and there's the part where you vote nolynch and then say that's a bad idea. Why did you vote it in the first place then?
Lilac wrote:
The fact is, Salvage always posts like that, regardless of alignment. I've still got my eye on you though.
Vote: NoLynchOkay, any experienced player is aware that no lynching is not useful to town 99% of the time. Where this becomes WIFOM-y, however, is ask yourself: Does no lynching sound like a favorable opportunity to mafia, regardless of the player's experience? Anybody who pounces on these players who vote no lynch is immediately suspicious to me, using it as such an easy opportunity to scumpaint. The more experienced the [scumpainting] player, the more suspicious they become. Realize that the ONLY person that will vote for a no lynch is an inexperienced player. Once you realize that, ask yourself, is it more common for an in experienced mafia to vote nolynch, or an inexperienced town? My vote goes for inexperienced town. That said:Fishie wrote:
While a huge part of me doesn't trust Salvage at all, this post made Rantai seem like he was grasping at straws to push a Salvage lynch/roleclaim. There were many cases to be argued at that point of the game that pointed in the direction of Salvage being scummy, but the fact that Rantai acknowledged something as small as this struck me as odd. To specify, labeling the "wasting time" bit to be "rather scummy" seems to be pushing it a lot, and looks like scumpainting. While perhaps Salvage could have chosen his words better, in no means do I think that little bit is scummy. If Salvage ends up rolling town, then I will re-instate this FoS on Rantai.Rantai wrote:
Really now?Salvage wrote:
adam : i'd rather waste time thinking about more important things , we won't reach anything discussing the probabilty of roles being used when we don't know anything about them yet , glad you start moving things with that vote ^_^.
That sounds rather scummy right there, glad to see you don't mind wasting time, as long as it's not around you.
Actually more like 2. Or 1 and a half.Lybydose wrote:
he's played 3 games before
Lybydose wrote:
I see where you're saying with the FoS's on anti no-lynchers, but the fact of the matter is that fishie isn't actually inexperienced. Someone already pointed out that he's played 3 games before this one on this site.
In Mafia III, he actually just voted No Lynch and that was pretty much it.LunaticMara wrote:
FYI, FisHie didn't actually play Mafia II. He was added just for the lulz.
NOW it's been 48 hours.LunaticMara wrote:
@Mod, prod Lilac?
Because I wanted to hear some opinions from you. Also yeah, prod DxS.Lilac wrote:
I'd like to know why Mara rushed my prod to begin with.
Asleep, and also not really having anything to say. I've already stated my opinions.Salvage wrote:
LS where are yoooooooouuu
Rolled wrote:
Salvage why are you waiting on LS specifically?
I really don't think Salvage is neither easy or scummy at all.bmin11 wrote:
blend in by votting an easy and generally scummy looking target without a clear reasoning nor actually focussing on the game.
It would look like that if people only reads the last few posts and I think that's what they are doing. Randomly pops out -> vote -> vanishWojjan wrote:
I really don't think Salvage is neither easy or scummy at all.bmin11 wrote:
blend in by votting an easy and generally scummy looking target without a clear reasoning nor actually focussing on the game.