Heyo!

M4M

• More xd

1. 00:00:877 (1,1,2,1,1) - there are just vocals at this moment these sliders sounds a bit off imo but if you really want to map vocals i can suggest to add circles on the big white ticks or to follow the vocals for example on the first part you can try something like this (slider 5 is on 1/6) https://puu.sh/xwlxR/4f1251e841.png or maybe you just need to finish on the end of the vocals:
2. 00:00:877 (1) - should be finish here 00:05:519
3. 00:07:409 (1) - should be finish here 00:12:051
4. 00:14:846 (1) - should be finish here 00:18:774
5. 00:20:560 (1) - should be finish here 00:25:560
   
6. 00:38:931 (1,3) - avoid this contact
7. 01:11:073 (4) - should be a 1/2 slider like you did at 01:08:216 (4) - for vocals
8. 01:44:288 (5) - why you don't make a 1/1 slider like before when you emphasised vocals? 01:29:645 (4) - 01:35:359 (4) - 01:36:430 (8) - 01:38:930 (3) - maybe i don't think that you going to fixed what i wrote just here because "there is a strong piano sound on the end of this slider, yes you're right but you make this for these sliders lol 01:29:645 (4) - 01:36:430 (8) - is like you want vocals or piano? which is more importantly? :thinking:
9. 02:08:930 (1) - this spinner should be start here 02:08:573
10. 02:40:359 (1,2,3) - suddendly a stack, there is no reason to add it imo
11. 02:47:323 (4,5,6,7) - ^
12. 03:43:216 (1) - remove nc
13. 03:46:073 (1) - move it to x:359 y:323
14. 04:31:788 (1) - you can start the spinner on the blue tick
15. 04:49:288 - 04:49:645 - why you don't map these piano sounds?
16. should be nice to add a spinner here 04:55:359 - until 04:57:502
17. 05:18:752 (2,2) - this overlap is off imo
    
    You just need more polish and it's should be fine~

gl!~

ShogunMoon wrote:

Heyo!

M4M

• More xd

1. 00:00:877 (1,1,2,1,1) - there are just vocals at this moment these sliders sounds a bit off imo but if you really want to map vocals i can suggest to add circles on the big white ticks or to follow the vocals for example on the first part you can try something like this (slider 5 is on 1/6) https://puu.sh/xwlxR/4f1251e841.png or maybe you just need to finish on the end of the vocals:
2. 00:00:877 (1) - should be finish here 00:05:519
3. 00:07:409 (1) - should be finish here 00:12:051
4. 00:14:846 (1) - should be finish here 00:18:774
5. 00:20:560 (1) - should be finish here 00:25:560 ended up just ending the sliders to the correct ticks >w<b
   
6. 00:38:931 (1,3) - avoid this contact fixed to move slider to stack with 00:36:788 (7) -
7. 01:11:073 (4) - should be a 1/2 slider like you did at 01:08:216 (4) - for vocals fixed
8. 01:44:288 (5) - why you don't make a 1/1 slider like before when you emphasised vocals? 01:29:645 (4) - 01:35:359 (4) - 01:36:430 (8) - 01:38:930 (3) - maybe i don't think that you going to fixed what i wrote just here because "there is a strong piano sound on the end of this slider, yes you're right but you make this for these sliders lol 01:29:645 (4) - 01:36:430 (8) - is like you want vocals or piano? which is more importantly? :thinking: you're right, a longer slider is more consistent with the significant sounds emphasized. fixed
9. 02:08:930 (1) - this spinner should be start here 02:08:573 oki
10. 02:40:359 (1,2,3) - suddendly a stack, there is no reason to add it imo fixed
11. 02:47:323 (4,5,6,7) - ^ just stacked the other double to keep consistent
12. 03:43:216 (1) - remove nc moved it to here 03:44:645 (1) -
13. 03:46:073 (1) - move it to x:359 y:323 ^
14. 04:31:788 (1) - you can start the spinner on the blue tick b
15. 04:49:288 - 04:49:645 - why you don't map these piano sounds? thinking about it, only the white tick seems significant enough to be mapped
16. should be nice to add a spinner here 04:55:359 - until 04:57:502
17. 05:18:752 (2,2) - this overlap is off imo fixed structure to form a triangle 05:18:752 (2,2,2) -
    
    You just need more polish and it's should be fine~

gl!~

Thanks! >w<//

hey
from my queue

[General]

1. You should convert your .mp3 to a max of 192kbps. Remember of checking offset and timing points after that (yes it sucks a lot, sorry).
2. Add Combo Colours!
3. Remember to hitsound your map :p
4. 04:58:216 - Stacked timing points with different volume are unrankable.
5. Basically, Normal sample hitsounds are a pain on most of songs. Change them to Soft instead.

[Just a Little More]

1. 00:00:877 (1,1) - These sliders should be 1/4 larger.
2. 00:14:016 (2) - Remove NC, add on next slider.
3. 00:14:846 (1) - 1/4 larger.
4. 00:20:560 (1) - 3/4 langer.
5. 00:40:180 (6) - Lower the slider tail to match 00:40:359 (1) - position.
6. 01:14:645 (1,2) - Spacing could be larger.
7. 01:16:788 (4) - If you're following vocals, you should add a note on 01:17:323.
8. 01:23:216 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Keep distance snaping or scale then, this (7) spacing is completely off.
9. 01:25:716 (8,1) - This spacing is unnecessary.
10. 01:35:359 (4,6) - Do you think that you could improve note disposal? Not a great overlap over there.
11. 01:44:823 (6,7,8,9) - Ugly movement angle, make it smaller (move 01:45:002 (7,8) - up and rearrange slider).
12. 01:46:430 (3,7) - If you make these sliders more curved you get a better movement.
13. 02:12:145 (3) - Curve it and make a blanket with (2).
14. 02:12:859 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Move it up so you can get a better movement from (3).
15. 02:28:038 (6,7,8,9) - This isn't straight.
16. 02:37:145 (1,1,1) - You shouldn't NC every not only because different Snaping. Spacing already shows that. You could use a different combo colour instead.
17. 02:38:216 (1,1,1) - ^
18. 02:56:073 (6) - Unnecessary. Make it a regular flow if you can't justify this sudden change.
19. 03:41:252 (2) - You don't need to use such large spacing
20. 03:45:716 (1,1,1) - You shouldn't NC every not only because different Snaping. Spacing already shows that. You could use a different combo colour instead.
21. 03:49:466 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Use a constant DS.
22. 03:55:538 (4,5) - Idk about this spacing, maybe the same mistake of ^
23. 04:05:895 (12,1) - S p a c i n g
24. 04:31:966 (1) - Make it like this.
25. 04:40:359 (1) - Remove NC.
26. 04:55:359 (1) - Like this.
27. 05:00:180 (7,8,9,10) - This overlap makes this pattern kinda bad, try moving some notes or rearrange.
28. 05:01:430 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - I get that vocals are intense now, but don't use more spacing than necessary. Try reducing it a bit.
29. 05:17:858 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This jump section doesn't work imo. I recommend search song lyrics and use notes for "fast" syllabes, and 1/4 sliders for longer syllabes (like "mida" of "namida").
30. 05:25:716 (6) - NC.
31. 05:29:644 (1,2,3,1,2) - Spacing and notes disposal can be better here.

Good luck!

Pulse wrote:

hey
from my queue

[General]

1. You should convert your .mp3 to a max of 192kbps. Remember of checking offset and timing points after that (yes it sucks a lot, sorry). D:
2. Add Combo Colours! )b
3. Remember to hitsound your map :p )b
4. 04:58:216 - Stacked timing points with different volume are unrankable. )b
5. Basically, Normal sample hitsounds are a pain on most of songs. Change them to Soft instead. )b

[Just a Little More]

1. 00:00:877 (1,1) - These sliders should be 1/4 larger. I'm following the vocals for the sliders
2. 00:14:016 (2) - Remove NC, add on next slider. it already isn't NC'd tho . . .
3. 00:14:846 (1) - 1/4 larger. same as before
4. 00:20:560 (1) - 3/4 langer. ^
5. 00:40:180 (6) - Lower the slider tail to match 00:40:359 (1) - position. fixed i think
6. 01:14:645 (1,2) - Spacing could be larger. I think it's fine
7. 01:16:788 (4) - If you're following vocals, you should add a note on 01:17:323. not following vocals for that section with circles or sliderheads
8. 01:23:216 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Keep distance snaping or scale then, this (7) spacing is completely off. the spacing change was meant to show the intensity increase of the music
9. 01:25:716 (8,1) - This spacing is unnecessary. spacing is needed to make the slider readable, as well as emphasizing the sweep of the piano
10. 01:35:359 (4,6) - Do you think that you could improve note disposal? Not a great overlap over there. will be fixed once I find a solution >.< I've been trying to find a good pattern for that part for a while now
11. 01:44:823 (6,7,8,9) - Ugly movement angle, make it smaller (move 01:45:002 (7,8) - up and rearrange slider). no changes as the jump angles are similar to jumps before that so the awkward-ish angles are already introduced to the player
12. 01:46:430 (3,7) - If you make these sliders more curved you get a better movement. redone
13. 02:12:145 (3) - Curve it and make a blanket with (2). inconsistent since i only use straight sliders for that section
14. 02:12:859 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Move it up so you can get a better movement from (3). there was enough time for the player to get to 4, as well I was following polygonal structure, so the spacing is justified
15. 02:28:038 (6,7,8,9) - This isn't straight. it is tho, I redid it and it's the same :thinking:
16. 02:37:145 (1,1,1) - You shouldn't NC every not only because different Snaping. Spacing already shows that. You could use a different combo colour instead. I think the nc is necessary imo
17. 02:38:216 (1,1,1) - ^ ^
18. 02:56:073 (6) - Unnecessary. Make it a regular flow if you can't justify this sudden change. it is justified since it forms a triangle, and I forgot to make 6 a nc. 6 is strong enough change from 5 that the spacing is justified
19. 03:41:252 (2) - You don't need to use such large spacing with slider leniency, i think it's fine
20. 03:45:716 (1,1,1) - You shouldn't NC every not only because different Snaping. Spacing already shows that. You could use a different combo colour instead. same as before
21. 03:49:466 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Use a constant DS. each white tick was emphasized with the spacing, and the last notes are spaced big just for build up sake.
22. 03:55:538 (4,5) - Idk about this spacing, maybe the same mistake of ^ same as before
23. 04:05:895 (12,1) - S p a c i n g justified with the vocal strength
24. 04:31:966 (1) - Make it like this. kept the beginning but the end i changed
25. 04:40:359 (1) - Remove NC. no need, if following the measures
26. 04:55:359 (1) - Like this. fine as it is imo
27. 05:00:180 (7,8,9,10) - This overlap makes this pattern kinda bad, try moving some notes or rearrange. fixed
28. 05:01:430 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - I get that vocals are intense now, but don't use more spacing than necessary. Try reducing it a bit. symmetrical spacing is justification, as well I coordinated big jumps with important notes still
29. 05:17:858 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This jump section doesn't work imo. I recommend search song lyrics and use notes for "fast" syllabes, and 1/4 sliders for longer syllabes (like "mida" of "namida"). I think it's fine, gimmicks like that are too hard to notice during gameplay and this pattern is still suitable
30. 05:25:716 (6) - NC. ok
31. 05:29:644 (1,2,3,1,2) - Spacing and notes disposal can be better here.for now, it's fine

Good luck!

Thanks for the mod~~

hi from my q

• -turn off countdown lol
  -put some combo colour

• 00:01:591 (2,1,2,1,1) - hmm to be honest all of this slider like just there to fill the map up .. i understand what your were trying to do but it is not quite right .. i think better if you follow the voice correctly
  01:16:788 (4) - single note more better
  01:25:359 (7,8) - why this two is not distance .. the distance should be the same as you did at 01:25:002 (6,7) - cuz the sound is just the same
  01:30:359 (6) - nc here would be nice
  01:33:216 (7) - same .. nc
  01:41:430 (2,3,4,5,6) - this replacement is kindda random .. try make it all the same distance .. use distance snap or the coordinate up right in the editor
  01:55:359 - hmm are you sure this is a break?
  02:08:930 - delete this timing point .. it is useless xD
  02:12:859 - nc
  02:16:609 (7,8) - idk why this is distance.. because the sound is just the same ..
  02:16:966 (9,10) - if you distance this then i can see what you are doing cuz there is a bit louder at that part .. the previous part is unnecessary to distance
  02:19:288 (5,6,7,8,9) - same reason as above
  02:27:502 (5) - nc here
  02:45:180 (7) - nc
  02:50:895 (6) - nc
  03:03:216 (1,1,1) - hmm i dont understand this slider .. it weirdly place slider ..it is not following either voice or instrument hmm
  04:59:466 - nc
  04:59:466 - nc
  05:11:073 (8) - probably nc here ..
  05:17:858 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - too messy .. rearrage them so they look neat.. dont change the patern .. the patern is already okey xD

that all from .. me goodluck with your map <3

YukiZura- wrote:

hi from my q

General

• -turn off countdown lol
  -put some combo colour

Just a Little More

• 00:01:591 (2,1,2,1,1) - hmm to be honest all of this slider like just there to fill the map up .. i understand what your were trying to do but it is not quite right .. i think better if you follow the voice correctly It's following "more important notes" (subjective to me, I know but listen i can explain)
  since it's right in the beginning, and I want to use notes and clicks sparsely
  01:16:788 (4) - single note more better slider ends follow vocals
  01:25:359 (7,8) - why this two is not distance .. the distance should be the same as you did at 01:25:002 (6,7) - cuz the sound is just the same fixed
  01:30:359 (6) - nc here would be nice )b
  01:33:216 (7) - same .. nc )b
  01:41:430 (2,3,4,5,6) - this replacement is kindda random .. try make it all the same distance .. use distance snap or the coordinate up right in the editor build up to the change in vocal strength and syntax, as well as the horizontal movement that goes with those vocals afterwards
  01:55:359 - hmm are you sure this is a break? yes I know, I'm trying to fix it ;~;
  02:08:930 - delete this timing point .. it is useless xD hitsound volume adjustment
  02:12:859 - nc )b
  02:16:609 (7,8) - idk why this is distance.. because the sound is just the same .. ... theres a pretty big difference to me
  02:16:966 (9,10) - if you distance this then i can see what you are doing cuz there is a bit louder at that part .. the previous part is unnecessary to distance it's not loudness, I'm going since it's in an ascending pitch order, thus the ascending set of notes . . .
  02:19:288 (5,6,7,8,9) - same reason as above mentioned above
  02:27:502 (5) - nc here )b
  02:45:180 (7) - nc )b
  02:50:895 (6) - nc )b
  03:03:216 (1,1,1) - hmm i dont understand this slider .. it weirdly place slider ..it is not following either voice or instrument hmm big sliders and circles land on strong vocals and short sliders are violin
  04:59:466 - nc )b
  04:59:466 - nc )b
  05:11:073 (8) - probably nc here .. )b
  05:17:858 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - too messy .. rearrage them so they look neat.. dont change the patern .. the patern is already okey xD seems fine to me

that all from .. me goodluck with your map <3

Thanks for the mod~~~

Hi, NM from #modreqs

GL~

Mou sukoshi dake de ii ato sukoshi dake de ii mou sukodhi dake de ii kara
Mou sukoshi dake de ii ato sukoshi dake de ii mou sukoshi dake kuttsuite iyou yo~

nm
im not good at english sorry xd

General
uncheck countdown
pls set custom combocolor

you have meta sourse..??


01:25:359 (7,8,1) - spacing issue
01:44:823 (6) - if you follow vocal, remove this better because there is a big vocal at 01:45:002 - , so 01:44:823 (6) - before big vocal does not good work.
02:25:538 - why did you skip big piano? xd (i think you follow piano mainy in this part)
02:46:073 (1) - move to down better, because players may confuse 1/4 gap at 02:45:716 (4,1) -
04:31:966 (1) - start at 04:31:788 - better imo.
05:03:930 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - tbh, placement of these dont match kiai time. I think that aim will not move so players will get bored. pls consider rework placement.
05:06:251 (7) - why did you follow not vocal only here?

[]
short mod. i think the diff need more mod. but not bad map. good luck.

Cris_1 wrote:

Hi, NM from #modreqs

Just a Little More
Check the AiMod, if you see this had a few problems that should be fixed (Kiai, audio and size of the beatmap) )b

1. 00:00:877 (1,2) - This patterns at the start don't represet correctly the vocals, imo you can put more notes here instead of a 1/2 and a loong slider I'm working on a permanent fix for this issue, as I'm thinking of moving slider arts to the big break and putting in ur suggestion in the beginning, or maybe some other ideas idk for now but something will be done
2. 01:25:895 (1) - This ruins the low intensity of this section, try to keep more consistency hopefully fixed by using 1/12 reverse slider instead of 1/18
3. 01:27:502 (2) - NC )b
4. 01:27:502 (2,3,4,5) - Imo you can do a better pattern here I think it's fine as it is
5. 01:31:430 (5,1) - Stack? I think looks nice because the piano I'll keep it as it is to emphasize the sound and timing pattern change
6. 01:40:359 (7) - NC fixed nc problem in that whole area
7. 01:41:609 (3,4,5,6) - The flow here is really bad :/ intentional for the change in vocal syntax (to which vocals I mapped in a horizontal motion flow)
8. 02:37:145 (1,1,1) - In this streams please reduce the space between this will keep for now until more people complain
9. 02:40:359 - In this point you follow the piano but 03:03:216 - here you follow the fiddle when the piano is most predominant I followed fiddle since it was the most dominant imo with sliders, and circles with significant vocals because the song slows down there
10. 03:43:216 (8) - NC )b
11. 03:40:359 (1) - Imo a 1/2 slider here and a circle 03:41:073 here sounds better nah, start of a new measure want to keep a long slider
12. 03:45:716 (1,1,1,1) - Same as above same as above as well
13. 03:47:502 (5) - This slider up looks better looks better this way
14. 05:06:251 (7,1) - Add space between this notes please spaced a little more
15. 05:44:644 - 5% volume inhirited here)b

GL~

Mou sukoshi dake de ii ato sukoshi dake de ii mou sukodhi dake de ii kara
Mou sukoshi dake de ii ato sukoshi dake de ii mou sukoshi dake kuttsuite iyou yo~<333

Thanks for the mod!

Asuka_- wrote:

nm
im not good at english sorry xd

General
uncheck countdown
pls set custom combocolor

you have meta sourse..?? thank you!~~

UniArtist:上白石萌音
Artist:Kamishiraishi Mone
UniTitle:なんでもないや(movie ver.)
Title:Nandemo Nai ya (movie ver.)

refs
http://kamishiraishimone.com/discography/cd.html
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/514204
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/515939

01:25:359 (7,8,1) - spacing issue fixed, I hope
01:44:823 (6) - if you follow vocal, remove this better because there is a big vocal at 01:45:002 - , so 01:44:823 (6) - before big vocal does not good work. fixed
02:25:538 - why did you skip big piano? xd (i think you follow piano mainy in this part) fixed
02:46:073 (1) - move to down better, because players may confuse 1/4 gap at 02:45:716 (4,1) - fixed i hope again
04:31:966 (1) - start at 04:31:788 - better imo. )b
05:03:930 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - tbh, placement of these dont match kiai time. I think that aim will not move so players will get bored. pls consider rework placement. fixed all of it, hope it's good
05:06:251 (7) - why did you follow not vocal only here? fixed, but idk if this is better. Both seem okay so I'll stick the changed one

[]
short mod. i think the diff need more mod. but not bad map. good luck.>w<//

Thank you~~~

Hello from my que
[Just a Little More]

• 00:29:645 (4) - hmm i think you can use here nc
  00:34:645 (1) - delete nc
  00:39:823 (4,5) - In my opinion it's better to swap them, because it's a quiet moment, and it's not so necessary jump 5-6
  00:54:645 (1,2,3,4,5) - I do not really understand this moment, I certainly saw what you did in the beginning for vocals, but almost in the whole part of the map you use the instrumental, so I think that you need to do here either one note or a slider
  01:25:954 (1) - Extend this slider by one tick, the sound ends here 01:26:133 -
  02:11:788 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Here you have the wrong arrangement of the notes, you need to do this either in 1/12 or you do not have the correct timing/In my opinion, this is true throughout the map. Ask someone who knows this
  02:44:645 (6) - Raise the note above, for a better flow
  02:50:180 (4,5) - Do blanket?
  02:52:145 (3) - Raise Up, for a Straight Line
  02:52:859 (5,7) - fix blaket
  02:58:930 (6) - Move to the left
  03:28:930 (1,2,3) - before you did straight lines, why did you decide to do it differently this time?
  03:45:954 (1,1) - why big space?
  03:47:502 (5) - make the curve the other way
  04:18:216 (2,3,4) - move down
  05:01:787 (4,5,6) - In my opinion this is a bad flow
  05:11:430 (6) - maybe crtl+G?

okay it's all
Good luck

makisokk wrote:

Hello from my que
[Just a Little More]

• 00:29:645 (4) - hmm i think you can use here nc sure
  00:34:645 (1) - delete nc ok
  00:39:823 (4,5) - In my opinion it's better to swap them, because it's a quiet moment, and it's not so necessary jump 5-6 the jump isn't so big that it's very surprising to the player, and i want a faster cursor movement before the piano triple
  00:54:645 (1,2,3,4,5) - I do not really understand this moment, I certainly saw what you did in the beginning for vocals, but almost in the whole part of the map you use the instrumental, so I think that you need to do here either one note or a slider fixed
  01:25:954 (1) - Extend this slider by one tick, the sound ends here 01:26:133 - done
  02:11:788 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Here you have the wrong arrangement of the notes, you need to do this either in 1/12 or you do not have the correct timing/In my opinion, this is true throughout the map. Ask someone who knows this will look into this
  02:44:645 (6) - Raise the note above, for a better flow fine as it is since 5 is lowered from 4
  02:50:180 (4,5) - Do blanket? soft blanket is fine
  02:52:145 (3) - Raise Up, for a Straight Line check again, it is a straight line already
  02:52:859 (5,7) - fix blaket edged over 2 pixels
  02:58:930 (6) - Move to the left no need for such a soft curve
  03:28:930 (1,2,3) - before you did straight lines, why did you decide to do it differently this time? 03:29:288 (3) - was placed like so instead of following a straight path so that I can make a triangle out of the shapes 03:29:109 (2,3,4) -
  03:45:954 (1,1) - why big space? to emphasize 03:46:073 (1) -
  03:47:502 (5) - make the curve the other way fine as it is imo
  04:18:216 (2,3,4) - move down done
  05:01:787 (4,5,6) - In my opinion this is a bad flow ok to me
  05:11:430 (6) - maybe crtl+G? sure

okay it's all
Good luck

Thanks for the mod~~

from my mod queue


that's all I can get, not enough skill to mod this beautiful map, sorry :s

C-Yuyuko wrote:

from my mod queue

Just A Little More

Ask AiMod first )b

00:34:645 (6,1) - switch NC (downbeat/long white tick reason))b
03:46:125 (1) - move this closer to others so it makes a straight line fine as it is, as the next notes follow a straight line
02:45:232 (1) - no NC )b
02:50:947 (1) - ^ )b
05:38:132 - Red line here and move note here to sync with piano Fixed whole area, as I noticed a mistake there as you mentioned that. :p

that's all I can get, not enough skill to mod this beautiful map, sorry :s it's ok <3

Thanks for the mod!!~~

00:20:560 (1) - 00:14:846 (1) - wired slider
00:28:931 (1) - 01:25:954 (1) - Add flow in this part pls. too straight forward,maybe add some curved slider
01:27:680 (2,3) - why jump
01:46:430 (7) - Ctrl+G
01:48:930 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1) - I think you can set a break time here to enjoy the music
02:11:838 - 02:33:980 - no flow here, too straight forward.
02:34:695 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can make these six slider into two Triangle,that may looks better.you can make sliders like this one:02:40:768 (3,4,5) -
02:37:264 (1,1) - why nc here?
02:38:335 (1,1) - ^
02:46:125 (1,2,3,4,5) - bad blanket
03:46:840 (3,4,5) - you want to make a triangle here? Well this part is wired, I can hardly find flow here. use ctrl+G at 03:47:197 (4,5) - . then I think it can make much more sense

05:15:001 (10) - Ctrl+G. I can hardly get your thought at here. IDK why you break your flow here
05:17:901 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - maybe separate a little
05:23:640 (11) - Ctrl+G
05:32:144 (3) - nice slider.

Good luck!!!

blueloniess wrote:

00:20:560 (1) - 00:14:846 (1) - wired slider ?
00:28:931 (1) - 01:25:954 (1) - Add flow in this part pls. too straight forward,maybe add some curved slider straight sliders = piano there.
as u see in 00:54:645 (1,2,3) - , only these are curved in that section because that followed the distinct vocals there
01:27:680 (2,3) - why jump 01:27:502 (1,2) - and 01:27:859 (3,4) - are in pairs. thus a jump between the two
01:46:430 (7) - Ctrl+G ok
01:48:930 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1) - I think you can set a break time here to enjoy the music the slider only part is calm enough to let the player enjoy the music
02:11:838 - 02:33:980 - no flow here, too straight forward. rhythm is simple, and what do you mean no flow?
02:34:695 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can make these six slider into two Triangle,that may looks better.you can make sliders like this one:02:40:768 (3,4,5) - fine as it is
02:37:264 (1,1) - why nc here? the quad is 1/3 rhythm
02:38:335 (1,1) - ^ ^
02:46:125 (1,2,3,4,5) - bad blanket wasn't blanketing, i was making symmetry
03:46:840 (3,4,5) - you want to make a triangle here? Well this part is wired, I can hardly find flow here. use ctrl+G at 03:47:197 (4,5) - . then I think it can make much more sense I just wanted to emphasize 03:47:554 (5) -

05:15:001 (10) - Ctrl+G. I can hardly get your thought at here. IDK why you break your flow here flow is consistent before the new combo.
after new combo, i wanted that flow break because look at the timing on the NC slider...
05:17:901 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - maybe separate a little no. i don't want a big diff spike like that. This is big enough
05:23:640 (11) - Ctrl+G ok
05:32:144 (3) - nice slider.<3

Good luck!!!

Thanks for the mod >w<//

hi from my Q (quite late but better late than never)

optional to change | unrankable | suggested to change

welp that's about it I hope i helped!! <3
goodluck~~

Idk why but I can't reply to you @AJamez so I'll do a budget reply :3



hi from my Q (quite late but better late than never)

optional to change | unrankable | suggested to change

General
i approve the tags :^) :^)
increase ar by .1 pls hmmm I'll ask around for more opinions on that
please change combo colors D: choose something that blends with the bg I don't think that's a good idea, since people playing with dim (myself included) will have trouble reading if the circles are similar colors to the bg

Just a Little More
00:29:823 (2,3) - i feel like u could ctrl g these to be consistent with 00:35:359 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - the pitch pattern changes from climbing to falling, so a rotational flow change is warranted
00:36:073 (5) - nc would fit here sure
00:36:788 (4) - ^ mmm ok
01:05:716 - ur missing the sound here :c i'd make this repeat instead I dont hear anything there
01:13:216 (5) - idk but i feel like u could emphasize the blue tick as well by making it a slider instead to acoid repititiveness for this part lo then make nescessary spacing adjustments after I think it's fine as it is
01:16:788 (4) - same as what i pointed out on 01:05:716 - it's just the "eto" part is a vocal that pops out more to the listener
01:27:859 (3,5) - i'd nc for emphasis hmm, it'll also help with reading, yeah that's a good idea
01:29:109 (2) - delet this note to follow the music like what u did on 01:31:609 - and other parts fine as it is
01:45:002 (1,2) - swap ncs for consistency ok
01:48:216 (5) - u could overlap this to 01:47:145 (2) - imo for better spacing emphasis nah, I'm avoiding overlaps
01:56:131 - u could add a note here to make the transition of the music more emphasized i'm only following violin here
02:00:059 - here u could emphasize the bass of the violin whynot add a note here as well eh ,it's fine as it is
02:12:195 (3) - quite underspaced imo make it simillar as 02:14:695 (1,2,3) - 02:14:695 - is stronger, thus a change from before. Also it's right after a spinner, so i want to ease into spacing and start small after the "break" (ie where i was just following violin with slow sliders)
02:33:266 (5,6) - would prefer a 1/2 slider instead mmm the slider end would land on a pretty significant note
03:49:518 (2) - delet note to avoid overmapping kiai justifies it
03:51:304 (10) - i'd delete this note too and make a repeat instead make necessary adjustments after fine as it is
03:52:375 (2) - pls delet note here and extend the slider instead make adjustments for the next sliders after ^
03:55:232 (2) - like what i mentioned before delet this note cus there's no specific sound on this part that supports the music at all and to avoid overmapping as said before, and deleting that is awkward as the pause can be weird in the kiai
03:59:518 (6) - ^ .
04:03:804 (2) - ^
04:20:054 (1) - place this on the right side instead to emphasize the spacing it's ok as it is
04:27:554 - missing note add circle here then stack it as well no violin sound there
04:54:518 (1) - add a timing point here and lower the volume to emphasize the piano sound ok
04:55:054 - spinner should start here and end 04:57:554 - here ok
05:07:680 (2,5) - these notes seems unncessary for me tbh cus it doesnt emphasizes nor clicks a specific sound cus the most prominent sound here is the vocals delet thiese two instead kiai filler rhythm
05:08:930 (4) - make this a repeat slider instead then add 2 circles for 05:09:466 (5) - sliders follow vocals, it's good as it is
05:09:823 (1) - delete this note after ^
05:17:723 (6) - pls delete this too ^
05:17:902 - aaaaaaaa i love this part <3 :D
05:34:286 (1) - overlap the sliderend of this to 05:32:144 (3) - it's already overlapping?
05:38:130 (2) - remove finish sounds better imo or just add a timing point here and lower the volumegood as it is, aka i really dont want to change every finish volume

the NC i I think as long as I'm consistent I'm fine, so no changes as of yet


Thanks for the mod!~~ >w<//

highlight all green and red lines at once and switch the sample to S:C1

enjoy your muted slider sound

Einja wrote:

highlight all green and red lines at once and switch the sample to S:C1

enjoy your muted slider sound

:eyes:

the timing killed me with how unorganized it is


if you does apply that new timing section I may back and give some words
btw its only bpm points

Time Capsule wrote:

the timing killed me with how unorganized it is

lol

[TimingPoints]
810,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
7410,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
13990,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
20740,810.810810810811,4,2,1,60,1,0
28960,714.285714285714,4,2,1,60,1,0
337174,923.076923076923,4,2,1,60,1,0

if you does apply that new timing section I may back and give some words
btw its only bpm points

I didn't copy paste your timing points, but some of the sections u noted were mistimed, so I fixed them with the help of a couple other mappers >w<//

Thanks!

q
~
Not really a fan of the intro but, not much you can do about it if you dont want it to be skippable
00:40:051 (5,6) - not too sure about making this a jump, doesnt really feel like its warranted since it is a bit sudden.
01:13:262 (5) - i think whistles here a bit better since the claps are pretty noisy
01:16:834 (4) - im guessing this is for the vocals, so why do these get ignored? 01:20:941 - 01:22:369 - ? I think its fine to just keep it as a note imo, dont really see the need to overcomplicate it
01:30:226 (5) - i think it would be nice if this was deleted so you get a pause between 01:29:691 (4,1) - since the vocal here is rather quiet and not very noticeable. it'll emphasise 01:30:405 (1) - very nicely
01:35:048 (2,3,4) - you have same ds here 01:32:191 (2,3,4) - but why not here as well ? 01:35:048 (2,3,4) -
01:43:976 (4) - split this into 2 notes? vocals on slider ends is a bit mm, if you change it, it'll be more consistent with 01:41:476 (5,6,1,2) - rhythm wise and contrasts with 01:42:548 (4,5,6) -
01:45:405 (2,6) - these arent symmetrical if your intending them to be
02:12:195 (3) - same thing as earlier, i still think keeping the section entirely whistles is better but up to you
02:48:804 (8,1) - not too sure about the jump here, its like the biggest jump so far in such a calm section
02:54:518 (9) - unecessary note? not sure what its mapped to. Besides i think a pause is a nicer feeling here
02:56:661 (2,3,4,5) - be cool if you made this similar to 02:45:232 (7,8,9,10) - 02:50:947 (6,7,8,9) -
03:03:268 (1) - is slider tail meant to be snapped to blue tick?
03:03:269 the transition to the undermapping here is a bit strange, cause to me, the sectionw before to this is basically the same, yet the transition is very sudden, its not like the music disappeared
03:05:411 (2,3) - i think it would be better if u change 3 to a slider and delete 2 if your trying to follow vocals since theres nothing on the white tick
03:08:269 (2) - same here about the white tick thing, nothing happens here but you hitsounded a clap on it
03:29:340 (3) -03:30:768 (7) - would be cool if you ctrl+g this maybe
03:48:982 (1,2) - maybe extend the slider to where 2 is or delete 2? i dont think it really needs to be clickable
03:49:697 (3,4,8) - the fact that this isnt a triangle but 03:50:054 (5,6,8) - is tilts me
03:51:840 (1,2,3) - why is this so different to 03:53:268 (5,6,7) - with regards to spacing? i noticed you kinda repeat it a bit later too , but i do think having similar spacing would be better
04:08:268 (2) - whats happening on this beat? would follow piano if it was on the blue or vocal on the red..
05:13:394 (3,4,5,6) - not really a fan of how this is a curve after all the triangle/linear patterns it seems a bit inconsistent, maybe something like this is better slightly? http://puu.sh/xIczD/98a8dbe8f6.png
hmm 2nd half of the last kiai seems a bit rushed..
your long sliders at the end are unrankable since u cant tell which direction it goes, try and unstack the head/tail slightly
~
cool style

kwk wrote:

q
~
Not really a fan of the intro but, not much you can do about it if you dont want it to be skippable I will look for fix when I get ideas uwu
00:40:051 (5,6) - not too sure about making this a jump, doesnt really feel like its warranted since it is a bit sudden. ctrl+g 4 and 5
01:13:262 (5) - i think whistles here a bit better since the claps are pretty noisy )b
01:16:834 (4) - im guessing this is for the vocals, so why do these get ignored? 01:20:941 - 01:22:369 - ? I think its fine to just keep it as a note imo, dont really see the need to overcomplicate it )b
01:30:226 (5) - i think it would be nice if this was deleted so you get a pause between 01:29:691 (4,1) - since the vocal here is rather quiet and not very noticeable. it'll emphasise 01:30:405 (1) - very nicely imo instead of emphasizing, i think the dead air is just awkward
01:35:048 (2,3,4) - you have same ds here 01:32:191 (2,3,4) - but why not here as well ? 01:35:048 (2,3,4) - 01:32:191 (2,3,4) - the slider is different in this pattern that the other ones with bigger spacing (vocal is softer)
01:43:976 (4) - split this into 2 notes? vocals on slider ends is a bit mm, if you change it, it'll be more consistent with 01:41:476 (5,6,1,2) - rhythm wise and contrasts with 01:42:548 (4,5,6) - )b i don't know why i ignored the vocal when I mapped it, as I was following the vocals :/
01:45:405 (2,6) - these arent symmetrical if your intending them to be no i was just following a honeycomb structure
02:12:195 (3) - same thing as earlier, i still think keeping the section entirely whistles is better but up to you mm this section i think the claps are fine
02:48:804 (8,1) - not too sure about the jump here, its like the biggest jump so far in such a calm section fixed
02:54:518 (9) - unecessary note? not sure what its mapped to. Besides i think a pause is a nicer feeling here filler rhythm
02:56:661 (2,3,4,5) - be cool if you made this similar to 02:45:232 (7,8,9,10) - 02:50:947 (6,7,8,9) - changed
03:03:268 (1) - is slider tail meant to be snapped to blue tick? sv change didnt register D: i fixed the sv so its good now
03:03:269 the transition to the undermapping here is a bit strange, cause to me, the sectionw before to this is basically the same, yet the transition is very sudden, its not like the music disappeared ^
03:05:411 (2,3) - i think it would be better if u change 3 to a slider and delete 2 if your trying to follow vocals since theres nothing on the white tick
03:08:269 (2) - same here about the white tick thing, nothing happens here but you hitsounded a clap on it short sliders are violin oscillations, circles are vocals
03:29:340 (3) -03:30:768 (7) - would be cool if you ctrl+g this maybe will keep that in mind, but for now I like the pattern i have
03:48:982 (1,2) - maybe extend the slider to where 2 is or delete 2? i dont think it really needs to be clickable filler rhythm since the slider being that long is a bit awkward imo
03:49:697 (3,4,8) - the fact that this isnt a triangle but 03:50:054 (5,6,8) - is tilts me 8 is supposed to be right in the center between 03:50:232 (6,7) - , just coincidence it makes a triangle lol
03:51:840 (1,2,3) - why is this so different to 03:53:268 (5,6,7) - with regards to spacing? i noticed you kinda repeat it a bit later too , but i do think having similar spacing would be better im emphasizing the finishes
04:08:268 (2) - whats happening on this beat? would follow piano if it was on the blue or vocal on the red.. i tried both options, and everyone that playtested said it was weird af since it doesnt follow rhythm (the song itself is weird as it doesnt follow music intuition). Just having equal timing space between the sliders and the circle sounds best
05:13:394 (3,4,5,6) - not really a fan of how this is a curve after all the triangle/linear patterns it seems a bit inconsistent, maybe something like this is better slightly? http://puu.sh/xIczD/98a8dbe8f6.png )b
hmm 2nd half of the last kiai seems a bit rushed.. uwu
your long sliders at the end are unrankable since u cant tell which direction it goes, try and unstack the head/tail slightly )b
~
cool style

Thanks for the mod!~~~

mitsuha ver.


as far as i could see, you would need effort on hitsounding and the intense that i pointed out. and find more effective opinions from mappers or modders.but it's fun for me in terms of playable stuff! if you have some question about my suggestion, dont hesitate to ask me~
Good Luck!

joker- wrote:

mitsuha ver.

Just a Little More

1. default soft finish and clap are clearly improper stuffs with the song like composed one. i suggest you prepare custom hitsounds for them at least. I'm looking for hitsounds uwu
   　
2. 00:00:877 - ~ 00:25:638 - the section prob runs the risk of unrankable issue cuz the sliders arent audible according to Raking Criteria. should avoid to mute slider slide and slider tick both to use 5% volume of green lines. mmmm people have told me it's still rankable. I'll ask around more and decide then
   　
3. 00:07:410 (1) - the slider shape doesnt look nice in my view. if you aim for ranked, you care of aesthetics stuff even long sliders. in case you have a reasonable intention as the slider, this shall not apply tho. 00:20:638 (1) - same I'll fix it when I get ideas uwu
   　
4. 01:16:834 (4) - i prefer to replace a circle instead since there are only quite weak vocal on blue tick and i seem you focus to beat piano sound at the whole. fixed
   　
5. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - the concept is really my preference! Good Job!! but you would be better to raise the distance a bit on 01:25:405 (7,8) - not same distance with 01:25:048 (6,7) - since through the 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - placement, there is most emphasized piano on here.
   fixed
   　
6. 01:25:048 (6,1) - doesnt look nice on editor since your placement pattern basically doesnt overlap in my view ^
   　
7. 01:26:000 (1) - reduce a reverse only once cuz 01:26:179 - doesnt follow anything imo ok
   　
8. 02:40:412 - 03:03:269 - the section has too much intense like last kiai part despite of not a excited section. i recommend you remove the objects that are following vocal mainly for consistent with 00:40:408 - ~ 01:03:262 - as a tip. i assume you have not to remove objects extremely like a former part tho I think the simple jump patterns make up for the spacing. Don't think it's too intense.
   　
9. 02:40:412 - inconsistent volume green line and red line each other. it's an unrankable issue. 05:21:140 - 05:25:716 - same fixed
   　
10. 03:45:887 (1,1) - what sound are you following to use 1/6's rhythm for the song? it makes more sense to snap 1/4 accurately as far as i could hear I'm following the violin oscillations
    　
11. 04:58:216 - 05:27:680 - plz check "kiai mode" on red lines same time. fixed
    　
12. 05:25:068 (5,1) - completely unfit stack with your map cuz you havent been used any else. used to help differentiate the timing oddity,
    as the song suddenly changes beat with the vocals
    　
13. 05:32:144 (3) - should avoid the slider shape cuz it doesn't entirely sure the direction of movement according ranking criteria. 05:35:001 (2) - 05:38:130 (2) - same. fixed

as far as i could see, you would need effort on hitsounding and the intense that i pointed out. and find more effective opinions from mappers or modders.but it's fun for me in terms of playable stuff! if you have some question about my suggestion, dont hesitate to ask me~ <3
Good Luck!

Thanks for the mod!~~~ >w<//

from my queue

general
04:34:340 - 04:54:519 - maybe leave this a break if u want
tags lmao
idk what the combo colors yellow and red has to do with but i assume the twilight maybe try pastel colors

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,255,100
Combo2 : 85,225,255
Combo3 : 253,255,255
Combo4 : 255,100,100

not general
00:20:638 (1) - this slider art can be confusing in the end the path is not so clear like this http://puu.sh/xNn0R/25ecc0a7fc.jpg
01:27:905 (1,2) - if u ctrl g these it will fit better the intens music
02:12:909 (1) - the sound of her vocal on blue tick sound stronger maybe make it clickable like here 02:11:838 (1,2,3) - and stack them on head of 02:13:266 (2) -
02:51:840 (1,4) - avoid this small overlap is not appealing
03:08:625 (3) - ctrl for the flow break here to emphasize more the finish sound here 03:08:983 (1) -
03:11:840 (3) - nc should be here to be consistent
03:20:054 (3) - same as before
03:21:840 (3) - a 1/2 repeat here can do better because of the sound that the slider body ignores here 03:22:197 -
03:25:947 (3,4) - u mapped 1/8 stacks differntly as 03:45:769 (1,1,1) - and same as 1/4 that way these 03:25:947 (3,4,1) - can be confused of 1/4 so maybe keep mapping them diffrent
03:46:006 (1,1) - dont think its needed to space the 1/8 here this is the only time u did it
04:06:125 (1) - this slider art can look lot smoother maybe smth like this http://puu.sh/xNmvp/94e70f1327.jpg
04:08:269 (2) - this note is overmapped there not audible clickable sound there
05:29:287 - this vocals feels need to be mapped maybe try add 1/2 slider there http://puu.sh/xNmHu/d58130b9bb.jpg

neat map over all good luck.

Lilyanna wrote:

from my queue

general
04:34:340 - 04:54:519 - maybe leave this a break if u want nu it'd be a pretty big break.
tags lmao :3
idk what the combo colors yellow and red has to do with but i assume the twilight maybe try pastel colors )b

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,255,100
Combo2 : 85,225,255
Combo3 : 253,255,255
Combo4 : 255,100,100

not general
00:20:638 (1) - this slider art can be confusing in the end the path is not so clear like this http://puu.sh/xNn0R/25ecc0a7fc.jpg )b
01:27:905 (1,2) - if u ctrl g these it will fit better the intens music )b maybe a bit too spaced but I'll change it to that
02:12:909 (1) - the sound of her vocal on blue tick sound stronger maybe make it clickable like here 02:11:838 (1,2,3) - and stack them on head of 02:13:266 (2) - not mapping to vocals, only to piano, sure it's clickable, but if I mapped it I wouldn't be being consistent
02:51:840 (1,4) - avoid this small overlap is not appealing )b
03:08:625 (3) - ctrl for the flow break here to emphasize more the finish sound here 03:08:983 (1) - want to keep the "sweeping" motion to emphasize the violin sweep
03:11:840 (3) - nc should be here to be consistent )b
03:20:054 (3) - same as before same explanation as before
03:21:840 (3) - a 1/2 repeat here can do better because of the sound that the slider body ignores here 03:22:197 - mmm vocals aren't being followed in this section so...
03:25:947 (3,4) - u mapped 1/8 stacks differntly as 03:45:769 (1,1,1) - and same as 1/4 that way these 03:25:947 (3,4,1) - can be confused of 1/4 so maybe keep mapping them diffrent fine as it is imo, different timing = different spacing so . . .
03:46:006 (1,1) - dont think its needed to space the 1/8 here this is the only time u did it emphasis is required for the slider
04:06:125 (1) - this slider art can look lot smoother maybe smth like this http://puu.sh/xNmvp/94e70f1327.jpg )b
04:08:269 (2) - this note is overmapped there not audible clickable sound there keeping it for now as without it the beat is killed. Am looking for a solution tho so I'll change it soon probably
05:29:287 - this vocals feels need to be mapped maybe try add 1/2 slider there http://puu.sh/xNmHu/d58130b9bb.jpg the vocals are custom hitsounds btw xd

neat map over all good luck. <3

Thank you for the mod!~~ >w<//

Thank you for using our queue! I'm not that good a mapper but here I go! Hope this helps!


And that's all! Good map overall, but I don't really like the song lol
Good luck with rank!

Nyantiaz wrote:

Thank you for using our queue! I'm not that good a mapper but here I go! Hope this helps!

00:00:877 - Maybe use a reverse slider? I think a normal slider is fine, to keep consistent with the star trail gimmick used later

00:40:229 - ^ - If you're going for Insane this may be difficult for 4* not too bad of a diff spike for 4*
01:37:191 - maybe space this note out a little more since it's not immediately clicked after, like 5,6,7 )b
01:47:548 - this overlays the note at 01:46:476, which doesn't look pretty. maybe try to fix? wanted them different shapes since vocals are different
01:53:619 - looks a little weird (this is just my opinion) keeping for flow
02:20:766 - i think this slider is out of rhythm sliderend lands on vocal

03:14:697 - looks a little weird (still opinion) maybe fix when i get an idea of a pretty slider :p
03:25:947 - i understand using a different snap for stacks to go in rhythm, but if you listen in 25% speed you may have used the wrong snap, since it sounds out of rhythm sounds right to me after several times listening
03:50:411 - maybe put a new combo here? not needed, thus the other nc suggestions are not changed to be consistent
03:56:126 - ^ ^
04:04:697 - ^ ^
04:54:519 - maybe replace this with a normal slider instead of reverse? reverse is needed to represent the piano sweep
05:02:501 - new combo? not a new measure
05:10:358 - remove new combo here, then add a new combo on 05:11:073 just removed nc
05:13:930 - new combo? not new measure
05:22:568 - ^^
05:25:068 - this slider is out of rhythm (i believe)shortened slider 1/16th tick
05:38:130 - this is a weird slider shape gimmick to represent a scene from source movie

And that's all! Good map overall, but I don't really like the song lol D:
Good luck with rank! :D

Thanks for the mod!~ >w<//

You're welcome! sorry for not being useful ENOUGH a_a im a noob modder lol

Nyantiaz wrote:

You're welcome! sorry for not being useful ENOUGH a_a im a noob modder lol

it's fine you were helpful :p

salchow wrote:

Mod from my queue

Just a Little More

General:

this map has weird flow and uncomfortable jumps that you can fix to make the map better. uwu



00:40:229 (6,1) - just remove the circle and use a repetitive slider instead. Fits better. want to change it up to emphasize the 00:40:408 (1) -

01:40:405 (1,2) - Use new combo here insted: 01:40:762 (2) sticking to nc on finishes

01:41:119 (4) - This slider could face downward, for more comfortable flow. 01:41:476 (5) - is a beginning of a new word, as well slider is not too pointed up therefore not that hard to hit the next note.

02:34:695 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - feels that these sliders face in random direction. Make this part more organized. they're not random . . . they follow a hexagon pattern and just following it with your cursor makes comfortable flow

02:37:145 (1,1,1,1) - 02:38:216 (1,1,1,1) - 03:45:769 (1,1,1,1) - less spaced stream could fit better tbh. those notes are 1/3 streams which are different from the standard 1/4 i've been using, so the spacing and nc is warranted

02:48:090 (6,7) - This slider faces anti-clockwise direction = bad flow and dosent really fit. Make some sort of flower shape here: 02:46:125 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) how is anti-clockwise bad flow if the rest follows it as well . . . ;~;

03:50:411 (7) - new combo the other patterns in the kiai build up doesnt have a nc so this doesn't need it imo

04:41:840 - Missing circle/sound. there's no piano there, and I'm following it on that section

05:06:787 (1) - this slider could be more curved. Fine as it is

05:38:130 (2) - This slider is problematic because it's so easy to combo break. make slider-end visible.Sliderend is visible, as well the sv is super slow.

thanks for the mod )b

[Marathon]

1. 00:00:877 (1,2) - I feel that's weird to have this slider: 00:00:877 (1) - focusing a syllab, and then on this slider: 00:01:591 (2) - you're based on the singer's long sentance, until she makes a break. And you're also doing it here: 00:14:016 (1,2) - // It's not really consistant to make what you did here.
   Furthermore, the sliderticks are pretty loud, and are pretty disturbing imo... Why not mapping each syllabs individually instead, to give a better rhythm perception to the player?
   
2. 00:40:229 (6,1) - In my opinion, that would play better if you change this 1/8 slider into two circles instead. I suggest you two way to fix it, cause I think that using a 1/8 sliders + a circle, isn't giving a good feedback. Here are my two suggestions:
   
   1. Change this pattern into three circles, so it would look like this. I think that's the best solution, since the intensity is increasing from here: 00:38:980 (1) - to here: 00:40:408 (1) -
   2. Change this pattern as a 1/8 reverse slider, likethis. It's not my favorite, cause it doesn't push the player to click in rhythm with the piano, but I think it would be more representative of the music than the actual pattern.
3. 00:41:834 (7) - From here, during the calm part, I think you can space more the circles when they're far from each other in the timeline. Cause otherwise, it will doesn't give a feeling of movement during this part.
   
4. 00:53:262 (2) - Why from here, you're focusing the vocals, and you did made it before? I think that's quite weird, maybe you didn't focused on vocals, but in that case, why are these sliders 00:54:691 (1,2,3) - base on vocals? If you wanna be consistant with it, you can just focus the piano here, but it will kinda look empty, since the piano is not important enough to focus it.
   
5. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I think that from here, since the song is getting crescendo, you can add a spacing effect that will represent that crescendo sound on the music, by adding a bit of spacing on each circles. Like this (don't do the same pattern, it's just to explain the increase of the spacing according to the song's intensity)
   
6. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same for here. I noticed that you made it on those 01:24:691 (5,6,7,8) - three last note, it's a nice idea, but I think that the intensity is getting higher from here: 01:23:262 (1) - to here: 01:25:762 (8) - so you should do something like I showed you on the screenshot previously.
   
7. 01:26:000 (1) - Are you sure about that unsnapped reversed slider? The spacing is somehow misleading, I think you should space it more, so the player can't be confused by it.
   
8. 01:33:262 (1,2) - I have a small suggestion in terms of aesthetics, that I think it can improve the flow, and emphasis. I think that's fitting pretty great with the vocals, since the sound that those two sliders are covering are kind of same, so in my opinion, that would be better to do this.
   
9. 02:17:552 (1,2,3) - It should be spaced more, cause the song that this circle: 02:17:552 (1) - is covering is pretty strong, and it's not spaced enough, also it has a 1/2 gap between this note and the previous one, so I suggest you to put more spacing, even if it's a calm part.
   
10. 02:19:695 (7,8,9) - Turn the angle of this pattern by 45°, to make it less sharp, and hard to play. According to the sound it's covering, it doesn't need such a sharp flow like this. If you don't know how to turn objects, use Ctrl+Shift+R. If you did it well, it will look like this.
    
11. 02:20:766 (3) - Why this slider is suddenly ending on the voice, if you're based on piano in background? If I listen to the song clearly, the only beat that end on this tick 02:20:989 - is the voice. So to fix this, I think you can delete this slider and replace it by a circle, or end the slider on the next white tick here: 02:21:123 -
    
12. 03:46:126 (1) - Since you're using a unregular snap in the song (1/3 in that case), I don't thing using a different spacing on this slider is a good idea, since it can be confusing to the player, so keep the same spacing.

That's all for me, it's a pretty beautiful song, and I really like the hitsound you use at the end. I think it still need some other mapper opinions about spacing, cause sometimes it feels quite irregular in the kiai, but anyway it plays well.
Good luck with it, and feel free to ask me if you need to clear up some point.

Pachiru wrote:

[Marathon]

1. 00:00:877 (1,2) - I feel that's weird to have this slider: 00:00:877 (1) - focusing a syllab, and then on this slider: 00:01:591 (2) - you're based on the singer's long sentance, until she makes a break. And you're also doing it here: 00:14:016 (1,2) - // It's not really consistant to make what you did here.
   Furthermore, the sliderticks are pretty loud, and are pretty disturbing imo... Why not mapping each syllabs individually instead, to give a better rhythm perception to the player? uwu I tried to make the slider heads land on the more important vocals like the beginning of a stanza and such (note the star was a gimmick), I'll try to come up with a fix
   
2. 00:40:229 (6,1) - In my opinion, that would play better if you change this 1/8 slider into two circles instead. I suggest you two way to fix it, cause I think that using a 1/8 sliders + a circle, isn't giving a good feedback. Here are my two suggestions:
   
   1. Change this pattern into three circles, so it would look like this. I think that's the best solution, since the intensity is increasing from here: 00:38:980 (1) - to here: 00:40:408 (1) - used this one
   2. Change this pattern as a 1/8 reverse slider, likethis. It's not my favorite, cause it doesn't push the player to click in rhythm with the piano, but I think it would be more representative of the music than the actual pattern.
3. 00:41:834 (7) - From here, during the calm part, I think you can space more the circles when they're far from each other in the timeline. Cause otherwise, it will doesn't give a feeling of movement during this part. I followed some symmetry pattern gimmicks to represent something from the movie, plus I think the slow speed of this part warrants the small spacing
   
4. 00:53:262 (2) - Why from here, you're focusing the vocals, and you did made it before? I think that's quite weird, maybe you didn't focused on vocals, but in that case, why are these sliders 00:54:691 (1,2,3) - base on vocals? If you wanna be consistant with it, you can just focus the piano here, but it will kinda look empty, since the piano is not important enough to focus it. vocals are too significant here, so i followed and changed slider shapes to compensate for that
   
5. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I think that from here, since the song is getting crescendo, you can add a spacing effect that will represent that crescendo sound on the music, by adding a bit of spacing on each circles. Like this (don't do the same pattern, it's just to explain the increase of the spacing according to the song's intensity) fixed
   
6. 01:23:262 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same for here. I noticed that you made it on those 01:24:691 (5,6,7,8) - three last note, it's a nice idea, but I think that the intensity is getting higher from here: 01:23:262 (1) - to here: 01:25:762 (8) - so you should do something like I showed you on the screenshot previously. fixed
   
7. 01:26:000 (1) - Are you sure about that unsnapped reversed slider? The spacing is somehow misleading, I think you should space it more, so the player can't be confused by it. kept slider, spaced it more
   
8. 01:33:262 (1,2) - I have a small suggestion in terms of aesthetics, that I think it can improve the flow, and emphasis. I think that's fitting pretty great with the vocals, since the sound that those two sliders are covering are kind of same, so in my opinion, that would be better to do this. sure why not, plays well
   
9. 02:17:552 (1,2,3) - It should be spaced more, cause the song that this circle: 02:17:552 (1) - is covering is pretty strong, and it's not spaced enough, also it has a 1/2 gap between this note and the previous one, so I suggest you to put more spacing, even if it's a calm part. not warranted enough imo for spacing equal or bigger than the piano patterns later on
   
10. 02:19:695 (7,8,9) - Turn the angle of this pattern by 45°, to make it less sharp, and hard to play. According to the sound it's covering, it doesn't need such a sharp flow like this. If you don't know how to turn objects, use Ctrl+Shift+R. If you did it well, it will look like this.fixed
    
11. 02:20:766 (3) - Why this slider is suddenly ending on the voice, if you're based on piano in background? If I listen to the song clearly, the only beat that end on this tick 02:20:989 - is the voice. So to fix this, I think you can delete this slider and replace it by a circle, or end the slider on the next white tick here: 02:21:123 - u right
    
12. 03:46:126 (1) - Since you're using a unregular snap in the song (1/3 in that case), I don't thing using a different spacing on this slider is a good idea, since it can be confusing to the player, so keep the same spacing. needed to emphasize the slider

That's all for me, it's a pretty beautiful song, and I really like the hitsound you use at the end. I think it still need some other mapper opinions about spacing, cause sometimes it feels quite irregular in the kiai, but anyway it plays well.
Good luck with it, and feel free to ask me if you need to clear up some point. <3

Thanks for the mod!!~~

Hi!
NM from my queueueuue

[Just a Little More]

1. Add Kimi No Na Wa and Your Name to tags; not everyone speaks japanese :thinking:
2. 00:00:877 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - 28 sec since first "note", 6 objects total; those sliderarts are cool and all but who like to play 25sec intro everytime you restart a map cuz of shitmiss? There's no music, no beat and you don't really map to the intro vocals either so what's the point of mapping this part?
3. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this could make use of mapping to the grid to make it more aestheticaly pleasing; maybe try something like this
4. 01:31:834 (1) - I'd stack it with 01:31:476 (5,2) - ; this would add a nice accent with that break of no movement (same 01:34:691 (1) - )
5. 01:54:333 (2) - you can make more creative slider instead, I believe in you!
6. 03:50:411 (7) - NC would make this clearer + would get rid of doubledigit combo
7. 04:06:125 (1) - stack it with 04:05:232 (8) -
8. 05:29:644 (1) - did you really add this as a hitsound? XD
9. 05:38:130 (2) - it should be clear which way it goes; rn it's not clear

[Afterword]
I legit lmao'ed when I saw tags. I'm not sure about this timing tbh. You should try asking some timing pro to recheck it. I'd really suggest you to get rid of that slider intro as it's really frustrating to play and might discourage some inpatient players. Good luck!

Catshy wrote:

Hi!
NM from my queueueuue

[Just a Little More]

1. Add Kimi No Na Wa and Your Name to tags; not everyone speaks japanese :thinking: :thonk:
2. 00:00:877 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - 28 sec since first "note", 6 objects total; those sliderarts are cool and all but who like to play 25sec intro everytime you restart a map cuz of shitmiss? There's no music, no beat and you don't really map to the intro vocals either so what's the point of mapping this part? Keeping it if that's the only reason for taking it off. Doesn't inhibit playability, so why change it just to accommodate people who dislike a slow start
3. 01:11:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this could make use of mapping to the grid to make it more aestheticaly pleasing; maybe try something like this it is structured with symmetry (almost all the circles) and the gradual spacing increase is essential for the tone shift in the music
4. 01:31:834 (1) - I'd stack it with 01:31:476 (5,2) - ; this would add a nice accent with that break of no movement (same 01:34:691 (1) - ) imo the different sounds on each note justifies different spacing between the two
5. 01:54:333 (2) - you can make more creative slider instead, I believe in you! following the straight ,curve, curve straight pattern i was going for with the two notes prior to this
6. 03:50:411 (7) - NC would make this clearer + would get rid of doubledigit combo no other pattern uses nc and its readable enough with the spacing
7. 04:06:125 (1) - stack it with 04:05:232 (8) - fixed
8. 05:29:644 (1) - did you really add this as a hitsound? XD :3
9. 05:38:130 (2) - it should be clear which way it goes; rn it's not clear looks clear to me with skins both with and without sliderends

[Afterword]
I legit lmao'ed when I saw tags. I'm not sure about this timing tbh. You should try asking some timing pro to recheck it. I'd really suggest you to get rid of that slider intro as it's really frustrating to play and might discourage some inpatient players. Good luck!

Thanks for the mod!~ >w<//

hi

00:28:980 - about this section, i wish u make more consistent ds in here.
just example) 00:29:694 (1,2,3) - vs 00:32:908 (2,3) -
00:39:694 (3,4) - since this section is so relax, i think it's better if u change to 1/4 slider this.
because this rhythm 00:39:694 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - is so dense for here. :/
00:39:872 (4,5,6) - inconsistent DS?
01:23:262 (1,2,3) - vs 01:11:834 (1,2,3) - their ds looks so different :s
01:26:000 (1) - this reverse slider looks so weird by reverse arrow.
need to consider to increase sv here. even if you increase sv here, they won't effort to playing, tho..
01:28:262 (1) - personally i think sv x1.0 is better,
since 01:27:548 (1,2,1,2) - previous partten don't have any bulid up source.
01:36:119 (6,7,8) - ehh, imo, this flow is most of awkward flow in the mapset. if u care of fulid playing.
01:56:476 (1,2) - blanket off-ed https://puu.sh/y1H87.png
02:30:945 (6,7,8,9) - improvable DS for consistent
02:34:695 (1) - i really thought u want to do clickable-note from piano sound. :/
03:25:947 (3,4,1) - i think that this ds was decreased by fast rhythm, or NC 03:25:947 (3) -
or increase ds at 03:25:590 (2,3) - . current staff kinda feel off-ed from slow mapping style.
03:35:947 - highly consider to make clickable here, by new starting lyric.
03:45:769 (1,1,1,1) - this partten is really compared with 02:37:145 (1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1) -
04:02:911 (9,1) - buff ds
05:17:723 (6) - tbh, i think this note don't need in here,
as 05:16:830 (5) - long slider already express some beat as well. imo :ssssssss
04:58:216 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - buff diffculty. this kiai section was composed to big DS, but not only here..

okie GL