1. Advanced (1,85 stars, 348 notes)
2. Dance Floor (4,93 stars, 1076 notes)
3. Hyper (2,94 stars, 625 notes)
4. Insane (3,94 stars, 855 notes)
5. Standard (1,24 stars, 201 notes)

Enon wrote:

Natsu without K-POP

Long time no see

1. hitsounds are barely hearable

1. 00:23:381 (1,2) - this thing looks too far away from 00:23:276 (5) - (if compare to distance between these 00:23:172 (4,5) - for example)
2. 00:23:484 (2) - i would shape it so this thing would look like one solid arc 00:22:964 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - , now slider seems a bit off (kinda same here 00:26:297 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - )
3. 01:00:047 (1,2) - distance between those is not consistent
4. 01:24:213 (1,4) - blanket?
5. 01:27:547 (4,6) - for some reason (6) was incredibly hard to read, i think this position way to unnatural in comparison to anything else (01:30:880 (4,1) - same here) (or maybe its just me)
6. 01:29:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i listened to this thing on 25% with default hses and it seems that now objects don't land properly on sounds, this rhythm works much better (well object choice is yours, i just pointed out ticks with sounds on them which seem closer to the music)
7. 01:32:130 (3,4) - didn't quite get why these sliders have this shape, you made such shape previously for different sounds, here it doesn't seem appropriate
8. 03:11:088 (2,3,4,5,6) - perhaps emphasize vocal with some 1/4 sliders? (you did so in insane diff)

1. 00:01:179 (1,2) - this rhythm was a bit confusing while playing, perhaps try something like this
2. 01:29:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as final diff
3. 01:32:130 (3,4) - same as final diff (these sounds are not even that continious to be 2/3 sliders, sounds more like 1/2)
4. 02:21:192 - note here?
5. 02:54:630 (3,4) - to big ds if compare to 02:54:213 (1,2) -
6. 03:17:547 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - emphasize synth with 1/4 sliders?
7. 03:29:838 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - thats really hard to read, maybe change 03:30:880 (2) - because its not the same sound as 03:30:047 (2) -

1. 00:29:109 (3,4) - align?
2. 01:42:546 (3,4) - too close
3. 02:01:296 (6) - id make 2 sliders to emphasize dj scretches
4. 02:54:838 (6,1) - perhaps make distance between those like 02:54:422 (4,6) -

1. the whole intro mapped with sliderends on downbeats, thats pretty weird
2. 00:18:380 (5,1) - swap nc?
3. 01:32:963 - note here?
4. 02:40:047 (1,2) - what. i think better abandon this idea for this diff, i don't think its loogs good

1. 00:57:130 (4) - i think "wiggly" part of this thing should start later to match drums (01:58:797 (4) - same
2. 01:06:714 (1,2) - 03:31:713 (1,2) - blanket
3. 01:10:047 (1,2,3,4) - these touches kinda look ugly
4. 03:34:213 (4,1) - visual space

A r M i N wrote:

M4M

This isn't KPop man what?

[Dance Floor]
imo u can go for ar 9 OD 8 here but its just personal preferance i guess tbh I wanted to use AR 8 lol

00:09:422 (1,2) - Its always 1,8x Spacing exept here? it's 1,77 pls
00:12:963 (2) - 1,75 spacing? yeah, those are fine, you don't need to space everything by the same pixels, since isn't noticeble in game and either i break them a little for stacking, blankets or pattern purposes
00:18:588 (2,3,1,2) - again here, i would make them equal spacing but maybe its on purpose ^^ ^
00:44:838 (5) - kinda close to the previous slider? ok
01:24:213 (1,4) - those overlap ok
01:45:047 (1,2,3) - space them equally? ok
02:33:172 (2) - make 1,9 spacing like 02:29:838 (2) - ok
02:54:213 - 02:54:422 - 02:54:630 - 02:54:838 - increase volume? ok
03:30:255 (1,1) - i'd space those a bit more for emphasis nah my 1/4 spacing is always short

[Insane]
01:25:255 (1,2) - Add a reverse on both maybe? I want to focus on the vocals
00:44:317 (1) - 01:39:317 (1) - make those equal rhythm, i'd choose the 1/4 not the 1/6 or what this is ok
02:09:631 (4,3) - stack? ok
02:26:922 (1,2) - reverse same as before

[Hard]
00:57:547 - Would be nice if this was clickable maybe move the slider there and add a circle here 00:57:338 - I'm following vocals
02:48:172 (5) - blanket hm ok
02:51:505 (6) - ^ ok
03:28:067 - i am not a big fan of starting this on a blue tick, maybe move to white tick and make a 3/4 vocals

Nothing to say really about the lower diffs exept that its very cool how you use red points to "map" the beats

Good luck :3
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/646741

joker- wrote:

Hello from your queue

General

1. 03:39:696 - ~ 03:46:083 - i assume the section is suitable to added kiai since it is so hard to play same as other kiai part. ok

Easy

1. 01:31:714 (3) - i'd prefer to extend the slider to the next white tick since it would make sense to beat vocal than muted slider end. it's a different rhythm, that's why I didn't want to extend the slider until there
2. 02:35:255 - 02:55:047 - i'm not sure the reason why the section is added NC at 1 measure. because it fits the music better, since each measure needs to be mapped individually here, the previous parts were suitable to be mapped as pairs, but not this section
3. 03:38:579 (1) - probably it's unsnapped object? it's 1/6

Normal

1. 01:31:714 (2) - same mention as easy same
2. 02:18:797 (2,2) - stack them then look neater on editor in my view not noticeable in game
3. 02:54:630 (3,4) - i seem the ds is kinda closer compared with privious objects ok

Hard

1. 00:00:658 (2) - i suggest the slider is replaced 1/2 slider instead since i feel the blue tick sound doesn't have to be beat for not major sound as far as i could hear. ok

Insane

1. 00:02:116 (3) - i'd prefer to replace a circle and start the spinner at 00:02:224 - like your hard diff cuz the spinner can follow synthesizer more properly in my view I want to start the spinner with the vocal at this diff

Dance Floor

1. 00:02:116 (3) - same mention as insane same
2. 00:04:747 (3) - can you remove reverse it then add circle on 00:04:928 - ? the reason why players are more comfortable that the objects are beat at equal interval. 03:39:419 (3) - same If I do that, then I'll kill the acc of players, there is a timing change, so a transition slider to circle is best
3. 01:46:192 (3) - the slider is not readable at all for me... maybe the issue is improved if the sldiers placed like this below? ok
   
   SPOILER

   

sorry for short mod. i will be happy if i can be of any help!
the concept that the slider shape express various sounds in easy/normal is very exciting for me~
Good Luck!
my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/640013

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

hi, m4m from your queue

1. hitsounds are barely hearable disagree, they sound fine and compliment the music nicely with its current volume

final diff:

1. 00:23:381 (1,2) - this thing looks too far away from 00:23:276 (5) - (if compare to distance between these 00:23:172 (4,5) - for example) it's intended, also the spacing difference is like 0,10 or less, it doesn't matter
2. 00:23:484 (2) - i would shape it so this thing would look like one solid arc 00:22:964 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - , now slider seems a bit off (kinda same here 00:26:297 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - ) it's intended, since the sliders are symmetrical with the center of the grid
3. 01:00:047 (1,2) - distance between those is not consistent it's consitent, they are only two objects, any spacing would be consistent
4. 01:24:213 (1,4) - blanket? ok
5. 01:27:547 (4,6) - for some reason (6) was incredibly hard to read, i think this position way to unnatural in comparison to anything else (01:30:880 (4,1) - same here) (or maybe its just me) it's in line with the previous slider, also approach circles are a thing
6. 01:29:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i listened to this thing on 25% with default hses and it seems that now objects don't land properly on sounds, this rhythm works much better (well object choice is yours, i just pointed out ticks with sounds on them which seem closer to the music) ok
7. 01:32:130 (3,4) - didn't quite get why these sliders have this shape, you made such shape previously for different sounds, here it doesn't seem appropriate they are nice imo
8. 03:11:088 (2,3,4,5,6) - perhaps emphasize vocal with some 1/4 sliders? (you did so in insane diff) I want to have circles on the top diff,
   insane only follows the vocals to make it less dense

insane:

1. 00:01:179 (1,2) - this rhythm was a bit confusing while playing, perhaps try something like this that's way to dense for the intro and doesn't fits the music at all
2. 01:29:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as final diff ok
3. 01:32:130 (3,4) - same as final diff (these sounds are not even that continious to be 2/3 sliders, sounds more like 1/2) eh, not only focus on one sound, the sound on the bg is holding for longer
4. 02:21:192 - note here? nop
5. 02:54:630 (3,4) - to big ds if compare to 02:54:213 (1,2) - because there are sv changes
6. 03:17:547 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - emphasize synth with 1/4 sliders? no i prefer circles over sliders, also the stream is closer to what the music is doing
7. 03:29:838 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - thats really hard to read, maybe change 03:30:880 (2) - because its not the same sound as 03:30:047 (2) - reading is fun

hard:

1. 00:29:109 (3,4) - align? intended
2. 01:42:546 (3,4) - too close ok
3. 02:01:296 (6) - id make 2 sliders to emphasize dj scretches too hard for this diff, also I'm not following that, but the 1/4 melody
4. 02:54:838 (6,1) - perhaps make distance between those like 02:54:422 (4,6) -ok

normal:

1. the whole intro mapped with sliderends on downbeats, thats pretty weird the downbeats don't act like the start of the melody at the intro, but more like the end or single beats, since the melody starts 1/2 later
2. 00:18:380 (5,1) - swap nc? ^
3. 01:32:963 - note here? nop
4. 02:40:047 (1,2) - what. i think better abandon this idea for this diff, i don't think its loogs good maybe, anyways I want to keep it

easy:

1. 00:57:130 (4) - i think "wiggly" part of this thing should start later to match drums (01:58:797 (4) - same I think it's fine
2. 01:06:714 (1,2) - 03:31:713 (1,2) - blanket ok
3. 01:10:047 (1,2,3,4) - these touches kinda look ugly I love them
4. 03:34:213 (4,1) - visual space it's fine

Hope i helped. My thing for m4m - https://osu.ppy.sh/s/654575. Good luck!

Nevo wrote:

m4m from your queue

Normal
01:42:339 (3) - isn't the same visual spacing as the slider before I overlapped them and they is off ok

01:42:548 (4) - same with this one ok

Hard
00:49:630 (5) - maybe make this 2 circles for the vocal it's to make the rhythm less dense from the insane diff, also is better for a hard diff
01:00:047 (1) - maybe rotate this like 3 degrees so its parralel with 00:59:630 (6) - ok
01:03:796 (2) - you could move this a couple pixels over so its in line with 01:03:380 (1) - ok
01:18:172 (1) - the blanket here could be better or more like 01:18:797 (3) - ok
01:28:380 (3) - does this sldier need the red points since it doesnt really sound like a "wub" like the others IMO yes
01:51:297 (5) - maybe make this 2 circles same as before
02:07:547 (4) - blanket could be better ok
02:58:018 (3) - I think 3 is a little closer than 2 is to 1 (don't know if it was intentional) ok
03:26:505 (1,2) - maybe make the visual spacing more similar to 03:28:797 (2,3,4) - I know the spacing is technically the same it's just how the second pattern looks. mmm nop, I want to have them a bit different

Dance Floor
this diff doesn't have widescreen supporter like the others it doesn't matter unless you have Storyboard
00:53:692 (2) - maybe move the tail just a tad bit out so it matches 00:52:650 (4) - ok
02:46:505 (6,7,8) - I found this kinda hard to read since I thought it was stacked to 02:46:192 (4) - could just be me though reading is fun
01:24:213 (1) - overlaps the sldier ok
01:55:672 (3) - you could blanket this to 01:55:047 (1) - overlaps the sldier ok
02:16:297 (1) - i love this slider


Sorry i could find much, but heres my m4m map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/499482
Good Luck c:

Underforest wrote:

M4M

[General]
Deshabilita Widescreen Support en todas las diffs, no es necesario no importa, solo cuando tenes sb

[Easy]
00:03:847 (1) - 01:18:171 (3) - Segun AiMod, estos sliders están desajustados el mio no dice nada
03:17:547 (3) - Hacerle CTRL+H a este slider mejoraria el flow no veo que lo mejore en nada

[Normal]
00:45:047 (1) - - Este slider tiene un DS de x0.9 con el anterior, deberías arreglar esto para hacer consistencia con 01:46:713 (1) - ok
01:59:630 (3) - Puede ser simplemente un slider con curveado normal no
02:55:047 (4) - El circulo se ve, visualmente, mal. Te recomiendo ajustarlo a un DS como x2.00 ok
03:38:579 (1) - Esto termina demasiado pronto, pues lo que le sigue casi queda en el beat azul supongo que esta bien, para eso hice la easy para tener una edgy diff normal

[Hard]
00:01:700 (4) - Solo mi opinión, el slider puede ser un slider 4/4 con un círculo en lugar de un slider repetido de 1/2 nah
00:57:338 (4) - Puedes en su lugar, poner un circulo en el beat rojo y luego a partir del beat azul, un slider, así para combinar con las vocales muy complicado
01:28:380 (3) - No encuentro ningún sentido que el slider tenga un flow tipo zig-zag, pues no hay sonido "wub" aquí si hay
01:59:005 (4) - Algo similar al segundo punto igual
02:15:879 (3) - Debería terminar en el beat rojo, y en el beat azul un circulo da igual en cual termine
02:47:547 (3) - Tiene distancia x1.08, cuando el promedio es x1.20 ok
03:01:533 (3) - Espácialo un poco más, está muy cerca y puede ser confuso a la hora de hacerle clic ok

[Insane]
00:57:338 (4) - 01:59:004 (4) - Similar a lo que dije en Hard igual
01:29:213 (1,4) - Deberías agregarles un flow zig-zag, tal y como lo hiciste en el caso de Hard el ritmo cambio xd
01:36:609 - Puedes agregar un círculo aquí para hacer consistente el ritmo de 01:43:172 (4) - es diferente

[Dance Floor]
00:30:047 (1,2,3) - La distancia probablemente puede ser acortada un poco xq?
Esta diff es muy buena, por lo que la encuentro limpia

Espero haya sido de ayuda, buena suerte~
Mi mapa: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/644996

• 
  - 00:00:241 (1) - Unsnapped? Should be on blue I think.
  - 00:01:283 - Might be worth covering this with a sliderend similar to 00:01:387 (2) - ?
  - 00:05:464 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1) - I'm already not too much of a fan of how these distinct synth melodies are simplified to a stream.
  

1. 00:05:464 (3,4) - Is clearly held but two circles fill this spot. I would think a 1/4 slider fits better here?
2. 00:05:984 - Has a sound on it that gets skipped presumably to make for a rest before the next pattern when a 1/4 slider on 00:05:880 - would also fit.
3. 00:06:505 (4,5) - Same issue as before, held sound to circles as does 00:07:755 (1,2) - do the same.
   This all repeats throughout the map.

• 
  - 00:05:463 (3) - This simplification suffers from the same issue I have with it in the topdiff, which is the unique melody isn't mapped in the most optimal way. Imo, it would be nicer to do https://i.imgur.com/ZuBnYMM.png or make 4,5,6 a repeat slider (from the image).
  - 00:06:297 (2) - Remove one repeat for all of these? Not sure why it's so extended.
  - 01:21:505 (1,1,1) - Personally I would prefer movement here since they're all different vocals but.. up to you I guess.
  - 01:29:630 (3,4) - Same as topdiff.
  - 02:14:213 - Pretty sure NC should be here as well as the pattern switch. I think 02:14:006 (1) - is still part of the previous beat. The vocals also start up on 02:14:213 -
  - 02:16:297 (1) - I feel like this could use more emphasis..

• 
  - 00:45:047 (1,3) - 3 appears before this slider fades out so it might be a surprise for normal players to read this. Maybe you could offset 3?
  - 03:39:696 - Honestly I feel like this part is too big of a diffspike. Even in the 144bpm kiai and whatnot you never had so many clickable 1/2 in a row. Having so much at the end of the map where the player is probably already fatigued is a little bit unfair imo.

• 
  - 03:39:696 (1,2) - I feel like this could easily be misread by new players, as well as all of 00:07:755 (3) - and similar sliders throughout the map.

MashaSG wrote:

fuc I'm late as always...
ok then, here goes minor stuff

General:

Turn off Widescreen Support in all diffs except last, or turn it on in last? it doesn't matter if you don't have SB

Easy:

03:20:046 (3,4,1) - Everything is so clean, only this pattern make me sick, maybe rearrange it somehow? I like it

Normal:

00:57:130 (2,3,1) - May be hard for new players to read this pattern I don't see how it's hard to read

01:33:380 (1,2) - uhhh maybe just put sliders like you did on 00:31:713 (1,2,3,4) - ? Also 01:40:047 (1,2,3,4) - again these sliders this part is less dense than the before one

03:39:696 (1,2,3,1,2) - uf uf isn't patterns like this too hard for Normal diff? + there are a lot of them rip newbies ok

Hard:

03:11:088 (2) - I would move this slider onto blue tick and make here circle, it's better rhythm here imo vocals

Insane:

00:00:241 (1) - hmm, maybe make this slider go into other way? Like https://puu.sh/xDOrf/99ede0cffa.png This way you will emphasize 00:00:450 (1) - more and it's still ok for the map difficulty as it stands right in the beginning that's too hard lol, tbh I rarely break my 1/4 spacing and breaking it just at the start of the map is meh

02:14:631 (4,3) - overlap feels eehh tbh you can't see it in game

Dance Floor:

00:03:847 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - Maybe it's just me but this pattern plays weird, I just can FC it lolo u just need to put ur cursor in the slider start and stream, I don't think i can make it easier to play tbh

aaaand 01:27:963 (5,6) - 01:31:297 (5,1) - feels kinda awkward too because of circle inder previous slider ehh reading is fun



This is all I can say now, feel free to request me another map of yours because this mod is really small, so it will be 2 mods from me for 1 mod from you xd

Good Luck!

Mir wrote:

Hello Natsu!

General
- When slider track is skinned. it's magic

Dance Floor

• 
  - 00:00:241 (1) - Unsnapped? Should be on blue I think. are you sure? I feel it too early for 1/4 o.o
  - 00:01:283 - Might be worth covering this with a sliderend similar to 00:01:387 (2) - ? I think the current rhythm is better, if I make both of them sliders 2 will lose emphasis, since 2 has 2 sounds while 1 only one o.O
  - 00:05:464 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1) - I'm already not too much of a fan of how these distinct synth melodies are simplified to a stream.
  

1. 00:05:464 (3,4) - Is clearly held but two circles fill this spot. I would think a 1/4 slider fits better here? there are 2 sounds on the melody and yea I prefer circles over sliders, idk I really dislike 1/4 sliders, I only use them when I'm forced to
2. 00:05:984 - Has a sound on it that gets skipped presumably to make for a rest before the next pattern when a 1/4 slider on 00:05:880 - would also fit. let me explain you 00:05:255 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 2 is a slider not because of the held sound, but to bring more emphasis to 00:05:464 (3) - and stops at 00:05:880 (7) - because a next object would not have relevance from a strong sound to a weak one, also the fact that If I start mapping everything the map will become a 1/4 constant rhythm, ignoring things is fine sometimes
3. 00:06:505 (4,5) - Same issue as before, held sound to circles as does 00:07:755 (1,2) - do the same. this 00:07:755 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
   is a clear 7 notes stream tho and 00:06:505 (4,5) - is a repeat sound from 00:06:297 (2,3) -
   This all repeats throughout the map.

- 00:35:984 (1,2) - More simplification things that misrepresents the song imo. there are 4 sounds in the melody o.O, maybe you are following the vocals instead of it? because the melody is really clear
- 00:40:255 (2,3,2,3) - These having the same emphasis kinda irks me since 3 on 00:41:088 (2,3) - is a lot stronger? What about https://i.imgur.com/Si5GPfX.png ? mmm tbh I think nowadays people focus much on single object emphasis and don't check the big picture of the things, for example if you check the bookmarks from 00:31:713 (1) - to 00:45:047 (1) - they are divided in 4 sections, slow/fast/slow/fast the slow ones follow distance snap while the fast ones introduce 1/4 rhythm to create a higher diference between them
- 00:44:005 - Probably circle here to emphasize the stop? Up to you though, it's quite minor. ok
- 00:55:463 (4) - Deleting this would probably be cute to make a double. <: I hate doubles lol, also that circle is still part of the melody
- 01:15:255 (2,3) - https://i.imgur.com/cDrDvHO.png ? ok
- 01:29:700 (4) - Should be snapped onto 01:29:630 - since as you have it now the beats are off. So like this: https://i.imgur.com/1Oeyk8h.png are u sure about this? i feels the second slider sounds really off snapped like that o.O
Problems just persist throughout the map but everything else looks okay I guess. I hope you're fine with my explain

Insane

• 
  - 00:05:463 (3) - This simplification suffers from the same issue I have with it in the topdiff, which is the unique melody isn't mapped in the most optimal way. Imo, it would be nicer to do https://i.imgur.com/ZuBnYMM.png or make 4,5,6 a repeat slider (from the image). same as top
  - 00:06:297 (2) - Remove one repeat for all of these? Not sure why it's so extended. because the melody has 4 notes, idk I think you are taking much attention to first beat and ignoring the second one?
  - 01:21:505 (1,1,1) - Personally I would prefer movement here since they're all different vocals but.. up to you I guess. 1/1 movements don't bring much emphasis unless is like a full screen movement
  - 01:29:630 (3,4) - Same as topdiff. same as you sure about it?
  - 02:14:213 - Pretty sure NC should be here as well as the pattern switch. I think 02:14:006 (1) - is still part of the previous beat. The vocals also start up on 02:14:213 - following the male vocals as in 01:12:338 (1,2,3,4) - in the second they don't appear that clearly, but eh consistency
  - 02:16:297 (1) - I feel like this could use more emphasis.. ok

Normal

• 
  - 00:45:047 (1,3) - 3 appears before this slider fades out so it might be a surprise for normal players to read this. Maybe you could offset 3? the slider fade out once u click 2 also is a circle is easier to read than a slider, like u can see the approach rate and normal diff players aren't that noobs tbh
  - 03:39:696 - Honestly I feel like this part is too big of a diffspike. Even in the 144bpm kiai and whatnot you never had so many clickable 1/2 in a row. Having so much at the end of the map where the player is probably already fatigued is a little bit unfair imo. ok

Easy

• 
  - 03:39:696 (1,2) - I feel like this could easily be misread by new players, as well as all of 00:07:755 (3) - and similar sliders throughout the map.

I'm not sure about some of the edgier buzz sliderbodies like 01:26:713 (1) - but otherwise seems fine to me. they already played things like 00:06:713 (2,3) - so they are prepared

I don't particularly like how the rhythm was done in the topdiff so much, I feel like it's too simple for the song. The lower diffs all look relatively okay except for some general concerns. i hope my explain makes sense for u, about the red node sliders on the low diffs I talked with a few nominators u can check the conversation about them in the discord thing

Good luck!

• 
  - 00:05:464 (3,4) - I am 100% sure this is one held note that's why I don't really agree with giving these circles and 00:05:672 (5,6,7) - circles where 5,6,7 are actually distinct unlike 3,4.
  - 00:05:880 - Fine this break is quite minor anyways lol
  - 00:06:505 (4,5) - Isn't clearly distinct notes like 00:06:297 (2,3,4) - or 00:06:609 (5,1,2) - so 00:06:609 (5) - is out of place imo and would fit better deleted or just as a slider end to represent the melody as closely as possible.
  - 00:36:088 - I don't hear anything here so it would make more sense to delete this imo.
  - 00:55:463 - There is no melody on this note, just a drum. So I thought it wouldn't be appropriate to merge these two in the same stream especially without any spacing emphasis. So I suggested deleting it or you can make it a 1/4 slider.

• 
  - 00:06:297 (2) - I think if you're trying to merge the trickling sound in the back it really takes away from the melody so that's why I suggested to remove a reverse. It's not really as prominent as the main melody is.
  
  Also my point from topdiff still stands lol.

Mir wrote:

Dance Floor

• 
  - 00:05:464 (3,4) - I am 100% sure this is one held note that's why I don't really agree with giving these circles and 00:05:672 (5,6,7) - circles where 5,6,7 are actually distinct unlike 3,4. 00:08:588 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - all are clearly, 1-2 rhythms, probably the drums at the previous beats 00:08:797 (2) - are making the next one obscure for you, the only reason why 1 is a slider is to don't have a drum in the middle of the stream
  - 00:05:880 - Fine this break is quite minor anyways lol
  - 00:06:505 (4,5) - Isn't clearly distinct notes like 00:06:297 (2,3,4) - or 00:06:609 (5,1,2) - so 00:06:609 (5) - is out of place imo and would fit better deleted or just as a slider end to represent the melody as closely as possible. as I said before, I think the previous sound is making the rhythm obscure to you, they are all 1-2 things, also there is even a bamboo sound at the blue tick or maybe the hs are making it confuse to hear?
  - 00:36:088 - I don't hear anything here so it would make more sense to delete this imo. just delete the object and play the map again at 100% and you'll notice how the melody would be missing a beat here 00:36:088 (2) -
  - 00:55:463 - There is no melody on this note, just a drum. So I thought it wouldn't be appropriate to merge these two in the same stream especially without any spacing emphasis. So I suggested deleting it or you can make it a 1/4 slider. again I think the drum is making the melody obscure for you, since there is a double here 00:55:255 (2,3) - and then the melody do a triplet here 00:55:463 (4,5,6) -

Insane

• 
  - 00:06:297 (2) - I think if you're trying to merge the trickling sound in the back it really takes away from the melody so that's why I suggested to remove a reverse. It's not really as prominent as the main melody is.
  
  Also my point from topdiff still stands lol.

Idk.. the rhythm on the topdiff just irks me a bit too much to where we just disagree about it I guess.