ok
temporary diff name I guess 00:03:043 (2) - could just copypaste the first slider and ctrl+h it, looks nicer to me + you did that here 00:05:908 (2,3) - anyway
00:08:099 (1) - sv feels way to slow for that
00:18:717 (3,1) - not really a fan of this stack, both beats are kinda strong, and this having the same emphasis as 00:18:043 (1,2) - looks kinda wrong to me
00:18:885 (1) - shortening this to 1/1 and making it a repeat slider would both capture the voice and the sounds on 00:19:222 - and 00:19:559 -
00:20:571 (2,3,4) - doesn't really need that spacing, but that's just my opinion
00:25:627 (1,3) - that overlap lol, could stack the sliderend of 00:26:301 (3) - on 00:24:953 (3) - and move 00:26:638 (4) - a little maybe, looks nicer to me
00:28:998 (3,4) - would map that as circles personally, fits the vocals better
00:35:571 - the 1/1 gap feels a little out of place to me, considering the vocals on 00:35:402 - and 00:35:571 -
00:39:953 (3,1) - you never did overlaps like this before, why now?
00:45:683 (1) -
could do something like this idk 00:47:200 (1) - I'd do circles for this slider, since the vocals are pretty dominant
01:32:537 (3,4,5) - nice stack dude
01:40:795 (10,1) - used to be only circles here 00:34:728 (10,11,1) - pls stay consistent (also maybe NC 01:40:626 (9) - and 00:34:559 (9) - )
02:00:009 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - compare this to 00:42:818 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - it's different in both NCing and pattern, + you had a slider the first time, but not the 2nd time
02:12:144 (1,2) - would switch those NCs for the guitar thingy and add one here 02:12:649 (6) -
02:14:503 (1) - unnecessary NC
02:25:121 (8,9) - don't really like the flow from 8 to 9 personally, moving 9 a bit more wouldn't hurt
d
