1. osu!community
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
posted
from friend list
01:04:334 (198) - k
01:15:628 (224) - k
01:21:275 (242) - k
01:33:981 (4) - mov to 01:34:157 -
04:16:510 (38,39) - dk
posted

ts8zs wrote:

from friend list
01:04:334 (198) - k
但是音高比01:05:040 - 低 o.o
01:15:628 (224) - k
抓得好!!
01:21:275 (242) - k
音高比01:21:804 (243) - 低
01:33:981 (4) - mov to 01:34:157 -
可是sound effect是在01:21:804 (243) - o.o
04:16:510 (38,39) - dk
想跟01:23:393 (249,250,251,252,253) - 這裡consistent


謝謝摸 :)
posted
Heyho o/ from my queue
[Interstellar]
01:30:451 (265) - Could be a kat as the pitch is pretty high. Reminds me a bit of this one 05:54:451 (703) - which is also a kat
02:01:334 (115,116,117) - This sounds more like a ddk than a kdk
04:02:746 (3) - kat as (4) is way lower than (3). It would also create a nice inverse pattern with 04:03:628 (6,7) - Also consistency with 04:05:569 (10,11) - and 04:08:393 (17,18) -
04:22:687 (51) - k?
04:30:451 (30) - ^
04:43:863 (146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162) - How about a kkddkdddkkddkdddk pattern here to reflect the varying pitch here?
That's all I found, pretty much no errors in that map. Good luck with ranking! :)
posted

DarkVortex wrote:

Heyho o/ from my queue
[Interstellar]
01:30:451 (265) - Could be a kat as the pitch is pretty high. Reminds me a bit of this one 05:54:451 (703) - which is also a kat
ok changed
02:01:334 (115,116,117) - This sounds more like a ddk than a kdk
I think kdk is fine as I don't want ddk d d ddk d d ddk patterns appear which look a bit repetitive there
04:02:746 (3) - kat as (4) is way lower than (3). It would also create a nice inverse pattern with 04:03:628 (6,7) - Also consistency with 04:05:569 (10,11) - and 04:08:393 (17,18) -
but it'd be so repetitive for k k kd k dk appears for two times consecutively imo...I'll ask for other modders' opinion
04:22:687 (51) - k? ok
04:30:451 (30) - ^ sounds good!
04:43:863 (146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162) - How about a kkddkdddkkddkdddk pattern here to reflect the varying pitch here? nice catch!changed
That's all I found, pretty much no errors in that map. Good luck with ranking! :)


Thanks for modding DarkVortex :)
posted
Hello ily4, request from discord DM:

[Interstellar]
01:13:157: dkd? The pitch of the instrument background in 01:13:334 is high only

01:29:393: d d k k? The pitch is rising up from 01:29:746

01:35:216: kk kkkk? High pitch

02:01:334: A ddk to make alike for each other.

02:10:510: kddkkdd?

02:11:922: kkddkkd?

03:15:804: Delete 2 notes? I think it will leave a break for players

03:43:687: kd? Fit the pitch

03:50:216 (236, 237): Ctrl + G?

04:15:981: dk doesn't fit the pitch i think, you can do kd to make it identical with the next small pattern

That's all for me, I'm still improving my modding skills
GL
posted

davidminh0111 wrote:

Hello ily4, request from discord DM:

[Interstellar]
01:13:157: dkd? The pitch of the instrument background in 01:13:334 is high only

01:29:393: d d k k? The pitch is rising up from 01:29:746
both accepted!
01:35:216: kk kkkk? High pitch
hmm but I think there'll too much k in that case
02:01:334: A ddk to make alike for each other.
another modder also pointed out that,but I think ddk d d ddk d d ddk will be too repetitive here,I'll keep first
02:10:510: kddkkdd?
kkddkdk
02:11:922: kkddkkd?
hmm remain unchange here
03:15:804: Delete 2 notes? I think it will leave a break for players
these two notes act as connective notes to the kiai time
03:43:687: kd? Fit the pitch
both are quite high pitch imo
03:50:216 (236, 237): Ctrl + G?
D hitsound sounds better than K imo
04:15:981: dk doesn't fit the pitch i think, you can do kd to make it identical with the next small pattern
another modder also pointed out that,but I think it fits and it's also consistent with 01:23:393 (249,250,251,252,253) -
That's all for me, I'm still improving my modding skills your skill has improved a lot!
GL


Thanks for modding david :)
posted
Hi~! ^^

From Team Frontline Modding Queue


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I just a noob modder lol xD but I will do my best
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Little modding :

[Interstellar]
01:54:628 (88) - change to k? Similar with 01:51:275 (73,74,75,76) -
01:54:981 (89) - ^ similar with 01:52:157 (77,78) -
04:12:804 (28) - change to k

04:31:157 (36) - remove finisher? stream meet finisher
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Nice map :) I not good modding at more 5*
But it still
Oni, so I think to mod it xD


Good luck~! :)
posted

Franklin_DeJavu wrote:

Hi~! ^^

From Team Frontline Modding Queue


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I just a noob modder lol xD but I will do my best
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Little modding :

[Interstellar]
01:54:628 (88) - change to k? Similar with 01:51:275 (73,74,75,76) -
01:54:981 (89) - ^ similar with 01:52:157 (77,78) -
both changed!
04:12:804 (28) - change to k instead I change 04:31:157 (36) - to k to follow piano

04:31:157 (36) - remove finisher? stream meet finisher emm I think it's fine here cuz the beat is strong enough to put finisher
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Nice map :) I not good modding at more 5*
But it still
Oni but you're XD, so I think to mod it xD


Good luck~! :)


Thanks for modding Franklin :)
posted
Hi again~ :3

[ Timing]
The first kiai should be end on 02:29:746. Just like 03:38:922 / 05:33:275

[ Interstellar]
00:20:040 (68,69) - Ctrl+G , for the consistency of 00:18:804 - 00:19:510 pitch
00:20:746 (72,73,74) - I think that this point should be ddk , to make 00:20:922 as k for the consistency of the pitch as I've talked on above.
00:23:393 (100,101,102,103) - How about d for the variation here?
01:19:510 - I would like to suggest to rearrange the pattern like this. For the consistency of the 01:13:863 (219,220,221,222,223,224) part.
01:48:098 - d might be good since the pitch here and 01:47:922 is different. And it's similar to 01:52:127 (77,78) imo.
01:56:216 (93,94,95) - kdk would be good in order to follow the piano pitch. Just the same thing that you've do on 01:57:628 (99,100,101) I guess~.
01:59:040 - ^

02:06:098 - How about this one? In order to have a note on 02:06:804 which it's similar to 03:15:981 somehow~


02:12:010 (202,203) - Ctrl+G , in order to follow the drum pitch by using d on 02:12:098 (203) . Like 02:12:451 (207)
02:13:863 - d , for the consistency of the drums sound on 02:12:451 - 02:12:804 - 02:13:157 - 02:13:510
02:53:304 moves to 02:53:216 - Tbh, I didn't understand the doublet here. uwu

02:55:334 - How about this one? , in order to make 02:56:216 as k for the consistency of 02:54:098 - 02:54:804 - 02:55:510 - 02:56:216 pitch (If agree, change 02:54:804 to k too.)


02:58:157 (581,582) - Ctrl+G , for the consistency of 02:58:334 (582) and on the above suggestion pitch.
04:11:393 (24,25,26,27,28) - k d k k d would be nice in my opinion. As 04:12:451 (27) is similar to 04:12:098 (26) uwu
04:19:863 - Change to d , seems similar to 04:18:451 more than 04:19:157
04:47:657 moves to 04:47:746 - Same as 02:06:098 suggestion.

Hope this can help some.
Good luck! :)
posted

Tyistiana wrote:

Hi again~ :3

[ Timing]
The first kiai should be end on 02:29:746. Just like 03:38:922 / 05:33:275
03:38:922 - this part is not the same with the first kiai,can't compare that

[ Interstellar]
00:20:040 (68,69) - Ctrl+G , for the consistency of 00:18:804 - 00:19:510 pitch as the music is getting more and more intense,I choose to use d k d k pattern here to reflect the intensity here
00:20:746 (72,73,74) - I think that this point should be ddk , to make 00:20:922 as k for the consistency of the pitch as I've talked on above.emm flow will be weird
00:23:393 (100,101,102,103) - How about d for the variation here? but all the sound 00:22:775 (93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106) - are the same,changing one of them to d is not suitable imo
01:19:510 - I would like to suggest to rearrange the pattern like this. For the consistency of the 01:13:863 (219,220,221,222,223,224) part. emm I feel weird to connect piano sound to vocal if I add a note on 01:19:863 -
01:48:098 - d might be good since the pitch here and 01:47:922 is different. And it's similar to 01:52:127 (77,78) imo. you mean k?yes it's better if you mean changing to k,changed anyways XD ok
01:56:216 (93,94,95) - kdk would be good in order to follow the piano pitch. Just the same thing that you've do on 01:57:628 (99,100,101) I guess~. ^
01:59:040 - ^ ^

02:06:098 - How about this one? In order to have a note on 02:06:804 which it's similar to 03:15:981 somehow~

different melodies can't be compared,I focus on background sound effect here

02:12:010 (202,203) - Ctrl+G , in order to follow the drum pitch by using d on 02:12:098 (203) . Like 02:12:451 (207)
02:13:863 - d , for the consistency of the drums sound on 02:12:451 - 02:12:804 - 02:13:157 - 02:13:510
remap this part by focusing on drum sound more
02:53:304 moves to 02:53:216 - Tbh, I didn't understand the doublet here. uwu it's how the music goes ;w;

02:55:334 - How about this one? , in order to make 02:56:216 as k for the consistency of 02:54:098 - 02:54:804 - 02:55:510 - 02:56:216 pitch (If agree, change 02:54:804 to k too.)
^ and this point: focus on piano sound and drum here,I put piano sound as k and drum sound as d to make it more clear.Your suggestion violates the mapping style sry :c

02:58:157 (581,582) - Ctrl+G , for the consistency of 02:58:334 (582) and on the above suggestion pitch. emm there're outstanding electronic sound effect on 02:58:157 - , also consistent with 02:58:863 (585,586,587,588,589,590) -
04:11:393 (24,25,26,27,28) - k d k k d would be nice in my opinion. As 04:12:451 (27) is similar to 04:12:098 (26) uwu [/color] ok!
04:19:863 - Change to d , seems similar to 04:18:451 more than 04:19:157 ok
04:47:657 moves to 04:47:746 - Same as 02:06:098 suggestion. reason explained :c

Hope this can help some.
Good luck! :)


Thanks for modding Tyistiana :)
posted

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Your suggestion violates the mapping style sry :c


Oops, I will be careful next time. Sorry. ;;w;;
posted

Tyistiana wrote:

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Your suggestion violates the mapping style sry :c


Oops, I will be careful next time. Sorry. ;;w;;


Different mappers have different styles,no need to sorry lwl,thanks for your comment :)
posted
yo

[Interstellar]
00:20:040 (68,69) - or 00:20:216 (69,70) - invert, its a bit werid while the pattern feels like d d k k d d k k
01:35:216 (9,10) - change kat, for a good flow
01:41:569 - maybe don more fit in 01:41:746 -
01:48:981 (65,66) - change dd or kd, snare for 01:49:510 (67,68) -
02:52:863 - move 02:52:775 - sounds in here
02:53:128 - can change kat
03:13:334 - maybe change kat
03:13:598 - and 03:14:657 - can change don to give a bit variety than kkddkkd

maybe just that from me
good luck
posted

[R] wrote:

yo

[Interstellar]
00:20:040 (68,69) - or 00:20:216 (69,70) - invert, its a bit werid while the pattern feels like d d k k d d k k
hmm I want the patterns be more variate this part
01:35:216 (9,10) - change kat, for a good flow
want to highlight 01:34:687 (7,8,13,14) - four outstanding high pitched sfx by putting k
01:41:569 - maybe don more fit in 01:41:746 -
k suits more as the pitch rise here
01:48:981 (65,66) - change dd or kd, snare for 01:49:510 (67,68) -
mapping the sound effect here,not the snare
02:52:863 - move 02:52:775 - sounds in here
02:53:128 - can change kat
remap this part to kddkdd dk
03:13:334 - maybe change kat
03:13:598 - and 03:14:657 - can change don to give a bit variety than kkddkkd
The original version sounds better than the suggestion

maybe just that from me
good luck


Thanks for modding [R] :)
posted
Peep, M4M

[General]
Nothing to report here :)

[Interstellar]
00:22:775 (93) - Think this could be changed to a d, all the sounds from notes 76-106 are actually the exact same noise, and continuing the ddkkddkk... pattern is more comfortable to play instead of changing it to ddkkddkkdkkkk.. so suddenly.
00:27:275 - I personally encourage mapping these piano sounds, as these are the only piano notes that you skip, which is kind of off-putting imo.
01:35:216 (9) - Pitch step downwards leading into note 8, meaning this note could stand as a kat.
01:43:510 (44,45) - These notes, along with notes 43 and 46, are decreasing in pitch. k k k d does a poor job of representing that pitch change, and would be better if changed to k k d d OR k d d d.
02:03:451 (130,131,132,133,134,135) - The structure of xxx x x xxx... is broken here, and I don't see any musical support for this change. I highly recommend sticking to the structure xxx x x xxx, but instead to show that buildup, use xxx x x xxxxx.
Picture for clarity

You can add a note on 02:03:893 if that makes it sound better to you

02:47:393 (494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,540,541,542,543) - Lol, so many notes, but I think you started the stream a little bit too early. Refer to the pictures below for more clarification.
Mas fotos
At 02:46:687 - , I feel that you should kind of echo the 02:46:863 (490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502) - scheme before starting the stream, which would look like this:

Then after 02:48:628 (505,506,507,508,509,510,511) - , you can start the stream, which would look like this:

03:35:216 (160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - Similar to above, I feel that stream starts too early. I recommend deleting 03:36:010 (169,171) - .
05:06:804 (352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394) - Similar to above again, except this time I recommend deleting 05:07:775 (363) - .
05:29:569 (556,557,558,559,560,561,562,563,564,565,566,567,568,569,570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596) - This is the exact same as 02:47:393 - .

I think overall a good map, but could use some minor improvements. Feel free to call me back to this map after you receive some more opinions.
Good luck~
posted

Taikocracy wrote:

Peep, M4M

[General]
Nothing to report here :)

[Interstellar]
00:22:775 (93) - Think this could be changed to a d, all the sounds from notes 76-106 are actually the exact same noise, and continuing the ddkkddkk... pattern is more comfortable to play instead of changing it to ddkkddkkdkkkk.. so suddenly.
yeah I see your points in terms of patterning but I think dkkkkkkkkkkkk... can reflect the same pitches and sound effects for 00:22:775 (93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106) - ,and I also mapped 00:22:775 (93) - this as k as I think dkkkk...can emphasize the sfx too!
00:27:275 - I personally encourage mapping these piano sounds, as these are the only piano notes that you skip, which is kind of off-putting imo.
It's a king of progression as I put notes on 00:49:510 (161,162,163) - and then 01:00:804 (191,192,193,194) - ,which I think putting fewer notes for 00:27:275 - is a kind of proression
01:35:216 (9) - Pitch step downwards leading into note 8, meaning this note could stand as a kat. yeah ok
01:43:510 (44,45) - These notes, along with notes 43 and 46, are decreasing in pitch. k k k d does a poor job of representing that pitch change, and would be better if changed to k k d d OR k d d d. change to k k d d
02:03:451 (130,131,132,133,134,135) - The structure of xxx x x xxx... is broken here, and I don't see any musical support for this change. I highly recommend sticking to the structure xxx x x xxx, but instead to show that buildup, use xxx x x xxxxx. I see your points in terms of structure,but I do think 02:02:922 (127,128,129,130) - as 1/2 k d k d can give a better emphasizing for 02:03:628 (131,132,133,134,135) - ,which these fives notes can act as connection notes for the stream.
Picture for clarity

You can add a note on 02:03:893 if that makes it sound better to you[/color]

02:47:393 (494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,540,541,542,543) - Lol, so many notes, but I think you started the stream a little bit too early. Refer to the pictures below for more clarification.
Mas fotos
At 02:46:687 - , I feel that you should kind of echo the 02:46:863 (490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502) - scheme before starting the stream, which would look like this:

Then after 02:48:628 (505,506,507,508,509,510,511) - , you can start the stream, which would look like this:

accept and also remap a bit too,suggestions also applied to 02:26:922 - too

03:35:216 (160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - Similar to above, I feel that stream starts too early. I recommend deleting 03:36:010 (169,171) - .ok
05:06:804 (352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394) - Similar to above again, except this time I recommend deleting 05:07:775 (363) - .ok
05:29:569 (556,557,558,559,560,561,562,563,564,565,566,567,568,569,570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596) - This is the exact same as 02:47:393 - . emm I decide to keep this part as this is final streams of the kiai times,and it's also the most intense part of the song,I think overmap a bit is ok

I think overall a good map, but could use some minor improvements. Feel free to call me back to this map after you receive some more opinions.
Good luck~


Thanks for modding Taikocracy :)
posted
G'day Sir, from my queue.

Planet [Interstellar]

00:56:216 (176) - Consider d to emphasized the (~177) pitch rise and very different longer 'raaaaaa'.
02:26:128 (319) - Could remove this note to mirror the previous 1/2 triplet and to give make the pre-stream part a bit simpler.
02:30:893 (366,388) - These could be k's for some 5plet variety with the bells (?).
02:42:187 (459) - This too i guess if you applied ^
02:59:304 (586) - This note seems excessive to me ˅
03:02:481 - 03:03:893 ^ or you could add notes here if you prefere to map the brass all the way ?
03:35:304 (161) - Again could move to 03:34:951 and k . As in (319) above.
04:55:687 - 04:57:628 Try to find a 1/2 single somewhere here, i know we're building intensity, but it feels out of place and breaks the flow bit.
05:11:834 (402,427) - ^ Bells like 02:30:893 ^

Fun map. Really well done already!
posted

Karee Pan wrote:

G'day Sir, from my queue.

Planet [Interstellar]

00:56:216 (176) - Consider d to emphasized the (~177) pitch rise and very different longer 'raaaaaa'. want to create variation for dkd to kkd
02:26:128 (319) - Could remove this note to mirror the previous 1/2 triplet and to give make the pre-stream part a bit simpler.
02:30:893 (366,388) - These could be k's for some 5plet variety with the bells (?). variate with 02:32:040 (375,376,377,378,379) -
02:42:187 (459) - This too i guess if you applied ^ same
02:59:304 (586) - This note seems excessive to me ˅ ok!
03:02:481 - 03:03:893 ^ or you could add notes here if you prefere to map the brass all the way ? just keep it,want to be simple here lul
03:35:304 (161) - Again could move to 03:34:951 and k . As in (319) above. remap instead!
04:55:687 - 04:57:628 Try to find a 1/2 single somewhere here, i know we're building intensity, but it feels out of place and breaks the flow bit. remap too
05:11:834 (402,427) - ^ Bells like 02:30:893 ^ same reason

Fun map. Really well done already! Thanks!


Thanks for modding :)
posted
Hello.

I haven't found anything major, the map is pretty solid and ready to go in my opinion. So, I'll just write some suggestions.

[Intersellar]

  1. 02:29:040 (351,352,353,354,355,356,357) - Due to the keyboard pitch, I think kdkdkkd works here better.
  2. 03:53:393 - How about k dk kd on this? as in add don on that spot, 03:53:569 (244) - make it kat, 03:53:922 - add kat and 03:54:098 (245) - make it don.
    It will follow the main keyboard pitch change better.
  3. 05:00:275 (295,296,297) - I recommend kkd on this, or kdd, due to the keyboard sound since you've followed on your patterns that sound everywhere else.
  4. 05:09:981 - Change this one too if you apply the first suggestion.


That's all from me, call me back when you apply the mod.
posted

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hello.

I haven't found anything major, the map is pretty solid and ready to go in my opinion. So, I'll just write some suggestions.

[Intersellar]

  1. 02:29:040 (351,352,353,354,355,356,357) - Due to the keyboard pitch, I think kdkdkkd works here better.
    But I want to be variate 02:51:628 (536,537,538,539,540,541,542) - ,also I think kkdkddk seems better because I think it's a bit awkward to have 02:51:451 (534,535,536,537,538,539,540) - kdkdkdk
  2. 03:53:393 - How about k dk kd on this? as in add don on that spot, 03:53:569 (244) - make it kat, 03:53:922 - add kat and 03:54:098 (245) - make it don.
    It will follow the main keyboard pitch change better. but here is the calmest part of the section,so I want to leave 3/2 space here
  3. 05:00:275 (295,296,297) - I recommend kkd on this, or kdd, due to the keyboard sound since you've followed on your patterns that sound everywhere else.
  4. 05:09:981 - Change this one too if you apply the first suggestion. remap instead,have a look!


That's all from me, call me back when you apply the mod.


Thanks for modding :)
Please sign in to reply.