. 00:00:877 - ~ 00:25:638 - the section prob runs the risk of unrankable issue cuz the sliders arent audible according to Raking Criteria. should avoid to mute slider slide and slider tick both to use 5% volume of green lines.
     
  3. 00:07:410 (1) - the slider shape doesnt look nice in my view. if you aim for ranked, you care of aesthetics stuff even long sliders. in case you have a reasonable intention as the slider, this shall not apply tho. 00:20:638 (1) - same
     
  4. 01:16:834 (4) - i prefer to replace a circle instead since there are only quite weak vocal on blue tick and i seem you focus to beat piano sound at the whole.
     
  5. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - the concept is really my preference! Good Job!! but you would be better to raise the distance a bit on 01:25:405 (7,8) - not same distance with 01:25:048 (6,7) - since through the 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - placement, there is most emphasized piano on here.
     
  6. 01:25:048 (6,1) - doesnt look nice on editor since your placement pattern basically doesnt overlap in my view
     
  7. 01:26:000 (1) - reduce a reverse only once cuz 01:26:179 - doesnt follow anything imo
     
  8. 02:40:412 - 03:03:269 - the section has too much intense like last kiai part despite of not a excited section. i recommend you remove the objects that are following vocal mainly for consistent with 00:40:408 - ~ 01:03:262 - as a tip. i assume you have not to remove objects extremely like a former part tho
     
  9. 02:40:412 - inconsistent volume green line and red line each other. it's an unrankable issue. 05:21:140 - 05:25:716 - same
     
  10. 03:45:887 (1,1) - what sound are you following to use 1/6's rhythm for the song? it makes more sense to snap 1/4 accurately as far as i could hear
     
  11. 04:58:216 - 05:27:680 - plz check "kiai mode" on red lines same time.
     
  12. 05:25:068 (5,1) - completely unfit stack with your map cuz you havent been used any else.
     
  13. 05:32:144 (3) - should avoid the slider shape cuz it doesn't entirely sure the direction of movement according ranking criteria. 05:35:001 (2) - 05:38:130 (2) - same.

as far as i could see, you would need effort on hitsounding and the intense that i pointed out. and find more effective opinions from mappers or modders.but it's fun for me in terms of playable stuff! if you have some question about my suggestion, dont hesitate to ask me~
Good Luck!
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

joker- wrote:

mitsuha ver.

Just a Little More

  1. default soft finish and clap are clearly improper stuffs with the song like composed one. i suggest you prepare custom hitsounds for them at least. I'm looking for hitsounds uwu
     
  2. 00:00:877 - ~ 00:25:638 - the section prob runs the risk of unrankable issue cuz the sliders arent audible according to Raking Criteria. should avoid to mute slider slide and slider tick both to use 5% volume of green lines. mmmm people have told me it's still rankable. I'll ask around more and decide then
     
  3. 00:07:410 (1) - the slider shape doesnt look nice in my view. if you aim for ranked, you care of aesthetics stuff even long sliders. in case you have a reasonable intention as the slider, this shall not apply tho. 00:20:638 (1) - same I'll fix it when I get ideas uwu
     
  4. 01:16:834 (4) - i prefer to replace a circle instead since there are only quite weak vocal on blue tick and i seem you focus to beat piano sound at the whole. fixed
     
  5. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - the concept is really my preference! Good Job!! but you would be better to raise the distance a bit on 01:25:405 (7,8) - not same distance with 01:25:048 (6,7) - since through the 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - placement, there is most emphasized piano on here.
    fixed
     
  6. 01:25:048 (6,1) - doesnt look nice on editor since your placement pattern basically doesnt overlap in my view ^
     
  7. 01:26:000 (1) - reduce a reverse only once cuz 01:26:179 - doesnt follow anything imo ok
     
  8. 02:40:412 - 03:03:269 - the section has too much intense like last kiai part despite of not a excited section. i recommend you remove the objects that are following vocal mainly for consistent with 00:40:408 - ~ 01:03:262 - as a tip. i assume you have not to remove objects extremely like a former part tho I think the simple jump patterns make up for the spacing. Don't think it's too intense.
     
  9. 02:40:412 - inconsistent volume green line and red line each other. it's an unrankable issue. 05:21:140 - 05:25:716 - same fixed
     
  10. 03:45:887 (1,1) - what sound are you following to use 1/6's rhythm for the song? it makes more sense to snap 1/4 accurately as far as i could hear I'm following the violin oscillations
     
  11. 04:58:216 - 05:27:680 - plz check "kiai mode" on red lines same time. fixed
     
  12. 05:25:068 (5,1) - completely unfit stack with your map cuz you havent been used any else. used to help differentiate the timing oddity,
    as the song suddenly changes beat with the vocals

     
  13. 05:32:144 (3) - should avoid the slider shape cuz it doesn't entirely sure the direction of movement according ranking criteria. 05:35:001 (2) - 05:38:130 (2) - same. fixed

as far as i could see, you would need effort on hitsounding and the intense that i pointed out. and find more effective opinions from mappers or modders.but it's fun for me in terms of playable stuff! if you have some question about my suggestion, dont hesitate to ask me~ <3
Good Luck!
Thanks for the mod!~~~ >w<//
Lilyanna
from my queue

general
04:34:340 - 04:54:519 - maybe leave this a break if u want
tags lmao
idk what the combo colors yellow and red has to do with but i assume the twilight maybe try pastel colors
[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,255,100
Combo2 : 85,225,255
Combo3 : 253,255,255
Combo4 : 255,100,100

not general
00:20:638 (1) - this slider art can be confusing in the end the path is not so clear like this http://puu.sh/xNn0R/25ecc0a7fc.jpg
01:27:905 (1,2) - if u ctrl g these it will fit better the intens music
02:12:909 (1) - the sound of her vocal on blue tick sound stronger maybe make it clickable like here 02:11:838 (1,2,3) - and stack them on head of 02:13:266 (2) -
02:51:840 (1,4) - avoid this small overlap is not appealing
03:08:625 (3) - ctrl for the flow break here to emphasize more the finish sound here 03:08:983 (1) -
03:11:840 (3) - nc should be here to be consistent
03:20:054 (3) - same as before
03:21:840 (3) - a 1/2 repeat here can do better because of the sound that the slider body ignores here 03:22:197 -
03:25:947 (3,4) - u mapped 1/8 stacks differntly as 03:45:769 (1,1,1) - and same as 1/4 that way these 03:25:947 (3,4,1) - can be confused of 1/4 so maybe keep mapping them diffrent
03:46:006 (1,1) - dont think its needed to space the 1/8 here this is the only time u did it
04:06:125 (1) - this slider art can look lot smoother maybe smth like this http://puu.sh/xNmvp/94e70f1327.jpg
04:08:269 (2) - this note is overmapped there not audible clickable sound there
05:29:287 - this vocals feels need to be mapped maybe try add 1/2 slider there http://puu.sh/xNmHu/d58130b9bb.jpg

neat map over all good luck.
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Lilyanna wrote:

from my queue

general
04:34:340 - 04:54:519 - maybe leave this a break if u want nu it'd be a pretty big break.
tags lmao :3
idk what the combo colors yellow and red has to do with but i assume the twilight maybe try pastel colors )b
[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,255,100
Combo2 : 85,225,255
Combo3 : 253,255,255
Combo4 : 255,100,100

not general
00:20:638 (1) - this slider art can be confusing in the end the path is not so clear like this http://puu.sh/xNn0R/25ecc0a7fc.jpg )b
01:27:905 (1,2) - if u ctrl g these it will fit better the intens music )b maybe a bit too spaced but I'll change it to that
02:12:909 (1) - the sound of her vocal on blue tick sound stronger maybe make it clickable like here 02:11:838 (1,2,3) - and stack them on head of 02:13:266 (2) - not mapping to vocals, only to piano, sure it's clickable, but if I mapped it I wouldn't be being consistent
02:51:840 (1,4) - avoid this small overlap is not appealing )b
03:08:625 (3) - ctrl for the flow break here to emphasize more the finish sound here 03:08:983 (1) - want to keep the "sweeping" motion to emphasize the violin sweep
03:11:840 (3) - nc should be here to be consistent )b
03:20:054 (3) - same as before same explanation as before
03:21:840 (3) - a 1/2 repeat here can do better because of the sound that the slider body ignores here 03:22:197 - mmm vocals aren't being followed in this section so...
03:25:947 (3,4) - u mapped 1/8 stacks differntly as 03:45:769 (1,1,1) - and same as 1/4 that way these 03:25:947 (3,4,1) - can be confused of 1/4 so maybe keep mapping them diffrent fine as it is imo, different timing = different spacing so . . .
03:46:006 (1,1) - dont think its needed to space the 1/8 here this is the only time u did it emphasis is required for the slider
04:06:125 (1) - this slider art can look lot smoother maybe smth like this http://puu.sh/xNmvp/94e70f1327.jpg )b
04:08:269 (2) - this note is overmapped there not audible clickable sound there keeping it for now as without it the beat is killed. Am looking for a solution tho so I'll change it soon probably
05:29:287 - this vocals feels need to be mapped maybe try add 1/2 slider there http://puu.sh/xNmHu/d58130b9bb.jpg the vocals are custom hitsounds btw xd

neat map over all good luck. <3
Thank you for the mod!~~ >w<//
intiaz
Thank you for using our queue! I'm not that good a mapper but here I go! Hope this helps! :D

00:00:877 - Maybe use a reverse slider?

00:40:229 - ^ - If you're going for Insane this may be difficult for 4*
01:37:191 - maybe space this note out a little more since it's not immediately clicked after, like 5,6,7
01:47:548 - this overlays the note at 01:46:476, which doesn't look pretty. maybe try to fix?
01:53:619 - looks a little weird (this is just my opinion)
02:20:766 - i think this slider is out of rhythm

03:14:697 - looks a little weird (still opinion)
03:25:947 - i understand using a different snap for stacks to go in rhythm, but if you listen in 25% speed you may have used the wrong snap, since it sounds out of rhythm
03:50:411 - maybe put a new combo here?
03:56:126 - ^
04:04:697 - ^
04:54:519 - maybe replace this with a normal slider instead of reverse?
05:02:501 - new combo?
05:10:358 - remove new combo here, then add a new combo on 05:11:073
05:13:930 - new combo?
05:22:568 - ^
05:25:068 - this slider is out of rhythm (i believe)
05:38:130 - this is a weird slider shape

And that's all! Good map overall, but I don't really like the song lol
Good luck with rank! :D
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Nyantiaz wrote:

Thank you for using our queue! I'm not that good a mapper but here I go! Hope this helps! :D

00:00:877 - Maybe use a reverse slider? I think a normal slider is fine, to keep consistent with the star trail gimmick used later

00:40:229 - ^ - If you're going for Insane this may be difficult for 4* not too bad of a diff spike for 4*
01:37:191 - maybe space this note out a little more since it's not immediately clicked after, like 5,6,7 )b
01:47:548 - this overlays the note at 01:46:476, which doesn't look pretty. maybe try to fix? wanted them different shapes since vocals are different
01:53:619 - looks a little weird (this is just my opinion) keeping for flow
02:20:766 - i think this slider is out of rhythm sliderend lands on vocal

03:14:697 - looks a little weird (still opinion) maybe fix when i get an idea of a pretty slider :p
03:25:947 - i understand using a different snap for stacks to go in rhythm, but if you listen in 25% speed you may have used the wrong snap, since it sounds out of rhythm sounds right to me after several times listening
03:50:411 - maybe put a new combo here? not needed, thus the other nc suggestions are not changed to be consistent
03:56:126 - ^ ^
04:04:697 - ^ ^
04:54:519 - maybe replace this with a normal slider instead of reverse? reverse is needed to represent the piano sweep
05:02:501 - new combo? not a new measure
05:10:358 - remove new combo here, then add a new combo on 05:11:073 just removed nc
05:13:930 - new combo? not new measure
05:22:568 - ^^
05:25:068 - this slider is out of rhythm (i believe)shortened slider 1/16th tick
05:38:130 - this is a weird slider shape gimmick to represent a scene from source movie

And that's all! Good map overall, but I don't really like the song lol D:
Good luck with rank! :D :D
Thanks for the mod!~ >w<//
intiaz
You're welcome! sorry for not being useful ENOUGH a_a im a noob modder lol
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Nyantiaz wrote:

You're welcome! sorry for not being useful ENOUGH a_a im a noob modder lol
it's fine you were helpful :p
salchow
Mod from my queue



Just a Little More
General:

this map has weird flow and uncomfortable jumps that you can fix to make the map better.



00:40:229 (6,1) - just remove the circle and use a repetitive slider instead. Fits better.

01:40:405 (1,2) - Use new combo here insted: 01:40:762 (2)

01:41:119 (4) - This slider could face downward, for more comfortable flow.

02:34:695 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - feels that these sliders face in random direction. Make this part more organized.

02:37:145 (1,1,1,1) - 02:38:216 (1,1,1,1) - 03:45:769 (1,1,1,1) - less spaced stream could fit better tbh.

02:48:090 (6,7) - This slider faces anti-clockwise direction = bad flow and dosent really fit. Make some sort of flower shape here: 02:46:125 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7)

03:50:411 (7) - new combo

04:41:840 - Missing circle/sound.

05:06:787 (1) - this slider could be more curved.

05:38:130 (2) - This slider is problematic because it's so easy to combo break. make slider-end visible.
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

salchow wrote:

Mod from my queue



Just a Little More
General:

this map has weird flow and uncomfortable jumps that you can fix to make the map better. uwu



00:40:229 (6,1) - just remove the circle and use a repetitive slider instead. Fits better. want to change it up to emphasize the 00:40:408 (1) -

01:40:405 (1,2) - Use new combo here insted: 01:40:762 (2) sticking to nc on finishes

01:41:119 (4) - This slider could face downward, for more comfortable flow. 01:41:476 (5) - is a beginning of a new word, as well slider is not too pointed up therefore not that hard to hit the next note.

02:34:695 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - feels that these sliders face in random direction. Make this part more organized. they're not random . . . they follow a hexagon pattern and just following it with your cursor makes comfortable flow

02:37:145 (1,1,1,1) - 02:38:216 (1,1,1,1) - 03:45:769 (1,1,1,1) - less spaced stream could fit better tbh. those notes are 1/3 streams which are different from the standard 1/4 i've been using, so the spacing and nc is warranted

02:48:090 (6,7) - This slider faces anti-clockwise direction = bad flow and dosent really fit. Make some sort of flower shape here: 02:46:125 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) how is anti-clockwise bad flow if the rest follows it as well . . . ;~;

03:50:411 (7) - new combo the other patterns in the kiai build up doesnt have a nc so this doesn't need it imo

04:41:840 - Missing circle/sound. there's no piano there, and I'm following it on that section

05:06:787 (1) - this slider could be more curved. Fine as it is

05:38:130 (2) - This slider is problematic because it's so easy to combo break. make slider-end visible.Sliderend is visible, as well the sv is super slow.
thanks for the mod )b
Pachiru
[Marathon]
  1. 00:00:877 (1,2) - I feel that's weird to have this slider: 00:00:877 (1) - focusing a syllab, and then on this slider: 00:01:591 (2) - you're based on the singer's long sentance, until she makes a break. And you're also doing it here: 00:14:016 (1,2) - // It's not really consistant to make what you did here.
    Furthermore, the sliderticks are pretty loud, and are pretty disturbing imo... Why not mapping each syllabs individually instead, to give a better rhythm perception to the player?
  2. 00:40:229 (6,1) - In my opinion, that would play better if you change this 1/8 slider into two circles instead. I suggest you two way to fix it, cause I think that using a 1/8 sliders + a circle, isn't giving a good feedback. Here are my two suggestions:
    1. Change this pattern into three circles, so it would look like this. I think that's the best solution, since the intensity is increasing from here: 00:38:980 (1) - to here: 00:40:408 (1) -
    2. Change this pattern as a 1/8 reverse slider, likethis. It's not my favorite, cause it doesn't push the player to click in rhythm with the piano, but I think it would be more representative of the music than the actual pattern.
  3. 00:41:834 (7) - From here, during the calm part, I think you can space more the circles when they're far from each other in the timeline. Cause otherwise, it will doesn't give a feeling of movement during this part.
  4. 00:53:262 (2) - Why from here, you're focusing the vocals, and you did made it before? I think that's quite weird, maybe you didn't focused on vocals, but in that case, why are these sliders 00:54:691 (1,2,3) - base on vocals? If you wanna be consistant with it, you can just focus the piano here, but it will kinda look empty, since the piano is not important enough to focus it.
  5. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I think that from here, since the song is getting crescendo, you can add a spacing effect that will represent that crescendo sound on the music, by adding a bit of spacing on each circles. Like this (don't do the same pattern, it's just to explain the increase of the spacing according to the song's intensity)
  6. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same for here. I noticed that you made it on those 01:24:691 (5,6,7,8) - three last note, it's a nice idea, but I think that the intensity is getting higher from here: 01:23:262 (1) - to here: 01:25:762 (8) - so you should do something like I showed you on the screenshot previously. :)
  7. 01:26:000 (1) - Are you sure about that unsnapped reversed slider? The spacing is somehow misleading, I think you should space it more, so the player can't be confused by it.
  8. 01:33:262 (1,2) - I have a small suggestion in terms of aesthetics, that I think it can improve the flow, and emphasis. I think that's fitting pretty great with the vocals, since the sound that those two sliders are covering are kind of same, so in my opinion, that would be better to do this.
  9. 02:17:552 (1,2,3) - It should be spaced more, cause the song that this circle: 02:17:552 (1) - is covering is pretty strong, and it's not spaced enough, also it has a 1/2 gap between this note and the previous one, so I suggest you to put more spacing, even if it's a calm part.
  10. 02:19:695 (7,8,9) - Turn the angle of this pattern by 45°, to make it less sharp, and hard to play. According to the sound it's covering, it doesn't need such a sharp flow like this. If you don't know how to turn objects, use Ctrl+Shift+R. If you did it well, it will look like this.
  11. 02:20:766 (3) - Why this slider is suddenly ending on the voice, if you're based on piano in background? If I listen to the song clearly, the only beat that end on this tick 02:20:989 - is the voice. So to fix this, I think you can delete this slider and replace it by a circle, or end the slider on the next white tick here: 02:21:123 -
  12. 03:46:126 (1) - Since you're using a unregular snap in the song (1/3 in that case), I don't thing using a different spacing on this slider is a good idea, since it can be confusing to the player, so keep the same spacing.
That's all for me, it's a pretty beautiful song, and I really like the hitsound you use at the end. I think it still need some other mapper opinions about spacing, cause sometimes it feels quite irregular in the kiai, but anyway it plays well.
Good luck with it, and feel free to ask me if you need to clear up some point.
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Pachiru wrote:

[Marathon]
  1. 00:00:877 (1,2) - I feel that's weird to have this slider: 00:00:877 (1) - focusing a syllab, and then on this slider: 00:01:591 (2) - you're based on the singer's long sentance, until she makes a break. And you're also doing it here: 00:14:016 (1,2) - // It's not really consistant to make what you did here.
    Furthermore, the sliderticks are pretty loud, and are pretty disturbing imo... Why not mapping each syllabs individually instead, to give a better rhythm perception to the player? uwu I tried to make the slider heads land on the more important vocals like the beginning of a stanza and such (note the star was a gimmick), I'll try to come up with a fix
  2. 00:40:229 (6,1) - In my opinion, that would play better if you change this 1/8 slider into two circles instead. I suggest you two way to fix it, cause I think that using a 1/8 sliders + a circle, isn't giving a good feedback. Here are my two suggestions:
    1. Change this pattern into three circles, so it would look like this. I think that's the best solution, since the intensity is increasing from here: 00:38:980 (1) - to here: 00:40:408 (1) - used this one
    2. Change this pattern as a 1/8 reverse slider, likethis. It's not my favorite, cause it doesn't push the player to click in rhythm with the piano, but I think it would be more representative of the music than the actual pattern.
  3. 00:41:834 (7) - From here, during the calm part, I think you can space more the circles when they're far from each other in the timeline. Cause otherwise, it will doesn't give a feeling of movement during this part. I followed some symmetry pattern gimmicks to represent something from the movie, plus I think the slow speed of this part warrants the small spacing
  4. 00:53:262 (2) - Why from here, you're focusing the vocals, and you did made it before? I think that's quite weird, maybe you didn't focused on vocals, but in that case, why are these sliders 00:54:691 (1,2,3) - base on vocals? If you wanna be consistant with it, you can just focus the piano here, but it will kinda look empty, since the piano is not important enough to focus it. vocals are too significant here, so i followed and changed slider shapes to compensate for that
  5. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I think that from here, since the song is getting crescendo, you can add a spacing effect that will represent that crescendo sound on the music, by adding a bit of spacing on each circles. Like this (don't do the same pattern, it's just to explain the increase of the spacing according to the song's intensity) fixed
  6. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same for here. I noticed that you made it on those 01:24:691 (5,6,7,8) - three last note, it's a nice idea, but I think that the intensity is getting higher from here: 01:23:262 (1) - to here: 01:25:762 (8) - so you should do something like I showed you on the screenshot previously. :) fixed
  7. 01:26:000 (1) - Are you sure about that unsnapped reversed slider? The spacing is somehow misleading, I think you should space it more, so the player can't be confused by it. kept slider, spaced it more
  8. 01:33:262 (1,2) - I have a small suggestion in terms of aesthetics, that I think it can improve the flow, and emphasis. I think that's fitting pretty great with the vocals, since the sound that those two sliders are covering are kind of same, so in my opinion, that would be better to do this. sure why not, plays well
  9. 02:17:552 (1,2,3) - It should be spaced more, cause the song that this circle: 02:17:552 (1) - is covering is pretty strong, and it's not spaced enough, also it has a 1/2 gap between this note and the previous one, so I suggest you to put more spacing, even if it's a calm part. not warranted enough imo for spacing equal or bigger than the piano patterns later on
  10. 02:19:695 (7,8,9) - Turn the angle of this pattern by 45°, to make it less sharp, and hard to play. According to the sound it's covering, it doesn't need such a sharp flow like this. If you don't know how to turn objects, use Ctrl+Shift+R. If you did it well, it will look like this.fixed
  11. 02:20:766 (3) - Why this slider is suddenly ending on the voice, if you're based on piano in background? If I listen to the song clearly, the only beat that end on this tick 02:20:989 - is the voice. So to fix this, I think you can delete this slider and replace it by a circle, or end the slider on the next white tick here: 02:21:123 - u right
  12. 03:46:126 (1) - Since you're using a unregular snap in the song (1/3 in that case), I don't thing using a different spacing on this slider is a good idea, since it can be confusing to the player, so keep the same spacing. needed to emphasize the slider
That's all for me, it's a pretty beautiful song, and I really like the hitsound you use at the end. I think it still need some other mapper opinions about spacing, cause sometimes it feels quite irregular in the kiai, but anyway it plays well.
Good luck with it, and feel free to ask me if you need to clear up some point. <3
Thanks for the mod!!~~
Bokkie
Hi!
NM from my queueueuue

[Just a Little More]
  1. Add Kimi No Na Wa and Your Name to tags; not everyone speaks japanese :thinking:
  2. 00:00:877 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - 28 sec since first "note", 6 objects total; those sliderarts are cool and all but who like to play 25sec intro everytime you restart a map cuz of shitmiss? There's no music, no beat and you don't really map to the intro vocals either so what's the point of mapping this part?
  3. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this could make use of mapping to the grid to make it more aestheticaly pleasing; maybe try something like this
  4. 01:31:834 (1) - I'd stack it with 01:31:476 (5,2) - ; this would add a nice accent with that break of no movement (same 01:34:691 (1) - )
  5. 01:54:333 (2) - you can make more creative slider instead, I believe in you!
  6. 03:50:411 (7) - NC would make this clearer + would get rid of doubledigit combo
  7. 04:06:125 (1) - stack it with 04:05:232 (8) -
  8. 05:29:644 (1) - did you really add this as a hitsound? XD
  9. 05:38:130 (2) - it should be clear which way it goes; rn it's not clear
[Afterword]
I legit lmao'ed when I saw tags. I'm not sure about this timing tbh. You should try asking some timing pro to recheck it. I'd really suggest you to get rid of that slider intro as it's really frustrating to play and might discourage some inpatient players. Good luck!
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Catshy wrote:

Hi!
NM from my queueueuue

[Just a Little More]
  1. Add Kimi No Na Wa and Your Name to tags; not everyone speaks japanese :thinking: :thonk:
  2. 00:00:877 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - 28 sec since first "note", 6 objects total; those sliderarts are cool and all but who like to play 25sec intro everytime you restart a map cuz of shitmiss? There's no music, no beat and you don't really map to the intro vocals either so what's the point of mapping this part? Keeping it if that's the only reason for taking it off. Doesn't inhibit playability, so why change it just to accommodate people who dislike a slow start
  3. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this could make use of mapping to the grid to make it more aestheticaly pleasing; maybe try something like this it is structured with symmetry (almost all the circles) and the gradual spacing increase is essential for the tone shift in the music
  4. 01:31:834 (1) - I'd stack it with 01:31:476 (5,2) - ; this would add a nice accent with that break of no movement (same 01:34:691 (1) - ) imo the different sounds on each note justifies different spacing between the two
  5. 01:54:333 (2) - you can make more creative slider instead, I believe in you! following the straight ,curve, curve straight pattern i was going for with the two notes prior to this
  6. 03:50:411 (7) - NC would make this clearer + would get rid of doubledigit combo no other pattern uses nc and its readable enough with the spacing
  7. 04:06:125 (1) - stack it with 04:05:232 (8) - fixed
  8. 05:29:644 (1) - did you really add this as a hitsound? XD :3
  9. 05:38:130 (2) - it should be clear which way it goes; rn it's not clear looks clear to me with skins both with and without sliderends
[Afterword]
I legit lmao'ed when I saw tags. I'm not sure about this timing tbh. You should try asking some timing pro to recheck it. I'd really suggest you to get rid of that slider intro as it's really frustrating to play and might discourage some inpatient players. Good luck!
Thanks for the mod!~ >w<//
Lami
hi

00:28:980 - about this section, i wish u make more consistent ds in here.
just example) 00:29:694 (1,2,3) - vs 00:32:908 (2,3) -
00:39:694 (3,4) - since this section is so relax, i think it's better if u change to 1/4 slider this.
because this rhythm 00:39:694 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - is so dense for here. :/
00:39:872 (4,5,6) - inconsistent DS?
01:23:262 (1,2,3) - vs 01:11:834 (1,2,3) - their ds looks so different :s
01:26:000 (1) - this reverse slider looks so weird by reverse arrow.
need to consider to increase sv here. even if you increase sv here, they won't effort to playing, tho..
01:28:262 (1) - personally i think sv x1.0 is better,
since 01:27:548 (1,2,1,2) - previous partten don't have any bulid up source.
01:36:119 (6,7,8) - ehh, imo, this flow is most of awkward flow in the mapset. if u care of fulid playing.
01:56:476 (1,2) - blanket off-ed https://puu.sh/y1H87.png
02:30:945 (6,7,8,9) - improvable DS for consistent
02:34:695 (1) - i really thought u want to do clickable-note from piano sound. :/
03:25:947 (3,4,1) - i think that this ds was decreased by fast rhythm, or NC 03:25:947 (3) -
or increase ds at 03:25:590 (2,3) - . current staff kinda feel off-ed from slow mapping style.
03:35:947 - highly consider to make clickable here, by new starting lyric.
03:45:769 (1,1,1,1) - this partten is really compared with 02:37:145 (1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1) -
04:02:911 (9,1) - buff ds
05:17:723 (6) - tbh, i think this note don't need in here,
as 05:16:830 (5) - long slider already express some beat as well. imo :ssssssss
04:58:216 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - buff diffculty. this kiai section was composed to big DS, but not only here..

okie GL
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Lami wrote:

hi

00:28:980 - about this section, i wish u make more consistent ds in here.
just example) 00:29:694 (1,2,3) - vs 00:32:908 (2,3) - 00:29:694 (1,2,3) - was used purely to contrast 00:28:980 (1,2,3) - . Thus 00:32:908 (2,3) - is the normal spacing for this beginning part of the song with the pianos
00:39:694 (3,4) - since this section is so relax, i think it's better if u change to 1/4 slider this.
because this rhythm 00:39:694 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - is so dense for here. :/ done
00:39:872 (4,5,6) - inconsistent DS? should be consistent since I used honeycomb geometry
01:23:262 (1,2,3) - vs 01:11:834 (1,2,3) - their ds looks so different :s fixed
01:26:000 (1) - this reverse slider looks so weird by reverse arrow.
need to consider to increase sv here. even if you increase sv here, they won't effort to playing, tho..it's fine as it is
01:28:262 (1) - personally i think sv x1.0 is better, fix
since 01:27:548 (1,2,1,2) - previous partten don't have any bulid up source. done
01:36:119 (6,7,8) - ehh, imo, this flow is most of awkward flow in the mapset. if u care of fulid playing. foxed
01:56:476 (1,2) - blanket off-ed https://puu.sh/y1H87.png fixed
02:30:945 (6,7,8,9) - improvable DS for consistent made spacing identical to the pixel with other patterns
02:34:695 (1) - i really thought u want to do clickable-note from piano sound. :/ I feel like note density would be too much for a non-kiai part
03:25:947 (3,4,1) - i think that this ds was decreased by fast rhythm, or NC 03:25:947 (3) -
or increase ds at 03:25:590 (2,3) - . current staff kinda feel off-ed from slow mapping style. I used same spacing as 00:40:229 (5,6,1) - since these two places are the only places with a 1/4 triple
03:35:947 - highly consider to make clickable here, by new starting lyric. done
03:45:769 (1,1,1,1) - this partten is really compared with 02:37:145 (1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1) - emphasis on 03:46:126 (1) -
04:02:911 (9,1) - buff ds done
05:17:723 (6) - tbh, i think this note don't need in here, ok
as 05:16:830 (5) - long slider already express some beat as well. imo :ssssssss reverse slider is fine as it is
04:58:216 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - buff diffculty. this kiai section was composed to big DS, but not only here.. somewhat fixed for now

okie GL
Thanks for the mod!~
newton-
from q

  1. you space out 1/1 the same way you space out 1/2 most of the time, consider giving each of them distinct spacing
  2. 00:20:638 (1) - nazi
  3. 00:34:694 (1,2) - this sorta looks like 1/1 idk
  4. 00:38:980 (1,2,3) - having this symmetrical would be cool
  5. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - instead of having this switch between wide and sharp flow i feel that the acceleration pattern wouldve made more impact if the entire thing was wide flow
  6. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same here maybe? also your sharp angle jumps dont feel arranged enough, maybe set 01:23:976 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - up into a hexgrid style triangle pattern
  7. 01:30:405 (1) - space this out from 5 a bit more, this deserves more emphasis imo
  8. 01:31:476 (5,1) // 01:34:334 (5,1) - looks like 1/2 due to the thing like 01:31:298 (4,5) -
  9. 01:36:298 (7,8) etc - would be better to have these follow implied slider flow imo. sharp entry/exit takes away from the relaxing smooth factor of the song
  10. 02:12:195 (3) // 03:02:911 (8) - ctrlg for circular flow?
  11. 03:34:697 (1,2) - also looks like 1/2 due to (4,1)
  12. 03:49:518 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - hexgrid would be cool here to better arrange them, you use a perfect hexgrid in lots of other places so might as well use it here
  13. 05:05:716 - i thought you were gonna go have the entire chorus mapped in symmetry to be special but i guess not :c. would have been better mapped that way to give it its own special flair and as a sort of gimmick thing imo but that's up to you ofc
good luck!
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

newton- wrote:

from q

  1. you space out 1/1 the same way you space out 1/2 most of the time, consider giving each of them distinct spacing :<
  2. 00:20:638 (1) - nazi nu I like the shape as it is
  3. 00:34:694 (1,2) - this sorta looks like 1/1 idk It doesn't the spacing between 00:34:694 (1,2) - and 00:35:408 (2,3) - is different
  4. 00:38:980 (1,2,3) - having this symmetrical would be cool made a symmetrical triangle
  5. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - instead of having this switch between wide and sharp flow i feel that the acceleration pattern wouldve made more impact if the entire thing was wide flow 5th note is wide angle to emphasize it
  6. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same here maybe? also your sharp angle jumps dont feel arranged enough, maybe set 01:23:976 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - up into a hexgrid style triangle pattern Redid this pattern so that the wide angle is consistent with the previous pattern.
  7. 01:30:405 (1) - space this out from 5 a bit more, this deserves more emphasis imo fixed
  8. 01:31:476 (5,1) // 01:34:334 (5,1) - looks like 1/2 due to the thing like 01:31:298 (4,5) - It's fairly obvious from listening to the music that it's not a 1/2, and a stack indicates something new is happening. This makes listening to the music a bit more important, rather than making the song into a whack-a-mole
  9. 01:36:298 (7,8) etc - would be better to have these follow implied slider flow imo. sharp entry/exit takes away from the relaxing smooth factor of the song fixed
  10. 02:12:195 (3) // 03:02:911 (8) - ctrlg for circular flow? 02:12:195 (3) - this sliderhead is emphasized as well I wanted flow break for the nc 03:02:911 (8,1) -
  11. 03:34:697 (1,2) - also looks like 1/2 due to (4,1) NC indicates that 03:34:697 (1) - is right after 03:34:340 (9) - . also the linear build up to the jump is pretty obvious 03:32:554 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -
  12. 03:49:518 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - hexgrid would be cool here to better arrange them, you use a perfect hexgrid in lots of other places so might as well use it here )b
  13. 05:05:716 - i thought you were gonna go have the entire chorus mapped in symmetry to be special but i guess not :c. would have been better mapped that way to give it its own special flair and as a sort of gimmick thing imo but that's up to you ofcmy idea was to map the strong vocals in the kiai (listen closely, and you'll notice the symmetry stops when the vocals get softer) to foreshadow the paired jumps here: 05:17:901 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) -
good luck!

Thanks for the mod!~~
Affirmation
m4m Q

[Just a little more]
00:40:319 (6) - beat is not in here.00:40:349 - in here.
01:11:834 (1,2,3,4) - set this DS consistent, from 01:13:262 (5) - , music has some emphasis, but 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't have specific emphasis.
01:37:548 (1,2) - DS looks 1/4, I mean, looks too close and looks hard to read.
05:32:144 (3) - this star slider looks hard to read little bit imo.

GL :D
Hey lululu
M4M

Just a Little More
00:28:980 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I feel unsnap start here,maybe you need check timing?If timing is correct...nvm plz
00:30:408 (1) - no need 1/4 tbh
00:40:408 (6) - NC
00:44:691 (2,3) - I think you can change to repeat slider
00:50:405 (2,3) - ^
01:26:000 (1) - wrong rythem and snap,this is 1/8 and you need move to yellow line
01:27:726 (2,1) - distance too far
01:57:190 (2) - Ai mod
05:18:259 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - jump location is very random and uncomfortable tbh
05:29:644 (1) - this hitsound is very wierd...that would misleading people

follow need more improve GL!
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Neoskylove wrote:

m4m Q

[Just a little more]
00:40:319 (6) - beat is not in here.00:40:349 - in here. Fixed
01:11:834 (1,2,3,4) - set this DS consistent, from 01:13:262 (5) - , music has some emphasis, but 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't have specific emphasis. Instead, I spaced 5 from 4 more. I wanted the gradual spacing increase because I wanted to interpret the soft crescendo of the piano.
yes 1 to 4 doesn't have that much emphasis, but I wanted the spacing increase to follow up to the crescendo.

01:37:548 (1,2) - DS looks 1/4, I mean, looks too close and looks hard to read. Fixed
05:32:144 (3) - this star slider looks hard to read little bit imo. Definitely readable with sliderends, and slider is slow enough that if the skin makes it hard to read, the player can adjust in time.

GL :D <3


Hey lululu wrote:

M4M

Just a Little More
00:28:980 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I feel unsnap start here,maybe you need check timing?If timing is correct...nvm plz There is only the tiniest of human errors in timing from the pianist. IMO negligible, so i kept a consistent bpm
00:30:408 (1) - no need 1/4 tbh You're right it sounds better with single )b
00:40:408 (6) - NC fix
00:44:691 (2,3) - I think you can change to repeat slider The sliderhead is a high pitch piano, and where the circle is, is another high pitch piano note. I want to keep consistent and keep clicks on the same pitch.
00:50:405 (2,3) - ^ ^
01:26:000 (1) - wrong rythem and snap,this is 1/8 and you need move to yellow line fix
01:27:726 (2,1) - distance too far nerfed
01:57:190 (2) - Ai mod fix >.<
05:18:259 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - jump location is very random and uncomfortable tbh fairly easy to follow pair jumps imo, the NC keep things readable
05:29:644 (1) - this hitsound is very wierd...that would misleading people just a little custom hitsound

follow need more improve GL!<3
Nevo
henlo

remove "Mitsuha is such a qt" from tags lol maybe add like "your name nandemonaiya kimi no na wa"

00:14:846 (2) - this slider looks super pretty but doesn't really have a clear path to where it's going like I couldn't tell where from a glance in play.
00:37:551 (1) - I say stack the head of this slider to 00:37:194 (3) - since you kinda do the same thing with 00:30:408 (1) -
00:40:229 (5,1) - I say just extend the slider to 00:40:229 - since the circle may be kinda confusing to play.
00:41:834 (2) - I say nc this if you do the point above
00:43:262 (2) - remove the nc on this one since its not the downbeat
00:44:691 (2) - NC this since it's a downbeat (and you can tell it's more important than the piano key before)
00:45:405 (2) - remove this nc since the nc before
00:47:548 (2) - I think should be nc'd aswell since its a downbeat
01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I know your trying to build up but the jumps literally seem random placed to me
01:47:548 (4) - I dont really understand why you made the slider like this like maybe just copy and replace 01:46:476 (6) -
01:53:619 (1) - I say make this a straight slider to keep consistency with 01:50:762 (1) -
01:56:476 (1) - same with this one
01:50:762 - this timing point isn't snapped to anything (doesn't really matter but still)
02:08:619 - place a circle here and start the spinner 02:08:708 - so you give some feedback to the beat on 02:08:619 -
02:11:838 (1,2,3) - I say increase the spacing between these notes for consistency
02:19:695 (7,8,9) - I say copy these and rotate them 180 degrees for 02:20:409 (1,2,3) - for a more clean look and stack 02:20:766 (3) - to 02:19:516 (6) - (hope that made sense
02:22:730 (8,9) - spacing change here seems kinda overkill in comparison to rest of the section.

02:11:838 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
Throughout this section it feels like you are trying to be super organized but then kinda forgot in some spots.
Like with things like 02:28:088 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - are different than 02:30:945 (6,7,8,9,1,2,3) - even tho they are basically the same thing in the song.
02:17:909 (3) - why is this a reverse slider when 02:15:052 (3) - isn't? its just some small inconsistencies
02:37:145 (1,1,1,1) - having nc's on all of these is completely unnecessary imo
same here 02:38:216 (1,1,1,1) -
03:03:268 (1) - I say the sv change here is kinda a lot imo maybe make this slider the same .75 sv as the sliders before
03:14:697 (1) - I think this slider could be more like smooth or less points maybe try a wave slider or something (basically I think it's ugly I "it's subjective but still:( )
03:40:054 (8,9) - I get your trying to build up but this jump is kinda big imo.
03:40:411 (1,2,3) - tis flow hurts meh. coming out of the reverse slider just to go back and then back again isn't really comfortable

maybe just stack 03:41:304 (2) - to 03:41:482 (3) -
03:45:769 (1,1,1) - nc thing again also I think having the jump to the slider is to much especially since the diff is only 4.2 stars lo
03:47:554 (1) - nc this for consistency with 03:48:982 (1) - since I'm guessing you going off vocals so this too 03:53:268 (5) - and so on
03:49:518 (2) - t h e r e ' s n o t h i n g o n t h i s x d (i say just delete it)
03:49:697 (3,4,5,6) - find the spacing here to be kinda big especially in comparison to the stuff around it
03:52:375 (2,3) - this jump is um kinda w i d e maybe make the jump to 3 a smaller angle
04:08:982 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - <3
04:06:125 (1) - checkmark (just had to say it :^) )

anyway imma wrap the mod up here. All in all i think the map is very inconsistent with what you are trying to follow, like sometimes you do only instruments and sometimes you only do vocals. The first kiai is a heavy diff spike when it truthfully doesn't have to have jumps are triple the size as the parts before. Also i think you break flow to much ;)

good luck with the mapset~~
Topic Starter
Hishiro Chizuru

Nevo wrote:

henlo

remove "Mitsuha is such a qt" from tags lol maybe add like "your name nandemonaiya kimi no na wa"

00:14:846 (2) - this slider looks super pretty but doesn't really have a clear path to where it's going like I couldn't tell where from a glance in play. Fix
00:37:551 (1) - I say stack the head of this slider to 00:37:194 (3) - since you kinda do the same thing with 00:30:408 (1) - fix
00:40:229 (5,1) - I say just extend the slider to 00:40:229 - since the circle may be kinda confusing to play.white tick is too significant imo
00:41:834 (2) - I say nc this if you do the point above ^
00:43:262 (2) - remove the nc on this one since its not the downbeat )b
00:44:691 (2) - NC this since it's a downbeat (and you can tell it's more important than the piano key before) )b
00:45:405 (2) - remove this nc since the nc before )b
00:47:548 (2) - I think should be nc'd aswell since its a downbeat )b
01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I know your trying to build up but the jumps literally seem random placed to me increasing in spacing each time, sharp angle for similar sounds and obtuse and awkward for significant shifts in piano pitch
01:47:548 (4) - I dont really understand why you made the slider like this like maybe just copy and replace 01:46:476 (6) - different sounds,
so different slider shape

01:53:619 (1) - I say make this a straight slider to keep consistency with 01:50:762 (1) - straight, curve, curve straight sorta symmetry pattern
01:56:476 (1) - same with this one ^
01:50:762 - this timing point isn't snapped to anything (doesn't really matter but still) it is?
02:08:619 - place a circle here and start the spinner 02:08:708 - so you give some feedback to the beat on 02:08:619 - )b
02:11:838 (1,2,3) - I say increase the spacing between these notes for consistency beginning of a new section, no real intensity, its to distinguish it from the rest
02:19:695 (7,8,9) - I say copy these and rotate them 180 degrees for 02:20:409 (1,2,3) - for a more clean look and stack 02:20:766 (3) - to 02:19:516 (6) - (hope that made sense ye lol fixed
02:22:730 (8,9) - spacing change here seems kinda overkill in comparison to rest of the section. fix

02:11:838 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
Throughout this section it feels like you are trying to be super organized but then kinda forgot in some spots.
Like with things like 02:28:088 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - are different than 02:30:945 (6,7,8,9,1,2,3) - even tho they are basically the same thing in the song.
02:17:909 (3) - why is this a reverse slider when 02:15:052 (3) - isn't? its just some small inconsistencies fix that one in particular, looking for other ones
02:37:145 (1,1,1,1) - having nc's on all of these is completely unnecessary imo 1/3
same here 02:38:216 (1,1,1,1) - 1/3
03:03:268 (1) - I say the sv change here is kinda a lot imo maybe make this slider the same .75 sv as the sliders before I made all violins slow sliders
03:14:697 (1) - I think this slider could be more like smooth or less points maybe try a wave slider or something (basically I think it's ugly I "it's subjective but still:( ) fix
03:40:054 (8,9) - I get your trying to build up but this jump is kinda big imo. spacing isn't too buff so I'll keep it
03:40:411 (1,2,3) - tis flow hurts meh. coming out of the reverse slider just to go back and then back again isn't really comfortable fix

maybe just stack 03:41:304 (2) - to 03:41:482 (3) -
03:45:769 (1,1,1) - nc thing again also I think having the jump to the slider is to much especially since the diff is only 4.2 stars lo with such a slow bpm, i don't think it's even that too difficult to hit
03:47:554 (1) - nc this for consistency with 03:48:982 (1) - since I'm guessing you going off vocals so this too 03:53:268 (5) - and so on fix
03:49:518 (2) - t h e r e ' s n o t h i n g o n t h i s x d (i say just delete it) piano sound tho
03:49:697 (3,4,5,6) - find the spacing here to be kinda big especially in comparison to the stuff around it seems fine
03:52:375 (2,3) - this jump is um kinda w i d e maybe make the jump to 3 a smaller angle sweeping motion was intentional
04:08:982 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - <3 <3
04:06:125 (1) - checkmark (just had to say it :^) ) :^)

anyway imma wrap the mod up here. All in all i think the map is very inconsistent with what you are trying to follow, like sometimes you do only instruments and sometimes you only do vocals. The first kiai is a heavy diff spike when it truthfully doesn't have to have jumps are triple the size as the parts before. Also i think you break flow to much ;) will work on that

good luck with the mapset~~tyty
Usaha
nm
00:29:694 (1,2,3) - should make these a little more spaced since it's barely even noticeable
00:30:765 (2,3,4) - 00:31:122 (3) - is lower pitched but the pattern makes it seem the sounds are equal, should change the pattern so 00:30:765 (2,4) - are grouped
00:34:694 (1) - remove nc and nc 00:35:408 (2) -
00:35:408 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - could make a interesting pattern with spacing as the piano gets lower pitched after each group of 3
01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - the spacing gets really big compared to the rest of your map so far, it would be better personally i think to make the spacing less drastic and slowly get bigger instead of it being small then suddenly big
01:27:548 (1,2,1,2) - this pattern matches the two two's together but there different pitches, should make 01:28:083 (2) - different
01:43:798 (3) - should be emphasized instead of 01:43:976 (4) - because the vocals are stronger there.
02:37:502 (1) - not timed correctly
02:57:911 (3) - would make a 1/1 slider and delete 02:58:268 (4) -
03:40:054 (8,9) - spacing is really big, i would make 03:40:232 (9) - less spaced because only the e sound is there and no piano
03:45:769 (1,1,1) - sounds weird to put a burst on this as there is a piano on 03:45:769 (1) - but the other 2 just have a violin
03:50:411 (1,2,3) - this linear movement is really awkward to play, i would just continue to use sharp angles
04:12:911 (2) - sound is really quiet, would just delete and make 04:13:090 (3,4) - into a 1/2 slider
04:31:840 (1) - spinner feels out of place imo, would start it right after 04:30:768 (2) -
04:54:518 (1) - piano sound ends on 04:54:638 - and i would make the spinner start on 04:54:697 -
05:00:716 (6) - is really spaced out for just having vocals on it, would make it similar to 05:00:358 (4) -
05:07:561 - missing a really strong piano sound
05:07:858 (3) - should be on 05:07:918 -
05:08:216 (4) - should be on 05:08:275 -
05:08:930 (6) - is on 05:08:989 -
05:09:287 (7) - is on 05:09:346 -
05:09:644 (1) - is on 05:09:704 - (going to stop here but there is a lot of objects that are off by one 1/12 tick)
05:10:596 - piano here
05:17:901 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - these type of jumps assume that every sound is of equal strength but there is a piano on some notes(and is really fast movement and clicking compared to the rest of the map)
gl~
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply