1. 01:08:633 - I don't think 1/3 works here. All I can hear is 1/2 1/4 drums, That includes for every 1/3 pattern at this section, and they felt pretty off. Consider them changing.
2. 03:43:777 (5) - Finisher maybe? I can hear a crash cymbal on it.
3. 03:48:042 (27) - Interesting idea: How about soft finisher here? Add 03:47:895 - soft and 03:48:189 - normal points on these spots and emphasize the actual sound with soft finisher :^)
4. 03:56:277 (72) - Same for this, points on 03:56:204 - 03:56:351 - those two.
5. 03:58:336 - Assuming you're following guitar, it's 1/3. 1/4 stream is overmapped there.
6. 04:02:453 - How about kkkd 1/3? dkkd could work too, but 04:02:527 (114,115) - these two 1/4 doublets felt really weird to me, since there is not a prominent sound on them I think you should change it.
7. 04:17:600 - You can use 1/8 doublet here due to the drums, but that's optional. It may break the structure, so it's up to you.
8. 04:36:497 (352) - Move this 1/4 back (to red tick) and start the stream on 04:36:571 (353) - this, assuming you're following guitar. This way is good too, by the way.
9. 04:43:335 (404) - Finishers on these? Will be consistent with the first part and emphasize more on keyboard sounds.

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Yolo.

[Reality]

1. 01:08:633 - I don't think 1/3 works here. All I can hear is 1/2 1/4 drums, That includes for every 1/3 pattern at this section, and they felt pretty off. Consider them changing. would kept it for now, since most of people fine with this. yeah I'd rather follow drum but for me the rhythm in here more noticeable. so ye I made it 1/3
2. 03:43:777 (5) - Finisher maybe? I can hear a crash cymbal on it. yes and reversed the colors
3. 03:48:042 (27) - Interesting idea: How about soft finisher here? Add 03:47:895 - soft and 03:48:189 - normal points on these spots and emphasize the actual sound with soft finisher :^) I love you, sir.
4. 03:56:277 (72) - Same for this, points on 03:56:204 - 03:56:351 - those two. so much
5. 03:58:336 - Assuming you're following guitar, it's 1/3. 1/4 stream is overmapped there. yes fukcin surono wanna pepe. OKAY DEM IT S1/3 OSH IT JUT RELAIZLIFEDDEegkjg
6. 04:02:453 - How about kkkd 1/3? dkkd could work too, but 04:02:527 (114,115) - these two 1/4 doublets felt really weird to me, since there is not a prominent sound on them I think you should change it. yes
7. 04:17:600 - You can use 1/8 doublet here due to the drums, but that's optional. It may break the structure, so it's up to you. que
8. 04:36:497 (352) - Move this 1/4 back (to red tick) and start the stream on 04:36:571 (353) - this, assuming you're following guitar. This way is good too, by the way. yes, mostly 2plet in this part were awkward aheuaheuaheu.
9. 04:43:335 (404) - Finishers on these? Will be consistent with the first part and emphasize more on keyboard sounds. in this part I felt the sounds are weak than the previously part.

Get one more mod and call me back.

Chocola_2287 wrote:

yo sweg madnut
Sorry for the delayed mod >_> qwdqdqdjwqdwdq

Map does not have many obvious problem so I can't really give out any suggestions.

[Dissembler]

• 00:10:202 (38) - d? Can help representing the upward pitch in 00:10:202 (38,39,40) - for objectively intensifisly I do
  
  00:15:251 (61,62,63) - I would rather use dddk 1/6 here because it actually feels like 1/6 when playing in 100% speed, you cant feel the 1/8. dem simpler with 4plet 1/6, 1/8 already gud in here cus the closest sound at snap
  
  01:06:133 (461,462,463) - delete 462, 461 as k , 463 as D . 1/4 actually took away the finishers impact. Moreover 463 should be consistent with 01:04:810 (453) - to have a better flow. but wehhh focus drum for now and wont make 1/4 stream finish
  
  The rest of the map are fine for me.
  

Good luck.

sellcow wrote:

N A N I !

Surono wrote:

sellcow wrote:

N A N I !

1. 00:04:810 (8,9,10,11) - Unlike 00:07:163 (18,19,20,21) - here, the first one doesn't have 3/4 keyboard, which I think it feels extremely off. Maybe use 1/2 snapping like the others.
2. 00:15:361 (62,63) - :thinking: The sounds are not even 1/8, they're closer to 1/6, I'm saying this because I hear 4 notes between 00:15:251 ~ 00:15:398 - these spots. Either use 1/6 (which I don't suggest because it's intro) or remove one of the notes from the doublet.
3. 00:20:324 - To smoothen the SV change, put 0.97x, 00:20:398 - 0.98x and 00:20:545 - 1.00x are my suggestions, which I think you should apply.
4. 01:21:867 - You don't need this red point here, the measure is still the same.
5. 03:37:748 (520,521) - Is there a reason about skipping these guitar sounds? If so, please explain, otherwise put some notes there.
6. 04:18:005 (186,187) - I don't think it's good to emphasize the keyboard here. While it's not accurate, it also doesn't play good after the first doublet you put to emphasize drums. Maybe a single note or a triplet in 1/4 would be better.
7. 06:07:745 - Mmm, I don't feel confident about these SV changes, maybe you should ask someone else if they seem good or not, this time I can't judge it well enough, sorry :3

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hello again, ma boi. im sad tacoboi

1. 00:04:810 (8,9,10,11) - Unlike 00:07:163 (18,19,20,21) - here, the first one doesn't have 3/4 keyboard, which I think it feels extremely off. Maybe use 1/2 snapping like the others. kek fixed
2. 00:15:361 (62,63) - :thinking: The sounds are not even 1/8, they're closer to 1/6, I'm saying this because I hear 4 notes between 00:15:251 ~ 00:15:398 - these spots. Either use 1/6 (which I don't suggest because it's intro) or remove one of the notes from the doublet. intro with small madnuts el ma o, yeh speakers sound users blame.exe
3. 00:20:324 - To smoothen the SV change, put 0.97x, 00:20:398 - 0.98x and 00:20:545 - 1.00x are my suggestions, which I think you should apply.
4. 01:21:867 - You don't need this red point here, the measure is still the same. I need to fit which metronome cymbal from da songs, de evens number tempo.
5. 03:37:748 (520,521) - Is there a reason about skipping these guitar sounds? If so, please explain, otherwise put some notes there. the reason is, surono is residentsleeper
6. 04:18:005 (186,187) - I don't think it's good to emphasize the keyboard here. While it's not accurate, it also doesn't play good after the first doublet you put to emphasize drums. Maybe a single note or a triplet in 1/4 would be better. 1/4
7. 06:07:745 - Mmm, I don't feel confident about these SV changes, maybe you should ask someone else if they seem good or not, this time I can't judge it well enough, sorry :3 demmm kwkwk, ok.. 06:08:113 - added 0.93 and 06:07:819 - 0.92, looks sm00th w33d. also for 00:38:339 - previous similar part too. would be fine now

After you fix the last issue and reply to the mod, you may call me back.

Uta wrote:

selamat bn tai