1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted
Peep, M4M

[General]
Nothing to report here :)

[Interstellar]
00:22:775 (93) - Think this could be changed to a d, all the sounds from notes 76-106 are actually the exact same noise, and continuing the ddkkddkk... pattern is more comfortable to play instead of changing it to ddkkddkkdkkkk.. so suddenly.
00:27:275 - I personally encourage mapping these piano sounds, as these are the only piano notes that you skip, which is kind of off-putting imo.
01:35:216 (9) - Pitch step downwards leading into note 8, meaning this note could stand as a kat.
01:43:510 (44,45) - These notes, along with notes 43 and 46, are decreasing in pitch. k k k d does a poor job of representing that pitch change, and would be better if changed to k k d d OR k d d d.
02:03:451 (130,131,132,133,134,135) - The structure of xxx x x xxx... is broken here, and I don't see any musical support for this change. I highly recommend sticking to the structure xxx x x xxx, but instead to show that buildup, use xxx x x xxxxx.

You can add a note on 02:03:893 if that makes it sound better to you

02:47:393 (494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,540,541,542,543) - Lol, so many notes, but I think you started the stream a little bit too early. Refer to the pictures below for more clarification.
At 02:46:687 - , I feel that you should kind of echo the 02:46:863 (490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502) - scheme before starting the stream, which would look like this:

Then after 02:48:628 (505,506,507,508,509,510,511) - , you can start the stream, which would look like this:

03:35:216 (160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - Similar to above, I feel that stream starts too early. I recommend deleting 03:36:010 (169,171) - .
05:06:804 (352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394) - Similar to above again, except this time I recommend deleting 05:07:775 (363) - .
05:29:569 (556,557,558,559,560,561,562,563,564,565,566,567,568,569,570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596) - This is the exact same as 02:47:393 - .

I think overall a good map, but could use some minor improvements. Feel free to call me back to this map after you receive some more opinions.
Good luck~
posted

Taikocracy wrote:

Peep, M4M

[General]
Nothing to report here :)

[Interstellar]
00:22:775 (93) - Think this could be changed to a d, all the sounds from notes 76-106 are actually the exact same noise, and continuing the ddkkddkk... pattern is more comfortable to play instead of changing it to ddkkddkkdkkkk.. so suddenly.
yeah I see your points in terms of patterning but I think dkkkkkkkkkkkk... can reflect the same pitches and sound effects for 00:22:775 (93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106) - ,and I also mapped 00:22:775 (93) - this as k as I think dkkkk...can emphasize the sfx too!
00:27:275 - I personally encourage mapping these piano sounds, as these are the only piano notes that you skip, which is kind of off-putting imo.
It's a king of progression as I put notes on 00:49:510 (161,162,163) - and then 01:00:804 (191,192,193,194) - ,which I think putting fewer notes for 00:27:275 - is a kind of proression
01:35:216 (9) - Pitch step downwards leading into note 8, meaning this note could stand as a kat. yeah ok
01:43:510 (44,45) - These notes, along with notes 43 and 46, are decreasing in pitch. k k k d does a poor job of representing that pitch change, and would be better if changed to k k d d OR k d d d. change to k k d d
02:03:451 (130,131,132,133,134,135) - The structure of xxx x x xxx... is broken here, and I don't see any musical support for this change. I highly recommend sticking to the structure xxx x x xxx, but instead to show that buildup, use xxx x x xxxxx. I see your points in terms of structure,but I do think 02:02:922 (127,128,129,130) - as 1/2 k d k d can give a better emphasizing for 02:03:628 (131,132,133,134,135) - ,which these fives notes can act as connection notes for the stream.

You can add a note on 02:03:893 if that makes it sound better to you[/color]

02:47:393 (494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,540,541,542,543) - Lol, so many notes, but I think you started the stream a little bit too early. Refer to the pictures below for more clarification.
At 02:46:687 - , I feel that you should kind of echo the 02:46:863 (490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502) - scheme before starting the stream, which would look like this:

Then after 02:48:628 (505,506,507,508,509,510,511) - , you can start the stream, which would look like this:

accept and also remap a bit too,suggestions also applied to 02:26:922 - too

03:35:216 (160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - Similar to above, I feel that stream starts too early. I recommend deleting 03:36:010 (169,171) - .ok
05:06:804 (352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394) - Similar to above again, except this time I recommend deleting 05:07:775 (363) - .ok
05:29:569 (556,557,558,559,560,561,562,563,564,565,566,567,568,569,570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596) - This is the exact same as 02:47:393 - . emm I decide to keep this part as this is final streams of the kiai times,and it's also the most intense part of the song,I think overmap a bit is ok

I think overall a good map, but could use some minor improvements. Feel free to call me back to this map after you receive some more opinions.
Good luck~
Thanks for modding Taikocracy :)
posted
G'day Sir, from my queue.

Planet [Interstellar]

00:56:216 (176) - Consider d to emphasized the (~177) pitch rise and very different longer 'raaaaaa'.
02:26:128 (319) - Could remove this note to mirror the previous 1/2 triplet and to give make the pre-stream part a bit simpler.
02:30:893 (366,388) - These could be k's for some 5plet variety with the bells (?).
02:42:187 (459) - This too i guess if you applied ^
02:59:304 (586) - This note seems excessive to me ˅
03:02:481 - 03:03:893 ^ or you could add notes here if you prefere to map the brass all the way ?
03:35:304 (161) - Again could move to 03:34:951 and k . As in (319) above.
04:55:687 - 04:57:628 Try to find a 1/2 single somewhere here, i know we're building intensity, but it feels out of place and breaks the flow bit.
05:11:834 (402,427) - ^ Bells like 02:30:893 ^

Fun map. Really well done already!
posted

Karee Pan wrote:

G'day Sir, from my queue.

Planet [Interstellar]

00:56:216 (176) - Consider d to emphasized the (~177) pitch rise and very different longer 'raaaaaa'. want to create variation for dkd to kkd
02:26:128 (319) - Could remove this note to mirror the previous 1/2 triplet and to give make the pre-stream part a bit simpler.
02:30:893 (366,388) - These could be k's for some 5plet variety with the bells (?). variate with 02:32:040 (375,376,377,378,379) -
02:42:187 (459) - This too i guess if you applied ^ same
02:59:304 (586) - This note seems excessive to me ˅ ok!
03:02:481 - 03:03:893 ^ or you could add notes here if you prefere to map the brass all the way ? just keep it,want to be simple here lul
03:35:304 (161) - Again could move to 03:34:951 and k . As in (319) above. remap instead!
04:55:687 - 04:57:628 Try to find a 1/2 single somewhere here, i know we're building intensity, but it feels out of place and breaks the flow bit. remap too
05:11:834 (402,427) - ^ Bells like 02:30:893 ^ same reason

Fun map. Really well done already! Thanks!
Thanks for modding :)
posted
Hello.

I haven't found anything major, the map is pretty solid and ready to go in my opinion. So, I'll just write some suggestions.

[Intersellar]

  1. 02:29:040 (351,352,353,354,355,356,357) - Due to the keyboard pitch, I think kdkdkkd works here better.
  2. 03:53:393 - How about k dk kd on this? as in add don on that spot, 03:53:569 (244) - make it kat, 03:53:922 - add kat and 03:54:098 (245) - make it don.
    It will follow the main keyboard pitch change better.
  3. 05:00:275 (295,296,297) - I recommend kkd on this, or kdd, due to the keyboard sound since you've followed on your patterns that sound everywhere else.
  4. 05:09:981 - Change this one too if you apply the first suggestion.


That's all from me, call me back when you apply the mod.
posted

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hello.

I haven't found anything major, the map is pretty solid and ready to go in my opinion. So, I'll just write some suggestions.

[Intersellar]

  1. 02:29:040 (351,352,353,354,355,356,357) - Due to the keyboard pitch, I think kdkdkkd works here better.
    But I want to be variate 02:51:628 (536,537,538,539,540,541,542) - ,also I think kkdkddk seems better because I think it's a bit awkward to have 02:51:451 (534,535,536,537,538,539,540) - kdkdkdk
  2. 03:53:393 - How about k dk kd on this? as in add don on that spot, 03:53:569 (244) - make it kat, 03:53:922 - add kat and 03:54:098 (245) - make it don.
    It will follow the main keyboard pitch change better. but here is the calmest part of the section,so I want to leave 3/2 space here
  3. 05:00:275 (295,296,297) - I recommend kkd on this, or kdd, due to the keyboard sound since you've followed on your patterns that sound everywhere else.
  4. 05:09:981 - Change this one too if you apply the first suggestion. remap instead,have a look!


That's all from me, call me back when you apply the mod.
Thanks for modding :)
posted
Bubbled!
posted
very solid map, some few things

00:26:922 - map these sounds wtf? you're not mapping only to the bass sounds in the rest of the part so leaving out the high pitched k sounds here where they are the strongest feels really weird, especially when comparing it to stuff like 00:32:569 -
00:38:216 - ^
00:49:510 - ^
01:00:804 - ^
03:37:157 - this strains really awkwardly since you're basically using wrist based patterns for 15 notes straight. Changing 03:37:422 - and 03:37:775 - to k is the simplest solution but maybe you can find something more interesting?
04:45:275 - the kdddk patterns here don't really represent what's going on in the music too well imo.. i feel like kdkkddkdkdkkddkkd or kdkkddkdkdkdkdkkd would work a lot better
05:31:510 - same as 03:37:157 -

the end.
posted

Chromoxx wrote:

very solid map, some few things

00:26:922 - map these sounds wtf? you're not mapping only to the bass sounds in the rest of the part so leaving out the high pitched k sounds here where they are the strongest feels really weird, especially when comparing it to stuff like 00:32:569 -
00:38:216 - ^
00:49:510 - ^
01:00:804 - ^
I only accepted 00:49 and 01:00 one because I focus on the bass sounds for the parts without vocal,I think it can show progression among the music. But yeah the part with vocal are a bit more intense compared to the previous part,so I added notes on vocal part.
03:37:157 - this strains really awkwardly since you're basically using wrist based patterns for 15 notes straight. Changing 03:37:422 - and 03:37:775 - to k is the simplest solution but maybe you can find something more interesting?
ok!
04:45:275 - the kdddk patterns here don't really represent what's going on in the music too well imo.. i feel like kdkkddkdkdkkddkkd or kdkkddkdkdkdkdkkd would work a lot better change to kdkkddkdkdkkddkkd
05:31:510 - same as 03:37:157 -
ok
the end.
Thanks for modding :)
*also change offset from 99 to 100(+1)
posted
i forgot to qualify earlier lol
posted
Gratz! :)
posted
congrat chu ^3^b
posted
Congratz ^O^
posted
Thank you guys :)
posted
Hello, metadata police here!

I believe your metadata are wrong as you do not mention anywhere that this is a remix by lapix:
  1. https://soundcloud.com/lapixmusic/dj-genki-feat-yukacco-planet-lapix-remix
  2. https://soundcloud.com/yukacco/prizmatic-cross-fade-demo
  3. http://yukacco.net/Prizmatic/#title


Please, consider changing the title to Planet (lapix Remix).
Also, the sources above suggest that the Y in Yukacco should be capitalised, even though both works.

Artist: DJ Genki feat. Yukacco
Title: Planet (lapix Remix)

Thank you very much!
posted
As we don't have much time left, I'll take this down for the time being. I don't have time to fully confirm this, but the references Kurai suggested look valid. If you have any objections, please reply on this thread, thanks.
posted
Here is the source, I also have the physical copy of this album if you need it.
http://www.tano-c.net/release/tanocd-0018/
posted
Apologies for the DQ. It turned out that neonat actually looked for the references already, but nobody noticed it and I only got this report. What Kurai found is a different version it seems, so I see this is actually the correct metadata.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
posted
I was sleeping LOLOL
Thanks for letting me know that there's lapix remix of this song btw XD
posted
Gratz :>
Please sign in to reply.