[ yesir ]
00:02:311 (2,3) - ctrl g? drum symbol sound is at 00:02:458 (3) - . even here followed piano sound, since here is the start of map, follow little drum so that catch the beat more easy seems not bad to me.
01:09:024 - , 01:09:122 - fill circle at this point seems good to me. 01:08:730 (475,476) - is the 1/3, but real drum sound is 1/4 in here, so i think you followed melody in here, but just next circle 01:09:073 (478) - is drum sound, not melody.
01:18:192 (547) - delete or d? no impact sound in here to me.
01:20:691 (551,552,553,554,555) - k k k dK? or only 01:21:720 (555) - K.
02:38:852 (69) - delete? sound is less big than 02:38:264 (63) - and 02:38:558 (66) - , and also can emphasize 02:39:073 (71) - more.
05:03:848 (80) - ^
02:42:749 (100) - delete? similar overall sound with 02:40:396 (79) - and also has no kicking sound but has little hi-hat sound, so for consistency?
02:52:161 (188) - ^
05:10:098 (33) - ^
05:19:510 (121) - ^
next level mapping
00:02:311 (2,3) - ctrl g? drum symbol sound is at 00:02:458 (3) - . even here followed piano sound, since here is the start of map, follow little drum so that catch the beat more easy seems not bad to me.
01:09:024 - , 01:09:122 - fill circle at this point seems good to me. 01:08:730 (475,476) - is the 1/3, but real drum sound is 1/4 in here, so i think you followed melody in here, but just next circle 01:09:073 (478) - is drum sound, not melody.
01:18:192 (547) - delete or d? no impact sound in here to me.
01:20:691 (551,552,553,554,555) - k k k dK? or only 01:21:720 (555) - K.
02:38:852 (69) - delete? sound is less big than 02:38:264 (63) - and 02:38:558 (66) - , and also can emphasize 02:39:073 (71) - more.
05:03:848 (80) - ^
02:42:749 (100) - delete? similar overall sound with 02:40:396 (79) - and also has no kicking sound but has little hi-hat sound, so for consistency?
02:52:161 (188) - ^
05:10:098 (33) - ^
05:19:510 (121) - ^
next level mapping